fix: use jemalloc everywhere we're rusty #24796
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
oliverb123
force-pushed
the
olly_try_jemalloc
branch
from
402dfc3 to
cafaa5c
Compare
oliverb123
requested review from
bretthoerner,
neilkakkar,
tomasfarias and
frankh
bretthoerner
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
neilkakkar
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2024
Co-authored-by: Brett Hoerner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Does what it says on the tin, tries to make adoption trivial, tries to work around cargo workspaces limitations.
As a broader note, I'm getting unhappy with "common" being a collection of crates, as opposed to one big crate that exposes features - it's annoying to have to manually specify the path this many times. I'm not bothered to make the refactor right now, but maybe some time in the future.