Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(deploy): move aggregation step into deploy #109

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

The workflows for working with pages artifacts are not as smart as the standard artifact routines. As such, the aggregation of previous artifacts must take place in the deploy script so the final artifact generated will have the same run-id as the deploy step that fetches it.

Fixes: 2d64c49 (feat(cicd): automated builds and deployment to pages, 2024-11-19)

The workflows for working with pages artifacts are not as smart as the
standard artifact routines. As such, the aggregation of previous
artifacts must take place in the deploy script so the final artifact
generated will have the same run-id as the deploy step that fetches it.

Fixes: 2d64c49 (feat(cicd): automated builds and deployment to pages, 2024-11-19)
Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <[email protected]>
@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member Author

Actual working run: https://github.com/StaticRocket/processor-sdk-doc/actions/runs/12300934415

Somehow the CI branch in my last PR was not correctly updated and a previous (broken) version of the pipeline was merged.

@cshilwant cshilwant merged commit 993e4f4 into TexasInstruments:master Dec 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants