chore: Use ruff formatter #18207
Merged
chore: Use ruff formatter #18207
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ruff is now also a formatter! And it runs in a fraction of a second across our whole codebase vs "I waited more than 30s and cancelled it because I got bored".
Gilbert09
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2023
Gilbert09
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2023
|
tagged @fuziontech as a codeowner because this formatted clickhouse migrations 😢 I highly highly doubt it's an issue, but I know some migration tools check SHAsums |
📸 UI snapshots have been updated1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:
Triggered by this commit. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ruff is now also a formatter! And it runs in a fraction of a second across our whole codebase vs "I waited more than 30s and cancelled it because I got bored".
Problem
Changes
👉 Stay up-to-date with PostHog coding conventions for a smoother review.
How did you test this code?