Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/merge in system text json branch #377

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lxatstariongroup
Copy link
Contributor

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive pull-request title
  • I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
  • I have verified that I am following the COMET-SDK code style guidelines
  • I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

Feat/merge in system text json branch

antoineatrhea and others added 4 commits March 22, 2024 16:59
Note: Integration test fails on write/update : Seed database with non-modified Server
…endency' into feat/merge-in-system-text-json-branch
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="AuthenticatorPlugin{TProperties, TConnector}"/> class.
/// </summary>
protected AuthenticatorPlugin()
{
this.LoadConfig();
this.InitializeConnectors();
this.JsonSerializerOptions = new JsonSerializerOptions(JsonSerializerOptions.Default);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i thik this needs to be refactored

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is only used for Deserialization of AuthenticatorConfig. No need for CDP4=COMET stuff there imho. Why would we refactor and what would we refactor?

CometServer/CometServer.csproj Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CometServer/Modules/10-25/SiteDirectoryApi.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CometServer/appsettings.Development.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants