Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: common method for building the app #671

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

test: common method for building the app #671

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Sep 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a test suite for the application database to ensure core functionalities are validated.
    • Added a new helper function to streamline application setup in upgrade and migration tests.
  • Refactor

    • Refactored application setup logic into a modular helper function for improved readability and maintainability in tests.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new test suite for the application database in app/app_db_test.go and refactor the application setup logic in the upgrade tests located in app/upgrade_test.go. A new helper function, buildApp, is created to streamline the initialization of the application and its dependencies, enhancing the organization and readability of the test code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/app_db_test.go Introduced a new test function TestAppDB for the application database, utilizing the Go testing framework and testify library.
app/upgrade_test.go Refactored the Test_UpgradeAndMigrate function by creating a new helper function buildApp to encapsulate application setup logic.

Poem

🐰 In the garden where the code does play,
New tests hop in, brightening the day.
With buildApp to guide, we leap and we bound,
In the world of Go, new joys are found!
So let’s celebrate, with a twitch of our ears,
For cleaner code brings us all happy cheers! 🌼

Tip

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/app_db_test.go (1)

12-22: Implement the actual test logic and remove the skip.

The test function is well-structured and follows the common pattern for setting up a test. However, there are a couple of suggestions:

  1. The test is being skipped using helpers.SkipTest. Please remove the skip once the test is implemented.
  2. The test is not performing any actual testing, as indicated by the placeholder comment // do something .... Please implement the actual test logic.
app/upgrade_test.go (1)

75-89: LGTM with a minor suggestion!

The buildApp function correctly initializes the application and its dependencies. The encapsulation of the setup code enhances the organization of the test code and promotes code reuse.

Suggestion: Add error handling for the app.New call.

Consider adding error handling for the app.New call to ensure that any errors during application initialization are properly handled.

Apply this diff to add error handling:

-	myApp := app.New(log.NewFilter(log.NewTMLogger(os.Stdout), log.AllowAll()),
+	myApp, err := app.New(log.NewFilter(log.NewTMLogger(os.Stdout), log.AllowAll()),
		db, nil, false, map[int64]bool{}, home, 0,
		makeEncodingConfig, app.EmptyAppOptions{}, baseapp.SetChainID(chainId))
+	require.NoError(t, err)
	return myApp, chainId
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b97c663 and a5f9bd4.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/app_db_test.go (1 hunks)
  • app/upgrade_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/upgrade_test.go (1)

33-33: LGTM!

The refactoring of the application setup logic into the buildApp function improves code modularity and readability. The change adheres to best practices by promoting code reuse and separation of concerns.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit f0a831d into main Sep 3, 2024
13 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the fx0x55/db_test branch September 3, 2024 08:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants