-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#103][#117] Introduce optional "verbose" test failure reporting and increase test coverage #120
[#103][#117] Introduce optional "verbose" test failure reporting and increase test coverage #120
Conversation
/retest |
retest requires an argument |
Report bugs in Issues The following are automatically added:
Available user actions:
Supported /retest check runs
Supported labels
|
d6465e4
to
59794ad
Compare
@myakove I cannot see the tox failures and cannot acknowledge the sonarqube issues. Should we just move the tox execution to a GitHub action? |
Sure, I will remove firewatch from the webhook configuration tomorrow. |
/retest sonarqube |
@myakove: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest tox |
@myakove: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest tox |
@myakove: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest sonarqube |
@myakove: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest tox |
@myakove: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No tox configured for this repository |
/retest sonarqube |
@myakove: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/verified |
/verified |
|
@Simranpal yeah that is in the stage environment, you'll have to set up some proxies. I'll ping you in slack with more info |
/verified |
/retest can-be-merged |
@calebevans: The
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Verbose Test Failure Reporting
This pull request introduces a new option in the firewatch CLI:
--verbose-test-failure-reporting
(and--verbose-test-failure-reporting-ticket-limit
). The new option allows users to optionally report on every test failure found in job (up to the limit defined in--verbose-test-failure-reporting-ticket-limit
which is 10 by default).When this functionality is enabled, it also changes the behavior of the duplicate bug search functionality by further specifying the specific test that has failed when searching. This same behavior is observed in the "past bugs" table in the issue description, so all past bugs in the table are relevant to that test name.
This was requested by the RHTAP team and may allow them to start using the tool in their OpenShift CI pipeline.
Example of a bug created using this functionality:
Test Coverage
Not much here, other than increased coverage. We are now at 72.89% coverage. We were previously at 58.69% coverage.