Code Coverage Improvement in 'OrganizationTags.tsx' #3031 #3158
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on enhancing the test suite for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
309-326: Consider verifying UI behavior after the error is raised.
Currently, the test asserts thattoast.erroris called. Consider verifying if the form or other UI elements reset or remain in an error state, to increase coverage and confidence.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2387
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx:350-376
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:41:04.350Z
Learning: In the `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx` file, the `OrganizationTags` component uses chunk size with the `InfiniteScroll` component and an outer parent div for handling data loading and scrolling.
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx:184-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: In the `talawa-admin` project, it's acceptable for test cases in `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx` to test multiple behaviors within a single test function without needing to split them into smaller, focused tests.
🪛 eslint
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts
[error] 1-1: 'error' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx
[error] 335-335: 'orgUserTagsScrollableDiv' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts
[failure] 1-1:
'error' is defined but never used
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx
[failure] 335-335:
'orgUserTagsScrollableDiv' is assigned a value but never used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx
[error] 335-335: 'orgUserTagsScrollableDiv' is assigned a value but never used (@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (2)
23-28: All good with the added mock imports.
These imports cleanly integrate the new mocks required for the additional test cases.
43-44: Use of combined mocks is clear.
MergingMOCKSwithMOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAGforlink3and defininglink4withMOCKS_EMPTYis a clean solution for simulating error and empty scenarios in tests.src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (3)
419-419: ID updated for error scenario.
ChangingidtoorgIdErrorinMOCKS_ERRORclarifies the error context effectively.
429-440: New error scenario mock looks good.
This addition helps simulate a GraphQL error for tag creation and improves test coverage.
442-472: Empty state mock is well-implemented.
Providing a dedicatedMOCKS_EMPTYscenario ensures that the empty list condition is accurately tested.src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (8)
87-87: No concerns for added preserve comment.
Keeping/* istanbul ignore next -- @preserve */might reduce coverage, but if it’s intentional, this is fine.
100-101: No issues.
EnsuringfetchMoreResultis checked here is appropriate.
131-131: Guard condition is valid.
Maintaining theistanbul ignoredirective suggests you want to exclude this condition from coverage.
144-144: No issues with conditional coverage ignore.
This is acceptable if you genuinely intend to skip coverage.
152-156: Error fallback approach.
Good fallback handling of an unknown error type.
159-159: Skipping coverage for entire error block.
If you want coverage for error states, consider removingistanbul ignore next. Otherwise, looks fine.
381-389: Preservation of coverage ignore inInfiniteScrollprops.
No issues, though you may reconsider if coverage is desired for this logic.
400-400: Custom noRowsOverlay is a neat addition.
Providing a fallback message for an empty list is user-friendly.
|
Please change the title of this PR so that it will be more easily searchable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
309-326: Consider adding UI state verification after error.The error handling test is well-structured but could be more comprehensive. Consider adding assertions to verify:
- The modal remains open after error
- The input field still contains the entered value
- The submit button remains enabled
Example assertions to add:
await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('createTagSubmitBtn')).toBeEnabled(); expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.tagNamePlaceholder)).toHaveValue('userTagE'); expect(screen.getByTestId('closeCreateTagModal')).toBeInTheDocument(); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx:184-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: In the `talawa-admin` project, it's acceptable for test cases in `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx` to test multiple behaviors within a single test function without needing to split them into smaller, focused tests.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (2)
23-28: LGTM! Well-structured mock setup.The new mock imports and link setup follow good testing practices by:
- Separating different test scenarios into distinct mock objects
- Maintaining consistency with existing patterns
- Combining base mocks with error scenarios where needed
Also applies to: 43-44
328-334: LGTM! Clear and focused empty state test.The test effectively verifies the empty state message. The focused scope aligns with the project's testing practices, as indicated by previous feedback.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3158 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 21.89% 89.72% +67.82%
=====================================================
Files 301 323 +22
Lines 7686 8459 +773
Branches 1679 1898 +219
=====================================================
+ Hits 1683 7590 +5907
+ Misses 5897 643 -5254
- Partials 106 226 +120 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
43-44: Clarify naming of combined mocks.While
link3mergesMOCKSandMOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG, consider using a more descriptive name (e.g.,mixedMocksLink) to better reflect the combination of standard and error-producing mocks.src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (6)
87-87: Consider removing coverage ignore if feasible.If test coverage can address the usage of
endCursor, removing/* istanbul ignore next -- @preserve */here might further improve actual coverage metrics.
100-101: Fetch-more fallback is appropriate.This check ensures we safely handle absent fetch results. Consider adding a direct test if feasible to remove the coverage ignore.
144-144: Maintain coverage or remove ignore comment if covered elsewhere.Since this
ifblock likely executes regularly, see if a test covers it. If so,/* istanbul ignore else */may be unnecessary.
159-159: Evaluate necessity of ignoring coverage.The entire error condition might be triggered by a failing query test. Check whether a test path can remove this ignore.
381-384: Confirm infinite-scroll data length coverage.Because
/* istanbul ignore next */skips this critical piece of logic, verify that test coverage can handle dynamicdataLengthor remove the ignore if it is already tested.
400-400: Custom overlay coverage check.
noRowsOverlayis a custom fallback. Confirm if these lines are tested by simulating conditions that render this overlay, removing the ignore if possible.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2387
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx:350-376
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:41:04.350Z
Learning: In the `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx` file, the `OrganizationTags` component uses chunk size with the `InfiniteScroll` component and an outer parent div for handling data loading and scrolling.
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx:184-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: In the `talawa-admin` project, it's acceptable for test cases in `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx` to test multiple behaviors within a single test function without needing to split them into smaller, focused tests.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (3)
23-28: Imports fromOrganizationTagsMockslook good.Bringing in these additional mock data arrays helps expand the test scenarios to improve coverage. No changes needed.
308-326: Good addition for error-handling coverage.This test effectively verifies that an error toast is displayed when tag creation fails.
328-334: Empty state coverage is comprehensive.Ensuring that the UI handles an empty list of tags properly enhances overall robustness.
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (3)
418-418: Use descriptive ID to avoid confusion.Renaming
'orgId'to'orgIdError'clarifies that this query path focuses on error scenarios. This is a good practice when mocking different outcomes.
428-439: Excellent error mock definition.
MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAGis neatly structured to simulate a failing mutation scenario. These targeted mocks help ensure the component’s error handling is thoroughly tested.
441-471: Empty-state mocks ensure completeness.Simulating zero tags with
MOCKS_EMPTYrobustly covers the empty list scenario, improving test coverage.src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (3)
131-131: Retain coverage ignore only if absolutely necessary.We ignore the case where
tagNameis empty, but tests can often handle simple user input validations. Confirm if a test can be made to cover this branch.
152-156: Error handling coverage can be expanded.Catching unknown exceptions is valuable, and verifying via test would be ideal. If you already test this scenario, you can remove the ignore comment.
388-389: ConfirmhasNextPagecoverage.Ensure a test covers the scenario where
hasNextPageis true or false, so ignoring coverage here might not be required.
arpit-chakraborty
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@palisadoes , Please have look at the PR and if there are any further changes required please let me know |
|
I will try to remove as many of them as possible. |
|
You will need to remove them all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-683: Refactor mock data to reduce file size.The file exceeds the maximum line count limit of 600 lines. Consider splitting the mock data into separate files based on their purpose:
- Base mocks (MOCKS)
- Error mocks (MOCKS_ERROR, MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG)
- Empty state mocks (MOCKS_EMPTY, MOCKS_EMPTY_USER_TAG)
- Edge case mocks (MOCKS_UNDEFINED_USER_TAGS, MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR, MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES)
Create a new directory
__mocks__and split the mocks:+ src/screens/OrganizationTags/__mocks__/ + ├── baseMocks.ts + ├── errorMocks.ts + ├── emptyStateMocks.ts + └── edgeCaseMocks.ts - src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.tsThen update the imports in the test file:
- import { - MOCKS, - MOCKS_ERROR, - MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG, - MOCKS_EMPTY, - MOCKS_UNDEFINED_USER_TAGS, - MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR, - MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES, - } from './OrganizationTagsMocks'; + import { MOCKS } from './__mocks__/baseMocks'; + import { MOCKS_ERROR, MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG } from './__mocks__/errorMocks'; + import { MOCKS_EMPTY } from './__mocks__/emptyStateMocks'; + import { + MOCKS_UNDEFINED_USER_TAGS, + MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR, + MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES, + } from './__mocks__/edgeCaseMocks';
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
356-373: Consider consolidating pagination edge case tests.The 'Null endCursor' and 'Null Page available' tests are similar in structure and purpose. Consider combining them into a single test case with multiple assertions to improve test maintainability.
- test('Null endCursor', async () => { - renderOrganizationTags(link6); - await wait(); - const orgUserTagsScrollableDiv = screen.getByTestId( - 'orgUserTagsScrollableDiv', - ); - fireEvent.scroll(orgUserTagsScrollableDiv, { - target: { scrollY: orgUserTagsScrollableDiv.scrollHeight }, - }); - await waitFor(() => { - expect(screen.getByTestId('createTagBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); - }); - }); - - test('Null Page available', async () => { - renderOrganizationTags(link7); - await wait(); - const orgUserTagsScrollableDiv = screen.getByTestId( - 'orgUserTagsScrollableDiv', - ); - fireEvent.scroll(orgUserTagsScrollableDiv, { - target: { scrollY: orgUserTagsScrollableDiv.scrollHeight }, - }); - await waitFor(() => { - expect(screen.getByTestId('createTagBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); - }); - }); + test('handles pagination edge cases', async () => { + // Test null endCursor + renderOrganizationTags(link6); + await wait(); + let orgUserTagsScrollableDiv = screen.getByTestId('orgUserTagsScrollableDiv'); + fireEvent.scroll(orgUserTagsScrollableDiv, { + target: { scrollY: orgUserTagsScrollableDiv.scrollHeight }, + }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(screen.getByTestId('createTagBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); + }); + + // Clean up + cleanup(); + + // Test null page + renderOrganizationTags(link7); + await wait(); + orgUserTagsScrollableDiv = screen.getByTestId('orgUserTagsScrollableDiv'); + fireEvent.scroll(orgUserTagsScrollableDiv, { + target: { scrollY: orgUserTagsScrollableDiv.scrollHeight }, + }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(screen.getByTestId('createTagBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); + }); + });Also applies to: 375-392
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx:184-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: In the `talawa-admin` project, it's acceptable for test cases in `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx` to test multiple behaviors within a single test function without needing to split them into smaller, focused tests.
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts
[error] 1-675: File exceeds maximum line count limit of 600 lines (current: 675 lines)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (3)
315-332: LGTM! Good error handling test coverage.The test case effectively verifies the error handling during tag creation, ensuring that the error message from GraphQL is properly displayed to the user.
334-342: LGTM! Good empty state handling.The test case properly verifies that the "no tags found" message is displayed when the tags list is empty.
344-354: LGTM! Good edge case coverage.The test case correctly verifies the handling of undefined userTagsList, ensuring the UI gracefully handles this edge case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (1)
323-323: Enhance error messages for better debugging.The generic error message "Mock Graphql Error" could be more specific to help developers quickly identify the failure scenario during testing.
- error: new Error('Mock Graphql Error'), + error: new Error('Failed to fetch organization tags: Invalid organization ID'),- error: new Error('Mock Graphql Error'), + error: new Error('Failed to create user tag: Tag name already exists'),Also applies to: 333-333
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts(16 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (4)
Line range hint
369-399: Remove duplicate mock data.The
MOCKS_EMPTY_USER_TAGarray is identical toMOCKS_EMPTY. Remove the duplicate and useMOCKS_EMPTYconsistently.
532-536:⚠️ Potential issueFix misleading pagination state.
The
pageInfoindicateshasNextPage: true, but the subsequent query returnsundefineddata. This creates an inconsistent state that could lead to infinite loading loops in the UI.pageInfo: { startCursor: '1', endCursor: '1', - hasNextPage: true, + hasNextPage: false, hasPreviousPage: false, },Likely invalid or redundant comment.
446-449:⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent pagination data.
The
pageInfoobject has contradicting values:
endCursorisnullhasNextPageistrueThis combination is invalid as
hasNextPage: truerequires a validendCursor.pageInfo: { startCursor: '1', - endCursor: null, - hasNextPage: true, + endCursor: '1', + hasNextPage: false, hasPreviousPage: false, },Likely invalid or redundant comment.
219-233: Ensure test data consistency.The mock data for search results shows inconsistency:
searchUserTag1haschildTags: { totalCount: 5 }butsearchUserTag2haschildTags: { totalCount: 0 }- Both tags have the same parent and ancestor, but different child counts.
This might affect test reliability if the component makes assumptions about related tags having similar structures.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (2)
444-453: Consider using different mock data for subsequent pages.The second page returns the same node with a different cursor (cursor: '2'). This could make the tests confusing and less representative of real scenarios. Consider using different mock data for the second page.
node: { - _id: '1', - name: 'userTag 1', + _id: '2', + name: 'userTag 2', parentTag: null, usersAssignedTo: { totalCount: 5 }, childTags: { totalCount: 11 }, ancestorTags: [], }, cursor: '2',
Line range hint
1-524: Consider using helper functions to generate mock data.The mock data contains repetitive patterns. Consider creating helper functions to generate mock data, which would:
- Reduce duplication
- Make maintenance easier
- Ensure consistency in mock data structure
Example helper function:
function createMockUserTag(id: string, name: string, options?: { parentTag?: { _id: string }; usersCount?: number; childTagsCount?: number; ancestorTags?: Array<{ _id: string; name: string }>; }) { return { node: { _id: id, name, parentTag: options?.parentTag ?? null, usersAssignedTo: { totalCount: options?.usersCount ?? 0 }, childTags: { totalCount: options?.childTagsCount ?? 0 }, ancestorTags: options?.ancestorTags ?? [], }, cursor: id, }; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts(16 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (6)
312-325: LGTM! Well-structured error mock.The error mock is well-implemented, using a distinct organization ID to simulate the error scenario.
327-335: LGTM! Well-structured error mock for tag creation.The error mock effectively simulates a failed tag creation scenario.
337-367: Remove duplicate mock data.This mock data is identical to
MOCKS_EMPTY_USER_TAG. Remove the duplicate and useMOCKS_EMPTYconsistently.
Line range hint
369-382: LGTM! Well-structured undefined scenario mock.The mock effectively simulates the undefined userTags scenario.
502-523: Fix inconsistent pagination metadata (same issue as above).The
pageInfoindicateshasNextPage: true, but the subsequent page request returnsundefineddata.
502-503:⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent pagination metadata.
The
pageInfoindicateshasNextPage: true, but the subsequent page request returnsundefineddata. This could lead to unexpected behavior in tests.pageInfo: { startCursor: '1', endCursor: '1', - hasNextPage: true, + hasNextPage: false, hasPreviousPage: false, },Likely invalid or redundant comment.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improves the code Coverage in 📂
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsxIssue Number:
Fixes #3031
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores