Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ci): try to ignore temporal #21559

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

fix(ci): try to ignore temporal #21559

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

mariusandra
Copy link
Collaborator

@mariusandra mariusandra commented Apr 16, 2024

Problem

Do we need Temporal for all tests? This is an annoyingly common sight:

image

Changes

Doesn't hard fail if temporal can't be started. Surely it's not always needed?

Does this work well for both Cloud and self-hosted?

🤷

How did you test this code?

All tests just passed 🤯

I had a few other PRs where multiple tests kept failing with temporal. Cherry picking this commit made everything just pass.

It doesn't solve all problems, but seems to be a QoL improvement... so... let's merge?

Copy link
Contributor

Size Change: 0 B

Total Size: 999 kB

ℹ️ View Unchanged
Filename Size
frontend/dist/toolbar.js 999 kB

compressed-size-action

@mariusandra mariusandra marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 08:38
@mariusandra mariusandra requested a review from a team April 16, 2024 08:39
@webjunkie
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure... wasn't this recently adjusted? #21510

@mariusandra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It was, but this adjusts it further 😅

I'm not sure honestly. I'm just trying not to loose too much time watering CI per day... Happy to do something else 🤔

@mariusandra mariusandra merged commit 3e68f1e into master Apr 16, 2024
103 checks passed
@mariusandra mariusandra deleted the temporally branch April 16, 2024 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants