feat: By-pass email verification on development environment #408
Conversation
|
@vinayak-vohra is attempting to deploy a commit to the Sanchit Bajaj's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe recent changes refine the user verification process by implementing conditional logic based on the application's environment. In production, users must verify their emails, while in development, this step is skipped to facilitate easier testing and account management. This enhancement significantly boosts the developer experience by streamlining workflows and enabling immediate access to application features without the need for email confirmation. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job, @vinayak-vohra! 🎉 Thank you for submitting your pull request. Your contribution is valuable and we appreciate your efforts to improve our project. Keep being the part of the community!
'We will promptly review your changes and offer feedback. Keep up the excellent work!
Kindly remember to check our Contributing Guidelines'
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/backend/auth.api.ts (2 hunks)
- src/components/pages/auth/register/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/backend/auth.api.ts (2)
251-254: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
saveDataToDatabaseproperly handle the new conditional logic for theisVerifiedfield.Verification successful
The function usage is verified and the new conditional logic for the
isVerifiedfield is properly handled within the codebase.
- The function
saveDataToDatabaseis defined and used withinsrc/backend/auth.api.ts.- The new conditional logic for the
isVerifiedfield is implemented and properly handled within the function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `saveDataToDatabase` handle the new conditional logic for the `isVerified` field. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of the new conditional logic. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'saveDataToDatabase'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `saveDataToDatabase` handle the new conditional logic for the `isVerified` field. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of the new conditional logic. rg --type js -A 5 $'saveDataToDatabase'Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the function `saveDataToDatabase` across all file types. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Function definition to be found. rg 'function saveDataToDatabase' # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of the new conditional logic. rg 'saveDataToDatabase'Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the context around the function calls and definition of `saveDataToDatabase` in `src/backend/auth.api.ts`. # Extract lines around the function definition rg 'const saveDataToDatabase = async' -A 10 -B 5 src/backend/auth.api.ts # Extract lines around the function calls rg 'saveDataToDatabase' -A 5 -B 5 src/backend/auth.api.tsLength of output: 1780
50-58: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
registerproperly handle the new conditional logic for email verification.Verification successful
No current usages of the
registerfunction found.The new conditional logic for email verification in the
registerfunction does not impact any existing code, as there are no calls to this function in the codebase. Ensure proper handling of this logic when the function is used in the future.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `register` handle the new conditional logic for email verification. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of the new conditional logic. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'register'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `register` handle the new conditional logic for email verification. # Find all JavaScript and TypeScript files and search for the function usage. fd -e js -e ts | xargs rg 'register'Length of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Specifically search for function calls to `register` within the codebase. # Find all JavaScript and TypeScript files and search for function calls to `register`. fd -e js -e ts | xargs rg '\bregister\b\s*\('Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Specifically search for function calls to `register` within the codebase, including more context lines. # Find all JavaScript and TypeScript files and search for function calls to `register`, including 10 lines of context. fd -e js -e ts | xargs rg 'register' -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 6683
src/components/pages/auth/register/index.tsx (1)
92-98: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
RegisterComponentproperly handle the new conditional logic for user experience.
Sanchitbajaj02
added
⭐ enhancement
Related Issue
fixes: #404
Description
Development mode
When the app is started in development mode by running
yarn dev:Production mode
When the app is started in production mode by running
yarn buildandyarn start, the flow is same as now:Screenshots
Development Mode
Palettegram-dev.mp4
Production Mode
Palettegram-prod.mp4
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes