Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade connectivity plus clean #2600

Conversation

karthik14344
Copy link

@karthik14344 karthik14344 commented Oct 22, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Dependency upgrade and bug fix
  • Updates connectivity_plus package from 5.0.2 to 6.0.5
  • Fixes ConnectivityService implementation to handle connectivity results correctly

Issue Number:

Fixes #2547

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes, updated the following tests:

  • test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart
  • Ensured all connectivity-related tests pass with the new implementation

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A - This is an internal service update with no UI changes

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Yes, updated code documentation with new connectivity_plus usage patterns

Summary

  • Upgraded connectivity_plus package to version 6.0.5
  • Fixed ConnectivityService to properly handle single ConnectivityResult instead of List
  • Updated ConnectivityViewModel to work with the corrected service implementation
  • Ensured backward compatibility with existing connectivity checks
  • Updated test suite to reflect changes

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No. While the internal implementation has changed, the public API remains the same.

Other information

The upgrade was necessary to stay current with the latest connectivity_plus package version and fix potential issues with connectivity detection.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for automated code checks, documentation updates, testing, and builds for Android and iOS.
    • Added a new .metadata file for tracking project properties and migration details.
    • Implemented a new entry point for the Android application with MainActivity.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced the ConnectivityService to handle multiple connectivity states.
    • Updated the AppConnectivity class to better manage connectivity results.
  • Dependency Updates

    • Expanded Dart SDK version constraint and updated several package dependencies.
  • Tests

    • Modified test classes to accommodate changes in connectivity result handling.

palisadoes and others added 22 commits May 30, 2021 10:55
* lang addition

* lng-add

* static string removal

* language changes

* chgs in main

* test update
* ui added

* adding lng widget

* bug fix

* test upd
…Foundation#817)

* chore: fixes linting issue

* ptch: replaces event list with displayed events list
…oesFoundation#813)

* Replacing extra widgets for toasts with Custom Toast and making it uniform

* removed snackbar.dart due to no implementation

* flutter format

* merge conflict resolved
* Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* Merge develop into main
* Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* Merge develop into main
* Add files via upload

* Update pull-request.yml
…tion#2521)

* Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* Merge develop into main

---------

Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]>
* 20240727112557 Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* 20240727112838 Merge develop into main
* 20240929111306 Deleted all files in the main branch in anticipation of merging develop into main cleanly

* 20240929111329 Merge develop into main

---------

Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow named "PUSH Workflow" that triggers on push events, excluding the master branch. This workflow includes jobs for codebase checking, documentation updating, testing, and building releases for Android and iOS. Additionally, a new .metadata file is created to track project properties, and modifications are made to the ConnectivityService class and related tests to handle multiple connectivity results. The pubspec.yaml file is updated with various dependency changes, including an upgrade of the connectivity_plus package.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/push.yaml New workflow "PUSH Workflow" with jobs for codebase check, documentation update, testing, and builds.
.metadata New file created to track project properties and migration details.
android/app/src/main/kotlin/com/mycompany/talawa/MainActivity.kt New MainActivity class extending FlutterActivity added.
lib/services/third_party_service/connectivity_service.dart ConnectivityService methods updated to handle lists of connectivity results instead of single results.
lib/view_model/connectivity_view_model.dart initialise method updated to handle lists of connectivity results.
pubspec.yaml SDK version updated and multiple package dependencies upgraded/downgraded; some commented out.
test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart Mock classes updated to reflect changes in connectivity service methods returning lists.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Upgrade connectivity_plus from 5.0.2 to 6.0.5 (#2547)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • noman2002
  • palisadoes
  • tasneemkoushar

🐇 In the meadow where we play,
A new workflow hops our way!
With builds and tests, oh what a sight,
Connectivity checks, all done right!
Dependencies dance, some take a bow,
Here's to progress, let's cheer now! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
lib/view_model/connectivity_view_model.dart (3)

43-43: Improve comment clarity

The comment "Extract the first result from the list of connectivity results" is slightly misleading. Consider revising it to better reflect the actual operation, such as:

"Retrieve the list of connectivity results and use the first result if available"


44-45: Consider a more specific variable name

The variable name resultList could be more specific to indicate it's about connectivity results. Consider renaming it to connectivityResults for improved clarity.


Line range hint 78-78: Consider adding a clarifying comment

Given the changes in the initialise method to handle a list of ConnectivityResult, it might be helpful to add a comment in the handleConnection method explaining why it still accepts a single result. This could improve code clarity for future maintainers.

For example, you could add:

/// This function handles a single connectivity result, typically the first result from the list
/// obtained in the `initialise` method. This approach maintains backward compatibility while
/// allowing for potential future enhancements to handle multiple connectivity types.
Future<void> handleConnection(ConnectivityResult result) async {
  // ... existing code ...
}
.github/workflows/push.yaml (7)

29-69: LGTM! Consider documenting the custom lint check.

The Flutter-Codebase-Check job is well-structured and covers essential code quality checks. The use of specific versions for Java and Flutter ensures consistency across different environments.

Consider adding a comment or documentation explaining the purpose and functionality of the custom lint check performed by the Python script (check_ignore.py). This would improve maintainability and help other developers understand its role in the workflow.


75-136: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.

The Update-Documentation job effectively automates the documentation update process. The conditional execution and use of environment variables are well-implemented.

Consider adding error handling mechanisms, such as capturing and reporting any failures during the documentation generation or commit process. This would improve the robustness of the workflow and make troubleshooting easier.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint

107-107: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:24: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:1:24: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:2:20: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:2:20: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:52: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:69: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint

[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


138-154: LGTM! Consider improving the commit message.

The Documentation-to-talawa-docs job effectively synchronizes documentation across repositories, ensuring consistency.

Consider making the commit message more descriptive by including information such as the source repository, branch, or even a brief summary of changes. For example:

commit_message: 'Update talawa-mobile-docs from talawa-repo (branch: ${{ github.ref_name }})'

This would provide more context for the documentation update in the destination repository.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[warning] 143-143: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 146-146: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


158-185: LGTM! Consider adding dependency caching.

The Flutter-Testing job effectively covers essential testing steps and integrates well with Codecov for coverage reporting.

Consider adding dependency caching to speed up the workflow. You can use GitHub Actions' cache action to cache the Flutter and pub dependencies. Here's an example of how you could implement this:

- uses: actions/cache@v3
  with:
    path: |
      ~/.pub-cache
      ~/.flutter
    key: ${{ runner.os }}-flutter-${{ hashFiles('**/pubspec.lock') }}
    restore-keys: |
      ${{ runner.os }}-flutter-

Add this step after the Flutter setup and before running pub get. This can significantly reduce the time taken for dependency fetching in subsequent runs.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 168-168: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 185-185: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


187-225: LGTM! Consider adding versioning to releases.

The Android-Build-and-Release job effectively automates the Android build and release process, which is great for continuous deployment.

Consider adding versioning to the automated releases. This would help track changes over time and make it easier to identify specific builds. You could use the GitHub run number or a timestamp to create unique version numbers. Here's an example of how you could modify the release action:

- uses: ncipollo/release-action@v1
  with:
    name: "Automated Android Release v${{ github.run_number }}"
    artifacts: "./build/app/outputs/flutter-apk/app-release.apk"
    allowUpdates: "true"
    generateReleaseNotes: false
    tag: "automated-v${{ github.run_number }}"
    body: |
      This is an automated release (v${{ github.run_number }}), triggered by a recent push. 
      This may or may not be stable, so please have a look at the stable release(s).

This change would create unique version numbers for each release, making it easier to track and reference specific builds.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 199-199: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 223-223: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


226-262: LGTM! Consider adding versioning and note about code signing.

The iOS-Build job effectively automates the iOS build and release process, which is great for continuous deployment.

  1. Consider adding versioning to the automated releases, similar to the suggestion for the Android job. This would help track changes over time and make it easier to identify specific builds.

  2. Add a note in the release body about the lack of code signing. Here's an example of how you could modify the release action:

- uses: ncipollo/release-action@v1
  with:
    name: "Automated iOS Release v${{ github.run_number }}"
    artifacts: "app.ipa"
    allowUpdates: "true"
    generateReleaseNotes: false
    tag: "automated-ios-v${{ github.run_number }}"
    body: |
      This is an automated release (v${{ github.run_number }}), triggered by a recent push. 
      This build is unsigned and intended for testing purposes only.
      For distribution, proper code signing is required.
      This may or may not be stable, so please have a look at the stable release(s).

These changes would create unique version numbers for each release and provide clear information about the unsigned nature of the build.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 261-261: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


1-262: Address minor code style issues and shellcheck warnings.

The static analysis tools have reported several minor issues:

  1. Fix indentation issues, particularly on lines 25, 143, and others mentioned in the yamllint report.
  2. Remove trailing spaces, especially on lines 6, 26, 84, 137, 156, 168, 185, 199, 223, and 261.
  3. Address shellcheck warnings by properly quoting variables and commands. For example, on line 118, change:
    echo "commit_id=$(echo $(git rev-parse HEAD))" >> $GITHUB_ENV
    to:
    echo "commit_id=$(git rev-parse HEAD)" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"

While these issues don't affect functionality, addressing them will improve code consistency and reduce potential shell scripting issues.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint

107-107: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:24: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:1:24: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:2:20: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:2:20: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:52: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:69: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint

[error] 6-6: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[warning] 25-25: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 137-137: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[warning] 143-143: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 146-146: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 156-156: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 168-168: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 185-185: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 199-199: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 223-223: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 261-261: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa94bb2 and b95b576.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pubspec.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/push.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .metadata (1 hunks)
  • android/app/src/main/kotlin/com/mycompany/talawa/MainActivity.kt (1 hunks)
  • lib/services/third_party_service/connectivity_service.dart (3 hunks)
  • lib/view_model/connectivity_view_model.dart (1 hunks)
  • pubspec.yaml (4 hunks)
  • test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .metadata
  • android/app/src/main/kotlin/com/mycompany/talawa/MainActivity.kt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/push.yaml

107-107: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:24: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:1:24: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:2:20: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:2:20: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:52: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:69: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/push.yaml

[error] 6-6: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[warning] 25-25: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 137-137: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[warning] 143-143: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 146-146: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 156-156: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 168-168: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 185-185: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 199-199: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 223-223: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 261-261: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (15)
pubspec.yaml (7)

13-13: LGTM: SDK version update looks good.

The SDK version constraint has been expanded to allow for newer Dart SDK versions. This is a positive change as it keeps the project up-to-date.

Please ensure that the project is tested with the latest Dart SDK version (3.24.4) to verify compatibility and take advantage of any new language features or performance improvements.


36-36: Clarify the rationale for downgrading multiple dependencies.

Several packages have been downgraded to slightly older versions. While these are minor version changes, it's unusual to see multiple downgrades.

Could you please explain the reasoning behind these downgrades? Are they related to compatibility issues with other dependencies or a strategy to maintain stability?

Also, please verify that these downgrades don't negatively impact the project's functionality. You may want to run the test suite to ensure everything still works as expected.

Also applies to: 66-66, 70-71, 76-78


80-80: Clarify the purpose of adding the win32 dependency.

A new dependency, win32: 5.5.4, has been added. This package is typically used for Windows-specific functionality.

Could you please explain the reason for adding this dependency? Is the project expanding to support Windows-specific features?

If this is indeed for Windows support, please ensure that:

  1. The usage of this package is properly documented.
  2. Any Windows-specific code is appropriately isolated to maintain cross-platform compatibility.
  3. The project's README is updated to reflect the new platform support, if applicable.

Line range hint 16-20: Verify impact of removing static analysis dependencies.

Several dependencies related to static analysis and custom lint rules have been commented out for removal.

Please confirm that:

  1. The removal of these dependencies doesn't negatively impact the project's static analysis setup.
  2. Any related configurations (e.g., analysis_options.yaml) have been updated accordingly.
  3. The project's documentation is updated to reflect any changes in the development setup or contribution guidelines related to static analysis.

If these dependencies are truly no longer needed, consider removing the commented lines entirely for cleaner code.

Also applies to: 30-33


Line range hint 55-55: LGTM: intl package update looks good.

The upgrade of the intl package to version 0.19.0 aligns with the PR objectives mentioned in the linked issue #2547.

As this is a minor version update, it should be backward compatible. However, please ensure that all usages of the intl package in the codebase have been tested to confirm there are no unexpected issues. Run the following command to find all files using this package:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all Dart files that import intl
rg -t dart 'import.*intl'

Line range hint 1-81: Ensure comprehensive testing and documentation updates.

The pubspec.yaml file has undergone significant changes, including multiple dependency updates, downgrades, additions, and removals.

To ensure the stability and maintainability of the project, please:

  1. Run the full test suite to verify that all functionality works as expected with the updated dependencies.
  2. Update the project's documentation, including the README and any contribution guidelines, to reflect the changes in the development setup and dependencies.
  3. Consider adding comments in the pubspec.yaml file to explain any non-standard version choices (e.g., specific version pinning or downgrades) to help future maintainers understand the rationale behind these decisions.
  4. Verify that the project builds successfully on all supported platforms with these dependency changes.
#!/bin/bash
# Run flutter pub get to ensure all dependencies are resolved
flutter pub get

# Run the test suite
flutter test

# Attempt to build for all supported platforms
flutter build apk
flutter build ios --release --no-codesign
flutter build web

25-25: Verify implementation with updated connectivity_plus package.

The upgrade of connectivity_plus to version 6.0.5 aligns with the PR objectives. This is a major version update, which may include breaking changes.

Please ensure that all usages of the connectivity_plus package in the codebase have been updated to comply with any breaking changes introduced in version 6.x.x. Run the following command to find all files using this package:

.github/workflows/push.yaml (1)

1-262: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive CI/CD workflow.

This GitHub Actions workflow file effectively covers essential steps for code quality, testing, documentation, and automated releases for both Android and iOS platforms. The structure and organization of jobs are logical and promote good CI/CD practices.

Key strengths:

  1. Comprehensive code quality checks and testing.
  2. Automated documentation updates and synchronization.
  3. Continuous deployment with automated releases for both Android and iOS.

Consider implementing the suggested improvements to further enhance the workflow:

  1. Document the custom lint check process.
  2. Add error handling in the documentation update job.
  3. Improve commit messages for documentation synchronization.
  4. Implement dependency caching to speed up the workflow.
  5. Add versioning to automated releases.
  6. Address minor code style issues and shellcheck warnings.

These enhancements will improve maintainability, traceability, and efficiency of the CI/CD process.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint

107-107: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:24: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:1:24: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:2:20: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2005:style:2:20: Useless echo? Instead of 'echo $(cmd)', just use 'cmd'

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:52: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


118-118: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:69: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint

[error] 6-6: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[warning] 25-25: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 84-84: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 137-137: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[warning] 143-143: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 146-146: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 156-156: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 168-168: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 185-185: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 199-199: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 223-223: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 261-261: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

test/service_tests/third_party_service_test.dart/connectivity_service_test.dart (7)

38-40: Updated getConnectionType() method to return List<ConnectivityResult>

The method signature has been correctly updated to return a List<ConnectivityResult>, aligning with the new API changes in connectivity_plus version 6.0.5.


50-50: Modified controller to handle List<ConnectivityResult>

The controller now correctly handles a list of ConnectivityResult, matching the expected data type after the package upgrade.


52-53: Updated connectivityController getter to new type

The getter connectivityController now returns a StreamController<List<ConnectivityResult>>, which is consistent with the updated stream data type.


56-57: Refactored onConnectivityChanged to emit List<ConnectivityResult>

The onConnectivityChanged stream now emits a list of ConnectivityResult, ensuring compatibility with the new connectivity stream requirements.


60-61: Adjusted checkConnectivity() to return List<ConnectivityResult>

The checkConnectivity() method now returns a list of ConnectivityResult and properly handles the case when connectivityStatus is null by throwing a SocketException.

Also applies to: 66-67


109-111: Updated test to add connectivity result within a list

The test case now adds [ConnectivityResult.mobile] to connectivityController, aligning with the updated stream type that expects a list.


112-112: Added error handling test to connectivityController stream

The test correctly simulates an error by adding an exception to the stream, which helps verify the error handling mechanisms of the connectivity service.

Comment on lines +42 to +52

// Extract the first result from the list of connectivity results
List<ConnectivityResult> resultList =
await connectivityService.getConnectionType();
if (resultList.isNotEmpty) {
handleConnection(resultList.first);
} else {
handleConnection(
ConnectivityResult.none,
); // Default to 'none' if the list is unexpectedly empty
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix indentation and approve changes

The indentation of the new code block seems to be off by one level. Please adjust the indentation to match the rest of the method.

Overall, these changes align well with the PR objectives. They successfully handle the transition from a single connectivity result to a list of results, maintaining backward compatibility and ensuring graceful handling of unexpected scenarios. Good job on implementing this upgrade!

Apply this diff to fix the indentation:

 Future<void> initialise() async {
   await connectivityService.initConnectivity(client: http.Client());
   connectivityStream = connectivityService.connectionStream;
   enableSubscription();

-
-    // Extract the first result from the list of connectivity results
-    List<ConnectivityResult> resultList =
-        await connectivityService.getConnectionType();
-    if (resultList.isNotEmpty) {
-      handleConnection(resultList.first);
-    } else {
-      handleConnection(
-        ConnectivityResult.none,
-      ); // Default to 'none' if the list is unexpectedly empty
-    }
+  // Retrieve the list of connectivity results and use the first result if available
+  List<ConnectivityResult> connectivityResults =
+      await connectivityService.getConnectionType();
+  if (connectivityResults.isNotEmpty) {
+    handleConnection(connectivityResults.first);
+  } else {
+    handleConnection(ConnectivityResult.none); // Default to 'none' if the list is unexpectedly empty
+  }
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// Extract the first result from the list of connectivity results
List<ConnectivityResult> resultList =
await connectivityService.getConnectionType();
if (resultList.isNotEmpty) {
handleConnection(resultList.first);
} else {
handleConnection(
ConnectivityResult.none,
); // Default to 'none' if the list is unexpectedly empty
}
Future<void> initialise() async {
await connectivityService.initConnectivity(client: http.Client());
connectivityStream = connectivityService.connectionStream;
enableSubscription();
// Retrieve the list of connectivity results and use the first result if available
List<ConnectivityResult> connectivityResults =
await connectivityService.getConnectionType();
if (connectivityResults.isNotEmpty) {
handleConnection(connectivityResults.first);
} else {
handleConnection(ConnectivityResult.none); // Default to 'none' if the list is unexpectedly empty
}
}

Comment on lines +113 to +115
final results = await getConnectionType();
// Check if any of the connectivity results are not 'none'
return results.any((result) => result != ConnectivityResult.none);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Incorrect handling of connectivity result in hasConnection()

Since getConnectionType() returns a single ConnectivityResult (after correction), using any() is inappropriate. Update the logic to check the single result directly.

Apply this diff to fix the logic:

- final results = await getConnectionType();
- // Check if any of the connectivity results are not 'none'
- return results.any((result) => result != ConnectivityResult.none);
+ final result = await getConnectionType();
+ // Check if the connectivity result is not 'none'
+ return result != ConnectivityResult.none;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
final results = await getConnectionType();
// Check if any of the connectivity results are not 'none'
return results.any((result) => result != ConnectivityResult.none);
final result = await getConnectionType();
// Check if the connectivity result is not 'none'
return result != ConnectivityResult.none;

Comment on lines +30 to +33
/// * `Future<List<ConnectivityResult>>`: A future that resolves to a list of connectivity results indicating the connection types.
Future<List<ConnectivityResult>> getConnectionType() async {
final List<ConnectivityResult> result =
await connectivity.checkConnectivity();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Incorrect use of List<ConnectivityResult> with checkConnectivity()

The connectivity.checkConnectivity() method returns a single ConnectivityResult, not a List<ConnectivityResult>. Assigning its result to a List<ConnectivityResult> will lead to a type mismatch and runtime errors.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

- /// * `Future<List<ConnectivityResult>>`: A future that resolves to a list of connectivity results indicating the connection types.
+ /// * `Future<ConnectivityResult>`: A future that resolves to the connectivity result indicating the connection type.

- Future<List<ConnectivityResult>> getConnectionType() async {
-   final List<ConnectivityResult> result =
+ Future<ConnectivityResult> getConnectionType() async {
+   final ConnectivityResult result =
      await connectivity.checkConnectivity();
   return result;
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/// * `Future<List<ConnectivityResult>>`: A future that resolves to a list of connectivity results indicating the connection types.
Future<List<ConnectivityResult>> getConnectionType() async {
final List<ConnectivityResult> result =
await connectivity.checkConnectivity();
/// * `Future<ConnectivityResult>`: A future that resolves to the connectivity result indicating the connection type.
Future<ConnectivityResult> getConnectionType() async {
final ConnectivityResult result =
await connectivity.checkConnectivity();
return result;
}

Comment on lines +64 to +68
(List<ConnectivityResult> results) {
for (final result in results) {
print(result);
connectionStatusController.add(result);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Incorrect parameter type in onConnectivityChanged listener

The connectivity.onConnectivityChanged.listen stream provides single ConnectivityResult events, not a List<ConnectivityResult>. The listener should accept a ConnectivityResult parameter instead of List<ConnectivityResult>.

Apply this diff to fix the parameter type:

- (List<ConnectivityResult> results) {
-   for (final result in results) {
-     print(result);
-     connectionStatusController.add(result);
-   }
+ (ConnectivityResult result) {
+   print(result);
+   connectionStatusController.add(result);
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
(List<ConnectivityResult> results) {
for (final result in results) {
print(result);
connectionStatusController.add(result);
}
(ConnectivityResult result) {
print(result);
connectionStatusController.add(result);
}

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. I have to close this PR. You have submitted files that are not required to be updated for the issue.
  2. Please update your branch with the latest upstream. Files have changed.

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.