Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Vitest to src/components/EventCalendar/* #2944

Merged

Conversation

shivasankaran18
Copy link
Contributor

@shivasankaran18 shivasankaran18 commented Dec 26, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Added Vitest to src/components/EventCalendar/*

Issue Number: 2805

Fixes #2805

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

Snapshots/Videos:
Screenshot 2024-12-26 224721

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated mock functions in the EventHeader component tests to use Vitest instead of Jest.
  • Chores

    • Replaced Jest mock clearing with Vitest in the EventCalendar component tests.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on migrating test files for the EventCalendar components from Jest to Vitest. Specifically, the changes involve updating the test files EventCalendar.spec.tsx and EventHeader.spec.tsx to use Vitest's testing utilities and syntax. The modifications include replacing Jest-specific mock functions with Vitest equivalents and renaming test files from .test.tsx to .spec.tsx.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.spec.tsx Replaced jest.clearAllMocks() with vi.clearAllMocks() and updated import to use Vitest's vi utility
src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.spec.tsx Replaced jest.fn() with vi.fn() for mock functions handleChangeView and showInviteModal

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor EventCalendar tests from Jest to Vitest [#2805]
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2805]
Rename test files to .spec.* suffix [#2805]

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Hop, skip, and a test away,
Jest transforms to Vitest today!
Mocks dance with new delight,
Specs shine ever so bright!
Code's journey continues its sway 🧪


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0cede94 and 53d6d00.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.spec.tsx (3)

7-7: Successful migration to Vitest import.

Good job importing vi from vitest; this aligns well with your framework migration.


12-16: Mock function naming and usage guideline.

The doc comment clarifies the purpose of handleChangeView. Everything here appears consistent and straightforward. Good work ensuring the mock function is well-documented.


17-20: Consistent style for second mock function.

Similarly, the showInviteModal mock function and its comment maintain consistency. This approach makes the tests more approachable.

src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.spec.tsx (2)

16-16: Vitest import alignment.

This import correctly replaces Jest with Vitest, ensuring consistency across the testing suite.


126-126: Clearing mocks after each test.

Using vi.clearAllMocks() in afterEach is a solid approach to reset mocks and prevent interference between tests.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.39%. Comparing base (0cede94) to head (53d6d00).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2944       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             46.06%   88.39%   +42.32%     
=====================================================
  Files                   299      316       +17     
  Lines                  7420     8271      +851     
  Branches               1623     1812      +189     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   3418     7311     +3893     
+ Misses                 3767      742     -3025     
+ Partials                235      218       -17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit a12833b into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 26, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants