-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(plugin-server): Preserve distinct ID locality on overflow rerouting #20945
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bedda6b
feat: Preserve distinct ID locality on overflow rerouting
tkaemming 4c85f5b
Replace `isIngestionOverflowEnabled` helper with standard(ish) `Hub`-…
tkaemming c1ad17e
Add `INGESTION_OVERFLOW_PRESERVE_PARTITION_LOCALITY` and add `Reroute…
tkaemming b196d21
Tidy up comment that referenced old configruation function name.
tkaemming dc6dd49
Default `INGESTION_OVERFLOW_PRESERVE_PARTITION_LOCALITY` to false for…
tkaemming 057597d
Merge branch 'master' into overflow-preserve-locality
tkaemming File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there's a change here where we set it to
undefined
instead ofnull
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I can tell, this was the issue.
The
produce
call here eventually forwards to aHighLevelProducer
instance, which does some extra stuff with thekey
in produce. If thekey
ends up beingundefined
it just quietly doesn't produce the message, and the callback is never called.This is also the behavior that I saw testing this manually in the node REPL:
What I figure happened is that any message that should have been routed to overflow never resolved it's promise, and the consumers simply stopped making forward progress once they saw a batch containing one of those messages.
The
key
property is typed asMessageKey
, which does include undefined, and theHighLevelProducer.produce
signature acceptsany
, which explains why this wasn't caught by the type checker.