Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove legacy Ruby version conditionals #1091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

tagliala
Copy link
Contributor

@tagliala tagliala commented Mar 24, 2024

Also:

  • Test against JRuby 9.4
  • Remove conditional installation of json on JRuby, because it appears
    to be part of the standard library on all supported Ruby versions
  • Move rbs and typeprof to Gemfile and conditionally install them
    only on supported Ruby platforms

Note: the minimum JRuby version which passes the specs is 9.4.2.0

@tagliala tagliala force-pushed the chore/remove-legacy-checks branch 2 times, most recently from e21dc88 to 6a827f5 Compare March 24, 2024 11:39
@tagliala tagliala changed the title Remove checks for old Ruby versions emove legacy Ruby version conditionals Mar 24, 2024
@tagliala tagliala changed the title emove legacy Ruby version conditionals Remove legacy Ruby version conditionals Mar 24, 2024
@tagliala tagliala force-pushed the chore/remove-legacy-checks branch 3 times, most recently from 0aa4bfe to cb51adb Compare March 24, 2024 11:43
Also:
- Test against JRuby 9.4
- Remove conditional installation of `json` on JRuby, because it appears
  to be part of the standard library on all supported Ruby versions
- Move `rbs` and `typeprof` to Gemfile and conditionally install them
  only on supported Ruby platforms

Note: the minimum JRuby version which passes the specs is 9.4.2.0
@tagliala tagliala marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2024 11:45
@semmons99 semmons99 merged commit 37e183a into RubyMoney:main Apr 15, 2024
5 checks passed
@tagliala tagliala deleted the chore/remove-legacy-checks branch April 15, 2024 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants