refacted:src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.test.ts from Jest to Vitest #3095
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on migrating the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (1)
The beforeEach hook with vi.clearAllMocks() is properly implemented. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (4)
3-3: Address spacing style issues.There is an extra space within the curly braces. Adjusting the import statement to comply with the linter’s rules improves readability and consistency.
-import {vi , it , expect , beforeEach , describe} from 'vitest'; +import { vi, it, expect, beforeEach, describe } from 'vitest';🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 3-3: Replace
vi·,·it·,·expect·,·beforeEach·,·describewith·vi,·it,·expect,·beforeEach,·describe·(prettier/prettier)
6-6: Remove forbidden dynamic import type annotations.Some lint rules discourage using
typeof import(...)in type contexts. Instead, you can import the type definition directly.-const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import('inquirer')>(); +import type InquirerModule from 'inquirer'; +const actual = await importOriginal<typeof InquirerModule>();🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 6-6:
import()type annotations are forbidden.(@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-imports)
8-9: Remove extra whitespace.According to static analysis, remove the trailing spaces in lines 8 and 9 to conform with the code style guidelines.
return { - ...actual, - prompt: vi.fn(), + ...actual, + prompt: vi.fn(), };🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 8-8: Delete
·(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete
·(prettier/prettier)
56-57: Remove extra blank lines.Cleaning up excessive blank lines enhances readability and adheres to linting guidelines.
+🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 56-58: Delete
⏎⏎(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts
[error] 3-3: Replace vi·,·it·,·expect·,·beforeEach·,·describe with ·vi,·it,·expect,·beforeEach,·describe·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: import() type annotations are forbidden.
(@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-imports)
[error] 8-8: Delete ·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete ·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-58: Delete ⏎⏎
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (3)
15-15: Correct usage of Vitest's vi.clearAllMocks().
This replacement from jest.clearAllMocks() is correct. It properly resets all mocks in each test run.
18-19: Tests effectively mock inquirer.prompt.
This test accurately verifies the user-provided endpoint logic. Good job using vi.spyOn for mocking.
37-38: Correct logic for verifying the default endpoint.
With this test, the fallback behavior to 'http://localhost:4000/graphql/' is appropriately validated. Looks good.
|
@aryanrule Please fix the failed tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts
[error] 6-6: import() type annotations are forbidden.
(@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-imports)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts
[failure] 6-6:
import() type annotations are forbidden
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Vitest imports are correctly configured
The migration to Vitest imports is properly implemented, importing all necessary testing utilities.
13-16: LGTM: Test suite structure follows best practices
The test suite is well-organized with proper test isolation using beforeEach and vi.clearAllMocks().
Line range hint 18-54: Refactor to reduce duplication and verify test failures
The test cases are well-structured but contain duplicated expectations. Also, given the PR comments about failed tests, we should verify the test execution.
Consider extracting the common expectations into a helper function:
const verifyPromptCall = (mockPrompt: any) => {
expect(mockPrompt).toHaveBeenCalledWith([
{
type: 'input',
name: 'endpoint',
message: 'Enter your talawa-api endpoint:',
default: 'http://localhost:4000/graphql/',
},
]);
};Let's investigate the reported test failures:
|
Please fix the failing test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (1)
Missing error handling test case for inquirer.prompt failures
The test suite needs to include error handling for potential
inquirer.promptfailures. Other test files in the codebase consistently handle error cases, but this implementation lacks such coverage. Here are the specific issues:
- No test case for when
inquirer.promptrejects/fails- No error handling in the implementation for prompt failures
- Similar prompt-based tests in the codebase (e.g.,
askForCustomPort) should have consistent error handling patternsTo fix:
- Add a test case using
mockRejectedValueOnceto verify error handling- Implement proper error handling in
askForTalawaApiUrlfunction- Consider adding input validation similar to other prompt-based implementations
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-55: Verify test failures mentioned in PR commentsLet's identify the cause of the failing tests:
This will help us understand:
- How similar functionality is tested in other files
- Common error handling patterns that might be missing in this implementation
Missing error handling test cases in askForTalawaApiUrl
Based on the search results, I found that:
- Other test files in the codebase commonly include error handling test cases using
mockRejectedValueOnce- The
inquirer.promptcould fail in real scenarios, but there's no test coverage for error casesLet's add verification for error handling patterns in similar prompt-based tests:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for similar test patterns in other files echo "Checking for similar test patterns..." rg -A 5 "askForTalawaApiUrl" --type ts # Check for any error handling patterns in similar files echo "Checking error handling patterns..." rg -A 5 "mockRejectedValueOnce|throw.*Error" --type tsLength of output: 13877
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for similar prompt-based test patterns echo "Checking prompt-based tests..." rg -B 2 -A 5 "prompt.*mock" --type ts # Look for the actual implementation to verify error handling echo "Checking implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'export async function askForTalawaApiUrl() { $$$ }'Length of output: 3850
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (3)
Line range hint
18-36: Consider adding validation and error handling test casesWhile the happy path is well tested, consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid URL formats
- Network failures
- URLs without trailing slashes
This will improve test coverage and ensure robust error handling.
Would you like me to provide example test cases for these scenarios?
Line range hint
37-55: Reduce test code duplicationConsider refactoring the common mock setup and expectations into helper functions:
const mockPromptSetup = (response: { endpoint: string }) => vi.spyOn(inquirer, 'prompt').mockResolvedValueOnce(response); const expectPromptCall = (mockPrompt: any) => { expect(mockPrompt).toHaveBeenCalledWith([{ type: 'input', name: 'endpoint', message: 'Enter your talawa-api endpoint:', default: 'http://localhost:4000/graphql/', }]); };This would make the tests more maintainable and reduce duplication.
55-55: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline at the end of the file to comply with coding standards.
}); +🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 55-55: Insert
⏎(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts
[error] 55-55: Insert ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (2)
5-11: Standardize mock implementation across test files
The current mock implementation differs from other test files in the codebase. Let's align with the established pattern:
-vi.mock('inquirer', async (importOriginal) => {
- const actual = await importOriginal<typeof inquirer>();
+vi.mock('inquirer', async () => {
+ const actual = await vi.importActual('inquirer');
return {
...actual,
prompt: vi.fn(),
};
});14-16: LGTM! Correct usage of Vitest's clearAllMocks
The beforeEach setup is properly migrated to use Vitest's mocking utilities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (1)
55-55: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline at the end of the file to satisfy the linter.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 55-55: Insert
⏎(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts
[error] 55-55: Insert ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.spec.ts (3)
5-11: Standardize mock implementation across test files
The mock setup is working correctly but differs from other test files in the codebase. Let's maintain consistency by using the simpler approach:
-vi.mock('inquirer', async () => {
- const actual = await vi.importActual('inquirer');
+vi.mock('inquirer', () => ({
+ default: {
+ prompt: vi.fn()
+ }
+}));13-16: LGTM: Test suite setup is correctly migrated
The beforeEach hook and mock clearing are properly implemented using Vitest's API.
Line range hint 18-54: Investigate test failures and add error handling
The test implementation looks correct, but since there are reported failures, let's add error handling and improve the async mock setup:
it('should return the provided endpoint when user enters it', async () => {
- const mockPrompt = vi.spyOn(inquirer, 'prompt').mockResolvedValueOnce({
+ const mockPrompt = vi.spyOn(inquirer, 'prompt').mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve({
endpoint: 'http://example.com/graphql/',
- });
+ }));
const result = await askForTalawaApiUrl();
+ await vi.waitFor(() => expect(mockPrompt).toHaveBeenCalled());Let's verify the test failures with this script:
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3095 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 26.39% 89.25% +62.85%
=====================================================
Files 301 322 +21
Lines 7588 8422 +834
Branches 1657 1840 +183
=====================================================
+ Hits 2003 7517 +5514
+ Misses 5454 670 -4784
- Partials 131 235 +104 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
palisadoes
merged commit 56c1fbe
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refracting src/setup/askForTalawaApiUrl/askForTalawaApiUrl.test.ts from Jest to Vitest
Issue number :
Fixes #2749
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit