Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tests for newly created events #2410

Conversation

ARYANSHAH1567
Copy link

@ARYANSHAH1567 ARYANSHAH1567 commented Nov 5, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2122

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced test coverage for the EventCalendar component, including new tests for event handling and window resizing.
    • Added a data-testid attribute to improve testability of the "View all" button.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved initialization of event dates for more accurate testing scenarios.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the test suite for the EventCalendar component, enhancing the handling of event data by updating how startDate and endDate are initialized. A new test case simulates window resizing and verifies the presence of a "View all" button when more than two events are present. Additionally, a data-testid attribute is added to a button in the Calendar component to improve testability. These changes aim to strengthen the testing framework without altering the component's existing functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx Updated event date initialization and added a test for window resizing and button interactions.
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx Added data-testid attribute to a button for improved testability.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Write Tests for newly created events being visible in the day view (#2122)

Possibly related PRs

  • fix events day-view #2087: This PR addresses a bug related to the visibility of events in the day view of the EventCalendar, which is directly related to the functionality of the EventCalendar component being tested in the main PR.

Suggested labels

no-pr-activity

🐰 In the garden of code we play,
With tests and buttons, hip-hip-hooray!
Events now dance in the light of day,
A "View all" button joins the fray.
So hop along, let’s test away! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.31%. Comparing base (6a0a64c) to head (dd02f23).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2410      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    98.29%   98.31%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          283      283              
  Lines         8207     8207              
  Branches      2376     2376              
===========================================
+ Hits          8067     8069       +2     
+ Misses         131      129       -2     
  Partials         9        9              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ARYANSHAH1567
Copy link
Author

image
It shows 100% coverage

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (2)

390-390: Remove debug console.log statement

Remove the console.log statement as it's not needed in the test code.

-    console.log('hi', viewAllButton); // This will show the buttons found in the test

Line range hint 289-411: Consider adding more edge cases for comprehensive testing

While the current test covers basic visibility, consider adding these scenarios to make the test suite more robust:

  1. Events spanning multiple days
  2. Events with overlapping times
  3. Events at the day boundary (midnight)
  4. Events with different timezones

This will help ensure the day view handles all possible scenarios correctly.

Would you like me to provide example test cases for these scenarios?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a0a64c and dd02f23.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (2)

Line range hint 289-371: LGTM: Well-structured test data setup

The event data initialization is well-organized with a good mix of all-day and timed events on the same date, which is perfect for testing day view visibility.


407-411: LGTM: Proper cleanup after test

Good practice to reset the window size after the test to prevent side effects.

@varshith257
Copy link
Member

@pranshugupta54 WDYT of failing introspection?

Is it of recent PR changes?

@pranshugupta54
Copy link
Member

@varshith257, yeah.

This PR has nothing around APIs or queries.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants