Fixes #2640 refactor src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns
#2643
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the test file Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/Campaigns.spec.tsx (1)🔇 Additional comments (7)src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/Campaigns.spec.tsx (7)
The migration from Jest to Vitest for imports and the react-toastify mock is correctly implemented. Also applies to: 30-36
The async mock implementation for DateTimePicker using
The new JSDoc comments improve code documentation and maintainability. Also applies to: 67-72
The mock implementation for useParams is correctly migrated to Vitest using async import and proper syntax.
The cleanup implementation is correctly migrated from Jest to Vitest.
The unmocking of react-router-dom is correctly implemented using Vitest's syntax. Line range hint The migration from Jest to Vitest has been completed successfully with:
The changes align perfectly with the PR objectives of migrating test files from Jest to Vitest syntax. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2643 +/- ##
=====================================================
- Coverage 95.73% 83.78% -11.95%
=====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7036 8118 +1082
Branches 1516 1830 +314
=====================================================
+ Hits 6736 6802 +66
- Misses 99 1178 +1079
+ Partials 201 138 -63 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
I refactored the Campaign component test file, but it fails during introspection on the talawa-api. How can I fix this? Appreciate your help! |
|
@rafidoth Asking the slack channel is a great way to get help for these questions. |
palisadoes
changed the title
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
|
Closing. Inactivity |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
#2571
Fixes #
Snapshots/Videos:
test_passed.webm
Summary
Campaigns.test.tsxtoCampaigns.spec.tsxDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit