Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unittests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page.dart #2681

Closed

Conversation

MayankJha014
Copy link

@MayankJha014 MayankJha014 commented Dec 28, 2024

Unittests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page.dart
Issue : #2621

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive test suite for the Edit Profile page
    • Verified UI elements including profile image, name fields, email section, and update functionality
    • Ensured proper interaction with image selection and profile update mechanisms

sumitra19jha and others added 19 commits June 5, 2021 12:55
* lang addition

* lng-add

* static string removal

* language changes

* chgs in main

* test update
* ui added

* adding lng widget

* bug fix

* test upd
…Foundation#817)

* chore: fixes linting issue

* ptch: replaces event list with displayed events list
…oesFoundation#813)

* Replacing extra widgets for toasts with Custom Toast and making it uniform

* removed snackbar.dart due to no implementation

* flutter format

* merge conflict resolved
* Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* Merge develop into main
* Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* Merge develop into main
* Add files via upload

* Update pull-request.yml
…tion#2521)

* Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* Merge develop into main

---------

Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]>
* 20240727112557 Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* 20240727112838 Merge develop into main
* 20240929111306 Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* 20240929111329 Merge develop into main

---------

Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]>
* 20241114060032 Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* 20241114060107 Merge develop into main
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive test suite for the EditProfilePage in a Flutter application. The new test file, edit_profile_page_test.dart, covers various aspects of the page's functionality, including UI elements like profile image, name fields, email section, and interaction tests for buttons such as "Add/Remove Image" and "Update". The tests ensure that the page behaves correctly under different scenarios, focusing on widget interactions, method calls, and visual components.

Changes

File Change Summary
test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart New test file added with comprehensive widget tests for EditProfilePage

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant EditProfilePage
    participant ViewModel
    participant ImageSelector
    
    User->>EditProfilePage: Open Page
    EditProfilePage->>EditProfilePage: Display Profile Image
    User->>EditProfilePage: Tap "Add/Remove Image"
    EditProfilePage->>ImageSelector: Show Image Selection Options
    User->>ImageSelector: Select Image Source
    ImageSelector-->>EditProfilePage: Update Profile Image
    User->>EditProfilePage: Enter Name Details
    User->>EditProfilePage: Tap "Update"
    EditProfilePage->>ViewModel: Call updateUserProfile()
    ViewModel-->>EditProfilePage: Update Confirmation
Loading

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • noman2002
  • palisadoes
  • Dante291

Poem

🐰 A test suite hops into view,
Checking profile pages, tried and true
Buttons clicked, images bright
Ensuring everything's just right
CodeRabbit's testing dance is through! 🧪


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MayankJha014 MayankJha014 changed the base branch from main to develop December 28, 2024 21:26
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (1)

13-31: Consider using a common test wrapper or setUp method to reduce redundancy.

You consistently wrap the EditProfilePage in a similar MaterialApp setup for each test, which is fine. However, you might streamline your test code by extracting repeated patterns—like widget pumping and locator initialization—into a shared setup method or leveraging setUp in addition to setUpAll. This will reduce boilerplate and make your tests more concise and maintainable.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b22a2e and f3db35a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (4)

40-52: Consider adding negative or edge case testing.

Currently, the tests check for the existence of the profile image and button. It might be helpful to test scenarios where the image could fail to load or if the button is disabled for any reason, to ensure comprehensive coverage.


54-74: Validate interactions after selecting camera or gallery options.

You verify that tapping the "Add/Remove Image" button displays a bottom sheet with camera and gallery options. Consider adding assertions that confirm subsequent actions or callbacks (e.g., what happens after choosing "Camera" or "Gallery"?). This ensures you’re fully testing the user flow rather than just verifying the presence of UI elements.


89-106: Add test coverage for form input variations.

While the update operation is tested by verifying that updateUserProfile is invoked, there is currently no test coverage for how invalid or empty input fields (e.g., empty first name, last name) are handled. Testing these scenarios ensures the component gracefully handles invalid user data and improves overall reliability.


108-118: Great job verifying essential UI elements.

Verifying the presence of the email icon and label is good practice, ensuring critical UI components exist. You may consider further checks to confirm dynamic data handling (e.g., real email address displays, error states) in any future expansions of your test suite.

@Dante291
Copy link
Contributor

Too many file changes, closing.

@Dante291 Dante291 closed this Dec 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.