Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sendmany RPC #19

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 1, 2024
Merged

Update sendmany RPC #19

merged 5 commits into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

JBetz
Copy link
Contributor

@JBetz JBetz commented Apr 22, 2024

Adds fee_asset argument to sendmany RPC. Like with sendtoaddress, the asset used for fees will default to the asset being sent in the transaction if not set. In this case, it's the first asset listed in the output_assets argument.

@JBetz JBetz requested a review from Mixa84 as a code owner April 22, 2024 15:36
Mixa84
Mixa84 previously approved these changes Apr 30, 2024
@JBetz JBetz merged commit d8d37a4 into dev May 1, 2024
1 check passed
@JBetz JBetz deleted the update-sendmany branch May 1, 2024 09:56
JBetz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
* Add fee_asset argument to sendmany RPC

* Add tests for sendmany

* Refactor argument parsing order

* Update sendmany JSON argument parameters

---------

Co-authored-by: Mihailo Milenkovic <[email protected]>
JBetz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
* Add fee_asset argument to sendmany RPC

* Add tests for sendmany

* Refactor argument parsing order

* Update sendmany JSON argument parameters

---------

Co-authored-by: Mihailo Milenkovic <[email protected]>
Mixa84 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
* Add fee_asset argument to sendmany RPC

* Add tests for sendmany

* Refactor argument parsing order

* Update sendmany JSON argument parameters

---------

Co-authored-by: Mihailo Milenkovic <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants