Improved Code Coverage in src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.tsx

[aadhil2k4]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Refactoring and Adding Tests

Issue Number:

Fixes #3073

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests

  • Added comprehensive test cases for the OrganizationSidebar component
  • Improved test coverage for error handling, loading states, and member image rendering

• Chores

  • Removed code coverage tool-specific comments from component code

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on improving the test coverage and code quality for the OrganizationSidebar component. The changes include adding three new test cases to the OrganizationSidebar.spec.tsx file, which enhance the testing suite by covering error handling, loading states, and member image rendering. Additionally, the implementation removes unnecessary Istanbul code coverage ignore comments from the OrganizationSidebar.tsx file, promoting better code coverage reporting.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.spec.tsx	Added three new test cases: - Handles GraphQL errors properly - Shows Loading state initially - Renders Member images correctly
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.tsx	Removed /* istanbul ignore next */ comments from useEffect hooks

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3073]	✅
Remove Istanbul Ignore Comments [#3073]	✅
Ensure 100% Test Coverage [#3073]	❓	Full coverage verification requires comprehensive review

Possibly related PRs

• Feat : Write Unittests for src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx #2393: Unit tests for OrganizationCard component
• Unittests for src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx #2396: Unit tests for UserSidebar component
• Improved Code Coverage in src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx #3080: Code coverage enhancement for BlockUser component
• Improved Code Coverage in CreateGroupChat.tsx #3068 #3088: Code coverage improvement for CreateGroupChat component

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Test Coverage Tale 🧪

In the code's garden, tests now bloom bright,
Catching errors with algorithmic might,
No comment ignored, no corner left dark,
Our sidebar now sings a coverage spark!

Hop, hop, hooray! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.spec.tsx (2)

181-198: Ensure error results are distinctly verifiable.
Currently, the error scenario is checked by verifying fallback texts ("No Members to show" and "No Events to show"). Consider also checking for any error logs, error states, or other distinguishing elements that confirm the component is handling errors as expected. This yields more robust test coverage and makes debugging easier.

---

215-236: Validate additional variations for member images.
This test properly checks both default and custom images. For extra coverage, you could test scenarios where the image prop is an empty string or a broken link, if the component gracefully handles them.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6349f3f and 80b4e61.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
• src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.tsx (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.tsx

🔇 Additional comments (2)

src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationSidebar/OrganizationSidebar.spec.tsx (2)

27-29: Great documentation for the new test scenarios.
These explanatory comments provide clarity on testing objectives, helping future maintainers quickly understand each test's purpose. Good job!

---

200-213: Loading state test looks solid.
The test for two loading states is clear and verifies the immediate state upon render. You might also consider mocking a slower response or employing a custom wait to ensure the test fully covers any transitional states if needed.

[palisadoes]

1. The code coverage report is not showing a change. I'm re-running the job to try to regenerate it
2. Please add a screen shot of the coverage on your local system

[aadhil2k4]

@palisadoes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.25%. Comparing base (b12325e) to head (d13fc07).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3096       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             25.43%   89.25%   +63.82%     
=====================================================
  Files                   301      322       +21     
  Lines                  7612     8422      +810     
  Branches               1665     1898      +233     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   1936     7517     +5581     
+ Misses                 5549      670     -4879     
- Partials                127      235      +108     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.