-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update GitHub Actions Workflow to Use Java Version "17.0" #2680
Update GitHub Actions Workflow to Use Java Version "17.0" #2680
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)
85-85
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces at the end of these lines that should be removed for consistency.
- java-version: '17.0' + java-version: '17.0'Also applies to: 117-117
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml
(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithyanotfound
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa#2654
File: .github/workflows/push.yml:40-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-23T15:58:53.732Z
Learning: Suggestions to update Java versions in GitHub Actions workflows are considered out of scope unless the PR specifically targets them.
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push.yml
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 117-117: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)
40-40
: LGTM! Java version updates are consistent and follow best practices.
The Java version has been consistently updated to '17.0' across all jobs using the latest setup-java action (v4). Java 17 is an LTS version and is compatible with the Flutter version used in the workflow.
Also applies to: 85-85, 117-117
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2680 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 95.98% 96.10% +0.12%
====================================================
Files 187 187
Lines 9887 9891 +4
====================================================
+ Hits 9490 9506 +16
+ Misses 397 385 -12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@palisadoes its done. |
89de889
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What is causing this error? The pushes are failing in another way now: |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Did you add tests for your changes?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit