Changed the OrgContribution from jest to vitest #2635
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the introduction of unit tests for the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.spec.tsx (4)
1-6: Documentation needs improvementThe documentation header incorrectly refers to "AddOn component" instead of "OrgContribution component".
- * Unit tests for the AddOn component. + * Unit tests for the OrgContribution component.
29-36: Enhance store mock implementationThe store mock could be improved by providing more specific mock implementations.
vi.mock('state/store', () => ({ store: { - // Mock store configuration if needed getState: vi.fn(() => ({ + // Add specific state shape needed for tests + // Example: + // user: { isLoggedIn: true }, + // organization: { currentOrg: null } })), subscribe: vi.fn(), dispatch: vi.fn(), }, }));
Line range hint
44-70: Enhance test coverageWhile the basic rendering test is good, consider adding more test cases:
- Test filtering functionality
- Test contribution data display
- Test loading state
- Test error scenarios
Example additional test:
test('should show loading state initially', () => { const { getByText } = render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <OrgContribution /> </I18nextProvider> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> </MockedProvider> ); expect(getByText('Loading data...')).toBeInTheDocument(); });
Line range hint
23-28: Consider removing custom wait functionThe custom
waitfunction could be replaced with Vitest's built-in async utilities.-async function wait(ms = 100): Promise<void> { - await act(() => { - return new Promise((resolve) => { - setTimeout(resolve, ms); - }); - }); -} +// Use either: +// 1. vi.advanceTimersByTime(ms) +// 2. await nextTick() +// 3. flushPromises from @vue/test-utils
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.spec.tsx(3 hunks)vitest.config.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
vitest.config.ts (1)
15-15: LGTM: Expanded test file pattern
The updated include pattern now supports both .spec and .test file extensions, providing better flexibility for test file naming.
src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.spec.tsx (2)
16-17: LGTM: Proper testing library setup
Good practice importing jest-dom for DOM testing assertions and explicitly importing Vitest testing functions.
38-43: LGTM: i18n mock implementation
The i18n mock is well implemented with proper ES module syntax and translation function.
| globals: true, | ||
| environment: 'jsdom', | ||
| setupFiles: 'vitest.setup.ts', | ||
| setupFiles: ['src/test/setup.ts'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The setup file path in vitest.config.ts needs to be updated
The specified path src/test/setup.ts does not exist. Instead, there is a vitest.setup.ts file in the root directory that contains the necessary test configurations including @testing-library/jest-dom. The path in vitest.config.ts should be updated to point to this existing file.
- Update
setupFiles: ['src/test/setup.ts']tosetupFiles: ['vitest.setup.ts']in vitest.config.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify setup file existence and configuration
The setupFiles path has been updated to use src/test/setup.ts. Let's verify this file exists and contains necessary test configurations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the setup file exists and contains required configurations
if [ -f "src/test/setup.ts" ]; then
echo "Setup file exists"
# Check for common testing library imports
rg -n "import.*testing-library" "src/test/setup.ts"
# Check for jest-dom setup
rg -n "jest-dom" "src/test/setup.ts"
else
echo "Setup file missing at src/test/setup.ts"
fi
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the setup file exists in any other location
fd -e ts "setup.ts"
# Also check the git history for any recent changes to setup files
git log --oneline -n 5 | grep -i "setup"
# Let's also check the package.json for any test-related configurations
cat package.json | jq '.scripts | select(has("test"))'
Length of output: 1247
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of both setup files we found
echo "=== Content of setup.ts ==="
cat setup.ts
echo -e "\n=== Content of vitest.setup.ts ==="
cat vitest.setup.ts
# Also check if there are any references to these setup files in the codebase
echo -e "\n=== References to setup files ==="
rg -l "setup.ts"
Length of output: 6371
|
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready. |
Feature/Refactoring OrgContribution
Issue Number : #2564
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
OrgContributioncomponent, enhancing testing coverage.Configuration Updates
.specand.testfiles.