Added checklist to PR template to enforce standards #2653
Conversation
adithyanotfound
requested review from
palisadoes and
noman2002
as code owners
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the pull request template located in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@adithyanotfound has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
30-31: Consider formatting improvements for the test coverage items.The content accurately reflects the PR objectives, but could be more readable.
-- [ ] Tests are written for all changes made in this PR. -- [ ] Test coverage meets or exceeds the current coverage (~90/95%). +- [ ] Tests are written for all changes made in this PR +- [ ] Test coverage meets or exceeds the current standard (90-95%)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
.github/pull_request_template.md
50-50: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
7-7: LGTM! Proper hyphenation improves readability.
The addition of hyphens in compound modifiers "production-ready" and "security-related" follows correct grammatical conventions.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
253-253: LGTM! Clear test coverage requirement added.
The addition clearly states the requirement for tests and maintains consistency with existing documentation about coverage thresholds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/pull_request_template.md (4)
22-22: Remove trailing punctuation from headingAccording to markdown best practices, headings should not end with punctuation marks.
-### Issue Number: +### Issue Number🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
22-22: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
30-31: Enhance test coverage requirement clarityThe current format of the coverage requirement could be more precise.
-- [ ] Test coverage meets or exceeds the current coverage (~90/95%). +- [ ] Test coverage meets or exceeds the current threshold (90-95%).
50-52: Add timing context to checklist itemsTo make the checklist more actionable, consider adding guidance about when these items should be checked.
### Checklist for Repository Standards -- [ ] Have you reviewed and implemented all applicable `coderaabbitai` review suggestions? -- [ ] Have you ensured that the PR aligns with the repository's contribution guidelines? +### Pre-merge Checklist +- [ ] I have reviewed and implemented all applicable `coderaabbitai` review suggestions (check this before requesting review) +- [ ] I have verified that this PR aligns with the repository's contribution guidelines (check this before submitting PR)
58-58: Standardize response formatFor consistency with other sections, consider using a checkbox instead of a yes/no comment.
-<!--Yes or No--> +- [ ] Yes, I have read and understood the [contributing guide](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
.github/pull_request_template.md
22-22: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
7-7: LGTM! Improved compound word formatting.
The addition of hyphens in "production-ready" and "security-related" enhances readability and grammatical correctness.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2653 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 95.51% 95.47% -0.05%
====================================================
Files 187 187
Lines 9884 9884
====================================================
- Hits 9441 9437 -4
- Misses 443 447 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
palisadoes
merged commit 825515d
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2651
Did you add tests for your changes?
Not required.
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not required.
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit