-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 811
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Unit Tests for OrganizationAgendaCategory Component and Search Functionality for Agenda Item Categories #3083
Add Unit Tests for OrganizationAgendaCategory Component and Search Functionality for Agenda Item Categories #3083
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@palisadoes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements to the agenda item categories functionality within the organization settings. Key changes include the addition of a Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (5)
4-4
: Confirm that “react-bootstrap” is the best UI choice for your design.This import is acceptable, but if the codebase standardizes on a different UI library or custom components, ensure consistency across modules.
6-6
: Check icon usage for accessibility.While MUI Icons are convenient, verify that tooltips or appropriate ARIA labels are provided so screen readers handle icons properly.
37-37
: Consistent namespace for translations.Using different translation keys (
'translation'
vs'common'
) is acceptable. Just confirm they follow a convention that is easy to maintain so these references remain clear and consistent across the app.
41-42
: Well-structured search state management.Using separate state variables (
searchTerm
andsearchValue
) can help improve control over search interactions, but be mindful about duplicating state. If both always remain in sync, consider a single state approach to avoid complexity.
148-174
: Thorough search event handling.Nice handling of Enter/Backspace keys. Consider adding a small debounce on search or a “clear” button if user input is large or typed rapidly. This can improve performance and user experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts
(1 hunks)src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
(1 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx
(5 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx
(4 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1)
11-18
: Include indexing or server-side optimizations for name-based filtering.
Adding a $where
input parameter for searching by name_contains
can be expensive if the underlying data store doesn't have an appropriate index. Consider verifying that the name field is indexed or that other optimizations exist to handle large datasets efficiently.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (2)
9-14
: Ensure error mocks align with actual error-handling logic.
These error mocks provide coverage for the new $where
parameter. Verify that the actual component tests handle the error states consistently and display correct messages.
24-29
: Confirm correctness of the “agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization” mock result.
Even though the mock returns a partially valid result followed by an error in the next request, ensure this flow accurately reflects the actual error scenarios in production.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (1)
9-41
: Good use of dynamic variables for search functionality.
Including different where.name_contains
values (blank and “Category”) is a solid approach to testing multiple search scenarios. Keep an eye on test coverage to ensure corner cases (like partial matches or special characters) are also tested if relevant.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (1)
63-68
: Good approach using where
with name_contains
.
The query usage for filtering is clear. Validate that the chosen search approach meets performance requirements for large data sets and consider partial vs. exact match logic if needed.
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2)
214-216
: Enhanced Column Width for Description Field
The md={6}
and lg={6}
props widen the description column, potentially improving readability on larger screens. Make sure this change aligns with the rest of the layout for a consistent user experience.
245-245
: Widened Column Configuration
Similar to the previous change, increasing the lg={6}
width for the description column helps maintain consistent layout sizing. Keep an eye on any potential wrapping issues for lengthy text content.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (10)
16-16
: Using Vitest for Mocking
Great choice leveraging vitest
for mocking. This strengthens test reliability and reduces dependencies on the actual implementation.
24-27
: Introducing Error Mocks
Importing MOCKS_ERROR_AGENDA_ITEM_CATEGORY_LIST_QUERY
and MOCKS_ERROR_MUTATION
is a clean approach to test error-handling flows without polluting success paths.
37-40
: Mocking Route Params
Mocking react-router-dom
’s useParams
is a solid way to isolate tests from actual route data. Ensure consistency by applying the same pattern across other tests that rely on routing.
55-55
: Dedicated StaticMockLink for Errors
Defining link3
to simulate error responses is a neat approach to cover negative test scenarios, ensuring robust error handling.
90-104
: Testing Loading State
Validating the spinner presence under empty mocks ensures your component correctly handles awaits. This is a good coverage improvement.
207-249
: Verifying Error Toast for Failed Creation
This test effectively checks the toast notification flow, ensuring users are alerted when creation fails. The coverage for negative scenarios is commendable.
250-271
: Search Field Typing Test
Verifying that users can type and that the input state updates is essential. This smoke test ensures core UI functionality is working as expected.
272-293
: Search on Enter Key
Testing a quick search trigger via the Enter key is a user-friendly approach. Good job ensuring multiple input methods are covered.
294-317
: Search on Button Click
Similarly, confirming the search runs when clicking the button addresses alternate user preferences. Nice coverage for common UI patterns.
318-338
: Backspace to Clear Search
Handling the clearing of the search input ensures a smooth user experience. Verifying it reverts the displayed list is an excellent detail for usability.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css (5)
16-20
: Responsive Layout for Input
Adding flex properties and a minimum width to .input
fosters responsive design. Be mindful of smaller breakpoints to ensure the input doesn't overflow.
23-25
: Custom Outline for Inputs
An explicit outline using var(--bs-gray-400)
keeps the input visually distinct. Confirm this styling remains consistent across light/dark themes if applicable.
28-31
: Inline Button in Input
Housing the button inside the .input
div is a slick design choice. Check significant device breakpoints for any layout shifts or wrapping.
33-36
: Enhanced InputField Style
A subtle shadow on .inputField
helps it stand out. Monitor color contrasts to ensure compliance with accessibility standards.
38-41
: Vertical Spacing on Button
A bit of vertical padding can improve clickability. Always test spacing changes on various screen resolutions to confirm the design remains balanced.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3083 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 26.43% 89.09% +62.66%
=====================================================
Files 300 321 +21
Lines 7577 8419 +842
Branches 1655 1839 +184
=====================================================
+ Hits 2003 7501 +5498
+ Misses 5443 676 -4767
- Partials 131 242 +111 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (3)
207-249
: Consider enhancing error state verificationWhile the test effectively verifies the error toast, consider adding assertions to verify:
- The modal's state after the error (whether it remains open or closes)
- The form's state after the error (whether it's reset or retains values)
Example addition:
await waitFor(() => { // Verify modal remains open expect(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); // Verify form state expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.name)).toHaveValue(formData.name); expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.description)).toHaveValue(formData.description); });
250-338
: Refactor to reduce test setup duplicationConsider extracting the common test setup into a helper function to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
Example refactor:
const renderComponent = () => { return render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> <Provider store={store}> <BrowserRouter> <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> {<OrganizationAgendaCategory orgId="123" />} </I18nextProvider> </LocalizationProvider> </BrowserRouter> </Provider> </MockedProvider> ); };
289-292
: Enhance search result assertionsThe current assertions only verify the count of elements with text "Category". Consider adding more specific assertions about the search results:
await waitFor(() => { const results = screen.getAllByText('Category'); expect(results.length).toBe(2); // Verify the specific categories found expect(results[0]).toHaveTextContent('Category 1'); expect(results[1]).toHaveTextContent('Category 2'); // Verify no other categories are shown expect(screen.queryByText('Category 3')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); });Also applies to: 314-316, 335-337
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx
(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (2)
16-16
: LGTM: Well-structured test setup!
The imports and mock configurations are properly organized, following testing best practices.
Also applies to: 24-27, 37-40, 55-55
90-104
: LGTM: Good coverage of loading state!
The test effectively verifies the loading spinner's presence when data is being fetched.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (5)
91-105
: LGTM: Loading state test is well-implementedThe test effectively verifies the loading state using an empty mocks array. Consider adding a follow-up test to verify that the spinner is removed once loading completes.
test('removes loading state after data is loaded', async () => { const { queryByTestId } = render( <MockedProvider mocks={MOCKS} addTypename={false}> <Provider store={store}> <BrowserRouter> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> {<OrganizationAgendaCategory orgId="123" />} </I18nextProvider> </BrowserRouter> </Provider> </MockedProvider> ); expect(queryByTestId('spinner-wrapper')).toBeInTheDocument(); await waitFor(() => { expect(queryByTestId('spinner-wrapper')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); });
208-250
: Enhance error handling test coverageThe test effectively verifies the error toast, but consider adding these improvements:
- Verify that the modal remains open after the error
- Verify that the form data is preserved
- Test the error state cleanup when retrying the submission
test('handles unsuccessful creation gracefully', async () => { render(/* ... existing setup ... */); // Existing steps... userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryFormSubmitBtn')); await waitFor(() => { // Verify error toast expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Mock Graphql Error'); // Verify modal remains open expect(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryModalCloseBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); // Verify form data is preserved expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.name)).toHaveValue(formData.name); expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText(translations.description)).toHaveValue(formData.description); }); // Test retry userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('createAgendaCategoryFormSubmitBtn')); // Add assertions for retry behavior });
294-294
: Remove debug statementThe
screen.debug()
statement should be removed as it's typically used during test development.- screen.debug();
251-343
: Enhance search functionality test coverageWhile the tests cover basic search interactions, consider these improvements:
- Test empty search results scenario
- Verify loading state during search
- Test special characters in search
- Test case sensitivity
test('handles empty search results appropriately', async () => { render(/* ... existing setup ... */); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchByName'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'NonexistentCategory'); fireEvent.keyUp(searchInput, { key: 'Enter' }); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.queryByText('Category')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByText(translations.noResults)).toBeInTheDocument(); }); }); test('shows loading state during search', async () => { render(/* ... existing setup ... */); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchByName'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Category'); fireEvent.keyUp(searchInput, { key: 'Enter' }); expect(screen.getByTestId('search-loading')).toBeInTheDocument(); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.queryByTestId('search-loading')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getAllByText('Category')).toHaveLength(2); }); });Also, consider consolidating the search tests to reduce duplication, as they share similar setup code.
Line range hint
1-343
: Consider test architecture improvementsThe test file would benefit from these architectural improvements:
- Extract common setup code into a helper function
- Group related tests using
describe
blocks- Consider using test.each for parameterized search tests
// Helper function const renderComponent = (mockLink = link) => { return render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={mockLink}> <Provider store={store}> <BrowserRouter> <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> {<OrganizationAgendaCategory orgId="123" />} </I18nextProvider> </LocalizationProvider> </BrowserRouter> </Provider> </MockedProvider> ); }; // Parameterized tests describe('search functionality', () => { test.each([ ['Enter key', (input) => fireEvent.keyUp(input, { key: 'Enter' })], ['search button', async () => userEvent.click(await screen.findByTestId('searchBtn'))] ])('triggers search on %s', async (_, triggerSearch) => { renderComponent(); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchByName'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Category'); await triggerSearch(searchInput); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getAllByText('Category')).toHaveLength(2); }); }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx
(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (1)
8-8
: LGTM: Import statements and mock setup are well-structured
The additions to imports and mocks are appropriate for the new test cases. The router mock is properly configured to provide the required orgId parameter.
Also applies to: 17-17, 25-28, 38-41
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comments
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Comment here when this is ready for review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (2)
Line range hint
128-140
: Consider improving error message presentationWhile the error handling is functional, consider making it more user-friendly:
- Avoid showing technical error messages to end users
- Provide clear next steps or actions users can take
- Error occured while loading{' '} - {agendaCategoryError && 'Agenda Categories'} - Data - <br /> - {agendaCategoryError && (agendaCategoryError as Error).message} + {t('errorLoadingCategories')} + <br /> + {t('tryAgainLater')}
149-173
: Consider enhancing search UX with debounce and tooltipsThe search implementation is good but could be improved:
- Add debounce to prevent excessive API calls during rapid typing
- Add tooltip to the search button for better accessibility
+import { debounce } from 'lodash'; + +const debouncedSearch = debounce((value: string) => { + setSearchTerm(value); +}, 300); <Form.Control type="name" placeholder={tCommon('searchByName')} autoComplete="off" required className={styles.inputField} value={searchValue} onChange={(e) => { setSearchValue(e.target.value); + debouncedSearch(e.target.value); }} - onKeyUp={(e) => { - if (e.key === 'Enter') { - setSearchTerm(searchValue); - } else if (e.key === 'Backspace' && searchValue === '') { - setSearchTerm(''); - } - }} data-testid="searchByName" /> <Button tabIndex={-1} className={styles.searchButton} onClick={() => setSearchTerm(searchValue)} data-testid="searchBtn" + title={tCommon('search')} > <Search /> </Button>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
(0 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx
(6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (4)
4-6
: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized
The new imports for Form and Search components are appropriately added and organized by their respective categories.
41-42
: LGTM: Well-implemented search state management
The dual state approach (searchTerm
for query control and searchValue
for input control) is a good pattern that prevents unnecessary API calls while maintaining a responsive UI.
63-68
: LGTM: Efficient GraphQL query implementation
The search filtering is properly implemented at the API level using GraphQL's where clause, which is more efficient than client-side filtering.
1-1
: Verify unit test coverage for the new search functionality
The PR objectives mention adding unit tests. Let's verify the test coverage for the new search functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Unit tests for search functionality are properly implemented
The verification shows comprehensive test coverage for the search functionality in OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx
with three specific test cases:
- "allow user to type in the search field"
- "triggers search on pressing Enter key"
- "triggers search on clicking search button"
These tests cover the essential user interactions with the search feature, including input handling and different ways to trigger the search.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for test file and its coverage
# Look for the test file
echo "Searching for test file..."
fd "OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx" src/
# Check test coverage for search functionality
echo "Checking test coverage for search functionality..."
rg -A 5 "test\(.*search" src/ --type ts
Length of output: 9612
@palisadoes can you review this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (1)
55-57
: Unify naming of title class attributes.The class name
titlemodalOrganizationEvents
is very specific. If this styling is meant solely for agenda category preview dialogs, consider a more generalized name (e.g.,titleModalPreview
) to maintain clarity and flexibility across different modal contexts.src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)
38-38
: Modal class name consistency
Whilestyles.campaignModal
is functionally correct, the naming implies a campaign context instead of an agenda category context. Consider renaming to something more context-specific to avoid confusion.src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (1)
50-50
: Modal class naming may cause ambiguity
This component is for creating an agenda category, but the modal class references a “campaign.” To maintain clarity, consider a more descriptive name.src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2)
52-52
: Confirm naming alignment and usage ofcampaignModal
.Previously, this component used an
AgendaCategoryModal
class name. Ensure thatcampaignModal
is consistent with the rest of the codebase's naming convention and does not introduce confusion.
57-59
: Consider simplifying the nametitlemodalOrganizationEvents
.While descriptive, the newly introduced class name might be overly long. Evaluate a shorter or more general naming approach that is consistent across similar components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (2)
4-4
: Consider verifying unused or removed styles.
You replaced the previous component-specific stylesheet import with a global app.module.css
. If OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
was removed or renamed, ensure that any required styles from the old file are properly carried over to app.module.css
, and that old styles are removed to avoid potential dead code.
50-50
: Double-check modal class naming consistency.
Renaming the modal class to campaignModal
is fine, but ensure consistency across other related modals. Also confirm that the new class maintains the desired styling for the organization agenda category preview context.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)
3-3
: Use of global style import looks good
Switching from a local module to style/app.module.css
simplifies styling maintenance across multiple components.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (2)
4-4
: Global style import is consistent
Importing app.module.css
provides a unified approach for styling across different components.
55-57
: New title class reference
Changing to titlemodalOrganizationEvents
better communicates its purpose than a generic titlemodal
. Ensure all references and related styling are updated consistently.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (1)
5-5
: Ensure references and class names are consistent with the new app.module.css
.
You've replaced the style import with a different CSS module. Verify that any references to other styles from the old file have been removed or updated in the component hierarchy.
@coderabbitai full review Please make coderabbitai approve your PR |
@palisadoes: Here's the full review of this pull request: Overall, the changes effectively add unit tests to the Below are some detailed points observed:
These changes appear well-structured, and the added tests significantly improve reliability. Nice contributions overall. ✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. Full review triggered. |
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)
38-38
: Consider using semantically correct class names.The class name
campaignModal
is being used for an agenda category modal, which creates a semantic mismatch. Consider using a more appropriate class name that reflects the modal's purpose, such asagendaCategoryModal
or a genericconfirmationModal
.- className={styles.campaignModal} + className={styles.agendaCategoryModal}src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (1)
52-52
: Consider using a more specific class nameThe class name
campaignModal
seems generic and potentially misleading for an agenda category modal. Consider using a more semantic name that reflects its purpose.- className={styles.campaignModal} + className={styles.agendaCategoryModal}src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (1)
50-50
: Consider using a more specific modal class nameThe class name
campaignModal
seems generic for an agenda category modal. Consider using a more semantic name likeagendaCategoryModal
to better reflect its purpose.- className={styles.campaignModal} + className={styles.agendaCategoryModal}src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (1)
50-50
: Review semantic accuracy of the modal class name.The class name
campaignModal
seems semantically incorrect for an agenda category creation modal. This could lead to confusion during maintenance.Consider using a more semantically appropriate class name:
- className={`mt-5 ${styles.campaignModal}`} + className={`mt-5 ${styles.agendaCategoryModal}`}src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts (1)
11-18
: Ensure default handling for the$where
parameter.
The new$where
parameter allows flexible filtering of agenda item categories, which is great for search functionality. However, consider validating or providing a default value if$where
is not supplied to avoid potential null or undefined scenarios at runtime.src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (3)
41-42
: Use of separate state variables for search
Declaring bothsearchTerm
andsearchValue
is acceptable. This pattern allows controlling when the query variable updates. However, verify you truly need two separate variables rather than a single state with controlled throttle or debounce for performance.
128-128
: Error rendering logic
Wrapping error details in a stylized container with icons is user-friendly. Consider localizing the “Error occurred while loading” text to maintain consistent i18n coverage.
144-173
: Implementation of search input
The logic for updatingsearchTerm
on Enter key and resetting it on Backspace is intuitive. Additionally, the button-driven search approach is a sound fallback. Consider adding a small debounce if the search queries APIs frequently in real-time, to reduce possible overhead.src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (1)
245-245
: Maintaining the layout for createdBy
No issues spotted here, but watch for wrapping on narrower screens if the updated column widths push text further.src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (1)
273-298
: Search triggered by Enter key
Simulating “Enter” and expecting updated search results is a complete end-to-end test. The debug output can be left commented out or removed once validated.src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (1)
9-14
: LGTM! Consider adding more error scenarios.The error mock correctly implements the new
where
clause structure for the category list query. However, consider adding additional error scenarios to test edge cases of the search functionality.Consider adding mocks for:
- Invalid search patterns (e.g., special characters)
- Very long search strings
- Non-ASCII characters
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts (2)
9-32
: Consider expanding test data variety.While the mock correctly implements the empty search scenario, consider enriching the test data to better represent real-world scenarios.
Add more varied test data:
result: { data: { agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization: [ { _id: 'agendaItemCategory1', name: 'Category', description: 'Test Description', createdBy: { _id: 'user1', firstName: 'Harve', lastName: 'Lance', }, }, + { + _id: 'agendaItemCategory2', + name: 'Another Category', + description: 'Different Description', + createdBy: { + _id: 'user2', + firstName: 'Jane', + lastName: 'Doe', + }, + } ], }, },
33-41
: Add more search term variations.The mock correctly implements a specific search scenario, but consider adding more variations to thoroughly test the search functionality.
Add mocks for additional search scenarios:
- Partial matches (e.g., "Cat")
- Case-insensitive matches
- No results scenario
- Multiple matching results
Example:
{ request: { query: AGENDA_ITEM_CATEGORY_LIST, variables: { organizationId: '123', where: { name_contains: 'nonexistent', }, }, }, result: { data: { agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization: [], }, }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
src/GraphQl/Queries/AgendaCategoryQueries.ts
(1 hunks)src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
(0 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx
(6 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx
(6 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts
(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryMocks.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (26)
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx (1)
3-3
: Verify the migration to global styles.
The change from a component-specific CSS module to global styles could impact maintainability. Ensure that all necessary styles have been properly migrated to app.module.css
.
✅ Verification successful
The style migration is appropriate and consistent with the codebase
The change to use app.module.css
and the campaignModal
class is actually correct because:
- The
campaignModal
class is being used consistently across all similar modals in the AgendaCategory components family (CreateModal, UpdateModal, PreviewModal, and DeleteModal). - The style provides a common modal positioning with
max-width: 80vw
and margin adjustments, which is appropriate for this delete confirmation modal. - The component uses Bootstrap's Modal component with additional styling, and the global styles provide the necessary layout adjustments without conflicting with Bootstrap's base styles.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the old styles exist in the new global CSS file
rg -A 5 "campaignModal|agendaCategoryModal" style/app.module.css
# Check for any remaining references to the old CSS module
rg "OrganizationAgendaCategory.module.css" src/
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the CSS file might be in a different location
fd -e css app.module
# Check for any CSS modules in the component's directory
fd -e css . src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/
# Look for any references to campaignModal class in the codebase
rg "campaignModal"
# Look for the component's usage to understand the context better
rg -l "AgendaCategoryDeleteModal"
Length of output: 1346
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the global CSS file to see the campaignModal styles
rg -A 5 "campaignModal" src/style/app.module.css
# Let's also check if there are any other modal-related styles that might be more appropriate
rg "modal" src/style/app.module.css
# Check the actual component to see how the modal is used
cat src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryDeleteModal.tsx
Length of output: 3273
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx (2)
57-59
: Clarify the use of events-related class name
The class name titlemodalOrganizationEvents
suggests this style is borrowed from organization events modals. While style reuse is good, using a more semantically appropriate class name would improve maintainability.
✅ Verification successful
Use consistent modal title styling across agenda category components
Based on the search results, I can see that titlemodalOrganizationEvents
is consistently used across agenda category-related modals and organization events components:
- src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryUpdateModal.tsx
- src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx
- src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx
This appears to be intentional as these components share similar styling with the organization events section. The class name is appropriate since agenda categories are closely related to organization events functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this class is used consistently across different modal types
# Find all files using this class name
rg "titlemodalOrganizationEvents" --type=typescript --type=tsx
# Check if there's a pattern of sharing modal styles
rg "modal.*Organization" "style/app.module.css"
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the styles and usage
# Find any CSS/SCSS files in the project
fd -e css -e scss
# Find files containing "titlemodal" (case-insensitive)
rg -i "titlemodal"
# Find all modal-related styles
rg "\.titlemodal"
Length of output: 15968
5-5
: Verify CSS classes exist in the new module
The change from component-specific CSS to global styles is noted. Let's verify that all required CSS classes exist in the new location.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx (3)
55-57
: LGTM! Good use of i18n and semantic markup
The title implementation follows best practices with proper semantic markup and internationalization.
Line range hint 1-105
: Overall component structure and implementation looks great!
The component demonstrates good practices:
- Well-documented with TypeScript interfaces and JSDoc
- Proper use of React patterns
- Good test coverage support with data-testid attributes
- Clean separation of concerns
4-4
: Verify style migration completeness
The change from local module to app-wide styles is good for consistency. However, we should verify that all required style classes have been properly migrated.
✅ Verification successful
Style migration is correctly implemented
The verification shows that:
- All required style classes (
campaignModal
,titlemodalOrganizationEvents
,preview
,view
,iconContainer
,icon
) exist in the app-wide CSS module atsrc/style/app.module.css
- These styles are consistently used across multiple components in the codebase, indicating this is part of a broader style centralization effort
- The style classes maintain their expected properties (e.g.,
.campaignModal
hasmax-width
,.preview
hasdisplay: flex
, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all required style classes exist in app.module.css
# Check if the new styles exist in app.module.css
rg -A 1 "\.campaignModal|\.titlemodalOrganizationEvents|\.preview|\.view|\.iconContainer|\.icon" style/app.module.css
# Check if there are any remaining references to the old module
rg "OrganizationAgendaCategory\.module\.css" src/
Length of output: 232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path for the CSS module file
fd -e css app.module
# Let's also check for any potential local CSS module for this component
fd -e css AgendaCategory src/
# Let's check the component to see what styles it's actually using
rg -A 1 "className=\{styles\." src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryPreviewModal.tsx
Length of output: 1076
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these style classes exist in the app-wide CSS module
rg -A 1 "\.campaignModal|\.titlemodalOrganizationEvents|\.preview|\.view|\.iconContainer|\.icon" src/style/app.module.css
# Let's also check if there are any other components using these styles
# to ensure the migration is consistent across the codebase
rg "className=\{.*\.(campaignModal|titlemodalOrganizationEvents|preview|view|iconContainer|icon)" src/
Length of output: 9356
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx (1)
55-57
: LGTM! Clear and specific title class name.
The title class name change to titlemodalOrganizationEvents
is more specific and better indicates the organizational context.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx (6)
4-4
: Importing Form from react-bootstrap is good.
This change is straightforward and aligns with the usage of <Form.Control>
for the search input.
6-6
: Ensure consistent icon usage from MUI.
Importing the Search
icon helps visually signal the search functionality. Verify that the build system properly includes these icons.
16-16
: Consolidated styles
Loading a shared stylesheet (app.module.css
) is a good approach for centralizing styling across components. Ensure removed or renamed styles from the old module are now referenced or replaced correctly in this file.
37-37
: Additional translation hook
Using t: tCommon
is a neat approach to separate common translations from local translations. Ensure keys are correctly managed in your translation files.
63-68
: Leveraging $where
for filtering
Passing name_contains: searchTerm
to the query effectively supports searching by name. This is well-structured, but be mindful of potential partial-match or case-sensitivity issues. If needed, consider expansions like name_i_contains
for case-insensitive matches, depending on your GraphQL schema.
180-180
: Custom class usage for the “Add Category” button
Applying styles.addButton
is a valid approach. Continue verifying that it doesn’t conflict with other classes in app.module.css
.
src/components/AgendaCategory/AgendaCategoryContainer.tsx (2)
214-214
: Column sizing adjustment
Increasing the description column’s md size from 2 to 6 makes sense if you expect longer text. Confirm that other columns remain visually balanced on large screens.
216-216
: Consistent layout
Using identical column sizes (lg={6}
) ensures consistent spacing. Check if the text might be truncated on smaller screens, or is the responsive fallback already covered by the other props?
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.spec.tsx (10)
8-8
: Appropriate use of fireEvent
Importing fireEvent
is standard for simulating keyboard or mouse interactions. Ensure usage consistency within the test suite.
17-17
: Mocking vitest
Mocking react-toastify
is helpful for verifying success/error toasts. Confirm that your tests still detect and assert correct toast calls.
25-28
: Adding multiple error mocks
Including multiple error mocks and queries is a good approach for robust error-handling tests. Make sure they’re all used to achieve coverage.
38-41
: Mocking react-router-dom
useParams
Mocking useParams
to return a stable orgId
is a convenient approach for consistent testing. If future tests vary the orgId, consider parameterizing this mock.
56-56
: Dedicated link for error scenario
Using link3
for the error mutation scenario is a good separation of concerns, ensuring each test suite references the appropriate link.
91-105
: Loading state test
Verifying the loader with an empty mocks array ensures that the loading spinner shows properly. Great coverage for an important UX case.
208-250
: Test: verifying toasts on unsuccessful creation
You are properly asserting that toast.error
is called with the expected error message. Good coverage for negative test scenarios.
251-272
: Search input: basic typing scenario
Your test conclusively verifies that userEvent.type()
updates the field as expected. This ensures the local state logic for the search input is functional.
299-322
: Search triggered by mouse click
Clicking the search button is a common user flow; verifying the same result ensures consistent behavior across different user interactions.
323-343
: Searching and clearing
Verifying that pressing Backspace with an empty search box resets the categories is essential. This is a great edge case to test.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategoryErrorMocks.ts (1)
24-29
: LGTM! Good error scenario coverage.
The mock effectively combines a successful category list query with a failed mutation, which is a realistic error scenario. The where
clause structure matches the updated query parameters.
src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/AgendaCategoryCreateModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
73cad1b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
…nctionality for Agenda Item Categories (PalisadoesFoundation#3083) * code refactor * Implemented search functionality * added new test cases for search functionality * Fix test * improve code coverage * mirgated OrganizationAgendaCategory to stylesheet * moved other components of AgendaCategory to common stylesheet --------- Co-authored-by: im-vedant <[email protected]>
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring and feature
Issue Number:
Fixes #2372
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
https://www.loom.com/share/fb28b6228fc649158f8db6eba1ab1fc6
Summary
Unit Tests: Added unit tests for the OrganizationAgendaCategory component located in src/components/OrgSettings/AgendaItemCategories/OrganizationAgendaCategory.tsx.
Search Functionality: Implemented a search feature to filter agenda item categories based on user input.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Tests