-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
First version of roadmap
- Loading branch information
0 parents
commit ba6e5ea
Showing
1 changed file
with
83 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ | ||
Outline for vertex algebras in Lean | ||
|
||
Introduce power series in a module M (over a rig R), allow multiple variables, allow shifts by multiplying powers of variables (i.e., allow Laurent polynomial action). More generally, formal power series M[[S]] in a module M with exponents in a set S should just be maps from S to M. | ||
|
||
Look at Lean4 mathlib files. Start with S arbitrary type, [Zero M] then [ZeroMul M], [AddCommMonoid M], [Module R M]. Then use instances to show that FormalSeriesModule inherits those structures. | ||
|
||
Given an action of an additive monoid G on S, we have an action of the monoid ring of finitely supported maps from G to R. Note: the coefficients are given by the sum in the formula (a.m)_k = \sum_{ij=k} a_i m_j, and if ij=k for fixed i and infinitely many j, this is infinite!!! To fix this, we require that for each k \in S, act^{-1}(k) of G \times S has finite fibers over G. See implementations of Algebra/Lie and Algebra/MonoidAlgebra. | ||
|
||
Laurent power series - We consider the case where G and S are compatibly ordered. (I think this just means g < h implies g+s < h+s.) In this case, we define a Laurent series to be a formal series whose support is bounded below in each G-congruence class. We show that Laurent series are closed under the monoid algebra action. | ||
|
||
Two maps M \to M[[S]] and M \to M[[T]] compose to form maps M \to M[[S \times T]] and M \to M[[T \times S]] by substitution of coefficients. | ||
|
||
Specialize to the case S = Z, maybe do something with a variable. | ||
|
||
Say something about different expansions of m(x-y)^{-n} in M((x))((y)) and M((y))((x)), and how the difference is annihilated by (x-y)^n. | ||
|
||
Field with variable z: R-module map from M to M((z)) [Li calls this a weak vertex operator]. | ||
Define identity field. More generally, allow things that look like intertwining operators. Allow operations like taking the y^n coefficient of an element of M[[x,y]][x^{-1}][\log x] as an element of M((x))[\log x] - use preimage of projection to y-exponent set. | ||
|
||
Operations: Addition, taking z^n term, shifting, divided power derivatives, | ||
composition with fields in different variables, residue products | ||
|
||
Define algebra of not-necessarily local fields. Problem: without locality, the power series made of residue products is not necessarily a field. What is Kac's definition of field algebra? Just Y(u_n v,z) = Y(u,z)_n Y(v,z). | ||
|
||
Theorem \partial^{(k)}A(z)_n B(z) = (-1)^k\binom{n}{k}A(z)_{n-k}B(z) | ||
|
||
Theorem \partial^{(k)}(A(z)_nB(z)) = \sum \partial^{(i)}A(z)_n\partial^{(k-i)}B(z) | ||
|
||
Prop: A(z)_nI(z) = \partial^{(-n-1)}A(z) for n < 0 and 0 for n \geq 0. I(z)_nA(z) = \delta_{n,-1}A(z). | ||
|
||
Locality: There is some n \geq 0 such that | ||
\sum \binom{n}{2i} z^{2i} w^{n-2i} A(z)B(w) = \sum \binom{n}{2i+1} z^{2i+1} w^{n-2i-1} B(w)A(z). | ||
If we allow -1, then make a map "multiplication by z-w", and consider its "eventual kernel". | ||
|
||
Operator product expansion. | ||
|
||
Cauchy-Jacobi identity - is there a proof by multi-index induction? | ||
|
||
Borcherds identity for residue products | ||
|
||
Vertex rng, non-unital vertex alg : What axiomatizations are equivalent? Just locality + assoc -> can we get Jacobi? | ||
|
||
Equivalent definitions of vertex algebra: Jacobi, locality + assoc, locality + translation, locality + weak assoc, weak assoc + skew, assoc + commutator, locality | ||
|
||
Creativity with respect to a vector - preserved under residue products. | ||
|
||
Basic properties with identity, Hasse-Schmidt derivations. | ||
Goddard's uniqueness. | ||
Explicit expansion of a_r b_s c and (a_r b)_s c (from Lepowsky-Li). | ||
|
||
Reconstruction theorem. | ||
|
||
Commutative rings with derivation are the same as commutative vertex algebras. Manipulations with center and idempotents. Commutants are vertex subalgebras. | ||
|
||
Lie algebra structure on V_1/TV_0, special: tensoring with C[z,z^{-1}] to get Lie algebra of coefficients. Enveloping topological associative algebra. | ||
|
||
Heisenberg, Lattice, Affine. | ||
|
||
Virasoro, conformal structure, Segal-Sugawara. | ||
|
||
Vertex superalgebras, free fermions. Conway moonshine? Boson-Fermion correspondence? | ||
|
||
Cofiniteness conditions. PBW-type bases. | ||
|
||
Modules, intertwining operators, abelian intertwining algebra? | ||
|
||
Moonshine module (use triality to avoid some twisted operator manipulations - probably can't avoid all when defining multiplication), finiteness and simplicity of monster, no-ghost theorem, monster Lie algebra, complete replicability. | ||
|
||
Ising, Miyamoto involutions. | ||
|
||
Complex-analytic properties - differential equations following Huang and Miyamoto, associativity of C_1 fusion, Modularity following Zhu, DLM, Pseudo-trace properties of Miyamoto. | ||
|
||
Hauptmodul criteria, monstrous moonshine, generalized moonshine. | ||
|
||
Conformal blocks in genus zero - identification with intertwining operators following Zhu and Arike. | ||
|
||
Conformal blocks in higher genus - analysis following damiolini-gibney-tarasca | ||
|
||
Verlinde formula, Modular tensor structure, regularity of fixed points, cyclic orbifolds. | ||
|
||
Self-dual integral form of moonshine. | ||
|
||
W-algebras? Geometric Langlands questions? |