Added codecov code for showing statistics #2877
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 yamllint (1.35.1).github/push.yml[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n (new-lines) [warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true] (truthy) 🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow.github/push.yml[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Changes to this file require the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed. 🔇 Additional comments (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2877 +/- ##
===================================================
Coverage ? 39.46%
===================================================
Files ? 450
Lines ? 32932
Branches ? 385
===================================================
Hits ? 12996
Misses ? 19936
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(7 hunks).github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)vitest.config.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml
[error] 79-79: too many blank lines
(1 > 0) (empty-lines)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 313-313: too many blank lines
(1 > 0) (empty-lines)
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
208-208: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
vitest.config.ts (1)
7-10: LGTM! Coverage configuration looks good.The coverage configuration is well-structured using the recommended v8 provider and includes appropriate reporters for different use cases (text for CLI, lcov for Codecov, html for local viewing).
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml (1)
50-55: LGTM! Test execution step is properly configured.The step correctly installs dependencies and runs tests with coverage reporting enabled.
package.json (1)
88-88: LGTM! Test script updated correctly.The
--coverageflag addition enables coverage reporting during test runs, which aligns with the Vitest configuration..github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
211-217: LGTM! Codecov upload configuration looks good.The Codecov upload step is properly configured with a unique name for the coverage report.
219-223: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider increasing the minimum coverage threshold.
The current minimum coverage threshold of 39.0% is quite low. Consider gradually increasing this threshold as you add more tests to ensure better code quality.
✅ Verification successful
Consider increasing the minimum coverage threshold gradually.
The current threshold of 39% is indeed low for a mature project. Since you're already using Codecov for monitoring coverage trends:
- Review your current coverage on Codecov dashboard
- Plan incremental increases (e.g., 5-10% at a time)
- Communicate changes to the team
- Update the threshold in
.github/workflows/pull-request.ymlafter adding more tests🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check current coverage to determine if we can set a higher threshold cat coverage/lcov.info | awk -F',' ' /LF:/ { lines += $1 } /LH:/ { covered += $1 } END { if (lines > 0) { coverage = (covered/lines) * 100 printf "Current coverage: %.1f%%\n", coverage } }'Length of output: 268
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for coverage information in documentation and PRs echo "=== Searching for coverage information in README ===" fd README.md --exec cat {} echo -e "\n=== Searching for coverage discussions ===" rg -i "coverage|test coverage" -g "!{coverage,node_modules}/*" -g "!*.{lock,sum}" echo -e "\n=== Checking for other coverage configuration files ===" fd -e yml -e yaml -e json --exec grep -l "coverage" {}Length of output: 41222
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check coverage configuration in vitest.config.ts echo "=== Checking coverage configuration ===" cat vitest.config.ts echo -e "\n=== Checking Codecov badge URL ===" rg "codecov.io.*badge" README.mdLength of output: 994
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml
[error] 80-80: too many blank lines
(1 > 0) (empty-lines)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive workflow file. Apply 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to override.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml (2)
Line range hint
19-20: Verify the necessity of the CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME environment variable.This environment variable appears to be unused in the workflow steps. If it's not required by Codecov or other parts of the workflow, consider removing it to maintain workflow clarity.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive workflow file. Apply 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to override.
Line range hint
1-80: Address the pipeline failure for workflow modifications.The pipeline is failing because this PR modifies a sensitive workflow file. Since these changes are legitimate for Codecov integration, request a maintainer to apply the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to the PR.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive workflow file. Apply 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to override.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Exclude
.github/workflows/pull-request.ymlfrom the PR. It is out of scope and there are no apparent material changes that would alter the functionality. - Put the push changes in a new
.github/workflows/push.ymlfile not.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml. Your changes will impact the deployment of the API website.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/push.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/push.yml
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/push.yml (1)
1-7:⚠️ Potential issue
⚠️ Unauthorized changes to sensitive workflow file detected.Changes to workflow files require special authorization. Please add the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed with the PR.
Consider consolidating with main workflow file.
Instead of maintaining a separate workflow file, consider consolidating this into the main workflow file using conditional job execution.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Changes to this file require the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/push.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/push.yml
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
.github/push.yml
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Changes to this file require the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/push.yml (2)
8-11: Add job timeout and concurrency controls.To prevent hung jobs and resource wastage, add timeout and concurrency configuration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Changes to this file require the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed.
12-31: Add missing setup steps and optimize workflow.Essential improvements needed for Node.js setup, pnpm setup, and dependency caching.
Verify coverage file path and add error handling.
The coverage file path
./coverage/lcov.infoneeds verification:
- Ensure the path matches your test configuration
- Add
fail_ci_if_error: trueto fail the workflow if coverage upload failsRun this script to verify the coverage configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Check test configuration for coverage output path rg -l "coverageDirectory|coverage.*directory" "package.json" "jest.config.*"🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Changes to this file require the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2854
Previous Merge Related to this issue #2871
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
I have updated the
push-deploy-website.ymlfile to send Codecov data to the Codecov website after a merge.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
develop-postgresbranch.