Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved code quality checks #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

improved code quality checks #2

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Nov 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced linter configurations for improved code quality checks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated error handling in various test cases to ensure immediate failure on assertion errors.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified method signatures by replacing interface{} with any across multiple packages.
    • Streamlined logic in the Run method of the scheduler for dynamic sleep time management.
    • Adjusted method signatures for several functions to improve clarity and consistency.
  • Tests

    • Transitioned from assert to require for stricter error handling in test cases.
    • Updated test cases to reflect changes in method signatures and improve assertion clarity.
  • Chores

    • Updated comments and documentation for clarity and maintenance.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve extensive modifications across various files, primarily focusing on updating method signatures to use the any type instead of interface{} for improved type clarity. Additionally, several methods have had their receiver types changed from pointer to value receivers, simplifying their usage. The configuration file .golangci.yml has been updated to enable and disable specific linters and adjust their settings. Various test files have adopted stricter error handling practices using require instead of assert, enhancing the robustness of the tests.

Changes

File Change Summary
.golangci.yml Added allow-parallel-runners, enabled/disabled multiple linters, modified settings for several linters.
dao/base.go Changed receivers of CommitTx and RollbackTx from pointer to value.
dao/base_test.go Updated TableName receiver from pointer to value; modified error handling in TestNoTransaction.
db/config.go Changed return type of MarshalYAML from interface{} to any; added comment for Check method.
db/config_test.go Updated error handling in TestCheck to use Require.
db/db.go Updated method signatures in DB interface to use any instead of interface{}.
db/db_test.go Replaced assert with require for error handling in multiple test methods.
db/driver_test.go Changed assertion for driver length from assert.Equal to assert.Len.
db/mysql.go Changed receivers of Open, GetMigrationsDriver, and MigrateOptions from pointer to value.
db/sqlite.go Changed receivers of several methods from pointer to value.
db/sqlite_test.go Replaced assert with suite methods for consistency in assertions.
eth/config_test.go Updated assertions in TestCheck to use Require.
eth/keys.go Added comment regarding needPass parameter in NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore.
eth/rpc.go Added comment to logger field in client struct for clarity.
log/log.go Removed newLogger type; updated Logger interface methods to use any.
log/logger.go Updated logging function signatures to use any.
log/noplog.go Updated method signatures to use any and changed receiver type.
log/zaplog.go Updated method signatures to use any for logging functions.
log/zerolog.go Updated method signatures to use any and renamed NewZeroLogger to newZeroLog.
log/zerolog_test.go Replaced assert.NoError with require.NoError in multiple test functions.
migration/config.go Changed method signatures for Check and Name to unnamed receivers.
migration/migration.go Changed parameter order in Start method and updated Close receiver type.
modules/big_int.go Updated Scan and unquoteIfQuoted method signatures to use any.
pprof/config.go Changed Name method signature to unnamed receiver.
pprof/server.go Changed parameter order in Start method; simplified BaseContext function signature.
pprof/server_test.go Updated server.Start method call parameter order and replaced assert.NoError with require.NoError.
rand/random.go Simplified logic in Str method for generating random strings.
rand/random_test.go Updated assertions for length checks and modified function signature for TestRngConcurrencySafety.
scheduler/scheduler.go Introduced sleepTime variable for dynamic sleep management in Run method.
scheduler/scheduler_test.go Simplified exec function signatures in tests.
server/interface.go Changed Start method signature to reorder parameters.
telemetry/config.go Changed Name method signature to unnamed receiver.
telemetry/metrics.go Changed receiver of gatherPrometheus from pointer to value.
telemetry/server.go Changed parameter order in Start method and simplified BaseContext function signature.
telemetry/server_test.go Updated server.Start method call parameter order and replaced assert.NoError with require.NoError.
tool/file.go Changed LoadJSONFile parameter type from interface{} to any.
tool/json.go Renamed functions and updated parameter types from interface{} to any.
tool/mapstructure.go Updated parameter types and return types for several hook functions to use any.
db/mysql_test.go Updated TestMysql_CheckSource test cases with new source values.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Changes made, we’ll never stop.
Types are clear, and tests are tight,
With every line, our code takes flight!
So let us cheer, with joy and glee,
For cleaner code, as fine as can be! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
server/interface.go (1)

10-12: Consider updating the comment to match parameter order.

The comment above the Start method could be more specific about the parameter order.

-	// Start service and keep the goroutine of the blocked
+	// Start service with the given context and error group, keeping the goroutine blocked
tool/json.go (1)

5-18: Consider more idiomatic function names.

The prefix "Itf" in the function names is not a standard Go abbreviation. Consider renaming these functions to be more idiomatic:

  • MustItfToJSONStrMustToJSONStr
  • MustItfToJSONStrIndexMustToJSONStrIndent

This would make the code more aligned with typical Go naming conventions while maintaining clarity about the functions' purposes.

pprof/server_test.go (1)

33-34: LGTM! Consider adding a cleanup comment

Good use of require for cleanup errors as failed server cleanup could affect subsequent tests.

Consider adding a comment explaining the importance of cleanup validation:

 	<-ctx.Done()
+	// Ensure proper server cleanup to prevent interference with other tests
 	require.NoError(t, server.Close())
 	require.NoError(t, group.Wait())
eth/keys.go (1)

14-14: LGTM, but consider splitting the function for better clarity.

While the linter directive is appropriate here, the boolean flag parameter could be eliminated by splitting this into two focused functions:

  • NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error)
  • NewPrivKeyFromKeyStoreWithPassword(keystoreFile, passwordFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error)

This would make the API more explicit and eliminate the need for the flag parameter.

-func NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, passwordFile string, needPass bool) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) { //nolint:revive // flag-parameter
+func NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) {
+	return newPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, "", false)
+}
+
+func NewPrivKeyFromKeyStoreWithPassword(keystoreFile, passwordFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) {
+	return newPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, passwordFile, true)
+}
+
+func newPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, passwordFile string, needPass bool) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) {
telemetry/server_test.go (1)

28-28: Consider standardizing assertion style across the test.

While changing to require.NoError here is good, there are still assert.NoError calls at the end of the test. For consistency, consider using the same assertion style throughout the test.

Apply this diff to standardize the assertions:

   <-ctx.Done()
-  assert.NoError(t, server.Close())
-  assert.NoError(t, group.Wait())
+  require.NoError(t, server.Close())
+  require.NoError(t, group.Wait())
log/zerolog_test.go (2)

30-30: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvement across test functions

The consistent replacement of assert.NoError with require.NoError across all test functions improves the robustness of the test suite by ensuring immediate test failure on logger initialization errors.

Consider applying this same pattern to other test files in the codebase for consistency. This change aligns with Go testing best practices where setup failures should immediately fail tests rather than continue with invalid state.

Also applies to: 39-39, 48-48


Update error assertions in logger tests for consistency

The verification reveals two distinct patterns of assert.NoError usage that need different handling:

  1. In log/zaplog_test.go, the logger initialization error checks should be updated to require.NoError for consistency with the changes made in zerolog_test.go, as these are critical setup steps.

  2. The remaining assert.NoError usages are appropriate in their current form:

    • In telemetry/server_test.go they're used for cleanup operations
    • In test tables of scheduler_test.go, driver_test.go, mysql_test.go, and sqlite_test.go they're used as test expectations via wantErr
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-56: Verify consistent error handling across the codebase

Let's ensure this error handling pattern is being applied consistently across all test files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining assert.NoError usage in test files
# that might need to be updated to require.NoError

# Search for remaining assert.NoError usage in test files
echo "Checking for remaining assert.NoError usage in test files:"
rg "assert\.NoError" --type go --type-add 'go:*.go' -g '*_test.go'

# Search for mixed usage of assert.NoError and require.NoError in same files
echo -e "\nChecking for files with mixed usage of assert.NoError and require.NoError:"
rg -l "assert\.NoError.*require\.NoError|require\.NoError.*assert\.NoError" --type go --type-add 'go:*.go' -g '*_test.go'

Length of output: 1115


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the context of assert.NoError usage to understand if they need to be changed to require.NoError

# Check telemetry/server_test.go
echo "=== telemetry/server_test.go ==="
rg "assert\.NoError" telemetry/server_test.go -B 2 -A 2

# Check log/zaplog_test.go
echo -e "\n=== log/zaplog_test.go ==="
rg "assert\.NoError" log/zaplog_test.go -B 2 -A 2

# Check scheduler and db test files for wantErr context
echo -e "\n=== scheduler and db test files ==="
rg "wantErr:\s*assert\.NoError" -B 5 -A 2 scheduler/scheduler_test.go db/driver_test.go db/mysql_test.go db/sqlite_test.go

Length of output: 3354

tool/mapstructure.go (1)

Line range hint 53-68: Simplify error handling in decimal conversion

While the type change to any is good, there's a minor improvement possible in the error handling.

Consider this small refinement:

       dec, err := decimal.NewFromString(data.(string))
       if err != nil {
           return nil, errors.Wrapf(err, "can't convert %v to decimal.Decimal", data)
       }
-      return dec, err
+      return dec, nil

The current code returns err which was already checked and would always be nil at this point.

db/config_test.go (1)

32-32: Great improvement in test error handling!

Switching to suite.Require().NoError() is a better practice as it ensures immediate test failure on error, preventing subsequent assertions from executing with an invalid configuration state. This makes test failures more obvious and easier to debug.

Consider applying the same improvement to the table-driven test TestSourceDesensitization by using require.Equal() instead of the current t.Errorf() pattern for consistency across the test suite.

db/sqlite_test.go (2)

60-60: Consider using more specific error assertions

Instead of just checking if the error is not nil, it would be more robust to verify the expected error condition.

-suite.NotNil(suite.driver.Open("coastdao.db"))
+err := suite.driver.Open("coastdao.db")
+suite.Error(err, "should return error when database doesn't exist")

60-81: Consider structuring error test cases more systematically

While the changes to standardize assertions are good, consider enhancing the error testing strategy by:

  1. Using table-driven tests for Open/CreateDB error cases (like you did for CheckSource)
  2. Testing specific error conditions rather than just error presence
  3. Adding test cases for edge cases (invalid paths, permission issues, etc.)
telemetry/config.go (1)

75-77: LGTM! Consider similar improvements for other methods.

The removal of the unused receiver parameter name improves code clarity. This change aligns with Go's style guide which suggests omitting parameter names when they're not used in the method body.

Consider reviewing other methods in the codebase for similar opportunities where receiver names are unused. For example, you can use this script to find potential candidates:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find method receivers that might have unused names
# Note: This is a basic check and results need manual verification

# Search for method receivers with single-letter names that might be unused
rg -U 'func \([a-z] [^)]+\).*?\{(?:\s*return[^}]+\}|\s*[^a-z][^}]*\})' --type go
db/sqlite.go (2)

Line range hint 32-37: LGTM! Value receiver is appropriate here

The change from pointer to value receiver is correct since this method doesn't modify the receiver's state. This aligns with Go best practices where methods that don't need to modify their receiver should use value receivers.


79-81: LGTM! Consider making this a package-level variable

The value receiver is appropriate as this method is stateless. However, since it returns a constant empty map, consider defining it as a package-level variable to avoid repeated map allocations.

+var sqliteMigrateOptions = map[string]string{}
+
 func (*Sqlite) MigrateOptions() map[string]string {
-    return map[string]string{}
+    return sqliteMigrateOptions
 }
rand/random_test.go (1)

71-71: Consider keeping the parameter name for consistency

While removing the parameter name works functionally, it creates inconsistency with other test functions in the file that use named parameters. Consider keeping the t parameter name:

-func TestRngConcurrencySafety(*testing.T) {
+func TestRngConcurrencySafety(t *testing.T) {
telemetry/metrics.go (1)

63-63: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about the unused receiver.

The change from pointer receiver to unnamed receiver is appropriate since the method doesn't use any Server state. This makes the code's intent clearer.

Consider adding a comment to explain why the receiver is unused:

+// gatherPrometheus uses the global prometheus.DefaultGatherer and doesn't need Server state
 func (*Server) gatherPrometheus() (GatherResponse, error) {
.golangci.yml (1)

101-101: Add newline at end of file

Add a newline character at the end of the file to comply with POSIX standards.

      - name: cognitive-complexity
        disabled: true
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 101-101: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

log/zerolog.go (1)

33-38: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.

The refactoring improves code organization by separating the public interface from implementation details. The error handling and format validation are comprehensive.

Consider using a custom error type or constants for the format validation error to make error handling more idiomatic:

+const ErrInvalidLogFormat = "invalid log format"

 func newZeroLog(format, logLevel string) (*zerolog.Logger, error) {
     // ...
     default:
-        return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid log format: %s", format)
+        return nil, fmt.Errorf("%s: %s", ErrInvalidLogFormat, format)
     }
     // ...
 }

Also applies to: 85-104

dao/base.go (1)

Line range hint 91-97: LGTM! Consistent with CommitTx changes.

The receiver type change is appropriate and maintains consistency with the CommitTx method. Both transaction management methods now clearly indicate they operate solely on the context.

The transaction handling pattern using context values is a clean approach, but consider documenting the expected lifecycle of transactions (Begin->Commit/Rollback) in the package documentation to help other developers use it correctly.

db/mysql.go (1)

Line range hint 129-134: LGTM! Consider further optimization

The change from pointer receiver to value receiver is correct since this method returns static data. However, since the returned map is constant, consider declaring it as a package-level constant to avoid recreating it on every call.

+var mysqlMigrateOptions = map[string]string{
+    "gorm:table_options": "ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4",
+}
+
 func (*Mysql) MigrateOptions() map[string]string {
-    return map[string]string{
-        "gorm:table_options": "ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4",
-    }
+    return mysqlMigrateOptions
 }
db/db_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-158: Great improvement in test architecture

The systematic conversion to suite.Require() throughout the test suite is a valuable architectural improvement because:

  1. It ensures immediate test failure on critical checks
  2. It maintains consistent error handling patterns
  3. It makes test failures more obvious and easier to debug

Consider adding these testing guidelines to your team's coding standards document.

db/config.go (1)

71-71: Consider future refactoring to reduce complexity.

While the linter directive addresses the immediate warning, the high cyclomatic complexity suggests this method could benefit from refactoring. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods in a future PR.

Example approach for future consideration:

func (c Config) Check() error {
    checks := []func() error{
        c.validateDriver,
        c.validateConnTimes,
        c.validateConnCounts,
        c.validateLogLevel,
    }
    
    for _, check := range checks {
        if err := check(); err != nil {
            return err
        }
    }
    return nil
}
telemetry/server.go (1)

Line range hint 47-134: Consider breaking down the Start method for better maintainability.

The //nolint:revive // cyclomatic comment suggests high cyclomatic complexity. Consider breaking down the Start method into smaller, focused functions:

  • initializeMetrics
  • setupPrometheusServer
  • startMetricsCollection

This would improve readability and make the code easier to test and maintain.

Example refactor:

func (s *Server) initializeMetrics() error {
    if numGlobalLables := len(s.config.GlobalLabels); numGlobalLables > 0 {
        parsedGlobalLabels := make([]metrics.Label, numGlobalLables)
        for i, gl := range s.config.GlobalLabels {
            parsedGlobalLabels[i] = NewLabel(gl[0], gl[1])
        }
        globalLabels = parsedGlobalLabels
    }

    s.memSink = metrics.NewInmemSink(10*time.Second, time.Minute)
    // ... rest of metrics initialization
    return nil
}

func (s *Server) setupPrometheusServer(ctx context.Context) error {
    s.prometheus = &http.Server{
        Addr:              s.config.ListenAddr,
        ReadHeaderTimeout: s.config.ReadTimeout,
        Handler: promhttp.InstrumentMetricHandler(
            prometheus.DefaultRegisterer,
            promhttp.HandlerFor(
                prometheus.DefaultGatherer,
                promhttp.HandlerOpts{MaxRequestsInFlight: s.config.MaxOpenConnections},
            ),
        ),
        BaseContext: func(net.Listener) context.Context {
            return ctx
        },
    }
    return nil
}

func (s *Server) startMetricsCollection(group *errgroup.Group) {
    if len(s.metricsCollector) == 0 {
        return
    }
    group.Go(func() error {
        defer func() {
            if err := recover(); err != nil {
                s.logger.Error("metric collection failed to enable", "error", err, "stack", debug.Stack())
            }
        }()
        // ... rest of metrics collection
        return nil
    })
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcb40b2 and 61e8d6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (38)
  • .golangci.yml (3 hunks)
  • dao/base.go (1 hunks)
  • dao/base_test.go (2 hunks)
  • db/config.go (2 hunks)
  • db/config_test.go (1 hunks)
  • db/db.go (10 hunks)
  • db/db_test.go (3 hunks)
  • db/driver_test.go (1 hunks)
  • db/mysql.go (2 hunks)
  • db/sqlite.go (2 hunks)
  • db/sqlite_test.go (1 hunks)
  • eth/config_test.go (1 hunks)
  • eth/keys.go (1 hunks)
  • eth/rpc.go (1 hunks)
  • log/log.go (1 hunks)
  • log/logger.go (1 hunks)
  • log/noplog.go (1 hunks)
  • log/zaplog.go (1 hunks)
  • log/zerolog.go (2 hunks)
  • log/zerolog_test.go (5 hunks)
  • migration/config.go (1 hunks)
  • migration/migration.go (2 hunks)
  • modules/big_int.go (2 hunks)
  • pprof/config.go (1 hunks)
  • pprof/server.go (3 hunks)
  • pprof/server_test.go (2 hunks)
  • rand/random.go (1 hunks)
  • rand/random_test.go (2 hunks)
  • scheduler/scheduler.go (1 hunks)
  • scheduler/scheduler_test.go (2 hunks)
  • server/interface.go (1 hunks)
  • telemetry/config.go (1 hunks)
  • telemetry/metrics.go (1 hunks)
  • telemetry/server.go (2 hunks)
  • telemetry/server_test.go (1 hunks)
  • tool/file.go (1 hunks)
  • tool/json.go (1 hunks)
  • tool/mapstructure.go (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • eth/rpc.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.golangci.yml

[error] 101-101: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (68)
tool/json.go (2)

5-10: LGTM! Good improvements to naming and type usage.

The changes improve the code by:

  1. Using the more modern any type instead of interface{}
  2. Following proper Go naming conventions with "JSON" capitalization
  3. Simplifying the control flow while maintaining the same behavior

13-18: LGTM! Consistent improvements with the previous function.

The changes maintain consistency with the previous function while preserving the distinct indentation functionality.

migration/config.go (2)

29-31: LGTM! Good cleanup of unused receiver name.

The removal of the unused receiver name c improves code clarity while maintaining identical functionality.


33-35: LGTM! Good cleanup of unused receiver name.

The removal of the unused receiver name c improves code clarity while maintaining identical functionality.

tool/file.go (2)

10-10: LGTM! Good modernization of type syntax

The change from interface{} to any aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability while maintaining identical functionality.


10-10: Verify consistent usage of any type

Let's ensure this type modernization is consistently applied across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

The previous search might have failed due to syntax issues. Let's try a different approach to gather information about both interface{} and any usage in the codebase to verify consistency.


Type modernization is consistently applied

The codebase shows consistent usage of any type in function signatures and interfaces. The search results reveal:

  1. All modern Go interfaces and functions use any type appropriately, particularly in:

    • Database operations (db/db.go)
    • Logging interfaces (log/log.go)
    • JSON handling (tool/file.go)
    • Type conversion utilities (tool/mapstructure.go)
  2. The occurrences of interface{} are only found in proper interface definitions (like type Server interface, type Logger interface, etc.) where they define method contracts, not as type parameters.

The change in LoadJSONFile to use any aligns with the modern Go practices seen throughout the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining interface{} usage that might need updating
# Expected: No occurrences of interface{} in function signatures that could use 'any' instead

# Search for interface{} usage in Go files
rg 'interface\{\}' -t go

# Search for function signatures using interface{} specifically
ast-grep --pattern 'func $NAME($PARAMS interface{}) $RETURN'

Length of output: 89


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for interface{} usage
# Search for interface{} in Go files with surrounding context
rg -t go 'interface\{\}' -B 2 -A 2

# Also search for any type declarations to see the broader context
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ interface {
  $$$
}'

# Search for function parameters using any
rg -t go '\bany\b' -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 19825

eth/config_test.go (1)

24-24: LGTM! Good improvement in test assertions.

The change from suite.EqualError to suite.Require().EqualError is a positive improvement that provides stricter error handling. Using Require() ensures tests fail fast when assertions don't pass, making test failures more obvious and preventing cascading failures.

Also applies to: 28-28

log/noplog.go (3)

11-13: LGTM! Clean type update to any

The change from interface{} to any is appropriate, and the named receiver is correctly maintained as it's used in the return statement.


15-23: LGTM! Consistent improvements across logging methods

The changes improve the code by:

  1. Using modern any type instead of interface{}
  2. Removing unused named receivers
  3. Maintaining consistent formatting across all methods

25-33: LGTM! Consistent formatting method improvements

The changes maintain perfect symmetry with the standard logging methods, ensuring a consistent approach across the entire logger implementation.

db/driver_test.go (1)

11-11: LGTM! More idiomatic assertion.

The change to use assert.Len improves readability by using a more specific and descriptive assertion method for checking collection length.

pprof/config.go (1)

40-42: LGTM! Good style improvement.

The change to use an unnamed receiver is appropriate since the receiver variable isn't used in the method body. This follows Go best practices for method declarations.

log/logger.go (2)

20-20: LGTM! Good modernization of type signatures

The change from interface{} to any aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.

Also applies to: 28-28, 36-36, 44-44


24-24: LGTM! Verify consistency across related files

The type signature updates look good. Let's ensure this change is consistently applied across related files.

Also applies to: 32-32, 40-40, 48-48

✅ Verification successful

Let me fix the regex and try again to verify this properly.


Let me check the logger interface to ensure completeness of the changes.


Changes are consistently applied across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  • All logging methods in logger.go use ...any consistently
  • The Logger interface in log.go also uses ...any for all its method signatures
  • No instances of ...interface{} were found in logging-related files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining interface{} usage in logging-related files
# that should have been updated to 'any'

# Search for interface{} usage in logging-related files
echo "Checking for remaining interface{} usage in logging files..."
rg "interface{}" --type go -l | grep -i "log"

# Search for method signatures similar to our logging methods
echo "Checking for similar logging method signatures..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(msg string, args ...interface{}) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 463


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for interface{} usage in logging-related files
echo "Checking for remaining interface{} usage in logging files..."
rg "interface\{\}" --type go | grep -i "log"

# Search for similar logging method signatures
echo "Checking for similar method signatures..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_, args ...interface{}) {
  $$$
}'

# Also check for any usage with 'any'
echo "Checking current any usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_, args ...any) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1413


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the logger interface definition
echo "Checking logger interface definition..."
rg "type.*Logger.*interface" -A 10 --type go

# Also check any other files that might contain logging-related interfaces
echo "Checking other logging-related interfaces..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface {
  $_($_, ...interface{})
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 701

pprof/server_test.go (3)

10-10: LGTM! Good addition of require package

The addition of the require package while maintaining assert is appropriate, as they serve different purposes in the test.


29-31: LGTM! Proper error handling hierarchy

Good use of require for critical errors while maintaining assert for subsequent checks. This ensures the test fails fast on critical errors while still performing validation checks when appropriate.


25-26: LGTM! Parameter order follows Go conventions

The parameter order change (ctx first) aligns with Go's standard conventions for context usage.

✅ Verification successful

These commands will help us:

  1. Find all Start method signatures to verify parameter ordering
  2. Find all Start method calls to ensure they match the new convention

Parameter ordering is consistently implemented across the codebase

The verification confirms that all Start method implementations and calls follow the same parameter ordering with context.Context as the first parameter:

  • Method signatures in:
    • telemetry/server.go: Start(ctx context.Context, group *errgroup.Group)
    • migration/migration.go: Start(context.Context, *errgroup.Group)
    • pprof/server.go: Start(ctx context.Context, group *errgroup.Group)
  • Method calls in:
    • telemetry/server_test.go: Start(ctx, group)
    • pprof/server_test.go: Start(ctx, group)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistent parameter ordering across Start method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ Start(ctx context.Context, group *errgroup.Group)'

Length of output: 80


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for Start method signatures
rg "func.*Start.*\(.*\)" -A 1

Length of output: 472


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Also search for the actual method calls to verify consistency
rg "\.Start\(" -A 1

Length of output: 232

log/log.go (2)

24-24: LGTM: Simplified variable declaration

The simplified declaration of NewLoggerFunc improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality through type inference.


29-41: LGTM: Updated type signatures to use any

The change from interface{} to any improves code readability and follows modern Go conventions.

Let's verify the minimum Go version requirement:

✅ Verification successful

✓ Go version requirement is compatible with any type

The project requires Go 1.22 as specified in go.mod, which fully supports the any type (introduced in Go 1.18). The change from interface{} to any is safe and follows modern Go conventions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the project's minimum Go version is compatible with the 'any' type (Go 1.18+)

# Look for go.mod file
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
    echo "Checking Go version in go.mod:"
    grep "^go " go.mod
else
    echo "go.mod not found"
fi

# Check for any CI configuration files that might specify Go version
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "go-version" || true

Length of output: 173

modules/big_int.go (2)

13-13: LGTM! Type change from interface{} to any improves readability.

The change maintains identical functionality while adopting modern Go type syntax.


43-43: LGTM! Consistent type update to any.

The change maintains the function's behavior while improving code consistency.

telemetry/server_test.go (1)

27-27: LGTM! Parameter order follows Go conventions.

The updated parameter order for server.Start(ctx, group) follows Go's convention of passing context as the first parameter, improving code consistency and readability.

log/zerolog_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM: Required import for stricter error handling

The addition of the require package import is consistent with the transition to stricter error handling in tests.


18-18: LGTM: Improved error handling in TestZeroLogger_Console

The switch to require.NoError is an improvement as it prevents subsequent assertions from running if logger creation fails, which would be meaningless without a valid logger instance.

migration/migration.go (2)

32-32: LGTM! Parameter reordering follows Go conventions.

The change to place context.Context as the first parameter follows Go's best practices and improves consistency across the codebase.


64-64: LGTM! Receiver naming follows Go style guide.

The change to use an anonymous receiver (*Server) instead of (s *Server) is correct since the receiver variable is unused in the method.

pprof/server.go (2)

8-8: LGTM! Appropriate linter directive for debug tooling.

The added //nolint:gosec directive with clear documentation is appropriate for the pprof import, as it's intentionally used for debugging purposes.


33-33: LGTM! Improved parameter ordering follows Go conventions.

The change to make context.Context the first parameter aligns with Go's standard conventions and improves consistency with the interface.

scheduler/scheduler.go (1)

42-42: Consider the PR scope and variable declaration placement

This change appears to be more substantial than just formatting as indicated in the PR title. Moving the sleepTime declaration outside the loop changes its scope and could affect memory usage (albeit minimally).

While the change is technically correct and matches the usage pattern in the code, it would be clearer if the PR title and description reflected these behavioral modifications.

Let's verify if there are similar patterns in other scheduler implementations:

Consider adding a comment explaining why sleepTime is declared outside the loop, as it's used for dynamic sleep duration adjustments based on error conditions.

tool/mapstructure.go (2)

25-25: LGTM: Type signature modernization

The change from interface{} to any aligns with modern Go practices while maintaining identical functionality.


41-41: LGTM: Consistent type modernization

The change maintains consistency with the codebase-wide transition to any type.

db/sqlite_test.go (2)

71-71: LGTM!

The changes to use suite.Equal are appropriate, and the test cases effectively cover both simple and path-based database names.

Also applies to: 74-74


79-79: LGTM!

The changes to use suite.Require().NoError are appropriate here, especially since these are critical operations that subsequent test steps depend on. Good use of T().TempDir() for test isolation.

Also applies to: 81-81

db/sqlite.go (5)

63-69: LGTM! Appropriate use of value receiver

The method operates independently of the receiver's state, making a value receiver suitable here.


71-77: LGTM! Value receiver is correct

The method performs stateless operations using only the input parameters, making a value receiver appropriate.


83-85: LGTM! Appropriate use of value receiver

The method is a simple delegation to a package-level function, making a value receiver suitable.


Line range hint 87-97: LGTM! Value receiver is appropriate

The method performs stateless operations with proper error handling, making a value receiver suitable.


Line range hint 32-97: Verify the consistency of receiver types across the codebase

The changes consistently update receiver types from pointer to value receivers. Let's verify this pattern is applied consistently across related files.

✅ Verification successful

The search results show that the pointer receivers found are all in test files (dao/base_test.go) and are part of test suites that inherit from DaoTestSuite. This is a common and correct pattern in Go testing where test suites typically use pointer receivers to maintain test state. Let's verify if there are any non-test files with pointer receivers that might need updates.


No inconsistencies found in receiver type usage

The verification confirms that:

  1. No pointer receivers exist in non-test files
  2. The only pointer receivers found are in test files, which is the correct pattern for test suites

The changes in sqlite.go to use value receivers are consistent with the rest of the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining pointer receivers in related database drivers
# that might need similar updates for consistency.

# Search for pointer receiver methods in database-related files
echo "Checking for remaining pointer receivers in database files:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func (s *$_) $_($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 16005


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for pointer receivers in non-test files
echo "Checking for pointer receivers in non-test files:"
fd --type f --exclude '*_test.go' --extension go | xargs ast-grep --pattern 'func (s *$_) $_($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 219

rand/random_test.go (3)

17-17: LGTM! More idiomatic assertion

The change to assert.Len improves readability by using a more specific assertion method for length checking.


23-23: LGTM! More idiomatic assertion

The change to assert.Len improves readability by using a more specific assertion method for length checking.


30-30: LGTM! More descriptive assertion

The change to assert.Less improves test failure messages by clearly indicating the comparison that failed, rather than just showing a boolean condition.

.golangci.yml (4)

74-99: Review revive rules configuration

The revive configuration looks good with sensible defaults:

  • Disabled line length limits for flexibility
  • Disabled function length checks
  • Custom var naming rules for common acronyms
  • Proper error handling configuration

5-5: Verify test isolation before enabling parallel runners

Enabling parallel runners can improve performance but ensure that your tests are properly isolated and don't share mutable resources.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:

Parallel test execution appears safe to enable

The codebase shows good test isolation practices:

  • Database tests use test suites with proper setup/teardown
  • Shared variables are properly scoped within test functions
  • Synchronization primitives (sync.WaitGroup) are used correctly for concurrent operations
  • No global mutable state detected across test files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential test isolation issues
rg -g "**_test.go" -A 5 "var |global|sync\." 

Length of output: 2850


3-3: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update Go version to currently available release

The specified Go version 1.22 is not yet released. Consider using 1.21 until 1.22 is officially available.

-  go: '1.22'
+  go: '1.21'

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


10-36: Consider potential linter conflicts

The enabled linters look good, but note that revive and stylecheck might have overlapping rules. This is not necessarily an issue but could lead to duplicate warnings.

log/zerolog.go (2)

Line range hint 18-24: LGTM! Good use of underscore for unused parameter.

The change to use _ for the unused parameter follows Go best practices and makes the code intent clearer.


40-41: LGTM! Good modernization of type signatures.

The consistent update from interface{} to any improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.

Let's verify the Go version requirement is properly set:

Also applies to: 45-46, 49-50, 53-54, 57-58, 61-62, 65-66, 69-70, 73-74, 77-78, 81-82

✅ Verification successful

Go version requirement is properly set for any type usage

The codebase specifies Go 1.22 in go.mod, which fully supports the any type alias (introduced in Go 1.18). The type signature modernization is safe to use.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if go.mod specifies Go 1.18+ which is required for `any`

# Check go.mod for Go version
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
    echo "Checking Go version requirement..."
    grep "^go 1." go.mod
else
    echo "go.mod not found"
fi

Length of output: 129

dao/base.go (2)

83-89: LGTM! Good improvement in receiver type.

The change from (d *BaseDao) to (*BaseDao) is appropriate since the method doesn't use the receiver. This makes the code more explicit about its dependencies and follows Go best practices.


Line range hint 83-97: Verify transaction handling remains unchanged.

While the receiver changes are safe, let's verify there are no breaking changes to transaction handling in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have comprehensive evidence about transaction handling patterns and tests.

Transaction handling remains safe and well-tested

The verification shows:

  • Transaction methods (BeginTx/CommitTx/RollbackTx) maintain their expected behavior
  • Extensive test coverage exists including:
    • Multiple transaction scenarios
    • Nested transactions
    • Error cases for already committed/rolled back transactions
    • Transaction context handling
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any changes to transaction handling patterns
# Look for BeginTx/CommitTx/RollbackTx usage patterns

# Search for transaction method calls
echo "Checking transaction method usage patterns..."
rg -A 2 "BeginTx|CommitTx|RollbackTx" --type go

# Look for any tests involving transactions
echo "Checking transaction-related tests..."
rg -B 2 "func.*Test.*Transaction" --type go

Length of output: 4834

log/zaplog.go (3)

34-36: LGTM! Good modernization of type signature.

The change from interface{} to any aligns with modern Go practices while maintaining the same functionality.


58-75: LGTM! Correctly implemented formatted logging methods.

The formatted logging methods are properly implemented with:

  • Modern any type usage
  • Correct argument spreading with args...

34-75: Verify Logger interface and implementations

Since these are interface method signature changes, we should verify:

  1. The Logger interface is updated to use any instead of interface{}
  2. All implementations of the Logger interface are updated accordingly
✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the implementations to ensure they match the interface.


Logger interface and implementations are consistent

The verification confirms that:

  1. The Logger interface in log/log.go uses any type consistently
  2. All three implementations (ZapLogger, ZeroLogger, and nopLogger) correctly implement the interface with matching method signatures using any
  3. All implementations are properly type-checked with var _ Logger = (*Type)(nil) assertions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Logger interface definition and implementations
echo "Checking Logger interface definition:"
rg "type Logger interface" -A 15

echo "\nChecking for Logger implementations:"
rg "var _ Logger = \(\*.*\)\(nil\)"

Length of output: 951


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check all logger implementations
echo "Checking ZeroLogger implementation:"
rg "func.*ZeroLogger" -A 1 log/zerolog.go

echo "\nChecking nopLogger implementation:"
rg "func.*nopLogger" -A 1 log/noplog.go

Length of output: 1979

db/mysql.go (2)

42-44: LGTM! Appropriate receiver type change

The change from pointer receiver to value receiver is correct since this method doesn't modify any struct state and doesn't access any struct fields.


125-127: LGTM! Appropriate receiver type change

The change from pointer receiver to value receiver is correct since this method is a stateless wrapper around the package-level GetMigrationsDriver function.

scheduler/scheduler_test.go (2)

36-38: LGTM! Good style improvement.

Removing the unused parameter name ctx follows Go's idiomatic practice of omitting parameter names when they're not referenced within the function body.


55-57: LGTM! Maintains consistency.

The parameter name removal here maintains consistency with the earlier change, making the test cases uniform in style.

db/db_test.go (3)

26-26: LGTM! Good improvement in test assertions

The conversion from assert to suite.Require() is a positive change as it ensures immediate test failure on critical checks. This makes the tests more robust and helps in faster debugging by failing fast when prerequisites aren't met.

Also applies to: 32-34, 39-40, 46-47, 54-55


72-72: LGTM! Consistent improvement in transaction test assertions

The conversion to suite.Require() is well implemented across all transaction test cases, maintaining the same logical flow while improving error handling.

Also applies to: 75-75, 78-78, 88-88, 91-91, 94-94, 107-110, 112-116, 118-118, 120-127


102-102: Verify the impact of switching to suite.Run

The change from suite.T().Run to suite.Run might affect how test failures are reported. While both methods run subtests, they might handle test context differently.

✅ Verification successful

No impact from using suite.Run - this is the correct usage

The codebase shows two distinct and correct usages of suite.Run:

  1. suite.Run(t, new(SuiteName)) - used to initialize test suites
  2. suite.Run(name, func()) - used for subtests within test suites

The change to suite.Run in the reviewed code follows the correct pattern for subtest execution within a test suite. This is consistent with the testify/suite package's intended usage and will properly handle test context and reporting.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of suite.T().Run vs suite.Run to ensure consistency
rg -l 'suite\.T\(\)\.Run|suite\.Run' --type go

Length of output: 134


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage patterns in these files to understand the context
rg 'suite\.T\(\)\.Run|suite\.Run' --type go -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 1047

db/config.go (1)

Line range hint 58-63: LGTM! Good modernization of type usage.

The change from interface{} to any aligns with modern Go practices while maintaining the same functionality. This type alias was introduced in Go 1.18 and makes the code more readable.

telemetry/server.go (2)

47-47: LGTM! Parameter reordering follows Go conventions.

The reordering of parameters to have context.Context as the first parameter follows Go's standard convention and improves consistency with other Start methods in the codebase.


90-92: LGTM! Simplified function signature.

The removal of the unused parameter name listener follows Go's style of omitting parameter names when they're not referenced in the function body.

db/db.go (4)

21-49: LGTM: Good modernization of type system usage

The change from interface{} to any aligns with modern Go practices. This is a type alias introduced in Go 1.18 that improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.


Line range hint 284-296: LGTM: Robust error handling in database operations

The Create/Update/Updates implementations maintain good practices:

  • Proper error handling with context in logs
  • Validation of affected rows
  • Clear error messages

Also applies to: 297-322


323-329: LGTM: Clean Exec implementation

The Exec method follows consistent error handling patterns with proper logging of SQL and values.


Line range hint 331-341: LGTM: Well-structured AutoMigrate implementation

The AutoMigrate implementation shows good practices:

  • Transaction-wrapped migration
  • Proper handling of driver-specific options
  • Clear error wrapping
dao/base_test.go (2)

23-25: LGTM: Appropriate receiver type change

The change from pointer to value receiver is appropriate since the method doesn't modify the receiver and only returns a constant string.


102-103: LGTM: Enhanced error assertion

The change improves the test by:

  1. Using the more semantically correct Error() assertion
  2. Adding explicit validation of the expected error message

server/interface.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pprof/server.go Show resolved Hide resolved
db/sqlite_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
.golangci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
log/zaplog.go Show resolved Hide resolved
rand/random.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@zakir-code zakir-code changed the title chore: format code improved code quality checks Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
db/mysql_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-38: Consider enhancing test robustness.

While the tests are functional, consider these improvements:

  1. Use require instead of assert to prevent test continuation after failures
  2. Add specific error message assertions to validate exact error conditions

Here's a suggested improvement:

 package db

 import (
 	"fmt"
 	"testing"
-	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 )

 func TestMysql_CheckSource(t *testing.T) {
 	tests := []struct {
 		name    string
 		source  string
-		wantErr assert.ErrorAssertionFunc
+		wantErr require.ErrorAssertionFunc
+		errMsg  string
 	}{
 		{
 			name:    "test1",
 			source:  "root:root@tcp(127.0.0.1:3306)/my?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local",
-			wantErr: assert.NoError,
+			wantErr: require.NoError,
 		},
 		{
 			name:    "test2",
 			source:  "",
-			wantErr: assert.Error,
+			wantErr: require.Error,
+			errMsg:  "empty source string",
 		},
 		{
 			name:    "test3",
 			source:  "my",
-			wantErr: assert.Error,
+			wantErr: require.Error,
+			errMsg:  "invalid source format",
 		},
 	}
 	for _, tt := range tests {
 		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
 			m := &Mysql{}
-			tt.wantErr(t, m.ParseSource(tt.source), fmt.Sprintf("ParseSource(%v)", tt.source))
+			err := m.ParseSource(tt.source)
+			tt.wantErr(t, err, fmt.Sprintf("ParseSource(%v)", tt.source))
+			if tt.errMsg != "" && err != nil {
+				require.Contains(t, err.Error(), tt.errMsg)
+			}
 		})
 	}
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61e8d6f and e3eda83.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .golangci.yml (3 hunks)
  • db/config.go (3 hunks)
  • db/config_test.go (3 hunks)
  • db/mysql_test.go (2 hunks)
  • db/sqlite_test.go (3 hunks)
  • pprof/server.go (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • db/config.go
  • db/config_test.go
  • db/sqlite_test.go
  • pprof/server.go
🔇 Additional comments (6)
db/mysql_test.go (1)

18-18: LGTM! Database name changes maintain test coverage.

The changes from 'coastdao' to 'my' maintain the test's effectiveness in validating both valid and invalid connection strings.

Also applies to: 28-28

.golangci.yml (5)

10-36: Well-chosen set of linters

The combination of linters is comprehensive and well-balanced, covering various aspects of code quality:

  • Style and formatting (gofumpt, stylecheck)
  • Performance (prealloc, wastedassign)
  • Code complexity (gocyclo)
  • Testing (testifylint, thelper)
  • Type safety (errorlint, typecheck)

83-84: LGTM: Cognitive complexity configuration fixed

The cognitive complexity rule is now properly configured, addressing the previous duplicate rule issue.


74-97: Verify custom revive rules configuration

The revive configuration is comprehensive but needs verification:

  1. Disabling line-length-limit and function-length might lead to maintainability issues
  2. The var-naming allowlist includes common acronyms
  3. The unhandled error configuration only covers fmt.Print functions
✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the code patterns.

Revive rules configuration is appropriate for the codebase

The current revive configuration aligns well with the codebase characteristics:

  • Only 2 lines exceed 120 characters, with one being a log statement and another being a documented function
  • No excessive function lengths detected in the codebase
  • The var-naming allowlist covers standard acronyms (ID, URL, JSON, RPC) which is a common practice
  • The unhandled error configuration for fmt.Print functions is sufficient as these are the primary sources of silent errors
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential issues with disabled length limits

# Check for very long lines
echo "Checking for long lines (>120 chars)..."
rg -t go "^.{120,}$"

# Check for long functions
echo "Checking for long functions..."
ast-grep --pattern $'func [^{]+ {
  $$$
  $$$
  $$$
  $$$
  $$$
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 556


70-73: Verify the impact of strict unused settings

The current unused settings are quite strict:

  • field-writes-are-uses: false
  • exported-fields-are-used: false
  • local-variables-are-used: false

This might lead to many false positives in the SDK where fields might be intentionally exported for user consumption.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the usage of these exported fields.


Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:

Strict unused settings are appropriate for this codebase

The current unused settings in .golangci.yml are well-suited for this codebase because:

  • All exported fields are actively used across the codebase, particularly in configuration structs
  • Fields are properly utilized in their respective packages (e.g., telemetry, db, eth)
  • The strict settings help maintain code quality by preventing truly unused exports

The search results show proper usage patterns:

  • Config fields are used for initialization and runtime behavior
  • Fields are accessed in server implementations
  • Database configurations properly utilize their exported fields
  • RPC and telemetry configurations show active field usage
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential false positives with unused settings

# Check for exported fields that might be intentionally exposed
echo "Checking for exported fields..."
rg -t go "^[[:space:]]*[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*[[:space:]]*[a-zA-Z0-9]*[[:space:]]*\`.*\`" --glob "*.go" --glob "!*_test.go"

Length of output: 1880


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these exported fields are actually used in the codebase
echo "Checking usage of config fields..."
rg -t go "config\.(ServiceName|Enabled|ListenAddr|MaxOpenConnections|Driver|Source|RpcUrl)" -B 1 -A 1

echo -e "\nChecking if fields are used in unmarshaling..."
rg -t go "(yaml|mapstructure).Unmarshal.*Config" -B 1 -A 1

Length of output: 5335


5-5: Verify test safety with parallel runners

Enabling parallel runners can improve performance but may cause issues with tests that have side effects or share resources. Please ensure that all tests are designed to run safely in parallel.

✅ Verification successful

Parallel test execution appears safe

The codebase shows good test design practices for parallel execution:

  • No global mutable state in test files
  • Local test variables are properly scoped within test functions
  • Database operations use isolated in-memory databases
  • The only sync primitive usage (WaitGroup in random_test.go) is for proper test coordination
  • No shared file system operations or resource conflicts detected
  • Test variables are properly initialized within their test functions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential test parallelization issues
# Look for shared resources or global state in tests

# Search for test files with global variables
echo "Checking for global variables in tests..."
rg -t go "^var\s+\w+\s+" --glob "*_test.go"

# Search for file operations in tests (potential shared resource)
echo "Checking for file operations in tests..."
rg -t go "os\.(Open|Create|Remove|Mkdir|RemoveAll)" --glob "*_test.go"

# Search for database operations (potential shared resource)
echo "Checking for database operations in tests..."
rg -t go "(sql\.Open|database\.Open)" --glob "*_test.go"

Length of output: 460


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for test parallelization
# 1. Look for t.Parallel() usage which indicates tests designed for parallel execution
# 2. Look for shared test fixtures or setup
# 3. Look for global test variables with := syntax

echo "Checking for parallel test declarations..."
rg -t go "t\.Parallel\(\)" --glob "*_test.go"

echo "Checking for test fixtures and setup..."
rg -t go "(func TestMain|func Setup|BeforeEach)" --glob "*_test.go"

echo "Checking for global test variables (including :=)..."
rg -t go "^[[:space:]]*[[:alnum:]]+\s*:=\s*" --glob "*_test.go"

# Also check for sync primitives which might indicate thread-safe test design
echo "Checking for sync primitive usage in tests..."
rg -t go "sync\.(Mutex|RWMutex|Once|WaitGroup)" --glob "*_test.go"

Length of output: 4450

@zakir-code zakir-code merged commit 22e53aa into main Nov 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@zakir-code zakir-code deleted the zakir/lint branch November 20, 2024 08:22
zakir-code added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant