Implements environment route tests #37
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the project's Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
Makefile (5)
1-1: Consider reordering format dependencies.The order of formatting and linting tools matters as they might conflict with each other. Consider running black last since it's the most opinionated formatter:
-format: flake8 pylint ruff black +format: flake8 pylint ruff black
3-4: Make black formatting more resilient.Using
&&will fail if thelibdirectory doesn't exist. Consider making it more resilient:-black: - black ./lib && black ./tests +black: + black ./lib || true + black ./tests || true
9-11: Make pylint commands more resilient.Similar to previous targets, consider making the commands more resilient:
-pylint: - pylint --extension-pkg-whitelist='pydantic' ./lib && pylint --extension-pkg-whitelist='pydantic' ./tests +pylint: + pylint --extension-pkg-whitelist='pydantic' ./lib || true + pylint --extension-pkg-whitelist='pydantic' ./tests || true
15-16: Enhance pytest configuration.Consider adding useful pytest flags and coverage reporting:
-test: - python3 -m pytest . +test: + python3 -m pytest -v --cov=lib --cov-report=term-missing .
Missing linting dependencies could hide warnings
The linting tools (flake8, pylint, ruff, black) are not listed in the requirements.txt file, which explains why the commands failed. The Makefile assumes these tools are installed but there's no guarantee they will be. This could lead to:
- CI/CD silently skipping linting checks
- Developers missing warnings locally
- The 290 warnings mentioned not being properly tracked
Recommendations:
- Add the linting tools to requirements.txt or create a requirements-dev.txt
- Add error handling in the Makefile to ensure linting tools are installed
- Consider adding CI configuration to enforce linting
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-29: Verify linting warnings are properly surfaced.The PR mentions 290 warnings in tests. With the current setup where most linting commands use
|| true, these warnings might be hidden. Consider:
- Initially running without
|| trueto see all warnings- Adding a warning threshold that fails the build if exceeded
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check current linting warnings count # Expected: Should see warnings to verify they're not being hidden echo "Running flake8..." flake8 --ignore E501,E402,F401,W503,C0414 ./lib ./tests || true echo -e "\nRunning pylint..." pylint --extension-pkg-whitelist='pydantic' ./lib ./tests || true echo -e "\nRunning ruff..." ruff check . || trueLength of output: 515
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check if the linting tools are installed in the repository # and examine the actual Makefile configuration # Check if these are Python packages in requirements files echo "Checking requirements files for linting tools..." fd requirements.txt --exec cat {} # Look at the actual Makefile content to verify the commands echo -e "\nChecking Makefile content..." cat Makefile # Check if there are any CI configuration files that might run linting echo -e "\nChecking for CI config files..." fd -e yml -e yaml --exec cat {}Length of output: 1387
pyproject.toml (2)
49-49: Consider consolidating line length configurations.The line length of 79 is defined in multiple places:
[tool.black][tool.pylint][tool.ruff]This redundancy could lead to maintenance issues if the values get out of sync.
Consider using a single source of truth, perhaps through a variable if the build system supports it, or at least add a comment noting that these values must be kept in sync.
Also applies to: 27-27, 31-31
55-57: Consider enabling more auto-fixable rules.Currently, only
F401(unused imports) is marked as fixable, but ruff can automatically fix many more issues. Consider enabling auto-fixes for other rules like:
E(pycodestyle errors)Q(quote standardization)fixable = [ "F401", + "E", # pycodestyle errors + "Q", # quote standardization ]tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py (3)
17-25: Enhance test fixtures with documentation and more realistic test data.Consider the following improvements:
- Add docstrings to explain the purpose and usage of each fixture
- Use more realistic test data for
mock_env- Expand
mock_env_summaryto include all relevant fieldsHere's a suggested implementation:
@pytest.fixture def mock_env(): + """ + Provides a mock Environment instance with realistic test data. + Used for testing environment-related endpoints. + """ - return Env(latitude=0, longitude=0) + return Env( + latitude=45.0, # Example: New York City coordinates + longitude=-75.0, + elevation=100, + timezone="America/New_York" + ) @pytest.fixture def mock_env_summary(): + """ + Provides a mock EnvSummary instance with complete test data. + Used for testing environment simulation endpoints. + """ - return EnvSummary() + return EnvSummary( + pressure=101325, # Standard atmospheric pressure (Pa) + temperature=288.15, # 15°C in Kelvin + humidity=50, # 50% relative humidity + # Add other relevant fields based on EnvSummary model + )
88-104: Refactor date handling to reduce code duplication.The date serialization logic is repeated across tests. Consider extracting it into a helper function.
def serialize_dates(data: dict) -> dict: """Helper function to serialize datetime fields in response data.""" date_fields = ['date', 'local_date', 'datetime_date'] for field in date_fields: if field in data and data[field]: data[field] = data[field].isoformat() return data def test_simulate_env(mock_env_summary): with patch.object( EnvController, "simulate_env", return_value=mock_env_summary ) as mock_simulate_env: response = client.get("/environments/123/summary") assert response.status_code == 200 expected_content = serialize_dates(mock_env_summary.model_dump()) assert response.json() == expected_content mock_simulate_env.assert_called_once_with("123")
27-114: Add parametrized tests for better coverage.Consider using pytest's parametrize decorator to test multiple scenarios efficiently.
Example implementation:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("coords,expected_status", [ ({"latitude": 45.0, "longitude": -75.0}, 200), ({"latitude": 90.1, "longitude": 0}, 422), # Invalid latitude ({"latitude": 0, "longitude": 180.1}, 422), # Invalid longitude ]) def test_create_env_validation(coords, expected_status): response = client.post("/environments/", json=coords) assert response.status_code == expected_statuslib/controllers/environment.py (3)
30-31: LGTM! Good refactoring to static method.The conversion to a static method with direct parameter passing improves testability and follows functional programming principles.
Consider moving the env_repo.env_id logging inside the try block or handling potential UnboundLocalError in finally block when env_repo is not defined.
Also applies to: 39-39
150-152: Update docstring to reflect new parameters.The method signature change looks good, but the docstring needs to be updated to include the new
envparameter.Add the following to the docstring Args section:
Args: env_id: str + env: Env - The environment data to updateAlso applies to: 167-167
Line range hint
39-61: Consider extracting common error handling pattern.The error handling pattern is duplicated across methods. Consider creating a decorator or utility function to handle common error patterns.
Example implementation:
from functools import wraps from typing import Callable, TypeVar T = TypeVar('T') def handle_env_errors(operation_name: str) -> Callable: def decorator(func: Callable[..., T]) -> Callable[..., T]: @wraps(func) async def wrapper(*args, **kwargs) -> T: try: return await func(*args, **kwargs) except PyMongoError as e: logger.error(f"controllers.environment.{operation_name}: PyMongoError {e}") raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_503_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE, detail=f"Failed to {operation_name} environment in db", ) from e except HTTPException as e: raise e from e except Exception as e: exc_str = parse_error(e) logger.error(f"controllers.environment.{operation_name}: {exc_str}") raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, detail=f"Failed to {operation_name} environment: {exc_str}", ) from e return wrapper return decorator # Usage example: @staticmethod @handle_env_errors("create_env") async def create_env(env: Env) -> Union[EnvCreated, HTTPException]: async with EnvRepository(env) as env_repo: await env_repo.create_env() return EnvCreated(env_id=env_repo.env_id)Also applies to: 167-189
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Makefile(2 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)lib/__init__.py(1 hunks)lib/controllers/environment.py(3 hunks)lib/routes/environment.py(3 hunks)pyproject.toml(3 hunks)requirements-dev.txt(1 hunks)tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- README.md
- lib/init.py
- requirements-dev.txt
🔇 Additional comments (6)
lib/routes/environment.py (4)
39-39: LGTM: Appropriate conversion to static method call
The change from instance method to static method is appropriate since the operation doesn't require instance state.
66-66: LGTM: Consistent static method implementation
The conversion to static method call maintains proper parameter ordering and is consistent with other route implementations.
121-121: LGTM: Consistent implementation
The delete route implementation maintains consistency with other routes in using static method calls.
70-70: Verify impact of route path change
The route path change from /rocketpy/{env_id} to /{env_id}/rocketpy follows RESTful conventions better. However, this is a breaking change that requires verification of client impact.
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py (2)
1-14: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.
The imports are comprehensive and properly organized, covering all necessary components (models, controllers, views) for testing the environment routes. The TestClient initialization follows FastAPI's best practices.
106-114: Add content validation for binary response.
While the test verifies the response status and content type, it should also validate the binary content structure or size.
Consider adding validation:
def test_read_rocketpy_env_validates_content(mock_env):
binary_data = b'rocketpy_valid_structure' # Replace with actual structure
with patch.object(
EnvController,
"get_rocketpy_env_binary",
return_value=binary_data
) as mock_read_rocketpy_env:
response = client.get("/environments/123/rocketpy")
assert response.status_code == 203
assert len(response.content) > 0
# Add specific validation based on expected binary structure
assert response.content.startswith(b'rocketpy')| def test_create_env(mock_env): | ||
| with patch.object( | ||
| EnvController, "create_env", return_value=EnvCreated(env_id="123") | ||
| ) as mock_create_env: | ||
| response = client.post( | ||
| "/environments/", json={"latitude": 0, "longitude": 0} | ||
| ) | ||
| assert response.status_code == 200 | ||
| assert response.json() == { | ||
| "env_id": "123", | ||
| "message": "Environment successfully created", | ||
| } | ||
| mock_create_env.assert_called_once_with(Env(latitude=0, longitude=0)) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error case testing for CRUD operations.
The current tests only cover successful scenarios. Consider adding tests for:
- Invalid input data
- Non-existent resources
- Server errors
- Authorization failures
Example implementation for error cases:
def test_create_env_invalid_data():
response = client.post(
"/environments/",
json={"latitude": "invalid", "longitude": 0}
)
assert response.status_code == 422
def test_read_env_not_found():
with patch.object(
EnvController,
"get_env_by_id",
side_effect=KeyError("Not found")
):
response = client.get("/environments/nonexistent")
assert response.status_code == 404Also applies to: 42-52, 54-71, 73-86
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is pertinent, will comply.
cc @Gui-FernandesBR, @aasitvora99 , @luimot any other test category you think worth adding to the routes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
| @@ -52,3 +44,14 @@ disable = """ | |||
| raise-missing-from, | |||
| too-many-instance-attributes, | |||
| """ | |||
|
|
|||
| [tool.ruff] | |||
| line-length = 79 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
79? I usually see 88 instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the API development we set PEP-8 as a north
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/pylint.yml (1)
24-24: Consider reducing the number of disabled Pylint checksThe current configuration disables 24 different Pylint checks, which could mask potential issues and increase technical debt. Some disabled checks are particularly concerning:
E1121: Too many positional arguments (could catch API misuse)W0719: Broad exception catching (could hide errors)W0621: Redefining name from outer scope (can lead to subtle bugs)Consider the following improvements:
- Document reasons for disabling each check in comments
- Re-enable critical checks like
E1121andW0719- Scope Pylint to specific directories to avoid checking generated/vendor code:
-pylint -d C0200,C0301,C0114,R0903,C0115,W0246,R0914,C0209,E1121,C0103,C2801,R0801,E1101,E0401,E0611,R0911,C0116,W0212,W0719,W0601,W1203,W0123,W0511,W0621 $(git ls-files '*.py') +# Add comments explaining why each check is disabled +pylint \ + --disable=C0200 # Reason for disabling... \ + --disable=C0301 # Reason for disabling... \ + lib/ tests/Makefile (3)
1-1: Consider optimizing the format target dependencies order.The current order might lead to conflicts between different formatting tools. Consider ordering the dependencies to minimize conflicts:
rufffirst (fastest and can fix imports)blacksecond (code formatting)flake8andpylintlast (linting checks)-format: flake8 pylint ruff black +format: ruff black flake8 pylint
12-13: Document disabled pylint errors for tests.Please add comments explaining why these specific errors are disabled for tests:
- E0401: Unable to import
- W0621: Redefining name from outer scope
This documentation helps future maintainers understand the reasoning behind these exceptions.
19-20: Enhance pytest configuration with common options.Consider adding useful pytest options to improve the testing experience:
- Coverage reporting
- Parallel test execution
- Verbose output
- JUnit XML reports for CI integration
-test: - python3 -m pytest . +test: + python3 -m pytest . -v --cov=lib --cov-report=term-missing --junitxml=test-results.xml -n auto
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/pylint.yml(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)lib/__init__.py(1 hunks)tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- lib/init.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py
49-49: Local variable mock_create_env is assigned to but never used
(F841)
80-80: Local variable mock_read_env is assigned to but never used
(F841)
128-128: Local variable mock_update_env is assigned to but never used
(F841)
169-169: Local variable mock_delete_env is assigned to but never used
(F841)
208-208: Local variable mock_simulate_env is assigned to but never used
(F841)
240-240: Local variable mock_read_rocketpy_env is assigned to but never used
(F841)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pylint.yml (1)
24-24: Verify the impact of disabling W0621
The newly added W0621 check helps prevent variable shadowing issues. Let's verify if there are legitimate cases where we need to disable this.
| def test_read_rocketpy_env(): | ||
| with patch.object( | ||
| EnvController, "get_rocketpy_env_binary", return_value=b'rocketpy' | ||
| ) as mock_read_rocketpy_env: | ||
| response = client.get("/environments/123/rocketpy") | ||
| assert response.status_code == 203 | ||
| assert response.content == b'rocketpy' | ||
| assert response.headers["content-type"] == "application/octet-stream" | ||
| mock_read_rocketpy_env.assert_called_once_with("123") | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Status code 203 should be changed to 200 for binary file download
The endpoint /environments/{env_id}/rocketpy returns a binary file (dill binary) with application/octet-stream content type. Using status code 203 (Non-Authoritative Information) is incorrect in this context as:
- The response contains the authoritative binary data directly from the source
- Status code 200 (OK) is the standard for successful GET requests returning content
- Status code 203 is typically used when the response is a transformed or modified version from a different source, which isn't the case here
Locations needing updates:
lib/routes/environment.py: Change status code from 203 to 200 in theread_rocketpy_envroute handlertests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py: Update the assertion intest_read_rocketpy_envto expect status code 200
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the use of status code 203 in test_read_rocketpy_env
In test_read_rocketpy_env, the test asserts that the status code is 203 (Non-Authoritative Information). Typically, for successful GET requests returning binary data, a status code of 200 (OK) is used. Please verify if 203 is the intended status code or if it should be updated to 200.
Run the following script to check the status code defined for the /environments/{env_id}/rocketpy endpoint:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the status code used in the 'get_rocketpy_env_binary' route.
# Search for the route definition in the codebase
rg -A 5 "def get_rocketpy_env_binary" lib/routes/
# Search for status codes in the environment routes
rg "status_code" lib/routes/environment.py
Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full implementation of the route handler to understand the context better
rg -B 2 -A 10 "status_code=203" lib/routes/environment.py
# Also check if there are any other similar binary file endpoints in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'Response($_, content_type="application/octet-stream")'
Length of output: 701
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not 100% correct. I have set custom middleware rules for changing the content header to octet-stream instead of gzip in these cases
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@GabrielBarberini, thank you for the clarification. I understand that you have custom middleware rules set up to change the content header to application/octet-stream instead of gzip in these cases. I'll keep this in mind for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: GabrielBarberini
PR: RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API#37
File: tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py:252-261
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T19:06:05.373Z
Learning: In the `Infinity-API` project, for the FastAPI route `/environments/{env_id}/rocketpy` in `lib/routes/environment.py`, custom middleware modifies the content header to `application/octet-stream`, and status code 203 is intentionally used. Do not suggest changing the status code from 203 to 200 for this route.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| def test_delete_env_not_found(): | ||
| with patch.object( | ||
| EnvController, | ||
| "delete_env_by_id", | ||
| return_value=EnvDeleted(env_id="123"), | ||
| ) as mock_delete_env: | ||
| response = client.delete("/environments/123") | ||
| assert response.status_code == 200 | ||
| assert response.json() == { | ||
| "env_id": "123", | ||
| "message": "Environment successfully deleted", | ||
| } | ||
| mock_delete_env.assert_called_once_with("123") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct test_delete_env_not_found to properly test the not found scenario
Currently, test_delete_env_not_found is identical to test_delete_env, returning a successful deletion. To test the "not found" case, the delete_env_by_id method should raise an HTTPException with a 404 status code.
Apply this diff to fix the test:
def test_delete_env_not_found():
with patch.object(
EnvController,
"delete_env_by_id",
- return_value=EnvDeleted(env_id="123"),
+ side_effect=HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Environment not found"),
) as mock_delete_env:
response = client.delete("/environments/123")
- assert response.status_code == 200
- assert response.json() == {
- "env_id": "123",
- "message": "Environment successfully deleted",
- }
+ assert response.status_code == 404
+ assert response.json() == {"detail": "Environment not found"}
mock_delete_env.assert_called_once_with("123")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def test_delete_env_not_found(): | |
| with patch.object( | |
| EnvController, | |
| "delete_env_by_id", | |
| return_value=EnvDeleted(env_id="123"), | |
| ) as mock_delete_env: | |
| response = client.delete("/environments/123") | |
| assert response.status_code == 200 | |
| assert response.json() == { | |
| "env_id": "123", | |
| "message": "Environment successfully deleted", | |
| } | |
| mock_delete_env.assert_called_once_with("123") | |
| def test_delete_env_not_found(): | |
| with patch.object( | |
| EnvController, | |
| "delete_env_by_id", | |
| side_effect=HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Environment not found"), | |
| ) as mock_delete_env: | |
| response = client.delete("/environments/123") | |
| assert response.status_code == 404 | |
| assert response.json() == {"detail": "Environment not found"} | |
| mock_delete_env.assert_called_once_with("123") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not true. There is no reason to let the client know we didn't had the document he was trying to delete, not only for security reasons but also because it is pointless, if he is trying to delete a file that does not exist in the dB then we can simply respond that the file was deleted since it is logically equivalent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@GabrielBarberini, understood. Thank you for the clarification. I'll keep this in mind for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: GabrielBarberini
PR: RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API#37
File: tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py:177-189
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T19:08:56.289Z
Learning: When deleting an environment in the API, return a success response even if the environment does not exist. Do not inform the client about the non-existence of the resource to maintain security and because it's logically equivalent.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)
48-57: LGTM: Ruff configuration is well-structured.The configuration:
- Maintains consistency with other tools (black, pylint) using 79 character line length
- Correctly targets Python 3.12
- Has a focused set of linting rules with appropriate exclusions
Consider enabling more rule categories like:
- B (bugbear) for additional bug checks
- S (security) for security issues
- I (isort) for import sorting
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pyproject.toml(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pyproject.toml (2)
3-3: LGTM: Version bump is appropriate.
The minor version increment from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0 aligns well with the addition of new test functionality.
16-16: Skip: Development status concerns already addressed.
A previous review comment already covers the concerns about changing to Production status.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py (1)
1-291: Comprehensive test suite with excellent coverage.The test suite thoroughly covers:
- All CRUD operations
- Optional parameters
- Error scenarios
- Binary response handling
- Input validation
Consider adding the following test cases:
- Boundary values for latitude/longitude
- Maximum/minimum values for optional parameters
- Malformed dates
- Empty or whitespace-only strings
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py (2)
Learnt from: GabrielBarberini
PR: RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API#37
File: tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py:177-189
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T19:08:56.409Z
Learning: When deleting an environment in the API, return a success response even if the environment does not exist. Do not inform the client about the non-existence of the resource to maintain security and because it's logically equivalent.
Learnt from: GabrielBarberini
PR: RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API#37
File: tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py:252-261
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T19:06:05.562Z
Learning: In the `Infinity-API` project, for the FastAPI route `/environments/{env_id}/rocketpy` in `lib/routes/environment.py`, custom middleware modifies the content header to `application/octet-stream`, and status code 203 is intentionally used. Do not suggest changing the status code from 203 to 200 for this route.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.py (6)
1-31: LGTM! Well-structured imports and fixtures.
The imports are organized logically, and the fixtures provide clean mock data for tests.
46-65: Comprehensive test coverage for optional parameters.
The test thoroughly validates the creation of an environment with all optional parameters, ensuring the API correctly handles the complete set of configuration options.
96-108: Well-implemented not found scenario.
The test properly validates both the status code and error message for the not found case.
137-141: Good validation test coverage.
The test properly validates the API's response to invalid input data.
215-225: Good use of fixtures in simulation test.
The test effectively uses the stub_env_summary fixture and validates both the response and the controller method call.
255-264: Excellent binary response validation.
The test thoroughly validates:
- The correct status code (203)
- The binary content
- The content-type header
tests/test_routes/test_environment_route.pyruffas additional linter toolSummary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
make, includingmake format,make test, andmake clean.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
flake8,pylint, andruffto improve code quality and linting processes.