Updated unit tests for manage Volunteer group view model #2661
Conversation
…ndation#2641) Bumps [flutter_local_notifications](https://github.com/MaikuB/flutter_local_notifications) from 18.0.0 to 18.0.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/MaikuB/flutter_local_notifications/releases) - [Commits](MaikuB/flutter_local_notifications@flutter_local_notifications-v18.0.0...flutter_local_notifications-v18.0.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: flutter_local_notifications dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fundraising Campaigns * adding tests * adding tests * adding tests * adding tests * adding tests * adding tests * adding tests
* added auto-label.json and updated issues.yml * named the issues.yml to issue.yml * improved the sync of issue.yml
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a suite of unit tests for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart (2)
12-13: Enhance file documentation with more details.While the current comments provide basic context, consider adding more details about:
- The purpose of ManageVolunteerGroupViewModel
- The types of operations being tested
- Any prerequisites or dependencies
-// This file contains unit tests for the ManageVolunteerGroupViewModel. -// It ensures that all methods and functionalities of the view model are working correctly. +/// Unit tests for ManageVolunteerGroupViewModel which handles volunteer group management operations. +/// Tests cover: +/// - Initialization and state management +/// - Organization user fetching +/// - Volunteer addition and removal +/// - Group updates and deletion +/// +/// Prerequisites: +/// - Mocked EventService +/// - Test locator setup
30-34: Consider adding more edge cases and validation tests.The test suite covers the main functionality well, but consider adding:
- Tests for invalid input validation (e.g., empty strings, null values)
- Tests for concurrent operations
- Tests for state management (e.g., loading states)
- Tests for error message formatting
Example test structure:
test('should handle empty group name', () async { final group = EventVolunteerGroup(id: "group1"); expect( () => model.updateVolunteerGroup(group, "1", "", 20), throwsA(isA<ArgumentError>()), ); }); test('should set loading state during operations', () async { final group = EventVolunteerGroup(id: "group1"); model.updateVolunteerGroup(group, "1", "name", 20); expect(model.isLoading, isTrue); // ... complete the operation expect(model.isLoading, isFalse); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart(6 hunks)
| test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup failure", () async { | ||
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | ||
| final int prevlength = model.volunteers.length; | ||
| when( | ||
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup( | ||
| { | ||
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | ||
| }, | ||
| ), | ||
| ).thenThrow(Exception('Failed to remove volunteer')); | ||
| try { | ||
| await model.removeVolunteerFromGroup("volunteer1"); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| expect(e.toString(), "Failed to add volunteer"); | ||
| } | ||
| expect(model.volunteers.length, prevlength); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect error message assertion.
The error message assertion doesn't match the thrown exception:
- Throws: "Failed to remove volunteer"
- Asserts: "Failed to add volunteer"
- expect(e.toString(), "Failed to add volunteer");
+ expect(e.toString(), "Failed to remove volunteer");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup failure", () async { | |
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | |
| final int prevlength = model.volunteers.length; | |
| when( | |
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup( | |
| { | |
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | |
| }, | |
| ), | |
| ).thenThrow(Exception('Failed to remove volunteer')); | |
| try { | |
| await model.removeVolunteerFromGroup("volunteer1"); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| expect(e.toString(), "Failed to add volunteer"); | |
| } | |
| expect(model.volunteers.length, prevlength); | |
| }); | |
| test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup failure", () async { | |
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | |
| final int prevlength = model.volunteers.length; | |
| when( | |
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup( | |
| { | |
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | |
| }, | |
| ), | |
| ).thenThrow(Exception('Failed to remove volunteer')); | |
| try { | |
| await model.removeVolunteerFromGroup("volunteer1"); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| expect(e.toString(), "Failed to remove volunteer"); | |
| } | |
| expect(model.volunteers.length, prevlength); | |
| }); |
| // Tests the failure case when removing a volunteer from a group with null removeEventVolunteer. | ||
| test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null data", () async { | ||
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | ||
| final int prevLength = model.volunteers.length; | ||
| when( | ||
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup({ | ||
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | ||
| }), | ||
| ).thenAnswer( | ||
| (_) async => QueryResult( | ||
| data: {'removeEventVolunteer': null}, | ||
| source: QueryResultSource.network, | ||
| options: QueryOptions( | ||
| document: gql(EventQueries().removeVolunteerMutation()), | ||
| ), | ||
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await model.removeVolunteerFromGroup("volunteer1"); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(model.volunteers.length, prevLength); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix duplicate test name and clarify test purpose.
There are two tests with the same name "Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null data". The second test specifically tests for null removeEventVolunteer response.
- test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null data", () async {
+ test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null removeEventVolunteer response", () async {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Tests the failure case when removing a volunteer from a group with null removeEventVolunteer. | |
| test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null data", () async { | |
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | |
| final int prevLength = model.volunteers.length; | |
| when( | |
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup({ | |
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | |
| }), | |
| ).thenAnswer( | |
| (_) async => QueryResult( | |
| data: {'removeEventVolunteer': null}, | |
| source: QueryResultSource.network, | |
| options: QueryOptions( | |
| document: gql(EventQueries().removeVolunteerMutation()), | |
| ), | |
| ), | |
| ); | |
| await model.removeVolunteerFromGroup("volunteer1"); | |
| expect(model.volunteers.length, prevLength); | |
| }); | |
| // Tests the failure case when removing a volunteer from a group with null removeEventVolunteer. | |
| test("Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null removeEventVolunteer response", () async { | |
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | |
| final int prevLength = model.volunteers.length; | |
| when( | |
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup({ | |
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | |
| }), | |
| ).thenAnswer( | |
| (_) async => QueryResult( | |
| data: {'removeEventVolunteer': null}, | |
| source: QueryResultSource.network, | |
| options: QueryOptions( | |
| document: gql(EventQueries().removeVolunteerMutation()), | |
| ), | |
| ), | |
| ); | |
| await model.removeVolunteerFromGroup("volunteer1"); | |
| expect(model.volunteers.length, prevLength); | |
| }); |
| // Tests the failure case when updating a volunteer group. | ||
| test('Test updateVolunteerGroup failure', () async { | ||
| final mockEventService = locator<EventService>(); | ||
| final group = EventVolunteerGroup( | ||
| id: "group1", | ||
| name: "Old Name", | ||
| volunteersRequired: -1, | ||
| ); | ||
| when( | ||
| mockEventService.updateVolunteerGroup({ | ||
| 'id': group.id, | ||
| 'data': { | ||
| 'eventId': "1", | ||
| 'name': "Updated Group", | ||
| 'volunteersRequired': 20, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| ).thenThrow(Exception('Failed to update group')); | ||
| try { | ||
| await model.updateVolunteerGroup(group, "1", "Updated Group", 20); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| expect(e.toString(), contains('Failed to update group')); | ||
| } | ||
| expect(group.name, "Old Name"); | ||
| expect(group.volunteersRequired, -1); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The test data using -1 for volunteersRequired is problematic and should be revised.
The test is using an invalid value (-1) for volunteersRequired, which doesn't make logical sense for a volunteer group. While there's no explicit validation in the view model or model class, negative values for required volunteers count is semantically incorrect. The test should use valid, real-world values to properly test the failure scenario.
Suggested changes:
- Replace the negative value with a valid positive integer in the failure test case
- Consider adding input validation in the view model to prevent negative values
🔗 Analysis chain
Review test data validity.
The test uses a negative value (-1) for volunteersRequired. Consider if this is a valid test case or if it should be testing input validation.
Let's verify if negative values are handled in the view model:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for validation logic in the view model
ast-grep --pattern 'updateVolunteerGroup($$$) {
$$$
if ($volunteersRequired < 0) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the view model file
fd "manage_volunteer_group_view_model"
# Then let's look for any validation logic in the updateVolunteerGroup method
rg -A 10 "updateVolunteerGroup" --type dart
Length of output: 22405
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the model class for any validation or constraints on volunteersRequired
rg -A 5 "class EventVolunteerGroup" --type dart
# Also check if there's any schema validation or constraints in the GraphQL schema
rg "UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput" --type graphql
Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the full EventVolunteerGroup model
cat lib/models/events/event_volunteer_group.dart
# Also check for any schema files with different extensions
fd "schema" --extension gql --extension graphql --extension sdl
Length of output: 2416
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2661 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 95.52% 95.26% -0.27%
====================================================
Files 187 199 +12
Lines 9884 10909 +1025
====================================================
+ Hits 9442 10392 +950
- Misses 442 517 +75 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart (3)
19-25: Add more descriptive comments for test environment setupConsider enhancing the setup documentation to explain:
- What services are being registered
- Why TestWidgetsFlutterBinding is required
- The purpose of the test locator
Line range hint
38-53: Enhance initialization test coverageConsider adding test cases for:
- Initialization with null event/group
- Initialization with empty event/group properties
- Edge cases for the isFetchingVolunteers getter
Line range hint
230-285: Add state verification to deleteVolunteerGroup testsConsider adding assertions to verify:
- Changes to the view model's state after deletion
- Any notifications or callbacks triggered
- Cleanup of related resources
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart (2)
150-151: Fix duplicate test name and clarify test purpose.
There are two tests with the same name "Test removeVolunteerFromGroup with null data". The second test specifically tests for null removeEventVolunteer response.
Line range hint 287-322: The test data using negative values for volunteersRequired is problematic and should be revised.
The test should use valid, real-world values to properly test the functionality.
| // Tests fetching the current organization users list. | ||
| test("Test getCurrentOrgUsersList success", () async { | ||
| final users = await model.getCurrentOrgUsersList(); | ||
| expect(users.length, 2); | ||
| expect(users[0].id, "fakeUser1"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add failure test case for getCurrentOrgUsersList
The current test only covers the success scenario. Consider adding tests for:
- Network failure
- Empty response
- Invalid user data
| await runZonedGuarded( | ||
| () async { | ||
| await model.addVolunteerToGroup("volunteer1", "1", "group1"); | ||
| }, | ||
| (error, stack) {}, | ||
| zoneSpecification: ZoneSpecification( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in addVolunteerToGroup failure test
The current implementation ignores the error in runZonedGuarded. Consider:
- Adding assertions for the error type
- Verifying the stack trace
- Adding specific error cases (network error, validation error, etc.)
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup( | ||
| { | ||
| 'volunteerId': 'volunteer1', | ||
| }, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix parameter name mismatch in mock setup
The mock setup uses 'volunteerId' but based on the success test case, it should be 'id'.
- 'volunteerId': 'volunteer1',
+ 'id': 'volunteer1',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup( | |
| { | |
| 'volunteerId': 'volunteer1', | |
| }, | |
| ), | |
| mockEventService.removeVolunteerFromGroup( | |
| { | |
| 'id': 'volunteer1', | |
| }, | |
| ), |
|
MohitMaulekhi
deleted the
unit_test_manage_volunteer_group_view_model.dart
branch
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR introduces unit tests for all methods, classes and getters in manage Volunteer group view model
Issue Number:
Fixes #2619
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes, unit tests were added
Summary
This PR aims to increase the code coverage of the specified file by adding comprehensive unit tests. It ensures that all methods, functions, and widgets are thoroughly tested, improving the overall reliability and maintainability of the codebase. The Pr will resolve issue #2619.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, this Pr doesn't introduce a breaking change
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit