Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GitHub Actions Workflow to Use Java Version "17.0" #2680

Merged

Conversation

may-tas
Copy link
Contributor

@may-tas may-tas commented Dec 28, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • updated push.yml to java-version "17.0"

Issue Number:

Did you add tests for your changes?

  • No (not required)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • No

Have you read the contributing guide?

  • Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use Java 17 across multiple jobs, replacing the previous Java 12 configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in .github/workflows/push.yml by upgrading the Java version from 12.0 to 17.0. This change is applied consistently across three jobs: Flutter-Codebase-Check, Flutter-Testing, and Android-Build-and-Release. The modification ensures that the push workflow uses the latest Java version, aligning with recent package upgrades.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/push.yml Updated Java version from '12.0' to '17.0' in three workflow jobs using actions/setup-java@v4

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update push.yml to Java 17.0 [#2679]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • noman2002
  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, Java's version takes a leap,
From twelve to seventeen, our workflow's steep!
Workflows dancing with newfound might,
Pushing code with technological delight!
Rabbit's code magic, version refined ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

85-85: Remove trailing spaces.

There are trailing spaces at the end of these lines that should be removed for consistency.

-          java-version: '17.0'          
+          java-version: '17.0'

Also applies to: 117-117

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 85-85: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e8b559 and c0a51b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithyanotfound
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa#2654
File: .github/workflows/push.yml:40-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-23T15:58:53.732Z
Learning: Suggestions to update Java versions in GitHub Actions workflows are considered out of scope unless the PR specifically targets them.
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push.yml

[error] 85-85: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 117-117: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

40-40: LGTM! Java version updates are consistent and follow best practices.

The Java version has been consistently updated to '17.0' across all jobs using the latest setup-java action (v4). Java 17 is an LTS version and is compatible with the Flutter version used in the workflow.

Also applies to: 85-85, 117-117

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.10%. Comparing base (3fe1d19) to head (c0a51b9).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2680      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             95.98%   96.10%   +0.12%     
====================================================
  Files                   187      187              
  Lines                  9887     9891       +4     
====================================================
+ Hits                   9490     9506      +16     
+ Misses                  397      385      -12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@may-tas
Copy link
Contributor Author

may-tas commented Dec 28, 2024

@palisadoes its done.
Sir please add the sensitive file label then i'll update the branch to start the workflow again.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 89de889 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 28, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@may-tas

What is causing this error? The pushes are failing in another way now:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants