-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(data-warehouse): external data resource #17554
Conversation
Hey @EDsCODE! 👋 |
This PR hasn't seen activity in a week! Should it be merged, closed, or further worked on? If you want to keep it open, post a comment or remove the |
This PR was closed due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen if it's still relevant. |
Hey @EDsCODE! 👋 |
from posthog.models.team import Team | ||
|
||
|
||
class ExternalDataResource(CreatedMetaFields, UUIDModel): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry to be pedantic about this, though it's a nightmare to fix later: I don't think external data source is the right name. I want to make sure we're consistently using "Source", in contrast to "Destination" which we're using on the pipeline side.
A few suggestions
ExternalDataSource
DatawarehouseSource
ETLSource
Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ha, I was in the middle of changing it to option 1 (ExternalDataSource) but then did "resource" mainly because the entities that are created are (source, connection, destination). But I think it's ok to do ExternalDataSource anyway so I'll change it to that
📸 UI snapshots have been updated1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:
Triggered by this commit. |
📸 UI snapshots have been updated1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:
Triggered by this commit. |
Problem
Changes
👉 Stay up-to-date with PostHog coding conventions for a smoother review.
How did you test this code?