Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated the calender to not accomodate future dates #2865

Conversation

arpit-chakraborty
Copy link
Contributor

@arpit-chakraborty arpit-chakraborty commented Dec 25, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

It restricts the user from selecting a future date as their date of birth from the calendar.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2732

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

image

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a restriction on the birth date input field to prevent selection of future dates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced input validation for the birth date field.
  • Tests

    • Introduced a test case to validate that future dates cannot be selected for the birth date input.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Settings.tsx component in the user portal settings screen by adding validation logic to prevent users from selecting a future date for the birthDate input field. A max attribute is introduced to restrict the selectable date to the current date or earlier. Additionally, a corresponding test case is added in Settings.spec.tsx to ensure this validation works as intended.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.tsx Added validation logic to prevent future dates for birthDate and added max attribute to the input.
src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx Added test to validate that future dates cannot be selected for the birthDate input.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Prevent selecting future dates for birth date [#2732]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In settings where dates once ran free,
A max now guards, as it should be!
No future dates to cause dismay,
Just past and present, come what may!
A birthday's joy, now safe and sound,
In the rabbit's world, joy abounds! 🎉📅


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@arpit-chakraborty arpit-chakraborty marked this pull request as ready for review December 25, 2024 12:03
@arpit-chakraborty
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is an upgrade on PR #2848 Please have a look if all the requirements are matched.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.13%. Comparing base (471f113) to head (a13ae97).
Report is 34 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2865       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             63.58%   88.13%   +24.55%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      316       +20     
  Lines                  7371     8271      +900     
  Branches               1610     1868      +258     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   4687     7290     +2603     
+ Misses                 2451      770     -1681     
+ Partials                233      211       -22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a test for this. We don't want the error to happen again.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx (1)

413-443: Great addition to ensure future dates are disallowed!
This test successfully validates that the user cannot input a future date. As a minor enhancement, consider adding an additional test for near-future boundaries (e.g., tomorrow) to solidify confidence across different environments and time zones.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3d9f45 and 5ab9418.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx (1 hunks)

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2024
@arpit-chakraborty
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure i will make relevant changes in the Settings.spec.tsx

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2024
@arpit-chakraborty
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please have look into the added tests, let me know if any further changes are required

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments

src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx (1)

414-445: LGTM! Consider adding more edge cases

The test case effectively validates the birth date restrictions using dynamic date calculations. Good job on testing both the rejection of future dates and acceptance of current date.

Consider enhancing the test coverage with additional edge cases:

  1. Tomorrow's date (immediate future)
  2. Yesterday's date (immediate past)
  3. Date at midnight UTC to handle timezone edge cases

Example enhancement:

// Add these test scenarios after line 444
const tomorrow = new Date();
tomorrow.setDate(tomorrow.getDate() + 1);
const tomorrowString = tomorrow.toISOString().split('T')[0];

// Should reject tomorrow's date
fireEvent.change(birthDateInput, { target: { value: tomorrowString } });
expect(birthDateInput.value).not.toBe(tomorrowString);

const yesterday = new Date();
yesterday.setDate(yesterday.getDate() - 1);
const yesterdayString = yesterday.toISOString().split('T')[0];

// Should accept yesterday's date
fireEvent.change(birthDateInput, { target: { value: yesterdayString } });
expect(birthDateInput.value).toBe(yesterdayString);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a8a367 and a13ae97.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.spec.tsx (1)

Line range hint 26-26: Replace hardcoded dates with dynamically calculated ones

The mock data contains hardcoded dates ('2024-03-01') that will become past dates after March 2024. Replace these with dynamically calculated dates to ensure the tests remain valid over time.

Example fix:

- birthDate: '2024-03-01',
+ birthDate: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],

Also applies to: 63-63, 244-244

@arpit-chakraborty
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please have a look, and let me know if any further changes are required.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 74305b0 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 26, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants