Upgrade connectivity_plus from v5.0.2 to v6.0.5 with updated implementations and tests
#2671
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on upgrading the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
lib/services/third_party_service/connectivity_service.dart (2)
30-31: Potential for multiple connectivity results
The new signature returns a Future<List> without post-processing, which can be beneficial if the underlying connectivity check returns multiple results. However, if only a single result is typically returned by the library, consider clarifying or transforming it for maintainability.
63-63: Logging connectivity changes
Good job logging the connectivity result. This is helpful for debugging. As a minor enhancement, consider grouping logs or using a structured logger when multiple logs occur frequently.test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (5)
38-39: Simplified getConnectionType
Returning a single-element list meets the new signature. For robust testing, consider verifying how your code handles multiple connectivity statuses if they occur.
71-74: MockConnectivity onConnectivityChanged
You have properly updated the controller to emit a list. Test that your code handles multiple connectivity states if the underlying library emits more than one at once.
81-86: Mock connectivity for testing
The checkConnectivity mock returning a list is consistent with the new library approach. Consider negative or mixed connectivity states to thoroughly test your logic.
117-120: connectionStream test
Verifying the type is correct. You may also want tests that confirm the stream yields elements accurately when controller.add(...) is called.
142-145: Testing isReachable
Good coverage for a typical URL case. Consider adding tests which mock partial connectivity or DNS failures to exercise different branches.lib/view_model/connectivity_view_model.dart (2)
54-55: Subscription callback
Listening to the stream with the newly typed callback is correct. Validate your exception handling to avoid silent failures if subscription can throw or break.
63-66: Documenting the handleConnection param
Accurate documentation for the new List parameter. Good practice to keep doc comments updated when signatures change.test/view_model_tests/connectivity_view_model_test.dart (2)
98-98: Remove debug print statement and consider adding assertionWhile the test has been correctly updated for the new API, there's a debug print statement above this line that should be removed. Consider replacing it with an assertion to verify the cached actions if that's part of the test's intent.
- print(cacheService.offlineActionQueue.getActions()); + expect(cacheService.offlineActionQueue.getActions(), isNotEmpty);
Line range hint
114-122: Consider improving test coverageA few suggestions to enhance these tests:
- Fix the typo in test name 'enableSubscirption'
- Add assertions to verify the expected behavior
- Consider testing multiple connectivity results in a single list, which is now supported by the new API version
- test('check enableSubscription body', () { + test('check enableSubscription behavior', () { connectivityService.connectionStatusController - .add([ConnectivityResult.none]); + .add([ConnectivityResult.none]); + expect(model.isConnected, false); + + // Test multiple connectivity results + connectivityService.connectionStatusController + .add([ConnectivityResult.wifi, ConnectivityResult.mobile]); + expect(model.isConnected, true); }); - test('enableSubscirption exception', () async { + test('enableSubscription exception handling', () async { model.enableSubscription(); + // Add assertions to verify exception handling });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pubspec.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
lib/services/third_party_service/connectivity_service.dart(5 hunks)lib/view_model/connectivity_view_model.dart(2 hunks)pubspec.yaml(1 hunks)test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(5 hunks)test/view_model_tests/connectivity_view_model_test.dart(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
lib/services/third_party_service/connectivity_service.dart (3)
18-21: Use of late
Declaring both the stream controller and its getter with 'late' ensures that they are not accessed before initialization. Just remember to properly dispose or close the controller to avoid memory leaks.
48-48: Ensure proper disposal of StreamController
While initializing the StreamController is appropriate here, confirm that it is closed when no longer needed (e.g., in a dispose method), so you don't leak resources or broadcast improper states.
110-112: Efficient connectivity check
Using results.any(...) is straightforward and clear. The approach is correct and meets the multiple-result requirements introduced by the updated library.
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (9)
21-21: Controller type conversion
Changing the controller to StreamController<List> aligns with the new approach. Ensure all tests correctly handle list-based results.
25-25: TODO in overriding getter
You’ve left a TODO. Confirm whether additional logic is needed here or if the default behavior is acceptable.
35-35: Returning the updated stream
Returning controller.stream is consistent with the list-based approach. Make sure you have coverage for scenarios with multiple connectivity results in your test suite.
43-51: hasConnection test coverage
The logic mirrors production code, returning false on exceptions. Make sure you have tests for both the exception path and the scenario where results include multiple statuses.
53-66: Timeout handling
You are correctly catching and returning false on exception during the isReachable check. Ensure your test coverage includes cases with timeouts or invalid URLs.
77-78: Returning a list from onConnectivityChanged
This ensures that the subscription sees the entire list. Nice to see consistent usage of the new library features.
102-102: Initialize in setUpAll
Storing references in setUpAll is a good approach. Ensure that each test is independent of side effects within setUpAll, especially if the test modifies shared state.
108-108: Register Singleton
Registering the mock in the locator helps ensure that all references point to the same instance. Be sure subsequent tests do not override expected behaviors.
127-127: Adding errors to the stream
Testing error handling within the connectivity controller is excellent. Ensure the application recovers gracefully after an error.
lib/view_model/connectivity_view_model.dart (2)
23-23: Stream of Lists
Switching from single-value streams to list-based streams matches the new connectivity approach. Confirm that code in the UI or widgets properly handles a list.
70-74: Multiple connectivity checks
Verifying that at least one result is neither none nor bluetooth is straightforward. Confirm that ignoring bluetooth is intentional for your app’s use case.
pubspec.yaml (1)
25-25: Connectivity library upgraded
Upgrading connectivity_plus to ^6.0.5 aligns with the new multiple-results feature. Good move. Be sure to confirm compatibility with older code or environments if necessary.
test/view_model_tests/connectivity_view_model_test.dart (4)
77-77: LGTM! Test correctly updated for new API
The test has been properly updated to pass a list of connectivity results, matching the new API signature while maintaining the original test intent.
82-82: LGTM! Offline test scenario properly updated
The test correctly uses a list with ConnectivityResult.none, maintaining proper test coverage for offline scenarios.
117-117: LGTM! Controller updated correctly for new API
The connection status controller has been properly updated to emit a list of connectivity results.
Line range hint 1-124: Verify integration test coverage for version upgrade
While the unit tests have been updated correctly for the new API, consider adding integration tests to verify the behavior of the connectivity changes in combination with other components, especially during the transition period where some parts of the app might still expect the old format.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2671 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 95.98% 95.98%
=================================================
Files 187 187
Lines 9887 9891 +4
=================================================
+ Hits 9490 9494 +4
Misses 397 397 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes @noman2002 my android build is failing as the package requires java17 and the current gradle is not compatible. 
|
|
Please fix the failing tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if any of these conditions occur:
Here are some steps to take:
We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. Additional notes:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (1)
Java 17 compatibility needs to be explicitly configured
The Gradle configuration files don't specify Java version compatibility settings. To support Java 17:
- Add
compileOptionsblock inandroid/app/build.gradle:android { compileOptions { sourceCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_17 targetCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_17 } }
- Update Kotlin JVM target in
android/app/build.gradle:kotlinOptions { jvmTarget = '17' }
- Consider upgrading Gradle wrapper version (current: 7.6.1) to latest compatible version
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1: Verify Gradle configuration for Java 17 compatibilityThe PR comments mention build failures due to Java 17 requirements. This needs to be addressed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Gradle configuration files echo "Checking Gradle configuration files..." fd -e gradle -e properties | grep -E "settings.gradle|build.gradle|gradle-wrapper.properties" # Check Java version in Gradle files echo "Checking Java version configuration..." rg "sourceCompatibility|targetCompatibility|JavaVersion" -A 2Length of output: 452
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Java/JDK configuration in Gradle files echo "Content of android/app/build.gradle:" cat android/app/build.gradle echo -e "\nContent of android/build.gradle:" cat android/build.gradle echo -e "\nContent of android/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties:" cat android/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.propertiesLength of output: 2844
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (2)
53-66: Replace print statement with proper test loggingThe print statement in the catch block isn't ideal for test environments.
- print('Timeout while checking reachability: $e'); + debugPrint('Timeout while checking reachability: $e');
117-132: Enhance the listener test coverageWhile the basic connectivity tests are correct, the listener test could be enhanced to verify the actual handling of the error case.
test('listener', () async { final mockConnectivity = testgetit.connectivity as MockConnectivity; mockConnectivity.connectivityController.add([ConnectivityResult.mobile]); + expect(mockConnectivity.onConnectivityChanged, emits([ConnectivityResult.mobile])); mockConnectivity.connectivityController .addError(Exception("Something went wrong!")); + expect(mockConnectivity.onConnectivityChanged, emitsError(isA<Exception>())); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (6)
15-15: LGTM: Global variable type updated correctly
The change from ConnectivityResult? to List<ConnectivityResult>? aligns with the connectivity_plus v6.0.5 requirements.
Line range hint 21-51: LGTM: Controller and hasConnection implementation
The changes correctly implement the new List requirements:
- StreamController properly typed
- hasConnection() correctly implements the connectivity check logic with proper error handling
Line range hint 71-87: LGTM: MockConnectivity implementation
The class correctly implements the new List requirements from connectivity_plus v6.0.5.
102-110: LGTM: Test setup properly initialized
The test setup correctly initializes the mocks and services with the new List type.
133-147: LGTM: Comprehensive stream testing
The test properly verifies the handling of multiple connectivity results through the stream.
149-172: LGTM: Comprehensive hasConnection test coverage
Excellent test coverage for hasConnection() with various scenarios:
- No connection
- Active connection
- Empty list
- Mixed results
- Multiple none results
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (4)
24-24: Remove TODO comment.The TODO comment should be removed as the implementation is already complete.
54-66: Consider improving error handling and loggingWhile the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Extract the timeout duration to a constant
- Replace print statement with proper test logging or remove it
- Consider handling specific exceptions (SocketException, TimeoutException) separately
- Future<bool> isReachable({ + static const timeoutDuration = Duration(seconds: 30); + + Future<bool> isReachable({ http.Client? client, String? uriString, }) async { try { await client! .get(Uri.parse(uriString ?? graphqlConfig.httpLink.uri.toString())) - .timeout(const Duration(seconds: 30)); + .timeout(timeoutDuration); return true; } catch (e) { - print('Timeout while checking reachability: $e'); return false; } }
81-81: Remove TODO comment.The TODO comment should be removed as the implementation is already complete.
133-193: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage with good edge casesThe test suite thoroughly covers the new list-based connectivity implementation. Consider adding these additional test cases:
- Test for concurrent connectivity changes
- Test for maximum list size (if there's a limit)
- Test for duplicate connectivity results
Example test case for concurrent changes:
test('handles rapid connectivity changes correctly', () async { final mockConnectivity = MockConnectivity(); final results = [ [ConnectivityResult.mobile], [ConnectivityResult.wifi], [ConnectivityResult.ethernet], ]; // Simulate rapid changes for (final result in results) { mockConnectivity.connectivityController.add(result); } expect( mockConnectivity.onConnectivityChanged, emitsInOrder(results), ); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (4)
15-15: LGTM! Correct type updates for connectivity_plus v6.0.5
The changes correctly reflect the new API requirements:
- Global
connectivityStatusis now a List - StreamController properly handles List
Also applies to: 21-25
43-51: LGTM! Robust implementation of hasConnection
The implementation correctly:
- Handles empty lists
- Checks for valid connectivity results
- Includes proper error handling
71-81: LGTM! Proper mock implementation for connectivity_plus v6.0.5
The mock implementation correctly reflects the new API requirements with proper typing for streams and futures.
102-110: LGTM! Proper test setup
The test setup correctly initializes all required mocks and services with appropriate types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (4)
24-26: Remove TODO comment or implement missing functionality.The TODO comment should either be removed or replaced with proper implementation documentation.
43-55: Consider improvements to error handling and configuration.A few suggestions for the implementation:
- Replace print statement with proper logging
- Consider making the timeout duration configurable
- print('Timeout while checking reachability: $e'); + debugPrint('Timeout while checking reachability: $e');
Line range hint
70-76: Remove TODO comment as implementation is complete.The TODO comment can be removed as the method is already implemented.
148-182: LGTM! Comprehensive connection state testing.The tests provide excellent coverage of various connectivity scenarios including:
- Valid connectivity results
- No connection cases
- Empty lists
- Mixed results
- Multiple none results
Consider adding tests for:
- Maximum list size handling
- Invalid connectivity results
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (5)
15-15: LGTM! Type updates align with connectivity_plus v6.0.5.
The changes correctly reflect the transition from single ConnectivityResult to List<ConnectivityResult> as required by the package upgrade.
Also applies to: 21-21, 35-35, 38-39
91-99: LGTM! Test setup is properly configured.
The initialization correctly sets up the mock services and test environment with the new List type.
106-109: LGTM! Tests properly verify new connectivity result type.
The tests effectively verify:
- The correct return type of the connection stream
- Proper handling of connectivity change events with multiple results
Also applies to: 122-136
138-146: LGTM! Error handling is properly tested.
The test effectively verifies that errors in the connectivity stream are properly propagated and handled.
Line range hint 1-200: Verify test coverage meets requirements.
The tests appear comprehensive, but let's verify the coverage meets the repository requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the TODOs and test coverage by examining the actual content.
TODOs in test mocks need attention, but test coverage is comprehensive
The test file contains 3 TODO comments, but they are only in the mock implementations and don't affect the actual test coverage. After examining the implementation and tests:
- All public methods in
ConnectivityServiceare covered:getConnectionType,initConnectivity,enableSubscription,isReachable, andhasConnection - Edge cases are well tested including:
- Various connectivity states (mobile, wifi, none)
- Empty results
- Mixed results
- Error conditions
- Timeout scenarios
Recommendation: Clean up the TODOs in the mock implementations, but the test coverage itself meets requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for connectivity-related files
# Find all connectivity-related test files
echo "Searching for connectivity-related test files..."
fd -e dart -e test.dart connectivity
# Find all connectivity-related implementation files
echo "Searching for connectivity-related implementation files..."
fd -e dart connectivity -E "*.test.dart" -E "*.spec.dart"
# Search for any remaining TODOs in connectivity-related files
echo "Checking for remaining TODOs..."
rg "TODO" -l $(fd -e dart connectivity)
Length of output: 1242
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual TODO comments and their context
echo "Examining TODOs in connectivity test file:"
rg "TODO" -A 2 test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart
# Check test coverage by examining implementation details vs tests
echo -e "\nExamining connectivity service implementation:"
cat lib/services/third_party_service/connectivity_service.dart
# Check test patterns and assertions
echo -e "\nExamining test patterns:"
rg "test|expect|verify" test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart
Length of output: 6071
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (4)
64-64: Replace print statement with proper logging.Consider using a proper logging mechanism instead of print statements for better debugging and production monitoring.
- print('Timeout while checking reachability: $e'); + debugPrint('Timeout while checking reachability: $e');
Line range hint
81-87: Enhance error handling in checkConnectivity method.The current implementation could be improved by:
- Adding specific error types for different failure scenarios
- Including more descriptive error messages
Future<List<ConnectivityResult>> checkConnectivity() async { - // TODO: implement checkConnectivity if (connectivityStatus == null) { - throw const SocketException('socket exception'); + throw const SocketException('Failed to check connectivity status: No status available'); } return connectivityStatus!; }
16-16: Remove unused variable 'internetAccessible'.The variable 'internetAccessible' is declared but never used in the test cases.
133-147: Add verification for stream closure.The test for connectivity changes should verify proper cleanup of stream resources.
test('successfully listens to connectivity changes', () async { final expectedResults = [ ConnectivityResult.mobile, ConnectivityResult.wifi, ]; final MockConnectivity mockConnectivity = MockConnectivity(); + final subscription = mockConnectivity.onConnectivityChanged.listen( - mockConnectivity.onConnectivityChanged.listen( (List<ConnectivityResult> results) { expect(results, equals(expectedResults)); }, ); // Trigger the event mockConnectivity.connectivityController.add(expectedResults); + + // Cleanup + await subscription.cancel(); + await mockConnectivity.connectivityController.close(); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (1)
Line range hint 1-214: Overall implementation looks good with comprehensive test coverage.
The test file has been properly updated to handle the new List return type from connectivity_plus v6.0.5. The test cases cover various scenarios including:
- Basic connectivity changes
- Error handling
- Multiple connectivity results
- Edge cases (empty lists, mixed results)
- Network reachability
The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of upgrading the connectivity_plus package.
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (3)
24-26: Remove TODO commentThe implementation is already complete. The TODO comment should be removed as it's no longer needed.
68-68: Replace print with proper loggingConsider using a proper logging mechanism instead of print statement for better error tracking in production.
- print('Timeout while checking reachability: $e'); + debugPrint('Timeout while checking reachability: $e');
Line range hint
85-91: Remove TODO comment and improve error handlingThe implementation is complete but could be improved:
- Remove the TODO comment
- Consider adding more specific error messages in the SocketException
- // TODO: implement checkConnectivity if (connectivityStatus == null) { - throw const SocketException('socket exception'); + throw const SocketException('Failed to check connectivity status'); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (6)
15-15: LGTM: Appropriate default test state
The initialization with a list containing ConnectivityResult.mobile provides a good default state for testing.
43-51: LGTM: Robust hasConnection implementation
The implementation correctly handles:
- Empty list check
- Validation for non-none connectivity results
- Error cases
99-100: LGTM: Good error case coverage
The addition of a 500 error test case improves the test coverage for error scenarios.
108-114: LGTM: Proper test setup
The test setup correctly initializes the mock service and connectivity status for the new List-based API.
139-163: LGTM: Comprehensive connectivity change tests
Excellent test coverage including:
- Multiple connectivity results
- Error handling
- Event listening verification
165-199: LGTM: Thorough hasConnection test coverage
Excellent test coverage for all possible scenarios:
- Valid connectivity results
- No connection cases
- Empty list handling
- Mixed connectivity results
- Multiple none results
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (2)
19-46: Consider adding error logging in hasConnection methodThe implementation looks good and properly handles the new List requirement. The error handling is appropriate, but consider logging the error for debugging purposes.
Future<bool> hasConnection() async { try { final results = await getConnectionType(); return results.isNotEmpty && results.any((result) => result != ConnectivityResult.none); } catch (e) { + print('Error checking connection: $e'); return false; } }
50-66: Consider making timeout duration configurableThe implementation properly handles HTTP status codes and errors. However, the 30-second timeout is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable to support different use cases.
Future<bool> isReachable({ http.Client? client, String? uriString, + Duration timeout = const Duration(seconds: 30), }) async { try { final response = await client! .get(Uri.parse(uriString ?? graphqlConfig.httpLink.uri.toString())) - .timeout(const Duration(seconds: 30)); + .timeout(timeout);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (6)
13-14: LGTM: Global variable updated to support multiple connectivity results
The change from single ConnectivityResult to List aligns with the connectivity_plus v6.0.5 upgrade requirements.
71-82: LGTM: Mock implementation properly supports multiple connectivity results
The MockConnectivity class correctly implements the new List requirement with proper stream handling using a broadcast controller.
95-96: Test case added for server error response
The addition of the 500 status code test case improves error handling coverage.
104-121: LGTM: Well-structured test setup with both mock and actual service testing
The setup properly initializes both mock and actual services, allowing comprehensive testing of the connectivity implementation.
148-176: LGTM: Comprehensive stream testing implementation
The test cases properly verify both the mock and actual service implementations, with good async testing practices using expectAsync1.
178-203: LGTM: Thorough test coverage for hasConnection
Excellent test coverage with cases for:
- Single connection type
- No connection
- Empty list
- Mixed results
- Multiple none results
|
@palisadoes @noman2002 Please review |
|
Please fix the failing tests |
Sir the java gradle is not compatible. connectivity_plus has a breaking change it will only work with java17 and above |
|
Please upgrade to the latest flutter/Java, and fix the |
|
@palisadoes To pass the android build test we will have to update the Java Version in GitHub Actions Workflow. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (3)
34-46: Consider adding error logging in hasConnection.The implementation correctly handles the new list-based connectivity results and includes proper error handling. However, consider logging the error in the catch block for better debugging capabilities.
catch (e) { + print('Error checking connection: $e'); return false; }
50-66: Consider extracting timeout duration as a constant.The implementation has good error handling and proper HTTP status code checks. Consider extracting the timeout duration as a named constant for better maintainability.
+ static const timeoutDuration = Duration(seconds: 30); Future<bool> isReachable({ http.Client? client, String? uriString, }) async { try { final response = await client! .get(Uri.parse(uriString ?? graphqlConfig.httpLink.uri.toString())) - .timeout(const Duration(seconds: 30)); + .timeout(timeoutDuration);
129-227: Consider adding a test case for null connectivityStatus.The test suite has good coverage of the new list-based functionality and error cases. However, consider adding a test case for when connectivityStatus is null.
+ test('hasConnection - with null status', () async { + connectivityStatus = null; + final hasConnection = await actualService.hasConnection(); + expect(hasConnection, false); + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(3 hunks)android/app/build.gradle(3 hunks)android/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties(1 hunks)android/settings.gradle(1 hunks)test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- android/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties
🔇 Additional comments (9)
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (4)
13-13: LGTM: Global variable updated to match new API.
The change from single ConnectivityResult to List<ConnectivityResult> aligns with the connectivity_plus v6.0.5 API changes.
19-31: LGTM: Stream controller properly updated for list-based connectivity results.
The stream controller and its accessors have been correctly updated to handle List<ConnectivityResult> instead of single results, maintaining proper streaming functionality.
Line range hint 71-86: LGTM: Mock connectivity implementation properly updated.
The mock implementation correctly handles the new list-based connectivity results and includes proper error simulation.
108-125: LGTM: Well-structured test setup and teardown.
The setup properly initializes both mock and actual services, and the teardown ensures clean unregistration.
android/settings.gradle (1)
22-22: Verify Android Gradle Plugin compatibility
The upgrade to AGP 8.3.0 is necessary for Java 17 support required by connectivity_plus v6.0.5. However, ensure Gradle wrapper version is also updated to 8.0+ in gradle-wrapper.properties for compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
AGP 8.3.0 and Gradle 8.5 versions are compatible
The Gradle wrapper version is set to 8.5, which satisfies the minimum requirement (Gradle 8.0+) for Android Gradle Plugin 8.3.0. The upgrade is safe to proceed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Gradle wrapper version
cat gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties | grep 'distributionUrl'
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the gradle wrapper properties file exists in the android directory
cat android/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties | grep 'distributionUrl'
Length of output: 155
android/app/build.gradle (3)
37-37: LGTM: Namespace declaration added
The namespace declaration is required for Android Gradle Plugin 8.0+. This is correctly set to match the applicationId.
53-56: LGTM: Java 17 compatibility configured
Correctly configured Java 17 compatibility required by connectivity_plus v6.0.5.
58-60: LGTM: Kotlin JVM target aligned
Kotlin JVM target is correctly aligned with Java version.
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
34-34: LGTM: CI/CD Java version aligned with project requirements
Java version is consistently updated to 17.0 across all jobs (Flutter-Codebase-Check, Flutter-Testing, and Android-Build), matching the local development environment requirements for connectivity_plus v6.0.5.
Also applies to: 120-120, 151-151
|
Please do it here. You discovered that we need to do the upgrade |
|
@palisadoes please review, I have fixed the workflow. |
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
|
Thanks. Please make a minor commit to trigger the workflow again |
Doing it rn. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
android/app/build.gradle (1)
37-37: Update the namespace for production useThe namespace contains "example" which is typically used for sample applications. For a production application, consider using your organization's reverse domain name pattern.
- namespace "com.example.talawa" + namespace "org.palisadoes.talawa"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
android/app/build.gradle(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
android/app/build.gradle (2)
58-60: LGTM! Kotlin configuration aligns with Java version
The Kotlin JVM target is correctly set to match the Java compatibility version.
53-56: LGTM! Java 17 configuration addresses the build failure
The Java 17 compatibility settings are correctly configured and align with the requirements of connectivity_plus v6.0.5.
Run this script to verify Java configuration in related files:
✅ Verification successful
Java 17 configuration is correctly set and consistent
The verification confirms that:
- Java 17 compatibility is properly configured in
android/app/build.gradle - The configuration aligns with modern Android development requirements and the
connectivity_plusv6.0.5 dependency - Other related configurations are consistent:
- Using recent Kotlin version (1.8.10)
- Modern Android SDK targets (compileSdkVersion 34)
- No conflicting Java version settings in other Gradle files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Java/Gradle configurations across the project
# Verify gradle wrapper properties
echo "Checking gradle-wrapper.properties..."
cat gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties
# Check root build.gradle
echo "Checking root build.gradle..."
cat build.gradle
Length of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find Gradle-related files first
echo "Finding Gradle configuration files..."
fd -t f "build.gradle|gradle-wrapper.properties"
# Then check Java version configurations in all Gradle files
echo -e "\nChecking Java version configurations in Gradle files..."
rg -i "java|jdk|version|compatibility" -t gradle
Length of output: 1899
|
@palisadoes All done. |
palisadoes
merged commit b6ddb72
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
|
@may-tas You need to open another PR for this. Our push workflows are failing because the changes were not added to the |
|
I've created an issue for it: |
Doing it rn. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
connectivity_plusto v6.0.5Issue Number:
connectivity_plusfrom 5.0.2 to 6.0.5 #2547Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
connectivity_plusv6.0.5 requirements :Summary
connectivity_plusfrom v5.0.2 to v6.0.5, updated implementation to meet new version requirements, and fixed related test cases.checkConnectivity()now returns aFuture<List<ConnectivityResult>>andonConnectivityChangednow returns aStream<List<ConnectivityResult>>instead of a singleFuture<ConnectivityResult>andStream<ConnectivityResult>respectively.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
settings.gradle,build.gradle, andgradle-wrapper.propertiesfiles with the required changes as per the package requirements. If these are deemed necessary for this PR, I will add them in a separate commit, as they are crucial for running the package and app correctly.Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Dependencies
connectivity_pluspackage to version^6.0.5.url_launcher_platform_interfaceversion2.3.2.Android Configuration
Tests