Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #3092

subrajeet-maharana · 2024-12-31T10:10:11Z

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR will migrate the src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2840

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Other information
N/A

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests
- Updated testing framework import for CurrentHourIndicator component tests
- Maintained existing test case for component rendering

…r/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest

coderabbitai · 2024-12-31T10:10:19Z

Walkthrough

This pull request involves migrating the test file for the CurrentHourIndicator component from Jest to Vitest. The change specifically adds new import statements for Vitest testing functions (describe, test, and expect) in the CurrentHourIndicator.spec.tsx file. The existing test case remains unchanged, ensuring that the component continues to render correctly.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.spec.tsx`	Added Vitest imports: `{ describe, test, expect }` from `vitest`

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2840]	✅
Rename test file from `.test.` to `.spec.` [#2840]	✅
Ensure tests pass using `npm run test:vitest` [#2840]	❓	Requires actual test run verification
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2840]	❓	Requires coverage report verification

Possibly related issues

Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2494: Refactoring CheckInModal.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest
Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2495: Refactoring CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest
Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/TableRow.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2496: Refactoring TableRow.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest
Refactor: src/components/AddOn/support/components/MainContent/MainContent.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2475: Refactoring MainContent.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest
Refactor : src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2493: Refactoring ChangeLanguageDropdown.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest

Possibly related PRs

Add AdvertisementEntry.spec.tsx for Vitest migration #2680: Migration of AdvertisementEntry component tests to Vitest
convert from jest to vitest #2486 #2705: Transition of Advertisements.spec.tsx to Vitest
Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2709: Migration of CheckInWrapper tests to Vitest
Refactor: jest to vitest of itemDeleteModal : fixes #2557 #2713: Refactoring ItemDeleteModal tests to Vitest

Suggested reviewers

palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Vitest hops in with glee,
Replacing Jest so merrily,
Test functions dance and sing,
A new testing framework's wing!
Code coverage soars, tests shine bright ✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6349f3f and 067eec5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.spec.tsx (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Learnings (1)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.spec.tsx (1)

4-4: Looks good for the Jest-to-Vitest migration.

No issues found in this migration line. Tests remain aligned with the same approach, ensuring consistency.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2024-12-31T10:10:37Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

codecov · 2024-12-31T10:22:21Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.12%. Comparing base (ff5663e) to head (9ae09ca).
Report is 17 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3092       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             25.48%   89.12%   +63.64%     
=====================================================
  Files                   301      322       +21     
  Lines                  7598     8421      +823     
  Branches               1659     1839      +180     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   1936     7505     +5569     
+ Misses                 5535      676     -4859     
- Partials                127      240      +113

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Cioppolo14 · 2024-12-31T12:58:14Z

@subrajeet-maharana Please fix the failed tests.

subrajeet-maharana · 2024-12-31T14:24:39Z

Hello @Cioppolo14!

PR Workflow Test Case is failing..
Branch name same hence test failing..

This was the same issue with my old PR #2930
So I created a fresh PR with a different branch name. But the issue persists.
Can you help me with this?

palisadoes · 2024-12-31T14:40:00Z

This PR needs to be closed.

The source and target PR branches are the same. This means that our reviewers will not be able to checkout the changes and test on their systems using this methodology which will cause a rejection error:

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

Please follow these steps:

Create a new branch with a different name in your local repository
1. Make sure the branch name is named differently from the required target branch in the PR
2. Use the git checkout -b command to do this.
Resubmit your PR

Closing

Updated Commit: Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicato…

067eec5

…r/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest

subrajeet-maharana changed the title ~~Updated Commit: Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicato…~~ Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest Dec 31, 2024

coderabbitai bot approved these changes Dec 31, 2024

View reviewed changes

subrajeet-maharana mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024

Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2930

Closed

palisadoes approved these changes Dec 31, 2024

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'develop-postgres' into currentHourIndicator

9ae09ca

rishav-jha-mech approved these changes Jan 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes merged commit b25ad26 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 1, 2025
15 checks passed

This was referenced Jan 5, 2025

Migrated src/components/TableLoader/TableLoader.test.tsx from jest to vitest #3156

Merged

Merge from develop-postgres prior to code freeze #3234

Merged

'Visit' Button Feature Added to Joined Organizations Filter #3232

Closed

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2025

Refactored CurrentHourIndicator component to use the global CSS file (app.module.css) instead of a component-specific CSS file (CurrentHourIndicator.module.css). #3387

Closed

6 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #3092

Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #3092

subrajeet-maharana commented Dec 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Dec 31, 2024

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Cioppolo14 commented Dec 31, 2024

subrajeet-maharana commented Dec 31, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 31, 2024

Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #3092

Refactor: Migrated src/components/CurrentHourIndicator/CurrentHourIndicator.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #3092

Conversation

subrajeet-maharana commented Dec 31, 2024 • edited Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

Cioppolo14 commented Dec 31, 2024

subrajeet-maharana commented Dec 31, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 31, 2024

subrajeet-maharana commented Dec 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading