Refactor src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2852
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)
16-16: Use consistent test naming conventions
Here, the test description follows a lowercased pattern (“should render...”). Ensure consistent naming conventions across all test cases (e.g., “should do something” vs. “Should do something”) for clarity and uniformity.
33-33: Match test description casing with others
This test name starts with a capital letter (“Should render...”); consider matching the lowercase style in line 16 or vice versa, so that your test suite reads consistently.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (1)
5-13: Nicely documented test file coverage
The added doc comments provide a clear explanation of what the tests validate and how they handle component props variations. This is beneficial for maintainability and quick onboarding of future contributors.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2852 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 66.20% 87.80% +21.59%
=====================================================
Files 296 313 +17
Lines 7369 8222 +853
Branches 1609 1798 +189
=====================================================
+ Hits 4879 7219 +2340
+ Misses 2253 804 -1449
+ Partials 237 199 -38 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
merged commit 00216ba
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR migrates the test cases in src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest, ensuring compatibility with Vitest .
✅ Replace Jest-specific functions and mocks with Vitest equivalents
✅ Ensure all tests in src/components/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest.pass after migration using npm run test:vitest
✅ Maintain the test coverage for the file as 100% after migration
✅ Upload a video or photo for this specific file coverage is 100% in the PR description
Issue Number:
Fixes #2816
Did you add tests for your changes?
yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
OrganizationCardcomponent.Style
testtoitfor consistency with testing framework conventions.