-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(insights): Attribute async queries to users #21019
Merged
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
42bf366
fix(insights): Attribute async queries to users
Twixes 75b59e1
Fix re-raising ClickHouse errors from threads
Twixes 92bfec6
Improve typing
Twixes b96a5ba
Update query snapshots
github-actions[bot] b902e95
Merge branch 'master' into attribute-async-queries
Twixes da6cd28
Fix more typing
Twixes 15df6ff
Update query snapshots
github-actions[bot] 6f24fb6
Update query snapshots
github-actions[bot] d516648
Update schema.py
Twixes 99f0d7c
Merge branch 'master' into attribute-async-queries
Twixes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternative idea: We put the user ID in the query status here, and thereby have it in the task, without the need to pass it to the task as args. As further advantages, it's then also persisted and returned via API.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, that could work too. Though I don't want to spend time reworking this right now to this degree, if the current solution works. 😄 It doesn't seem super useful right now to return the user ID via the API. I guess if that changes, it might be fine to adjust this