convert test from jest to vitest #2832 #2858
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@khushipatil1523 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx (1)
4-4: Fix spacing to satisfy Prettier.Prettier recommends adding a space after commas in named imports. Here's a suggested fix:
-import {describe,it} from 'vitest'; +import { describe, it } from 'vitest';🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 4-4: Replace
describe,itwith·describe,·it·(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🪛 eslint
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx
[error] 4-4: Replace describe,it with ·describe,·it·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 11-11: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 17-17: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 18-18: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx (3)
7-13: Conversion to Vitest it block looks correct.
The replacement of test with it aligns properly with Vitest standards, and all expectations remain inside the block. The ESLint "jest/no-standalone-expect" rules might be misfiring if they aren't configured for Vitest yet.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 10-10: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 11-11: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
14-20: Second test block also appears correctly migrated.
No other changes are shown here besides switching to Vitest. This is consistent and does not break the existing testing logic.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 17-17: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 18-18: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
Line range hint 21-26: Final test block successfully migrated to Vitest.
All expect statements remain within the it block, indicating correct usage. Implementation follows the same pattern as above.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 4-4: Replace describe,it with ·describe,·it·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 11-11: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 17-17: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 18-18: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 24-24: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx (1)
4-5: Consider importing cleanup utilityWhile migrating to Vitest, consider importing and using the cleanup utility from @testing-library/react to ensure proper test isolation.
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react'; +import { cleanup } from '@testing-library/react'; import Loader from './Loader'; import { describe, it } from 'vitest'; +afterEach(() => { + cleanup(); +});
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🪛 eslint
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx
[error] 10-10: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 11-11: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 17-17: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 18-18: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx
[failure] 10-10:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 11-11:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 17-17:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 18-18:
Expect must be inside of a test block
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Loader/Loader.spec.tsx (1)
Line range hint 7-26: Test migration looks good!
The conversion from Jest's test() to Vitest's it() has been done correctly while maintaining the existing test structure and assertions. All test cases are properly contained within the describe block and follow consistent patterns.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 10-10: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 11-11: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 17-17: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 18-18: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
[error] 24-24: Expect must be inside of a test block
(jest/no-standalone-expect)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[failure] 10-10:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 11-11:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 17-17:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 18-18:
Expect must be inside of a test block
[failure] 24-24:
Expect must be inside of a test block
| @@ -1,26 +1,27 @@ | |||
| import React from 'react'; | |||
| import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react'; | |||
| import Loader from './Loader'; | |||
| import { describe, it } from 'vitest'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
ESLint configuration needs to be updated for Vitest
The ESLint configuration currently includes Jest-specific settings (plugin:jest/recommended and jest plugin) but lacks Vitest configuration. Since you're migrating from Jest to Vitest, you should:
- Remove
"plugin:jest/recommended"from extends array - Remove
"jest"from plugins array - Remove Jest-specific rules
- Add Vitest ESLint plugin and configuration
Specific locations that need attention:
.eslintrc.json:- Line 11: Remove
"plugin:jest/recommended" - Line 27: Remove
"jest"from plugins array - Line 93: Remove
"jest/expect-expect": 0
- Line 11: Remove
The package.json shows that Vitest is already installed ("vitest": "^2.1.5"), but the ESLint plugin for Vitest is missing. You'll need to install eslint-plugin-vitest and update the configuration accordingly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Update ESLint configuration for Vitest
The ESLint errors about expects being outside test blocks are likely due to Jest-specific ESLint rules. Consider updating the ESLint configuration to use Vitest-compatible rules.
Run this script to check the ESLint configuration:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check ESLint configuration for Jest rules that need to be updated for Vitest
# Search for Jest-related ESLint configurations
rg -l "jest" .eslintrc*
# Check for existing Vitest ESLint plugin in package.json
rg -l "eslint-plugin-vitest" package.json
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of the ESLint configuration
cat .eslintrc.json
# Also check if there are any Vitest-related ESLint configurations already in place
rg -l "vitest" .eslintrc*
# Check package.json for both Jest and Vitest dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies'
Length of output: 7428
|
Please fix the failing test. Click the link for explanations |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2858 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 64.63% 87.80% +23.16%
=====================================================
Files 296 313 +17
Lines 7369 8222 +853
Branches 1609 1854 +245
=====================================================
+ Hits 4763 7219 +2456
+ Misses 2371 804 -1567
+ Partials 235 199 -36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will migrate the src/components/Loader/Loader.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2832
Issue Number:
Fixes #2832
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
itfunction from thevitesttesting framework.