Refactored src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2588
Conversation
…wn.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest PalisadoesFoundation#2493
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx (1)
20-21: Consider enhancing the wait utility functionWhile the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Add JSDoc documentation to explain the purpose and usage
- Consider increasing the default timeout for more reliable tests
- Add input validation for negative timeout values
+/** + * Utility function to pause execution for a specified duration + * @param ms - The number of milliseconds to wait (default: 100) + * @throws {Error} If ms is negative + */ async function wait(ms = 100): Promise<void> { + if (ms < 0) throw new Error('Timeout must be non-negative'); await new Promise((resolve) => { setTimeout(resolve, ms); }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Proper migration to Vitest imports
The migration from Jest to Vitest testing functions has been implemented correctly.
Line range hint 1-158: Verify test coverage after suggested changes
While the migration to Vitest is successful, please ensure that the suggested optimizations don't affect the test coverage.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the test coverage by examining the test file structure and assertions.
Test coverage is comprehensive and well-maintained after migration
The test suite thoroughly covers all key functionality of the ChangeLanguageDropdown component:
- Component rendering and presence of all UI elements
- Props handling and style customization
- Cookie handling for unset language
- Language change functionality including both success (fr) and error (hi) cases
- GraphQL mutation integration
- User interactions via dropdown
The migration to Vitest preserved all test cases and their assertions without compromising coverage. No additional test coverage is needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify test coverage remains at 100% after applying changes
npm run test:vitest -- --coverage src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx
Length of output: 1017
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test file structure and assertions
ast-grep --pattern 'test($$$)' src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx
# Check the component implementation to verify test coverage against component features
cat src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropDown.tsx
Length of output: 14214
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| const changeLanguageBtn = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-fr`); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(changeLanguageBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | ||
| await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(cookies.get('i18next')).toBe('fr'); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | ||
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize test structure by reducing unnecessary waits
The current implementation has multiple consecutive wait() calls that could make the tests flaky and slower than necessary. Consider consolidating the waits and using more reliable ways to wait for state changes.
- await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn'));
- await wait();
- const changeLanguageBtn = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-fr`);
- await wait();
- expect(changeLanguageBtn).toBeInTheDocument();
- await wait();
- await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn);
- await wait();
- expect(cookies.get('i18next')).toBe('fr');
- await wait();
+ await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn'));
+ const changeLanguageBtn = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-fr`);
+ expect(changeLanguageBtn).toBeInTheDocument();
+ await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn);
+ // Wait for cookie to be set
+ await wait(200);
+ expect(cookies.get('i18next')).toBe('fr');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | |
| await wait(); | |
| const changeLanguageBtn = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-fr`); | |
| await wait(); | |
| expect(changeLanguageBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); | |
| await wait(); | |
| userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | |
| await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | |
| await wait(); | |
| expect(cookies.get('i18next')).toBe('fr'); | |
| await wait(); | |
| userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | |
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | |
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | |
| const changeLanguageBtn = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-fr`); | |
| expect(changeLanguageBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); | |
| await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | |
| // Wait for cookie to be set | |
| await wait(200); | |
| expect(cookies.get('i18next')).toBe('fr'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not relevant to this issue, This PR only refactors the test case to vitest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Understood @bitbard3, thank you for the clarification. I'll keep that in mind for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.616Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bitbard3 Multiple wait calls make redundancy. Please apply the coderabbitai changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| const changeLanguageBtnHi = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-hi`); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(changeLanguageBtnHi).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtnHi); | ||
| await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtnHi); | ||
| await wait(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add assertions for error handling
The test case for the Hindi language selection triggers an error (as per the mock), but doesn't verify how the error is handled. Consider adding assertions to validate the error state.
await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn'));
- await wait();
const changeLanguageBtnHi = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-hi`);
- await wait();
expect(changeLanguageBtnHi).toBeInTheDocument();
- await wait();
await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtnHi);
- await wait();
+ await wait(200);
+ // Add assertions for error handling
+ expect(cookies.get('i18next')).not.toBe('hi');
+ // Verify error message is displayed (add appropriate test ID)
+ expect(getByTestId('error-message')).toBeInTheDocument();Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello reviewer this changes are outside the scope of this issue, Do you still want me to add these changes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bitbard3, understood. Since these changes are outside the scope of this issue, it's acceptable to leave them as is. Would you like me to open a new GitHub issue to track adding these error handling assertions in the future?
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Error handling has not been implemented in the component, so the test case does not cover error scenarios
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bitbard3, understood. Thank you for the clarification. Since error handling is not implemented in the component, it's acceptable that the test case does not cover error scenarios.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:155-162
Timestamp: 2024-12-03T05:52:37.748Z
Learning: In the `ChangeLanguageDropdown` component (`src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.tsx`), error handling has not been implemented. Therefore, test cases in `src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx` do not cover error scenarios related to error handling.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2588 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 70.01% 87.27% +17.25%
=====================================================
Files 296 313 +17
Lines 7358 8204 +846
Branches 1606 1792 +186
=====================================================
+ Hits 5152 7160 +2008
+ Misses 1960 859 -1101
+ Partials 246 185 -61 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Please fix the failing tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if any of these conditions occur:
We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. Also ensure that CodeRabbit.ai approves your work |
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| const changeLanguageBtn = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-fr`); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(changeLanguageBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | ||
| await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtn); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(cookies.get('i18next')).toBe('fr'); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | ||
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bitbard3 Multiple wait calls make redundancy. Please apply the coderabbitai changes
| await userEvent.click(getByTestId('language-dropdown-btn')); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| const changeLanguageBtnHi = getByTestId(`change-language-btn-hi`); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(changeLanguageBtnHi).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
| userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtnHi); | ||
| await userEvent.click(changeLanguageBtnHi); | ||
| await wait(); |
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
|
Please assign this to me @palisadoes |
|
@bitbard3 Any update on this |
|
@Cioppolo14 @palisadoes We can reassign this issue I guess if we don't have activity from the contributor or else that minor changes I will apply and merge this PR |
…wn.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2493
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactor
Issue Number:
Fixes #2493
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
Migrated test for ChangeLanguageDropdown.tsx from jest to vitest.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
ChangeLanguageDropdowntests for better reliability and readability.