Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use flat fees for calculating billing limit usage #18464

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 8, 2023

Conversation

raquelmsmith
Copy link
Member

Problem

When calculating allowed usage for a given billing limit, we didn't take a tier's flat fee into consideration. So, people with flat fees on their tiers (custom pricing) would see inflated allowed usage numbers for their billing limit.

Changes

Uses the flat fee on the tiers to calculate the usage allowed for a certain billing limit, and for calculating the cost of a given usage.

👉 Stay up-to-date with PostHog coding conventions for a smoother review.

How did you test this code?

added tests

@raquelmsmith raquelmsmith requested a review from xrdt November 7, 2023 19:14
@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

4 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 4 modified, 0 deleted:

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

3 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 3 modified, 0 deleted:

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:

  • chromium: 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted (diff for shard 2)
  • webkit: 0 added, 0 modified, 0 deleted

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:

  • chromium: 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted (diff for shard 2)
  • webkit: 0 added, 0 modified, 0 deleted

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:

  • chromium: 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted (diff for shard 2)
  • webkit: 0 added, 0 modified, 0 deleted

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:

  • chromium: 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted (diff for shard 2)
  • webkit: 0 added, 0 modified, 0 deleted

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📸 UI snapshots have been updated

1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:

  • chromium: 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted (diff for shard 2)
  • webkit: 0 added, 0 modified, 0 deleted

Triggered by this commit.

👉 Review this PR's diff of snapshots.

@raquelmsmith raquelmsmith enabled auto-merge (squash) November 8, 2023 19:42
@raquelmsmith raquelmsmith disabled auto-merge November 8, 2023 19:42
@raquelmsmith raquelmsmith enabled auto-merge (squash) November 8, 2023 19:42
@raquelmsmith raquelmsmith merged commit 51b19dc into master Nov 8, 2023
70 checks passed
@raquelmsmith raquelmsmith deleted the fix/billing-limit-calcs branch November 8, 2023 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants