Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding SiN crossing to PDK #316

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2024
Merged

adding SiN crossing to PDK #316

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

felme1
Copy link
Contributor

@felme1 felme1 commented Nov 8, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.68%. Comparing base (8b959f9) to head (7cf53fc).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #316   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.68%   73.68%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines       11804    11804           
=======================================
  Hits         8698     8698           
  Misses       3106     3106           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lukasc-ubc
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much for your contribution!

Here are suggestions to further improve the performance.

  1. I suspect your taper is not adiabatic and introduces loss. You could use a smooth taper that doesn't have abrupt transitions. There is a PCell in the EBeam-Beta library. I overlaid it on your cell for illustration purposes.
image
  1. The straight regions leading into the middle of the crossing don't do anything. You can reduce their lengths to 0.
image

Perhaps you could run the simulation on this design and compare to yours? Then maybe investigate the taper_bezier parameters, primarily lengths, but potentially the the two a, b, bezier parameters.

Also, did you use 3D-FDTD for your simulation, or 2D? (hopefully 3D).

thanks!

crossing_SiN_1550.gds.zip

@lukasc-ubc lukasc-ubc merged commit 01f03b7 into SiEPIC:master Nov 9, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants