Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Unit Tests for OrganizationAgendaCategory Component and Search Functionality for Agenda Item Categories #3083

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

im-vedant
Copy link
Contributor

@im-vedant im-vedant commented Dec 29, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Refactoring and feature

Issue Number:

Fixes #2372

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

https://www.loom.com/share/fb28b6228fc649158f8db6eba1ab1fc6

Summary

  1. Unit Tests: Added unit tests for the OrganizationAgendaCategory component located in src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx.

  2. Search Functionality: Implemented a search feature to filter agenda item categories based on user input.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added search functionality for agenda item categories.
    • Enhanced filtering capabilities for agenda categories.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for category-related operations.
  • Style

    • Updated layout and styling for agenda category components.
    • Changed CSS imports and class names for better consistency.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test coverage for search functionality.
    • Implemented new test scenarios for loading and error states.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@palisadoes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ff0594 and aa326cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to the agenda item categories functionality within the organization settings. Key changes include the addition of a $where parameter to the GraphQL query for filtering categories, the implementation of search capabilities in the OrganizationAgendaCategory component, and comprehensive updates to the associated test cases. Additionally, the CSS styling for various modals has been reorganized, with the removal of an obsolete CSS module. The overall focus is on improving user experience through better search and filtering options.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts Added $where parameter to AgendaItemCategoriesByOrganization query for filtering
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx Minor layout adjustments to Col components
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css Removed the CSS file, losing all associated styles
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx Added multiple tests for search functionality, loading states, and error handling
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx Implemented search functionality with input handling and filtering
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts Updated error mocks with where clause
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts Added mocks with search-related query variations
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx Updated CSS imports and class names for modal styling
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx Updated CSS imports and class names for modal styling
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx Updated CSS imports and class names for modal styling
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx Updated CSS imports and class names for modal styling

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
100% Coverage for OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx [#2372] Coverage details are not confirmed in this PR.
Comprehensive Unit Tests Multiple test cases added covering search, loading, and error scenarios.
No Functionality Removal Existing functionality preserved with added search capability.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, search with glee,
Categories dancing, now easy to see!
Input fields sparkle, queries so bright,
Agenda items filtered, what a delight!
CodeRabbit's magic makes searching a breeze 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (5)

4-4: Confirm that “react-bootstrap” is the best UI choice for your design.

This import is acceptable, but if the codebase standardizes on a different UI library or custom components, ensure consistency across modules.


6-6: Check icon usage for accessibility.

While MUI Icons are convenient, verify that tooltips or appropriate ARIA labels are provided so screen readers handle icons properly.


37-37: Consistent namespace for translations.

Using different translation keys ('translation' vs 'common') is acceptable. Just confirm they follow a convention that is easy to maintain so these references remain clear and consistent across the app.


41-42: Well-structured search state management.

Using separate state variables (searchTerm and searchValue) can help improve control over search interactions, but be mindful about duplicating state. If both always remain in sync, consider a single state approach to avoid complexity.


148-174: Thorough search event handling.

Nice handling of Enter/Backspace keys. Consider adding a small debounce on search or a “clear” button if user input is large or typed rapidly. This can improve performance and user experience.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78699b3 and 9ba17b3.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css (1 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1)

11-18: Include indexing or server-side optimizations for name-based filtering.

Adding a $where input parameter for searching by name_contains can be expensive if the underlying data store doesn't have an appropriate index. Consider verifying that the name field is indexed or that other optimizations exist to handle large datasets efficiently.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (2)

9-14: Ensure error mocks align with actual error-handling logic.

These error mocks provide coverage for the new $where parameter. Verify that the actual component tests handle the error states consistently and display correct messages.


24-29: Confirm correctness of the “agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization” mock result.

Even though the mock returns a partially valid result followed by an error in the next request, ensure this flow accurately reflects the actual error scenarios in production.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (1)

9-41: Good use of dynamic variables for search functionality.

Including different where.name_contains values (blank and “Category”) is a solid approach to testing multiple search scenarios. Keep an eye on test coverage to ensure corner cases (like partial matches or special characters) are also tested if relevant.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (1)

63-68: Good approach using where with name_contains.

The query usage for filtering is clear. Validate that the chosen search approach meets performance requirements for large data sets and consider partial vs. exact match logic if needed.

src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2)

214-216: Enhanced Column Width for Description Field

The md={6} and lg={6} props widen the description column, potentially improving readability on larger screens. Make sure this change aligns with the rest of the layout for a consistent user experience.


245-245: Widened Column Configuration

Similar to the previous change, increasing the lg={6} width for the description column helps maintain consistent layout sizing. Keep an eye on any potential wrapping issues for lengthy text content.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (10)

16-16: Using Vitest for Mocking

Great choice leveraging vitest for mocking. This strengthens test reliability and reduces dependencies on the actual implementation.


24-27: Introducing Error Mocks

Importing MOCKS_ERROR_AGENDA_ITEM_CATEGORY_LIST_QUERY and MOCKS_ERROR_MUTATION is a clean approach to test error-handling flows without polluting success paths.


37-40: Mocking Route Params

Mocking react-router-dom’s useParams is a solid way to isolate tests from actual route data. Ensure consistency by applying the same pattern across other tests that rely on routing.


55-55: Dedicated StaticMockLink for Errors

Defining link3 to simulate error responses is a neat approach to cover negative test scenarios, ensuring robust error handling.


90-104: Testing Loading State

Validating the spinner presence under empty mocks ensures your component correctly handles awaits. This is a good coverage improvement.


207-249: Verifying Error Toast for Failed Creation

This test effectively checks the toast notification flow, ensuring users are alerted when creation fails. The coverage for negative scenarios is commendable.


250-271: Search Field Typing Test

Verifying that users can type and that the input state updates is essential. This smoke test ensures core UI functionality is working as expected.


272-293: Search on Enter Key

Testing a quick search trigger via the Enter key is a user-friendly approach. Good job ensuring multiple input methods are covered.


294-317: Search on Button Click

Similarly, confirming the search runs when clicking the button addresses alternate user preferences. Nice coverage for common UI patterns.


318-338: Backspace to Clear Search

Handling the clearing of the search input ensures a smooth user experience. Verifying it reverts the displayed list is an excellent detail for usability.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css (5)

16-20: Responsive Layout for Input

Adding flex properties and a minimum width to .input fosters responsive design. Be mindful of smaller breakpoints to ensure the input doesn't overflow.


23-25: Custom Outline for Inputs

An explicit outline using var(--bs-gray-400) keeps the input visually distinct. Confirm this styling remains consistent across light/dark themes if applicable.


28-31: Inline Button in Input

Housing the button inside the .input div is a slick design choice. Check significant device breakpoints for any layout shifts or wrapping.


33-36: Enhanced InputField Style

A subtle shadow on .inputField helps it stand out. Monitor color contrasts to ensure compliance with accessibility standards.


38-41: Vertical Spacing on Button

A bit of vertical padding can improve clickability. Always test spacing changes on various screen resolutions to confirm the design remains balanced.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.09%. Comparing base (6ff0594) to head (aa326cd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3083       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             26.43%   89.09%   +62.66%     
=====================================================
  Files                   300      321       +21     
  Lines                  7577     8419      +842     
  Branches               1655     1839      +184     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2003     7501     +5498     
+ Misses                 5443      676     -4767     
- Partials                131      242      +111     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Please get the code coverage for the patch up to 100%
  2. Make CR approve your PR

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (3)

207-249: Consider enhancing error state verification

While the test effectively verifies the error toast, consider adding assertions to verify:

  1. The modal's state after the error (whether it remains open or closes)
  2. The form's state after the error (whether it's reset or retains values)

Example addition:

await waitFor(() => {
  // Verify modal remains open
  expect(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn')).toBeInTheDocument();
  
  // Verify form state
  expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.name)).toHaveValue(formData.name);
  expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.description)).toHaveValue(formData.description);
});

250-338: Refactor to reduce test setup duplication

Consider extracting the common test setup into a helper function to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.

Example refactor:

const renderComponent = () => {
  return render(
    <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}>
      <Provider store={store}>
        <BrowserRouter>
          <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}>
            <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}>
              {<OrganizationAgendaCategory orgId="123" />}
            </I18nextProvider>
          </LocalizationProvider>
        </BrowserRouter>
      </Provider>
    </MockedProvider>
  );
};

289-292: Enhance search result assertions

The current assertions only verify the count of elements with text "Category". Consider adding more specific assertions about the search results:

await waitFor(() => {
  const results = screen.getAllByText('Category');
  expect(results.length).toBe(2);
  
  // Verify the specific categories found
  expect(results[0]).toHaveTextContent('Category 1');
  expect(results[1]).toHaveTextContent('Category 2');
  
  // Verify no other categories are shown
  expect(screen.queryByText('Category 3')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

Also applies to: 314-316, 335-337

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ba17b3 and fb4ad84.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (2)

16-16: LGTM: Well-structured test setup!

The imports and mock configurations are properly organized, following testing best practices.

Also applies to: 24-27, 37-40, 55-55


90-104: LGTM: Good coverage of loading state!

The test effectively verifies the loading spinner's presence when data is being fetched.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (5)

91-105: LGTM: Loading state test is well-implemented

The test effectively verifies the loading state using an empty mocks array. Consider adding a follow-up test to verify that the spinner is removed once loading completes.

test('removes loading state after data is loaded', async () => {
  const { queryByTestId } = render(
    <MockedProvider mocks={MOCKS} addTypename={false}>
      <Provider store={store}>
        <BrowserRouter>
          <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}>
            {<OrganizationAgendaCategory orgId="123" />}
          </I18nextProvider>
        </BrowserRouter>
      </Provider>
    </MockedProvider>
  );

  expect(queryByTestId('spinner-wrapper')).toBeInTheDocument();
  
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(queryByTestId('spinner-wrapper')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});

208-250: Enhance error handling test coverage

The test effectively verifies the error toast, but consider adding these improvements:

  1. Verify that the modal remains open after the error
  2. Verify that the form data is preserved
  3. Test the error state cleanup when retrying the submission
test('handles unsuccessful creation gracefully', async () => {
  render(/* ... existing setup ... */);

  // Existing steps...
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryFormSubmitBtn'));
  
  await waitFor(() => {
    // Verify error toast
    expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Mock Graphql Error');
    
    // Verify modal remains open
    expect(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn')).toBeInTheDocument();
    
    // Verify form data is preserved
    expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.name)).toHaveValue(formData.name);
    expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.description)).toHaveValue(formData.description);
  });

  // Test retry
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryFormSubmitBtn'));
  // Add assertions for retry behavior
});

294-294: Remove debug statement

The screen.debug() statement should be removed as it's typically used during test development.

- screen.debug();

251-343: Enhance search functionality test coverage

While the tests cover basic search interactions, consider these improvements:

  1. Test empty search results scenario
  2. Verify loading state during search
  3. Test special characters in search
  4. Test case sensitivity
test('handles empty search results appropriately', async () => {
  render(/* ... existing setup ... */);
  
  const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchByName');
  userEvent.type(searchInput, 'NonexistentCategory');
  fireEvent.keyUp(searchInput, { key: 'Enter' });
  
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.queryByText('Category')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
    expect(screen.getByText(translations.noResults)).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});

test('shows loading state during search', async () => {
  render(/* ... existing setup ... */);
  
  const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchByName');
  userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Category');
  fireEvent.keyUp(searchInput, { key: 'Enter' });
  
  expect(screen.getByTestId('search-loading')).toBeInTheDocument();
  
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.queryByTestId('search-loading')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
    expect(screen.getAllByText('Category')).toHaveLength(2);
  });
});

Also, consider consolidating the search tests to reduce duplication, as they share similar setup code.


Line range hint 1-343: Consider test architecture improvements

The test file would benefit from these architectural improvements:

  1. Extract common setup code into a helper function
  2. Group related tests using describe blocks
  3. Consider using test.each for parameterized search tests
// Helper function
const renderComponent = (mockLink = link) => {
  return render(
    <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={mockLink}>
      <Provider store={store}>
        <BrowserRouter>
          <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}>
            <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}>
              {<OrganizationAgendaCategory orgId="123" />}
            </I18nextProvider>
          </LocalizationProvider>
        </BrowserRouter>
      </Provider>
    </MockedProvider>
  );
};

// Parameterized tests
describe('search functionality', () => {
  test.each([
    ['Enter key', (input) => fireEvent.keyUp(input, { key: 'Enter' })],
    ['search button', async () => userEvent.click(await screen.findByTestId('searchBtn'))]
  ])('triggers search on %s', async (_, triggerSearch) => {
    renderComponent();
    const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchByName');
    userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Category');
    await triggerSearch(searchInput);
    
    await waitFor(() => {
      expect(screen.getAllByText('Category')).toHaveLength(2);
    });
  });
});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb4ad84 and b18f150.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (1)

8-8: LGTM: Import statements and mock setup are well-structured

The additions to imports and mocks are appropriate for the new test cases. The router mock is properly configured to provide the required orgId parameter.

Also applies to: 17-17, 25-28, 38-41

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Comment here when this is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (2)

Line range hint 128-140: Consider improving error message presentation

While the error handling is functional, consider making it more user-friendly:

  1. Avoid showing technical error messages to end users
  2. Provide clear next steps or actions users can take
-            Error occured while loading{' '}
-            {agendaCategoryError && 'Agenda Categories'}
-            Data
-            <br />
-            {agendaCategoryError && (agendaCategoryError as Error).message}
+            {t('errorLoadingCategories')}
+            <br />
+            {t('tryAgainLater')}

149-173: Consider enhancing search UX with debounce and tooltips

The search implementation is good but could be improved:

  1. Add debounce to prevent excessive API calls during rapid typing
  2. Add tooltip to the search button for better accessibility
+import { debounce } from 'lodash';
+
+const debouncedSearch = debounce((value: string) => {
+  setSearchTerm(value);
+}, 300);

 <Form.Control
   type="name"
   placeholder={tCommon('searchByName')}
   autoComplete="off"
   required
   className={styles.inputField}
   value={searchValue}
   onChange={(e) => {
     setSearchValue(e.target.value);
+    debouncedSearch(e.target.value);
   }}
-  onKeyUp={(e) => {
-    if (e.key === 'Enter') {
-      setSearchTerm(searchValue);
-    } else if (e.key === 'Backspace' && searchValue === '') {
-      setSearchTerm('');
-    }
-  }}
   data-testid="searchByName"
 />
 <Button
   tabIndex={-1}
   className={styles.searchButton}
   onClick={() => setSearchTerm(searchValue)}
   data-testid="searchBtn"
+  title={tCommon('search')}
 >
   <Search />
 </Button>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b18f150 and 9b4ad99.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (4)

4-6: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized

The new imports for Form and Search components are appropriately added and organized by their respective categories.


41-42: LGTM: Well-implemented search state management

The dual state approach (searchTerm for query control and searchValue for input control) is a good pattern that prevents unnecessary API calls while maintaining a responsive UI.


63-68: LGTM: Efficient GraphQL query implementation

The search filtering is properly implemented at the API level using GraphQL's where clause, which is more efficient than client-side filtering.


1-1: Verify unit test coverage for the new search functionality

The PR objectives mention adding unit tests. Let's verify the test coverage for the new search functionality.

✅ Verification successful

Unit tests for search functionality are properly implemented

The verification shows comprehensive test coverage for the search functionality in OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx with three specific test cases:

  • "allow user to type in the search field"
  • "triggers search on pressing Enter key"
  • "triggers search on clicking search button"

These tests cover the essential user interactions with the search feature, including input handling and different ways to trigger the search.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for test file and its coverage

# Look for the test file
echo "Searching for test file..."
fd "OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx" src/

# Check test coverage for search functionality
echo "Checking test coverage for search functionality..."
rg -A 5 "test\(.*search" src/ --type ts

Length of output: 9612

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 30, 2024
@im-vedant
Copy link
Contributor Author

@palisadoes can you review this?

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (1)

55-57: Unify naming of title class attributes.

The class name titlemodalOrganizationEvents is very specific. If this styling is meant solely for agenda category preview dialogs, consider a more generalized name (e.g., titleModalPreview) to maintain clarity and flexibility across different modal contexts.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)

38-38: Modal class name consistency
While styles.campaignModal is functionally correct, the naming implies a campaign context instead of an agenda category context. Consider renaming to something more context-specific to avoid confusion.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (1)

50-50: Modal class naming may cause ambiguity
This component is for creating an agenda category, but the modal class references a “campaign.” To maintain clarity, consider a more descriptive name.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2)

52-52: Confirm naming alignment and usage of campaignModal.

Previously, this component used an AgendaCategoryModal class name. Ensure that campaignModal is consistent with the rest of the codebase's naming convention and does not introduce confusion.


57-59: Consider simplifying the name titlemodalOrganizationEvents.

While descriptive, the newly introduced class name might be overly long. Evaluate a shorter or more general naming approach that is consistent across similar components.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b4ad99 and aa326cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (2)

4-4: Consider verifying unused or removed styles.

You replaced the previous component-specific stylesheet import with a global app.module.css. If OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css was removed or renamed, ensure that any required styles from the old file are properly carried over to app.module.css, and that old styles are removed to avoid potential dead code.


50-50: Double-check modal class naming consistency.

Renaming the modal class to campaignModal is fine, but ensure consistency across other related modals. Also confirm that the new class maintains the desired styling for the organization agenda category preview context.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)

3-3: Use of global style import looks good
Switching from a local module to style/app.module.css simplifies styling maintenance across multiple components.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (2)

4-4: Global style import is consistent
Importing app.module.css provides a unified approach for styling across different components.


55-57: New title class reference
Changing to titlemodalOrganizationEvents better communicates its purpose than a generic titlemodal. Ensure all references and related styling are updated consistently.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (1)

5-5: Ensure references and class names are consistent with the new app.module.css.

You've replaced the style import with a different CSS module. Verify that any references to other styles from the old file have been removed or updated in the component hierarchy.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai full review

Please make coderabbitai approve your PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

@palisadoes: Here's the full review of this pull request:

Overall, the changes effectively add unit tests to the OrganizationAgendaCategory component to cover loading states, error handling, and the new search functionality. The introduction of where clauses in GraphQL queries and additional test mocks for search scenarios help ensure that the filtering logic is thoroughly tested. The removal of OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css in favor of a more centralized app.module.css approach seems consistent across the modal components and is unlikely to introduce regressions, though it’s good to confirm all styling references are updated. The test files now appear to cover many realistic user interactions and edge cases (e.g., error states, loading states, search input, and clearing). Good job ensuring coverage of these enhancements.

Below are some detailed points observed:

  1. Search Tests:

    • The new search tests thoroughly validate user interactions. Confirm you also have coverage for scenarios where the search input might be invalid or non-existent.
    • Consider verifying how partial matches or uppercase inputs are handled if the GraphQL filter is case-sensitive.
  2. Error Handling:

    • The test mocks for error states help ensure robust coverage. Just ensure any toasts or user feedback messages remain consistent with the project’s i18n or UI guidelines if applicable.
  3. Styling & Layout:

    • Since OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css is removed and replaced with app.module.css, double-check that previously used unique classes still behave as expected in modals (e.g., spacing, alignment).
  4. Code Coverage:

    • You mentioned the requirement to reach 100% coverage for the patch. Confirm that all newly introduced statements and branches (e.g., the searchValue and searchTerm logic, error states, loading states) are indeed instrumented in tests to achieve full coverage.

These changes appear well-structured, and the added tests significantly improve reliability. Nice contributions overall.

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.


Full review triggered.

@palisadoes palisadoes self-requested a review December 30, 2024 22:00
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)

38-38: Consider using semantically correct class names.

The class name campaignModal is being used for an agenda category modal, which creates a semantic mismatch. Consider using a more appropriate class name that reflects the modal's purpose, such as agendaCategoryModal or a generic confirmationModal.

-      className={styles.campaignModal}
+      className={styles.agendaCategoryModal}
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (1)

52-52: Consider using a more specific class name

The class name campaignModal seems generic and potentially misleading for an agenda category modal. Consider using a more semantic name that reflects its purpose.

-      className={styles.campaignModal}
+      className={styles.agendaCategoryModal}
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (1)

50-50: Consider using a more specific modal class name

The class name campaignModal seems generic for an agenda category modal. Consider using a more semantic name like agendaCategoryModal to better reflect its purpose.

-      className={styles.campaignModal}
+      className={styles.agendaCategoryModal}
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (1)

50-50: Review semantic accuracy of the modal class name.

The class name campaignModal seems semantically incorrect for an agenda category creation modal. This could lead to confusion during maintenance.

Consider using a more semantically appropriate class name:

-      className={`mt-5 ${styles.campaignModal}`}
+      className={`mt-5 ${styles.agendaCategoryModal}`}
src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1)

11-18: Ensure default handling for the $where parameter.
The new $where parameter allows flexible filtering of agenda item categories, which is great for search functionality. However, consider validating or providing a default value if $where is not supplied to avoid potential null or undefined scenarios at runtime.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (3)

41-42: Use of separate state variables for search
Declaring both searchTerm and searchValue is acceptable. This pattern allows controlling when the query variable updates. However, verify you truly need two separate variables rather than a single state with controlled throttle or debounce for performance.


128-128: Error rendering logic
Wrapping error details in a stylized container with icons is user-friendly. Consider localizing the “Error occurred while loading” text to maintain consistent i18n coverage.


144-173: Implementation of search input
The logic for updating searchTerm on Enter key and resetting it on Backspace is intuitive. Additionally, the button-driven search approach is a sound fallback. Consider adding a small debounce if the search queries APIs frequently in real-time, to reduce possible overhead.

src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (1)

245-245: Maintaining the layout for createdBy
No issues spotted here, but watch for wrapping on narrower screens if the updated column widths push text further.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (1)

273-298: Search triggered by Enter key
Simulating “Enter” and expecting updated search results is a complete end-to-end test. The debug output can be left commented out or removed once validated.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (1)

9-14: LGTM! Consider adding more error scenarios.

The error mock correctly implements the new where clause structure for the category list query. However, consider adding additional error scenarios to test edge cases of the search functionality.

Consider adding mocks for:

  • Invalid search patterns (e.g., special characters)
  • Very long search strings
  • Non-ASCII characters
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (2)

9-32: Consider expanding test data variety.

While the mock correctly implements the empty search scenario, consider enriching the test data to better represent real-world scenarios.

Add more varied test data:

 result: {
   data: {
     agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization: [
       {
         _id: 'agendaItemCategory1',
         name: 'Category',
         description: 'Test Description',
         createdBy: {
           _id: 'user1',
           firstName: 'Harve',
           lastName: 'Lance',
         },
       },
+      {
+        _id: 'agendaItemCategory2',
+        name: 'Another Category',
+        description: 'Different Description',
+        createdBy: {
+          _id: 'user2',
+          firstName: 'Jane',
+          lastName: 'Doe',
+        },
+      }
     ],
   },
 },

33-41: Add more search term variations.

The mock correctly implements a specific search scenario, but consider adding more variations to thoroughly test the search functionality.

Add mocks for additional search scenarios:

  • Partial matches (e.g., "Cat")
  • Case-insensitive matches
  • No results scenario
  • Multiple matching results

Example:

{
  request: {
    query: AGENDA_ITEM_CATEGORY_LIST,
    variables: {
      organizationId: '123',
      where: {
        name_contains: 'nonexistent',
      },
    },
  },
  result: {
    data: {
      agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization: [],
    },
  },
},
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ff0594 and aa326cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (26)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)

3-3: Verify the migration to global styles.

The change from a component-specific CSS module to global styles could impact maintainability. Ensure that all necessary styles have been properly migrated to app.module.css.

✅ Verification successful

The style migration is appropriate and consistent with the codebase

The change to use app.module.css and the campaignModal class is actually correct because:

  1. The campaignModal class is being used consistently across all similar modals in the AgendaCategory components family (CreateModal, UpdateModal, PreviewModal, and DeleteModal).
  2. The style provides a common modal positioning with max-width: 80vw and margin adjustments, which is appropriate for this delete confirmation modal.
  3. The component uses Bootstrap's Modal component with additional styling, and the global styles provide the necessary layout adjustments without conflicting with Bootstrap's base styles.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the old styles exist in the new global CSS file
rg -A 5 "campaignModal|agendaCategoryModal" style/app.module.css

# Check for any remaining references to the old CSS module
rg "OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css" src/

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the CSS file might be in a different location
fd -e css app.module

# Check for any CSS modules in the component's directory
fd -e css . src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/

# Look for any references to campaignModal class in the codebase
rg "campaignModal"

# Look for the component's usage to understand the context better
rg -l "AgendaCategoryDeleteModal"

Length of output: 1346


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the global CSS file to see the campaignModal styles
rg -A 5 "campaignModal" src/style/app.module.css

# Let's also check if there are any other modal-related styles that might be more appropriate
rg "modal" src/style/app.module.css

# Check the actual component to see how the modal is used
cat src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx

Length of output: 3273

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2)

57-59: Clarify the use of events-related class name

The class name titlemodalOrganizationEvents suggests this style is borrowed from organization events modals. While style reuse is good, using a more semantically appropriate class name would improve maintainability.

✅ Verification successful

Use consistent modal title styling across agenda category components

Based on the search results, I can see that titlemodalOrganizationEvents is consistently used across agenda category-related modals and organization events components:

  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx
  • src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx
  • src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx

This appears to be intentional as these components share similar styling with the organization events section. The class name is appropriate since agenda categories are closely related to organization events functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this class is used consistently across different modal types

# Find all files using this class name
rg "titlemodalOrganizationEvents" --type=typescript --type=tsx

# Check if there's a pattern of sharing modal styles
rg "modal.*Organization" "style/app.module.css"

Length of output: 206


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the styles and usage

# Find any CSS/SCSS files in the project
fd -e css -e scss

# Find files containing "titlemodal" (case-insensitive)
rg -i "titlemodal" 

# Find all modal-related styles
rg "\.titlemodal" 

Length of output: 15968


5-5: Verify CSS classes exist in the new module

The change from component-specific CSS to global styles is noted. Let's verify that all required CSS classes exist in the new location.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (3)

55-57: LGTM! Good use of i18n and semantic markup

The title implementation follows best practices with proper semantic markup and internationalization.


Line range hint 1-105: Overall component structure and implementation looks great!

The component demonstrates good practices:

  • Well-documented with TypeScript interfaces and JSDoc
  • Proper use of React patterns
  • Good test coverage support with data-testid attributes
  • Clean separation of concerns

4-4: Verify style migration completeness

The change from local module to app-wide styles is good for consistency. However, we should verify that all required style classes have been properly migrated.

✅ Verification successful

Style migration is correctly implemented

The verification shows that:

  1. All required style classes (campaignModal, titlemodalOrganizationEvents, preview, view, iconContainer, icon) exist in the app-wide CSS module at src/style/app.module.css
  2. These styles are consistently used across multiple components in the codebase, indicating this is part of a broader style centralization effort
  3. The style classes maintain their expected properties (e.g., .campaignModal has max-width, .preview has display: flex, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all required style classes exist in app.module.css

# Check if the new styles exist in app.module.css
rg -A 1 "\.campaignModal|\.titlemodalOrganizationEvents|\.preview|\.view|\.iconContainer|\.icon" style/app.module.css

# Check if there are any remaining references to the old module
rg "OrganizationAgendaCategory\.module\.css" src/

Length of output: 232


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path for the CSS module file
fd -e css app.module

# Let's also check for any potential local CSS module for this component
fd -e css AgendaCategory src/

# Let's check the component to see what styles it's actually using
rg -A 1 "className=\{styles\." src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx

Length of output: 1076


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these style classes exist in the app-wide CSS module
rg -A 1 "\.campaignModal|\.titlemodalOrganizationEvents|\.preview|\.view|\.iconContainer|\.icon" src/style/app.module.css

# Let's also check if there are any other components using these styles
# to ensure the migration is consistent across the codebase
rg "className=\{.*\.(campaignModal|titlemodalOrganizationEvents|preview|view|iconContainer|icon)" src/

Length of output: 9356

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (1)

55-57: LGTM! Clear and specific title class name.

The title class name change to titlemodalOrganizationEvents is more specific and better indicates the organizational context.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (6)

4-4: Importing Form from react-bootstrap is good.
This change is straightforward and aligns with the usage of <Form.Control> for the search input.


6-6: Ensure consistent icon usage from MUI.
Importing the Search icon helps visually signal the search functionality. Verify that the build system properly includes these icons.


16-16: Consolidated styles
Loading a shared stylesheet (app.module.css) is a good approach for centralizing styling across components. Ensure removed or renamed styles from the old module are now referenced or replaced correctly in this file.


37-37: Additional translation hook
Using t: tCommon is a neat approach to separate common translations from local translations. Ensure keys are correctly managed in your translation files.


63-68: Leveraging $where for filtering
Passing name_contains: searchTerm to the query effectively supports searching by name. This is well-structured, but be mindful of potential partial-match or case-sensitivity issues. If needed, consider expansions like name_i_contains for case-insensitive matches, depending on your GraphQL schema.


180-180: Custom class usage for the “Add Category” button
Applying styles.addButton is a valid approach. Continue verifying that it doesn’t conflict with other classes in app.module.css.

src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2)

214-214: Column sizing adjustment
Increasing the description column’s md size from 2 to 6 makes sense if you expect longer text. Confirm that other columns remain visually balanced on large screens.


216-216: Consistent layout
Using identical column sizes (lg={6}) ensures consistent spacing. Check if the text might be truncated on smaller screens, or is the responsive fallback already covered by the other props?

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (10)

8-8: Appropriate use of fireEvent
Importing fireEvent is standard for simulating keyboard or mouse interactions. Ensure usage consistency within the test suite.


17-17: Mocking vitest
Mocking react-toastify is helpful for verifying success/error toasts. Confirm that your tests still detect and assert correct toast calls.


25-28: Adding multiple error mocks
Including multiple error mocks and queries is a good approach for robust error-handling tests. Make sure they’re all used to achieve coverage.


38-41: Mocking react-router-dom useParams
Mocking useParams to return a stable orgId is a convenient approach for consistent testing. If future tests vary the orgId, consider parameterizing this mock.


56-56: Dedicated link for error scenario
Using link3 for the error mutation scenario is a good separation of concerns, ensuring each test suite references the appropriate link.


91-105: Loading state test
Verifying the loader with an empty mocks array ensures that the loading spinner shows properly. Great coverage for an important UX case.


208-250: Test: verifying toasts on unsuccessful creation
You are properly asserting that toast.error is called with the expected error message. Good coverage for negative test scenarios.


251-272: Search input: basic typing scenario
Your test conclusively verifies that userEvent.type() updates the field as expected. This ensures the local state logic for the search input is functional.


299-322: Search triggered by mouse click
Clicking the search button is a common user flow; verifying the same result ensures consistent behavior across different user interactions.


323-343: Searching and clearing
Verifying that pressing Backspace with an empty search box resets the categories is essential. This is a great edge case to test.

src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (1)

24-29: LGTM! Good error scenario coverage.

The mock effectively combines a successful category list query with a failed mutation, which is a realistic error scenario. The where clause structure matches the updated query parameters.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 73cad1b into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 30, 2024
15 checks passed
@im-vedant im-vedant deleted the unit-test branch December 30, 2024 22:03
Dhiren-Mhatre pushed a commit to Dhiren-Mhatre/talawa-admin that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
…nctionality for Agenda Item Categories (PalisadoesFoundation#3083)

* code refactor

* Implemented search functionality

* added new test cases for search functionality

* Fix test

* improve code coverage

* mirgated OrganizationAgendaCategory to stylesheet

* moved other components of AgendaCategory to common stylesheet

---------

Co-authored-by: im-vedant <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants