Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add docs tutorial section for predefined quantum objects #82

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 8, 2024

Conversation

apkille
Copy link
Member

@apkille apkille commented Aug 16, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.31%. Comparing base (6275f8b) to head (f6c8756).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #82      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.92%   75.31%   +1.38%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines         794      794              
==========================================
+ Hits          587      598      +11     
+ Misses        207      196      -11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@apkille apkille requested a review from Krastanov August 17, 2024 14:35
@Krastanov Krastanov added the Skip-Changelog label for control of CI: skips the changelog check label Sep 8, 2024
@apkille
Copy link
Member Author

apkille commented Sep 8, 2024

@Krastanov good to merge?

@Krastanov
Copy link
Member

oh, yeah, my bad, forgot to merge it

@Krastanov Krastanov merged commit 8b64f43 into QuantumSavory:main Sep 8, 2024
15 of 17 checks passed
@apkille apkille deleted the docs branch September 9, 2024 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip-Changelog label for control of CI: skips the changelog check
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants