Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Docs: move docs to IBM docs #1166

Open
IceKhan13 opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Docs: move docs to IBM docs #1166

IceKhan13 opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority
Milestone
Q1'24

Comments

@IceKhan13
Copy link
Member

IceKhan13 commented Jan 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

What is the expected enhancement?

Move documentation from gh to ibm docs.

Epic #1164
@IceKhan13 IceKhan13 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority labels Jan 17, 2024
@IceKhan13 IceKhan13 added this to the Q1'24 milestone Jan 17, 2024
@IceKhan13 IceKhan13 mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2024
Open
@psschwei
Copy link
Collaborator

With this move, do we still need #1141 ?
My assumption is no, since the default provider over on IQP will be IBMServerlessProvider ...

This was referenced Jan 18, 2024
Closed
Closed
@IceKhan13
Copy link
Member Author

I think you are right about default provider. But I think it is still worth it to have local provider for tests.

What I think will not be needed anymore is #812

@psschwei
Copy link
Collaborator

Let me see if I can update the notebooks to run using local provider...

@psschwei
Copy link
Collaborator

Think we will also want to purge some of the docs on the move (for example, installation and deployment may no longer be needed)

This was referenced Mar 4, 2024
Open
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Q1'24
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@IceKhan13 @psschwei