Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Refactor] Refactor reset ids for restore (backport #52075) #52088

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

This is an automatic backport of pull request #52075 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Signed-off-by: xiangguangyxg <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 9db7976)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/ListPartitionInfo.java
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/OlapTable.java
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Cherry-pick of 9db7976 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/branch-3.1/pr-52075
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/branch-3.1'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 9db79768de.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/PartitionInfo.java
	modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/RangePartitionInfo.java

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/ListPartitionInfo.java
	both modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/OlapTable.java

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Oct 18, 2024

@mergify[bot]: Backport conflict, please reslove the conflict and resubmit the pr

@mergify mergify bot closed this Oct 18, 2024
@andyziye andyziye reopened this Oct 18, 2024
@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git enabled auto-merge (squash) October 18, 2024 06:40
Signed-off-by: xiangguangyxg <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
D Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git merged commit 8e1e2f8 into branch-3.1 Oct 18, 2024
27 of 29 checks passed
@wanpengfei-git wanpengfei-git deleted the mergify/bp/branch-3.1/pr-52075 branch October 18, 2024 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants