-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update main
!
#86
update main
!
#86
Conversation
allow sppNameVector
added assertion nd missing dependency
* sim$sppEquiv left untouched
several fixes
2 cohorts become identical ... cohort 1 = 14 B and 2 = 15 B at start of yr
* creates annoying conflicts with main
Hmm, I don't think that's a good workflow. Those are super easy conflicts to resolve: take the devel version of those files. If main is regularly updated AND the documentation is kept up to date during devel (and tested locally!), it may not make a real practical difference... but we know that devel docs aren't regularly maintained, and if they aren't built locally and problems fixed, then we won't see issues for weeks/months until the next merge to |
Sure. It's just that I found my self doing that like 10 times today, lol. And what was happening was, if I took the devel versions there would be "nothing to merge" and the conflict would't be "resolved". |
You can also rebuild the docs locally and use the new files (taking neither the main nor devel versions). |
I don't think that doesn't work either because (assuming there's a PR devl -> main)
|
The "only" way I found to "remove" the conflict was to: |
It's time :P
@achubaty, I've removed
development
from teh GHA workflow, because it keeps creating html/md files that conflict with themain
branch on every push during a PR.Perhaps this is not ideal, but the manual is not a true test either and it gets rebuild on push to
main
anyways (when PR is merged)