Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REFACTOR]: Jest to Vitest migration for chartToPdf.test.ts #2864

Merged

Conversation

hustlernik
Copy link
Contributor

@hustlernik hustlernik commented Dec 25, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR migrates the test cases in src/utils/chartToPdf.test.ts from Jest to Vitest, ensuring compatibility with Vitest .

✅ Replace Jest-specific functions and mocks with Vitest equivalents
✅ Ensure all tests in src/utils/chartToPdf.test.ts from Jest to Vitest.pass after migration using npm run test:vitest
✅ Maintain the test coverage for the file as 100% after migration
✅ Upload a video or photo for this specific file coverage is 100% in the PR description

Issue Number:

Fixes #2760

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

test

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced a new suite of unit tests for CSV export functions, ensuring proper functionality and error handling.
    • Removed previous unit tests for the same CSV export functions, streamlining the testing approach.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request refactors the unit tests for CSV export functions in the chartToPdf module from Jest to Vitest. The changes involve renaming the test file from chartToPdf.test.ts to chartToPdf.spec.ts and updating the test suite to use Vitest's syntax and mocking capabilities. The tests cover various scenarios for CSV export functions, including data formatting, error handling, and filename generation.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/utils/chartToPdf.spec.ts Added Vitest-based unit tests for CSV export functions with comprehensive coverage
src/utils/chartToPdf.test.ts Removed Jest-based test file

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2760]
Rename test file to .spec.* suffix [#2760]
Ensure tests pass using npm run test:vitest [#2760] Requires actual test run verification
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2760] Requires coverage report verification

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Jest tests now dance with Vitest's spree!
CSV exports, clean and bright,
Refactored tests take playful flight.
Coding magic, rabbit's delight! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/utils/chartToPdf.spec.ts (2)

23-30: Strong usage of DOM method mocks.
Mocking document.createElement, appendChild, and removeChild helps in verifying side effects without requiring an actual DOM. Ensure that these mocks are reset or cleared after each test to prevent cross-test interference.


83-106: Appropriate coverage of event labels and attendance trends.
Testing exportTrendsToCSV with valid numeric arrays confirms correct CSV generation. Consider adding a test for mismatched array lengths or empty arrays in exportTrendsToCSV, similar to exportDemographicsToCSV.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 471f113 and 27cc24d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/utils/chartToPdf.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/utils/chartToPdf.test.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/utils/chartToPdf.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/utils/chartToPdf.spec.ts (7)

1-2: Good use of Vitest imports.
Nice to see the direct import of Vitest’s testing utilities and the Mock type, ensuring strong type checking across the test suite.


18-21: Validate mocking for URL methods.
Mocking URL.createObjectURL and URL.revokeObjectURL is a standard approach in a browser environment test scenario. Good job isolating external dependencies.


51-67: Great coverage for CSV formatting validations.
The test verifies that the generated link is properly created and removed, the CSV is triggered for download, and the object URL is revoked. This confirms a typical CSV export flow.


69-75: Useful edge case checks for empty data and filename.
Throwing an error ensures that these scenarios are caught early and surfaces valuable feedback.


77-81: Validation of appending “.csv” extension.
This test ensures that your function is user-friendly by automatically appending the file extension if it’s omitted.


108-151: Robust test coverage for demographics export scenarios.
These tests cover valid data, missing category names, array length mismatches, and safe filename generation with timestamps. This thoroughness ensures high reliability.


3-7: Confirm that the tested functions exist and remain importable.
If chartToPdf is also undergoing changes, confirm that the named exports remain in sync with these test implementations.

✅ Verification successful

All exported functions exist and match the imports in the test file

The verification confirms that all three functions (exportToCSV, exportTrendsToCSV, and exportDemographicsToCSV) are properly exported from src/utils/chartToPdf.ts and match the imports in the test file. They are defined as:

  • Line 3: export const exportToCSV
  • Line 50: export const exportTrendsToCSV
  • Line 80: export const exportDemographicsToCSV

The exports and imports are in sync, and no issues were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching to ensure that 'exportToCSV', 'exportTrendsToCSV', and 
# 'exportDemographicsToCSV' exist in 'chartToPdf.ts' or 'chartToPdf.js'
ast-grep --pattern $'export function exportToCSV($_) {\n  $$$\n}\n\nexport function exportTrendsToCSV($_) {\n  $$$\n}\n\nexport function exportDemographicsToCSV($_) {\n  $$$\n}' 

Length of output: 168


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find these exports
# First, let's check if the file exists
fd "chartToPdf.ts|chartToPdf.js" src/

# Then let's look for exports in the file
rg "export.*(?:exportToCSV|exportTrendsToCSV|exportDemographicsToCSV)" src/utils/chartToPdf.ts -p

Length of output: 319

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.81%. Comparing base (ad6ca7c) to head (27cc24d).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2864       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             64.43%   87.81%   +23.38%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      313       +17     
  Lines                  7369     8224      +855     
  Branches               1609     1855      +246     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   4748     7222     +2474     
+ Misses                 2386      802     -1584     
+ Partials                235      200       -35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 87bfd94 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 25, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants