-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tests for newly created events #2410
Tests for newly created events #2410
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the test suite for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2410 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.29% 98.31% +0.02%
===========================================
Files 283 283
Lines 8207 8207
Branches 2376 2376
===========================================
+ Hits 8067 8069 +2
+ Misses 131 129 -2
Partials 9 9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (2)
390-390
: Remove debug console.log statementRemove the console.log statement as it's not needed in the test code.
- console.log('hi', viewAllButton); // This will show the buttons found in the test
Line range hint
289-411
: Consider adding more edge cases for comprehensive testingWhile the current test covers basic visibility, consider adding these scenarios to make the test suite more robust:
- Events spanning multiple days
- Events with overlapping times
- Events at the day boundary (midnight)
- Events with different timezones
This will help ensure the day view handles all possible scenarios correctly.
Would you like me to provide example test cases for these scenarios?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx
(6 hunks)src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (2)
Line range hint 289-371
: LGTM: Well-structured test data setup
The event data initialization is well-organized with a good mix of all-day and timed events on the same date, which is perfect for testing day view visibility.
407-411
: LGTM: Proper cleanup after test
Good practice to reset the window size after the test to prevent side effects.
@pranshugupta54 WDYT of failing introspection? Is it of recent PR changes? |
@varshith257, yeah. This PR has nothing around APIs or queries. |
3694271
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2122
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
EventCalendar
component, including new tests for event handling and window resizing.data-testid
attribute to improve testability of the "View all" button.Bug Fixes