Refactor src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2820 #2874
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves migrating the test file for the SuperAdminScreen component from Jest to Vitest. The change introduces a new import statement for Vitest's testing functions ( Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (2)📓 Common learningssrc/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.spec.tsx (1)🔇 Additional comments (1)src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.spec.tsx (1)
This change correctly introduces Vitest imports and is aligned with the goal of migrating from Jest to Vitest. Nice work! To ensure complete migration, consider verifying that there are no leftover references to Jest in the rest of the codebase: ✅ Verification successfulBased on the search results, there are still many Jest-related references in the codebase, particularly in test files, package.json, and configuration files. However, this is expected during a migration process since:
The specific change in Let me check the content of these Vitest configuration files to verify the migration setup. Vitest migration is properly configured and the import change is correct The change to use Vitest imports in
The presence of Jest-related files and dependencies is expected during the migration process and doesn't affect the correctness of this specific change. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Searching for any leftover references to Jest
rg 'jest'
Length of output: 65818 Script: # Check for Vitest configuration files
fd vitest
Length of output: 44 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check Vitest configuration files content
cat vitest.config.ts vitest.setup.ts
Length of output: 1090 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
hey @palisadoes the test cases are passing but the is getting console.log I checkout about it, It basically states that test does not have a mocked response for the getCommunityData. So means there is no Mock data. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2874 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 60.19% 87.90% +27.70%
=====================================================
Files 296 313 +17
Lines 7373 8224 +851
Branches 1610 1799 +189
=====================================================
+ Hits 4438 7229 +2791
+ Misses 2690 791 -1899
+ Partials 245 204 -41 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
merged commit 22436b5
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
Refactored src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.test.tsx to
src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.spec.tsx
Issue: #2820: #2820
Changes Implemented:
Refactored the testing framework from Jest to Vitest in src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.test.tsx.
Updated import statements, mocking methods, and assertions to align with Vitest conventions.
Verified compatibility with the existing codebase using Vitest.
SuperAdminScreen.test.tsx → SuperAdminScreen.spec.tsx to follow the naming convention for Vitest.
Refactor
src/components/SuperAdminScreen/SuperAdminScreen.test.tsxfrom Jest to Vitest #2820Other information
I have read the previous refactor PR and tried to keep things as uniform as possible.
Please suggest any other changes if required.
Summary by CodeRabbit
SuperAdminScreencomponent, enhancing the testing structure while maintaining existing test logic.