Refactor CSS files in src/screens/ForgotPassword (fixes #2506) #2666
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS for the ForgotPassword screen by consolidating its styles into the global Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
622-635: LGTM! Consider using CSS custom properties for consistent spacing.The layout classes are well-structured and follow good practices. The flexbox centering in
.pageWrapperand the card styling in.cardTemplateare implemented correctly.Consider using CSS custom properties for the padding and border-radius values to maintain consistency across components:
.cardTemplate { - padding: 2rem; + padding: var(--card-padding, 2rem); background-color: #fff; - border-radius: 0.8rem; + border-radius: var(--card-radius, 0.8rem); border: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-200); }
761-787: LGTM! Consider modernizing animation prefixes.The zoom animation is well-implemented with smooth transitions.
For modern browsers, you might not need the
-webkitprefix anymore. Consider using the@supportsrule to provide fallbacks only when needed:-@-webkit-keyframes zoomIn { - 0% { - opacity: 0; - -webkit-transform: scale(0.5); - transform: scale(0.5); - } - - 100% { - opacity: 1; - -webkit-transform: scale(1); - transform: scale(1); - } -} @keyframes zoomIn { 0% { opacity: 0; - -webkit-transform: scale(0.5); transform: scale(0.5); } 100% { opacity: 1; - -webkit-transform: scale(1); transform: scale(1); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/ForgotPassword/ForgotPassword.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/ForgotPassword/ForgotPassword.tsx(2 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/ForgotPassword/ForgotPassword.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/screens/ForgotPassword/ForgotPassword.tsx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
CSS consolidation approach needs reconsideration
The verification reveals that these styles are actively used across multiple components (23+ imports of app.module.css found). However, the current consolidation approach may need adjustment because:
- The
.pageWrapper,.cardTemplate, and.keyWrapperclasses appear to be component-level styles but are placed in the global app.module.css- These styles are only defined once in app.module.css, suggesting they might be better suited as component-specific modules or shared utility classes
- The current placement in app.module.css could lead to naming conflicts and make it harder to maintain component isolation
Consider:
- Moving these styles to a dedicated shared components module (e.g., shared-components.module.css)
- Or keeping them with their respective components if they're not truly reusable
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
622-787: Good approach to CSS consolidation.Moving these styles to the global module aligns with the goal of improving CSS organization. However, consider documenting this pattern in the project's style guide to ensure consistency across future implementations.
Let me gather more information about the usage patterns of these styles.
Let me try a different search pattern to analyze the CSS usage.
Let me fix the regex syntax and try one more time.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining component-specific CSS modules that could be consolidated # Expected: No other CSS modules with similar patterns that could be consolidated # Search for component-specific CSS modules fd -e css -e scss --full-path "src/screens" | grep -i "module" # Check for similar styling patterns in other CSS files rg -l "pageWrapper|cardTemplate|keyWrapper" --type cssLength of output: 1611
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of component CSS modules for similar patterns rg -A 3 "display:\s*flex;.*flex-direction:\s*column" --type css rg -A 3 "padding:.*2rem.*background-color:.*border-radius" --type cssLength of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for similar styling patterns with more flexible matching rg "\.pageWrapper\s*{" --type css -A 5 rg "\.cardTemplate\s*{" --type css -A 5 rg "\.keyWrapper\s*{" --type css -A 5 # Check imports of app.module.css rg -l "from.*app\.module\.css" --type typescript --type javascriptLength of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for similar styling patterns with correct regex rg "\.pageWrapper.*\{" --type css -A 5 rg "\.cardTemplate.*\{" --type css -A 5 rg "\.keyWrapper.*\{" --type css -A 5 # Check imports using app.module.css with simpler pattern rg "app\.module\.css" -lLength of output: 2668
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
630-635: Consider using CSS variables for consistent spacing and border-radius.While the implementation is clean, using CSS variables for spacing and border-radius would improve maintainability and consistency across the application.
.cardTemplate { - padding: 2rem; + padding: var(--spacing-lg, 2rem); background-color: #fff; - border-radius: 0.8rem; + border-radius: var(--border-radius-lg, 0.8rem); border: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-200); }
761-787: Consider using CSS variables for animation parameters.The animation implementation is solid, but using CSS variables would allow for easier customization of timing and scaling values.
:root { + --zoom-in-duration: 0.3s; + --zoom-in-timing: ease-in-out; + --zoom-in-scale-start: 0.5; } .keyWrapper .keyLogo { height: 42px; width: 42px; - -webkit-animation: zoomIn 0.3s ease-in-out; - animation: zoomIn 0.3s ease-in-out; + -webkit-animation: zoomIn var(--zoom-in-duration) var(--zoom-in-timing); + animation: zoomIn var(--zoom-in-duration) var(--zoom-in-timing); } @keyframes zoomIn { 0% { opacity: 0; - transform: scale(0.5); + transform: scale(var(--zoom-in-scale-start)); } 100% { opacity: 1; transform: scale(1); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
622-628: LGTM! Clean and reusable page wrapper implementation.
The .pageWrapper class follows flexbox best practices for vertical and horizontal centering, making it highly reusable across different pages.
637-664: Great implementation incorporating previous review feedback!
The key wrapper styles have been improved as suggested:
- Added
transform-origin: center - Removed redundant
displayproperty - Using CSS variables for theme-related values
|
|
Closing due to inactivity |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2506
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not relevant
Summary
The goal is to convert the CSS file in this subdirectory and all the components related to this screen to use this new design pattern.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit