fix(PRU-ICSS): Remove the PRU-ICSS table that comes up on Sitara Legacy devices docs index page for now #134
Conversation
jeevantelukula
requested review from
cshilwant,
StaticRocket,
praneethbajjuri,
uditkumarti and
aniket-l
as code owners
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jeevantelukula Nitpick,
commit message title looks too long.
Checkout previous commits by other authors to get more idea - https://github.com/TexasInstruments/processor-sdk-doc/commits/master/
Also, I would personally encourage you to checkout - torvalds/linux#17 (comment)
jeevantelukula
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
593a81a to
eeacd55
Compare
source/linux/Overview/_Processor_SDK_Linux_Software_Developers_Guide.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jeevantelukula
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
eeacd55 to
a123f6d
Compare
|
@nsaulnier-ti @liubiin for reviews |
|
@jeevantelukula is PTP and RSTP still tested on CPSW for AM335x & AM437x? If so, I would rather that we just remove CCLink & OPC/UA, and keep the PTP and RSTP pages. Just update the note at the top of the PTP page to say the information only applies to CPSW, instead of "only applies to CPSW on SDK 9.1" |
|
@nsaulnier-ti PTP / RSTP is not tested on CPSW in this release. AFAIK, it was last tested during 8.x SDK. Same is true for ICSSM as well. We are not doing any active testing on legacy platforms (except AM65x) |
…nd toc Currently there was no support on PRU-ICSS protocols, so remove from the docs until further clarity. Signed-off-by: Telukula Jeevan Kumar Sahu <[email protected]>
jeevantelukula
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
a123f6d to
eb539a0
Compare
@nsaulnier-ti Since PTP/RSTP are not tested on CPSW also, I removed those pages along with CCLink & OPC/UA pages from 335x/437x docs. As there is active testing for AM65x platform, these sections are maintained in docs. |
Currently there was no support on these protocols, so remove from the docs index page until further clarity.