Add Support For Volunteer & Volunteer Groups in User & Admin Portal #2397
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the localization and functionality of the application regarding volunteer management. It adds new sections for "leaderboard" and "eventVolunteers" across multiple language translation files, including English, French, Hindi, Spanish, and Chinese. Additionally, it modifies the routing structure in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (208)
src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.module.css (1)
31-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing browser support and responsiveness.
While the current implementation works, here are some suggestions to improve it:
.rankings { - aspect-ratio: 1; border-radius: 50%; - width: 35px; + width: clamp(30px, 2.5vw, 35px); + height: clamp(30px, 2.5vw, 35px); + display: flex; + align-items: center; + justify-content: center; + background-color: var(--bs-gray-200); + color: var(--bs-gray-700); }Changes explained:
- Replace fixed width with responsive
clamp()for better scaling- Add explicit height as fallback for browsers without aspect-ratio support
- Add flex properties for better content alignment
- Add default background and text colors using CSS variables
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..rankings { border-radius: 50%; width: clamp(30px, 2.5vw, 35px); height: clamp(30px, 2.5vw, 35px); display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; background-color: var(--bs-gray-200); color: var(--bs-gray-700); }src/GraphQl/Mutations/ActionItemMutations.ts (1)
18-32:
⚠️ Potential issueParameter naming and documentation need improvement.
Several issues need to be addressed:
- The parameter
dDateuses inconsistent naming compared todueDatein the UPDATE mutation- The JSDoc comments are missing documentation for the new required
assigneeTypeparameter- The parameter name
dDateis less descriptive thandueDateApply these changes to improve consistency and documentation:
/** * GraphQL mutation to create an action item. * * @param actionItemCategoryId - ActionItemCategory to which the ActionItem is related. * @param assigneeId - User to whom the ActionItem is assigned. + * @param assigneeType - Type of the assignee (e.g., 'VOLUNTEER', 'USER') * @param preCompletionNotes - Notes prior to completion. * @param dueDate - Due date. * @param eventId - Event to which the ActionItem is related. * @param allotedHours - Hours alloted for the ActionItem. */ mutation CreateActionItem( $actionItemCategoryId: ID! $assigneeId: ID! $assigneeType: String! $preCompletionNotes: String - $dDate: Date + $dueDate: Date $eventId: ID $allotedHours: Float ) { createActionItem( actionItemCategoryId: $actionItemCategoryId data: { assigneeId: $assigneeId assigneeType: $assigneeType preCompletionNotes: $preCompletionNotes - dueDate: $dDate + dueDate: $dueDate eventId: $eventId allotedHours: $allotedHours } )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.$assigneeType: String! $preCompletionNotes: String $dueDate: Date $eventId: ID $allotedHours: Float ) { createActionItem( actionItemCategoryId: $actionItemCategoryId data: { assigneeId: $assigneeId assigneeType: $assigneeType preCompletionNotes: $preCompletionNotes dueDate: $dueDate eventId: $eventId allotedHours: $allotedHourssrc/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/VolunteerManagement.module.css (6)
22-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve maintainability by removing
!importantand using CSS variables.The accordion styles use
!importantflags and hardcoded colors which can make maintenance difficult..accordionSummary { - width: 100% !important; + width: 100%; padding-right: 0.75rem; display: flex; - justify-content: space-between !important; + justify-content: space-between; align-items: center; } .accordionSummary button:hover { - background-color: #31bb6a50 !important; - color: #31bb6b !important; + background-color: var(--primary-color-light); + color: var(--primary-color); }Consider adding these CSS variables to your root:
:root { --primary-color: #31bb6b; --primary-color-light: #31bb6a50; }
40-58: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility with relative units and WCAG-compliant contrast ratios.
Consider using relative units and ensuring proper color contrast for better accessibility.
.titleContainer h3 { - font-size: 1.25rem; + font-size: clamp(1.1rem, 2.5vw, 1.25rem); font-weight: 750; - color: #5e5e5e; + color: var(--text-primary); margin-top: 0.2rem; } .subContainer span { - font-size: 0.9rem; + font-size: clamp(0.875rem, 2vw, 0.9rem); margin-left: 0.5rem; font-weight: lighter; - color: #707070; + color: var(--text-secondary); }Add these variables to your root:
:root { --text-primary: #424242; /* Darker for better contrast */ --text-secondary: #595959; /* WCAG AA compliant */ }
79-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make progress bar responsive to prevent overflow.
The fixed width could cause layout issues on smaller screens.
.progress { display: flex; - width: 45rem; + width: 100%; + max-width: 45rem; } .progressBar { - margin: 0rem 0.75rem; + margin: 0 clamp(0.5rem, 2vw, 0.75rem); width: 100%; - font-size: 0.9rem; + font-size: clamp(0.875rem, 2vw, 0.9rem); - height: 1.25rem; + height: clamp(1rem, 3vh, 1.25rem); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..progress { display: flex; width: 100%; max-width: 45rem; } .progressBar { margin: 0 clamp(0.5rem, 2vw, 0.75rem); width: 100%; font-size: clamp(0.875rem, 2vw, 0.9rem); height: clamp(1rem, 3vh, 1.25rem); }
60-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve chip styles with CSS variables and flexible sizing.
The chip styles could be more maintainable and flexible.
.chipIcon { - height: 0.9rem !important; + height: 0.9rem; + width: auto; + aspect-ratio: 1; } .chip { - height: 1.5rem !important; + min-height: 1.5rem; + height: auto; margin: 0.15rem 0 0 1.25rem; + padding: 0.25rem 0.5rem; } .active { - background-color: #31bb6a50 !important; + background-color: var(--status-active); } .pending { - background-color: #ffd76950 !important; - color: #bb952bd0 !important; - border-color: #bb952bd0 !important; + background-color: var(--status-pending-bg); + color: var(--status-pending-text); + border-color: var(--status-pending-border); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving responsiveness and accessibility.
The button container layout could be enhanced:
- Replace hardcoded button width with relative units
- Add media queries for mobile responsiveness
- Add RTL support for international users
.btnsContainer { display: flex; margin: 1.5rem 0; + flex-wrap: wrap; + gap: 1rem; } .btnsContainer .input { flex: 1; - min-width: 18rem; + min-width: min(18rem, 100%); position: relative; } .btnsContainer .input button { - width: 52px; + width: 3.25rem; } +@media (max-width: 768px) { + .btnsContainer { + flex-direction: column; + } + .btnsContainer .input { + width: 100%; + } +} +/* RTL Support */ +[dir="rtl"] .btnsContainer .input { + margin-left: 0; + margin-right: auto; +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./* Upcoming Events Styles */ .btnsContainer { display: flex; margin: 1.5rem 0; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 1rem; } .btnsContainer .input { flex: 1; min-width: min(18rem, 100%); position: relative; } .btnsContainer input { outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400); background-color: white; } .btnsContainer .input button { width: 3.25rem; } @media (max-width: 768px) { .btnsContainer { flex-direction: column; } .btnsContainer .input { width: 100%; } } /* RTL Support */ [dir="rtl"] .btnsContainer .input { margin-left: 0; margin-right: auto; }
91-138: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve modal positioning and clean up redundant styles.
The modal styles have some issues:
- Fixed viewport-based positioning might cause issues
- Redundant width and margin declarations
- Missing focus styles for accessibility
.pledgeModal { - max-width: 80vw; - margin-top: 2vh; - margin-left: 13vw; + max-width: min(80vw, 1200px); + margin: 2vh auto; + position: relative; + left: 50%; + transform: translateX(-50%); } .greenregbtn { - margin: 1rem 0 0; - margin-top: 15px; + margin: 1rem 0; border: 1px solid #e8e5e5; box-shadow: 0 2px 2px #e8e5e5; padding: 10px 10px; border-radius: 5px; - background-color: #31bb6b; + background-color: var(--primary-color); width: 100%; font-size: 16px; color: white; outline: none; font-weight: 600; cursor: pointer; transition: transform 0.2s, box-shadow 0.2s; - width: 100%; +} + +.greenregbtn:focus-visible { + outline: 2px solid var(--primary-color); + outline-offset: 2px; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./* Pledge Modal */ .pledgeModal { max-width: min(80vw, 1200px); margin: 2vh auto; position: relative; left: 50%; transform: translateX(-50%); } .titlemodal { color: #707070; font-weight: 600; font-size: 32px; width: 65%; margin-bottom: 0px; } .modalCloseBtn { width: 40px; height: 40px; padding: 1rem; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; } .noOutline input { outline: none; } .greenregbtn { margin: 1rem 0; border: 1px solid #e8e5e5; box-shadow: 0 2px 2px #e8e5e5; padding: 10px 10px; border-radius: 5px; background-color: var(--primary-color); width: 100%; font-size: 16px; color: white; outline: none; font-weight: 600; cursor: pointer; transition: transform 0.2s, box-shadow 0.2s; } .greenregbtn:focus-visible { outline: 2px solid var(--primary-color); outline-offset: 2px; }src/GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries.ts (4)
41-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding useful metadata fields.
For better group management, consider adding:
updatedAttimestamp for tracking modificationsstatusfield for group lifecycle management (active/inactive)maxVolunteersto complementvolunteersRequired
12-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding pagination support.
For better performance and UX when dealing with large volunteer lists, consider adding pagination parameters (
first,after,last,before) and including total count in the response.Example modification:
export const EVENT_VOLUNTEER_LIST = gql` query GetEventVolunteers( $where: EventVolunteerWhereInput! $orderBy: EventVolunteersOrderByInput + $first: Int + $after: String ) { - getEventVolunteers(where: $where, orderBy: $orderBy) { + getEventVolunteers(where: $where, orderBy: $orderBy, first: $first, after: $after) { + totalCount + pageInfo { + hasNextPage + endCursor + } + nodes { _id hasAccepted # ... rest of the fields + } } } `;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
120-134:
⚠️ Potential issueReview data privacy and add time period support.
- Consider removing the
- Add time period parameters to support different ranking periods (weekly/monthly/yearly).
Apply this modification:
export const VOLUNTEER_RANKING = gql` - query GetVolunteerRanks($orgId: ID!, $where: VolunteerRankWhereInput!) { + query GetVolunteerRanks( + $orgId: ID! + $where: VolunteerRankWhereInput! + $startDate: DateTime + $endDate: DateTime + ) { getVolunteerRanks(orgId: $orgId, where: $where) { rank hoursVolunteered user { _id lastName firstName image - email } } } `;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
89-118: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider tracking membership changes with timestamps and source information
The suggestion to add tracking fields is valid as:
updatedAtis commonly used across other entities in the codebase (seen in donations, chats, organizations)- The membership status changes are handled through mutations (
UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP) in multiple components- The current schema only tracks
createdAtbut lacks change historySpecific recommendations:
- Add
updatedAttimestamp to track when status changes occur (accepted/rejected)- Add
joinedThroughenum field to differentiate between direct requests (seen in UpcomingEvents.tsx) and invitations (seen in Invitations.tsx)- Consider
lastActiveAtfor future engagement metrics🔗 Analysis chain
Enhance membership tracking capabilities.
Consider adding:
updatedAtfor tracking membership changeslastActiveAtfor tracking volunteer engagementjoinedThroughto track the source (direct/invitation/request)Also, verify that proper authorization checks are in place for membership status changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for authorization checks in resolvers rg -A 5 "getVolunteerMembership.*resolver"Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for resolver implementation with broader pattern rg -A 10 "getVolunteerMembership.*\{" # Search for schema definition rg -A 5 "type.*VolunteerMembership.*\{" # Search for any existing timestamps in the model ast-grep --pattern 'interface VolunteerMembership { $$$ }'Length of output: 837
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the model/type definition files fd -e ts -e js -e tsx -e jsx volunteer -i --exec rg -A 10 "(?i)(type|interface|class).*volunteermembership" # Search for mutation resolvers related to membership rg -A 10 "Mutation.*volunteer.*membership" -i # Look for existing timestamp fields in similar entities rg "updatedAt|lastActiveAt" --type tsLength of output: 7827
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerViewModal.test.tsx (2)
89-101:
⚠️ Potential issueExpand test coverage for comprehensive component testing.
The current tests only verify basic rendering. Consider adding:
Modal behavior tests:
- Test modal close functionality
- Test modal open/close transitions
Content verification tests:
- Verify all volunteer details are displayed correctly
- Test formatting of hours volunteered
- Verify group membership display
Interaction tests:
- Test any buttons or interactive elements
- Test any volunteer action handlers
Accessibility tests:
- Test modal focus management
- Verify ARIA attributes
- Test keyboard navigation
Example test case for modal close behavior:
it('should close modal when hide is called', () => { const hide = jest.fn(); render(<VolunteerViewModal {...itemProps[0]} hide={hide} />); // Assuming there's a close button with test-id const closeButton = screen.getByTestId('modal-close-button'); fireEvent.click(closeButton); expect(hide).toHaveBeenCalled(); });
14-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using structured clone for better performance.
While the current implementation works, using
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())for deep cloning can be inefficient and doesn't handle certain types (likeDate,Map,Set). Consider using the more modernstructuredClone()function.const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), + ...structuredClone(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}), + ...structuredClone(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}), + ...structuredClone(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}) };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...structuredClone(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}), ...structuredClone(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}), ...structuredClone(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}) };src/GraphQl/Mutations/EventVolunteerMutation.ts (6)
56-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve documentation for update mutation.
The JSDoc should document the structure of
UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInputsimilar to howEventVolunteerGroupInputwas documented. Also, there's an extra newline in the JSDoc.Also consider returning the same fields as suggested for CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP for consistency.
98-112:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect documentation.
The JSDoc appears to be copied from
UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUPmutation. Please update it to correctly document the membership update operation:
- It should mention volunteer membership instead of volunteer group
- Document the
statusparameter and its possible valuesAlso consider returning the same fields as suggested for CREATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP for consistency.
3-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing mutation response fields.
While the mutation works correctly, returning only the
_idfield might be insufficient for UI feedback. Consider returning additional fields that might be needed for immediate UI updates (e.g., status, createdAt).export const ADD_VOLUNTEER = gql` mutation CreateEventVolunteer($data: EventVolunteerInput!) { createEventVolunteer(data: $data) { _id + status + createdAt + event { + _id + name + } } } `;Also, please enhance the JSDoc to document the structure of
EventVolunteerInput.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
90-96:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing documentation for membership creation.
Please add JSDoc documentation for this mutation, including:
- Description of the mutation's purpose
- Structure of
VolunteerMembershipInput- Description of the return value
Also consider returning additional fields useful for UI updates:
export const CREATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP = gql` mutation CreateVolunteerMembership($data: VolunteerMembershipInput!) { createVolunteerMembership(data: $data) { _id + status + createdAt + volunteer { + _id + firstName + lastName + } + group { + _id + name + } } } `;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const CREATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP = gql` mutation CreateVolunteerMembership($data: VolunteerMembershipInput!) { createVolunteerMembership(data: $data) { _id status createdAt volunteer { _id firstName lastName } group { _id name } } } `;
107-108: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for membership status.
Instead of accepting any string for the status, consider using a GraphQL enum type to ensure type safety and valid status values.
export const UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP = gql` - mutation UpdateVolunteerMembership($id: ID!, $status: String!) { + mutation UpdateVolunteerMembership($id: ID!, $status: VolunteerMembershipStatus!) { updateVolunteerMembership(id: $id, status: $status) {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
34-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing group creation response.
The mutation should return additional fields that would be useful for immediate UI updates without requiring an additional query.
export const CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP = gql` mutation CreateEventVolunteerGroup($data: EventVolunteerGroupInput!) { createEventVolunteerGroup(data: $data) { _id + name + description + volunteersRequired + leader { + _id + firstName + lastName + } + volunteers { + _id + firstName + lastName + } } } `;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * GraphQL mutation to create an event volunteer group. * * @param data - The data required to create an event volunteer group. * - data contains following fileds: * - eventId: string * - leaderId: string * - name: string * - description?: string * - volunteers: [string] * - volunteersRequired?: number * @returns The ID of the created event volunteer group. * */ export const CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP = gql` mutation CreateEventVolunteerGroup($data: EventVolunteerGroupInput!) { createEventVolunteerGroup(data: $data) { _id name description volunteersRequired leader { _id firstName lastName } volunteers { _id firstName lastName } } } `;src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerContainer.test.tsx (5)
43-94: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test coverage for key volunteer management scenarios.
Given the PR objectives, consider adding these test cases:
- Loading states during GraphQL operations
- Error handling for failed GraphQL operations
- Volunteer group creation/deletion flows
- Invitation acceptance/rejection flows
- Action item assignment validation
Example test structure to add:
test('should show loading state during GraphQL operations', async () => { renderVolunteerContainer(); expect(screen.getByTestId('loading-spinner')).toBeInTheDocument(); await waitForElementToBeRemoved(() => screen.getByTestId('loading-spinner')); }); test('should handle GraphQL errors gracefully', async () => { // Mock GraphQL error response const errorLink = new StaticMockLink([ { ...MOCKS[0], error: new Error('Failed to fetch volunteers'), }, ]); render( <MockedProvider link={errorLink}> <VolunteerContainer /> </MockedProvider> ); expect(await screen.findByText('Failed to fetch volunteers')).toBeInTheDocument(); });
18-41: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding ErrorBoundary for better error handling in tests.
The helper function is well-structured, but could benefit from error boundary wrapping to catch and test potential rendering errors.
const renderVolunteerContainer = (): RenderResult => { return render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link1}> <MemoryRouter initialEntries={['/event/orgId/eventId']}> <Provider store={store}> <LocalizationProvider> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> + <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div data-testid="error-boundary">Error occurred</div>}> <Routes> <Route path="/event/:orgId/:eventId" element={<VolunteerContainer />} /> <Route path="/" element={<div data-testid="paramsError">paramsError</div>} /> </Routes> + </ErrorBoundary> </I18nextProvider> </LocalizationProvider> </Provider> </MemoryRouter> </MockedProvider>, ); };Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
55-78:
⚠️ Potential issueRefactor test to use helper function and enhance assertions.
The test case duplicates provider setup and could benefit from additional assertions.
- Use the helper function to avoid code duplication:
- render( - <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link1}> - <MemoryRouter initialEntries={['/event/']}> - <Provider store={store}> - <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> - <Routes> - <Route path="/event/" element={<VolunteerContainer />} /> - <Route - path="/" - element={<div data-testid="paramsError"></div>} - /> - </Routes> - </I18nextProvider> - </Provider> - </MemoryRouter> - </MockedProvider>, - ); + mockRouteParams({}); + renderVolunteerContainer();
- Add URL assertion:
await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('paramsError')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(window.location.pathname).toBe('/'); });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
43-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider parameterizing the useParams mock for different test scenarios.
The current implementation uses static values. Consider creating a helper function to dynamically set parameters for different test cases.
+const mockRouteParams = (params: { orgId?: string; eventId?: string }) => { + jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), + useParams: () => params, + })); +}; describe('Testing Volunteer Container', () => { beforeAll(() => { - jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ - ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }), - })); + mockRouteParams({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const mockRouteParams = (params: { orgId?: string; eventId?: string }) => { jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => params, })); }; describe('Testing Volunteer Container', () => { beforeAll(() => { mockRouteParams({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }); }); afterAll(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); });
79-94:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance test coverage for radio button interactions.
The test only verifies presence and click events but doesn't validate the actual effects of these interactions.
Add assertions to verify the state changes and visual feedback:
test('Testing Volunteer Container Screen -> Toggle screens', async () => { renderVolunteerContainer(); const groupRadio = await screen.findByTestId('groupsRadio'); expect(groupRadio).toBeInTheDocument(); userEvent.click(groupRadio); + expect(groupRadio).toBeChecked(); + expect(await screen.findByTestId('groupsContent')).toBeVisible(); const requestsRadio = await screen.findByTestId('requestsRadio'); expect(requestsRadio).toBeInTheDocument(); userEvent.click(requestsRadio); + expect(requestsRadio).toBeChecked(); + expect(groupRadio).not.toBeChecked(); + expect(await screen.findByTestId('requestsContent')).toBeVisible(); const individualRadio = await screen.findByTestId('individualRadio'); expect(individualRadio).toBeInTheDocument(); userEvent.click(individualRadio); + expect(individualRadio).toBeChecked(); + expect(requestsRadio).not.toBeChecked(); + expect(await screen.findByTestId('individualContent')).toBeVisible(); });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.test.tsx (1)
41-44: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test cases for 'EventVolunteer' and 'EventVolunteerGroup' assignee types
The test data structure only covers the 'User' assignee type, but the codebase shows three possible values from
interfaces.ts: 'EventVolunteer', 'EventVolunteerGroup', and 'User'. Add test cases for:
assigneeType: 'EventVolunteer'with corresponding volunteer dataassigneeType: 'EventVolunteerGroup'with corresponding group dataThis ensures the delete modal handles all possible assignee scenarios correctly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding test cases for different assignee types.
The test data structure now supports both individual and group assignments, which aligns with the PR objectives for volunteer management. However, the current test only covers the 'User' assignee type.
Let's check what other assignee types exist in the codebase:
Consider adding test cases for other assignee types (e.g., 'Group', 'Volunteer') to ensure the modal handles all scenarios correctly. For example:
const groupAssigneeProps = { ...itemProps, actionItem: { ...itemProps.actionItem, assigneeType: 'Group', assigneeUser: null, assigneeGroup: { _id: 'groupId1', name: 'Volunteer Group 1' } } };🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for possible assignee type values rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' "assigneeType.*['\"].*['\"]"Length of output: 5381
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerDeleteModal.tsx (2)
55-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing error handling.
While the error handling is functional, it could be more specific to help users better understand and resolve issues.
Consider implementing more specific error handling:
- } catch (error: unknown) { - toast.error((error as Error).message); + } catch (error: unknown) { + if (error instanceof Error) { + if (error.message.includes('not found')) { + toast.error(t('volunteerNotFound')); + } else if (error.message.includes('permission')) { + toast.error(t('noPermissionToDelete')); + } else { + toast.error(t('errorDeletingVolunteer')); + } + } else { + toast.error(t('unexpectedError')); + } }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
71-99: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing modal accessibility.
The modal implementation is good, but could benefit from additional keyboard handling for better accessibility.
Consider adding keyboard support:
<Modal className={styles.volunteerModal} onHide={hide} show={isOpen} + onEscapeKeyDown={hide} + enforceFocus + autoFocus >Also, consider adding
aria-labelattributes to the buttons for better screen reader support:<Button variant="danger" onClick={hide} className={styles.modalCloseBtn} data-testid="modalCloseBtn" + aria-label={t('closeModal')} >Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupDeleteModal.tsx (2)
52-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and null safety.
The error handling and null checking could be improved:
- Add explicit null check for
groupbefore accessing_id- Use more specific error types for better error handling
Consider this implementation:
const deleteHandler = async (): Promise<void> => { + if (!group?._id) { + toast.error(t('invalidGroupError')); + return; + } try { await deleteVolunteerGroup({ variables: { - id: group?._id, + id: group._id, }, }); refetchGroups(); hide(); toast.success(t('volunteerGroupDeleted')); } catch (error: unknown) { - toast.error((error as Error).message); + if (error instanceof Error) { + toast.error(error.message); + } else { + toast.error(t('unknownError')); + } } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const deleteHandler = async (): Promise<void> => { if (!group?._id) { toast.error(t('invalidGroupError')); return; } try { await deleteVolunteerGroup({ variables: { id: group._id, }, }); refetchGroups(); hide(); toast.success(t('volunteerGroupDeleted')); } catch (error: unknown) { if (error instanceof Error) { toast.error(error.message); } else { toast.error(t('unknownError')); } } };
67-98: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve modal accessibility and structure.
- The empty fragment (
<></>) is unnecessary since there's only one root element- Add keyboard accessibility for better user experience
Apply these improvements:
- return ( - <> - <Modal className={styles.volunteerModal} onHide={hide} show={isOpen}> + return ( + <Modal + className={styles.volunteerModal} + onHide={hide} + show={isOpen} + keyboard={true} + aria-labelledby="delete-group-modal-title" + > <Modal.Header> - <p className={styles.titlemodal}> {t('deleteGroup')}</p> + <p className={styles.titlemodal} id="delete-group-modal-title"> + {t('deleteGroup')} + </p> <Button variant="danger" onClick={hide} className={styles.modalCloseBtn} data-testid="modalCloseBtn" + aria-label={t('close')} > - {' '} <i className="fa fa-times"></i> </Button> </Modal.Header> // ... rest of the modal content </Modal> - </> );Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerContainer.tsx (4)
18-18:
⚠️ Potential issueFollow React naming conventions.
React component names should use PascalCase.
Apply this change:
-function volunteerContainer(): JSX.Element { +function VolunteerContainer(): JSX.Element { // ... } -export default volunteerContainer; +export default VolunteerContainer;Also applies to: 113-113
23-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety for URL parameters.
While the implementation is correct, we can improve type safety and readability.
Consider these improvements:
- const { orgId, eventId } = useParams(); + const { orgId, eventId } = useParams<{ + orgId: string; + eventId: string; + }>(); - if (!orgId || !eventId) { - return <Navigate to={'/'} replace />; - } + // Early return pattern for better readability + if (!orgId || !eventId) return <Navigate to="/" replace />;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Get the organization ID and event ID from URL parameters const { orgId, eventId } = useParams<{ orgId: string; eventId: string; }>(); // Early return pattern for better readability if (!orgId || !eventId) return <Navigate to="/" replace />;
102-108: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify conditional rendering logic.
The nested ternary operator could be replaced with a more readable solution.
Consider using an object map for cleaner conditional rendering:
- {dataType === 'individual' ? ( - <Volunteers /> - ) : dataType === 'group' ? ( - <VolunteerGroups /> - ) : ( - <Requests /> - )} + { + { + individual: <Volunteers />, + group: <VolunteerGroups />, + requests: <Requests /> + }[dataType] + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
36-100:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove accessibility for toggle interface.
While the implementation is functional, we should enhance the accessibility for screen readers.
Consider these accessibility improvements:
<div> <div className="mt-2 mb-4 d-flex justify-content-between"> - <span className={styles.titlemodal}> + <span className={styles.titlemodal} role="heading" aria-level="1"> {t( `${dataType === 'group' ? 'volunteerGroups' : dataType === 'individual' ? 'volunteers' : 'requests'}`, )} </span> <div className="d-flex justify-content-center"> - <div - className={`btn-group ${styles.toggleGroup}`} - role="group" - aria-label="Basic radio toggle button group" - > + <fieldset className={`btn-group ${styles.toggleGroup}`}> + <legend className="visually-hidden">Select view type</legend> {/* ... radio buttons ... */} - </div> + </fieldset> </div> </div>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.tsx (1)
59-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the assigneeId determination logic.
While the current implementation works correctly, the nested ternary operations make it harder to read and maintain.
Consider refactoring to a more readable form:
- assigneeId: - assigneeType === 'EventVolunteer' - ? assignee?._id - : assigneeType === 'EventVolunteerGroup' - ? assigneeGroup?._id - : assigneeUser?._id, + assigneeId: { + const assigneeMap = { + 'EventVolunteer': assignee?._id, + 'EventVolunteerGroup': assigneeGroup?._id, + 'User': assigneeUser?._id + }; + return assigneeMap[assigneeType]; + },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupViewModal.test.tsx (2)
15-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify translation setup and improve reusability.
The nested JSON.parse operations are unnecessary since i18n.getDataByLanguage already returns a JavaScript object.
Consider simplifying the translation setup:
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}, +};Consider moving this to a helper function for reuse across test files:
// utils/testHelpers.ts export const getTestTranslations = (namespaces: string[]) => { return namespaces.reduce((acc, namespace) => ({ ...acc, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.[namespace] ?? {}, }), {}); };
112-126:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance test coverage with additional test scenarios and assertions.
The current tests only verify basic rendering. Consider adding:
- Negative test cases
- Interaction testing
- Proper async behavior testing
Add these test cases:
it('should handle modal close', async () => { const hide = jest.fn(); renderGroupViewModal({ ...itemProps[0], hide }); const closeButton = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /close/i }); await userEvent.click(closeButton); expect(hide).toHaveBeenCalled(); }); it('should display error state when group data is invalid', () => { renderGroupViewModal({ ...itemProps[0], group: { ...itemProps[0].group, name: '' } }); expect(screen.getByText(/invalid group data/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('should format dates correctly', () => { renderGroupViewModal(itemProps[0]); expect(screen.getByText(/october 25, 2024/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); });Also, remove the
asynckeyword from current tests since they don't use any async operations.src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerDeleteModal.test.tsx (1)
28-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify translation setup.
The current translation setup with multiple JSON.parse operations could be simplified:
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, +};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, };src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.mocks.ts (2)
162-181: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance empty result test coverage.
Consider adding empty result scenarios for different time frames and search conditions to ensure proper handling of no-data states across all filter combinations.
Add test cases for:
- Empty weekly/monthly/yearly results
- No matches for name search
- Empty results with ascending sort
183-198: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Expand error scenario coverage.
Consider adding specific error scenarios that might occur in production:
- Network errors
- Permission denied errors
- Invalid time frame errors
Add test cases like:
{ request: { query: VOLUNTEER_RANKING, variables: { orgId: 'orgId', where: { orderBy: 'hours_DESC', timeFrame: 'allTime', nameContains: '', }, }, }, error: new Error('Permission denied: User not authorized to view volunteer rankings'), },src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerCreateModal.test.tsx (1)
33-72: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the translation setup.
The current translation setup spreads multiple JSON.parse operations which could be simplified.
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, +} ?? {};The renderCreateModal utility function is well structured with all necessary providers. 👍
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const link1 = new StaticMockLink(MOCKS); const link2 = new StaticMockLink(MOCKS_ERROR); const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, } ?? {}; const itemProps: InterfaceVolunteerCreateModal[] = [ { isOpen: true, hide: jest.fn(), eventId: 'eventId', orgId: 'orgId', refetchVolunteers: jest.fn(), }, ]; const renderCreateModal = ( link: ApolloLink, props: InterfaceVolunteerCreateModal, ): RenderResult => { return render( <MockedProvider link={link} addTypename={false}> <Provider store={store}> <BrowserRouter> <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> <VolunteerCreateModal {...props} /> </I18nextProvider> </LocalizationProvider> </BrowserRouter> </Provider> </MockedProvider>, ); };src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/VolunteerManagement.test.tsx (2)
43-58: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using explicit mock implementation.
The current mock setup could be more explicit about the expected shape of the params:
- jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ - ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), - })); + const mockParams = { orgId: 'test-org-id' }; + jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), + useParams: () => mockParams, + }));Also, consider adding cleanup for localStorage in afterAll:
afterAll(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); + localStorage.clear(); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.describe('Volunteer Management', () => { beforeAll(() => { const mockParams = { orgId: 'test-org-id' }; jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => mockParams, })); }); beforeEach(() => { setItem('userId', 'userId'); }); afterAll(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); localStorage.clear(); });
86-94: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add more specific assertions for the initial render test.
The current test could be more thorough in validating the initial state:
test('Render Volunteer Management Screen', async () => { renderVolunteerManagement(); const upcomingEventsTab = await screen.findByTestId('upcomingEventsTab'); expect(upcomingEventsTab).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(upcomingEventsTab).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'true'); expect(screen.getByTestId('invitationsBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('invitationsBtn')).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'false'); expect(screen.getByTestId('actionsBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('actionsBtn')).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'false'); expect(screen.getByTestId('groupsBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('groupsBtn')).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'false'); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.test('Render Volunteer Management Screen', async () => { renderVolunteerManagement(); const upcomingEventsTab = await screen.findByTestId('upcomingEventsTab'); expect(upcomingEventsTab).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(upcomingEventsTab).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'true'); expect(screen.getByTestId('invitationsBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByTestId('invitationsBtn')).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'false'); expect(screen.getByTestId('actionsBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByTestId('actionsBtn')).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'false'); expect(screen.getByTestId('groupsBtn')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByTestId('groupsBtn')).toHaveAttribute('aria-selected', 'false'); });src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.module.css (2)
261-285:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove duplicate toggle button styles.
This entire block is a duplicate of the styles defined in lines 235-260. Remove this redundant code to maintain cleaner and more maintainable styles.
235-260: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor toggle button styles to follow best practices.
- Replace hardcoded color values with CSS custom properties for consistency
- Consider restructuring selectors to avoid
!importantflags- Remove duplicate code block (lines 261-285)
Apply this diff to improve the code:
/* Toggle Btn */ .toggleGroup { width: 50%; min-width: 20rem; margin: 0.5rem 0rem; } .toggleBtn { padding: 0rem; height: 2rem; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; } .toggleBtn:hover { - color: #31bb6b !important; + color: var(--bs-primary) !important; } input[type='radio']:checked + label { - background-color: #31bb6a50 !important; + background-color: var(--bs-primary-light) !important; } input[type='radio']:checked + label:hover { color: black !important; }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupDeleteModal.test.tsx (2)
81-98: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error boundary testing capability.
The render setup is well-structured, but consider adding an error boundary wrapper to test error handling scenarios comprehensively.
// Add this utility function above renderGroupDeleteModal const TestErrorBoundary: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => { return ( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div data-testid="error-fallback">Error occurred</div>}> {children} </ErrorBoundary> ); }; // Modify the render function to optionally include error boundary const renderGroupDeleteModal = ( link: ApolloLink, props: InterfaceDeleteVolunteerGroupModal, withErrorBoundary = false, ): RenderResult => { const component = ( <MockedProvider link={link} addTypename={false}> <Provider store={store}> <BrowserRouter> <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> <VolunteerGroupDeleteModal {...props} /> </I18nextProvider> </LocalizationProvider> </BrowserRouter> </Provider> </MockedProvider> ); return render( withErrorBoundary ? <TestErrorBoundary>{component}</TestErrorBoundary> : component ); };
100-141: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with edge cases and accessibility tests.
While the current test cases cover the main scenarios, consider adding:
- Accessibility testing for modal interactions
- Edge cases for group data
- Network timeout scenarios
Add these additional test cases:
it('should be keyboard accessible', () => { renderGroupDeleteModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const dialog = screen.getByRole('dialog'); expect(dialog).toHaveAttribute('aria-modal', 'true'); // Test keyboard navigation userEvent.tab(); expect(screen.getByTestId('deletenobtn')).toHaveFocus(); userEvent.tab(); expect(screen.getByTestId('deleteyesbtn')).toHaveFocus(); }); it('should handle empty group data gracefully', () => { const emptyGroupProps = { ...itemProps[0], group: { ...itemProps[0].group, volunteers: [], assignments: null } }; renderGroupDeleteModal(link1, emptyGroupProps); expect(screen.getByTestId('deleteyesbtn')).toBeEnabled(); }); it('should handle network timeout', async () => { // Create a mock that never resolves const timeoutLink = new StaticMockLink([ { ...MOCKS[0], delay: Infinity } ]); renderGroupDeleteModal(timeoutLink, itemProps[0]); userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('deleteyesbtn')); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('timeout')); }); });src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.mocks.ts (2)
4-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving mock data robustness.
A few suggestions to enhance the mock data:
- The hard-coded future dates (2044) might cause tests to fail when the dates are reached. Consider using dynamic dates relative to the current date.
- There's inconsistent null handling:
group: nullvsimage: null. Consider standardizing the approach.- Consider adding TypeScript type definitions for the mock data structure.
Example implementation for dynamic dates:
// Add type definitions interface VolunteerMembership { _id: string; status: 'requested' | 'accepted' | 'rejected'; createdAt: string; event: { _id: string; title: string; startDate: string; }; volunteer: { _id: string; user: { _id: string; firstName: string; lastName: string; image: string | null; }; }; group: null; } // Use dynamic dates const getFutureDate = (daysFromNow: number): string => { const date = new Date(); date.setDate(date.getDate() + daysFromNow); return date.toISOString().split('T')[0]; }; const membership1: VolunteerMembership = { // ... other fields remain same event: { _id: 'eventId', title: 'Event 1', startDate: getFutureDate(30), // 30 days from now }, // ... rest of the object };
167-192:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using undefined in GraphQL variables.
GraphQL typically doesn't handle undefined values well. Consider:
- Omitting optional variables entirely
- Using null instead of undefined
- Adding more specific error messages that match potential backend errors
- userName: undefined, - orderBy: undefined, + // Remove undefined fields entirely eventId: 'eventId', status: 'requested',Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/EventVolunteers.module.css (7)
161-187: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve cross-browser compatibility and color consistency.
- Add all necessary vendor prefixes or consider using a CSS autoprefixer
- Use CSS variables for colors in
.dropdown.noOutline input:disabled { - -webkit-text-fill-color: black !important; + -webkit-text-fill-color: var(--bs-dark); + -moz-text-fill-color: var(--bs-dark); + text-fill-color: var(--bs-dark); } .dropdown { background-color: white; - border: 1px solid #31bb6b; + border: 1px solid var(--bs-primary); position: relative; display: inline-block; - color: #31bb6b; + color: var(--bs-primary); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
91-111: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve consistency with design system variables.
- Use CSS variables for
hrstyles- Consider using more reliable units for
.messagemarginhr { border: none; height: 1px; - background-color: var(--bs-gray-500); + background-color: var(--bs-border-color); - margin: 1rem; + margin: var(--bs-spacer); } .message { - margin-top: 25%; + margin-top: 4rem; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; flex-direction: column; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.hr { border: none; height: 1px; background-color: var(--bs-border-color); margin: var(--bs-spacer); } .iconContainer { display: flex; justify-content: flex-end; } .icon { margin: 1px; } .message { margin-top: 4rem; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; flex-direction: column;
209-217: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use semantic color variables for status indicators.
Replace hardcoded colors with semantic CSS variables for better maintainability.
.active { - background-color: #31bb6a50 !important; + background-color: var(--bs-success-light); } .pending { - background-color: #ffd76950 !important; - color: #bb952bd0 !important; - border-color: #bb952bd0 !important; + background-color: var(--bs-warning-light); + color: var(--bs-warning-dark); + border-color: var(--bs-warning); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
32-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance responsive design and simplify padding declarations.
- Consider using CSS Grid or Flexbox for modal positioning instead of fixed viewport units
- Simplify padding declarations in
.datebox.actionItemModal { - max-width: 80vw; - margin-top: 2vh; - margin-left: 13vw; + position: fixed; + top: 50%; + left: 50%; + transform: translate(-50%, -50%); + width: min(80vw, 1200px); } .datebox { - padding-top: 2px; - padding-bottom: 2px; - padding-right: 5px; - padding-left: 5px; + padding: 2px 5px; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..actionItemModal { position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); width: min(80vw, 1200px); } .datediv { display: flex; flex-direction: row; } .datebox { width: 90%; border-radius: 7px; outline: none; box-shadow: none; padding: 2px 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-left: 5px; }
71-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clean up button styles and optimize transitions.
- Remove duplicate
widthproperty- Use more specific transition properties for better performance
.greenregbtn { margin: 1rem 0 0; margin-top: 15px; border: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-300); box-shadow: 0 2px 2px var(--bs-gray-300); padding: 10px 10px; border-radius: 5px; background-color: var(--bs-primary); - width: 100%; font-size: 16px; color: var(--bs-white); outline: none; font-weight: 600; cursor: pointer; - transition: - transform 0.2s, - box-shadow 0.2s; + transition: transform 0.2s ease-out, box-shadow 0.2s ease-out; width: 100%; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..greenregbtn { margin: 1rem 0 0; margin-top: 15px; border: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-300); box-shadow: 0 2px 2px var(--bs-gray-300); padding: 10px 10px; border-radius: 5px; background-color: var(--bs-primary); font-size: 16px; color: var(--bs-white); outline: none; font-weight: 600; cursor: pointer; transition: transform 0.2s ease-out, box-shadow 0.2s ease-out; width: 100%; }
16-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve maintainability by using CSS variables and removing
!importantflags.Consider these improvements:
- Replace hardcoded colors with CSS variables
- Remove
!importantflags by increasing selector specificity.toggleBtn:hover { - color: #31bb6b !important; + color: var(--bs-primary); } input[type='radio']:checked + label { - background-color: #31bb6a50 !important; + background-color: var(--bs-primary-light); } input[type='radio']:checked + label:hover { - color: black !important; + color: var(--bs-dark); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
219-255: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve modal responsiveness and remove unnecessary
!importantflags.
- Use more reliable positioning for modals
- Remove
!importantflags from table image styles.itemModal { - max-width: 80vw; - margin-top: 2vh; - margin-left: 13vw; + position: fixed; + top: 50%; + left: 50%; + transform: translate(-50%, -50%); + width: min(80vw, 1200px); + max-height: 90vh; + overflow-y: auto; } .TableImage { object-fit: cover; - width: 25px !important; - height: 25px !important; - border-radius: 100% !important; + width: 25px; + height: 25px; + border-radius: 50%; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./* Modals */ .itemModal { position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); width: min(80vw, 1200px); max-height: 90vh; overflow-y: auto; } .titlemodal { color: #707070; font-weight: 600; font-size: 32px; width: 65%; margin-bottom: 0px; } .modalCloseBtn { width: 40px; height: 40px; padding: 1rem; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; } .imageContainer { display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; margin-right: 0.5rem; } .TableImage { object-fit: cover; width: 25px; height: 25px; border-radius: 50%; }src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerCreateModal.tsx (2)
91-93: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling with localized messages.
The error handling could be improved by:
- Using more specific error types instead of
unknown- Using localized error messages instead of raw error messages
- } catch (error: unknown) { - toast.error((error as Error).message); + } catch (error: unknown) { + if (error instanceof Error) { + toast.error(t('errorAddingVolunteer', { message: error.message })); + } else { + toast.error(t('unknownError')); + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
73-96:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing dependencies to useCallback.
The
useCallbackhook is missing dependencies that are used within the callback:
addVolunteerhiderefetchVolunteerst(translation function)This could lead to stale closures.
}, [ userId, eventId, + addVolunteer, + hide, + refetchVolunteers, + t ]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Function to add a volunteer for an event const addVolunteerHandler = useCallback( async (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLFormElement>): Promise<void> => { try { e.preventDefault(); await addVolunteer({ variables: { data: { eventId, userId, }, }, }); toast.success(t('volunteerAdded')); refetchVolunteers(); setUserId(''); hide(); } catch (error: unknown) { toast.error((error as Error).message); } }, [ userId, eventId, addVolunteer, hide, refetchVolunteers, t ], );src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (2)
102-119: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response:
The
description_containsparameter should be added for consistencyThe schema shows that
EventWhereInputtype includesdescription_containsas a valid filter parameter, and theORGANIZATION_EVENTS_CONNECTIONquery uses this parameter. For consistency across queries and to maintain alignment with the schema, this parameter should be added toUSER_EVENTS_VOLUNTEER.
src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts: Adddescription_containsparameter to match schema capabilities and maintain consistency with other event queries.🔗 Analysis chain
Consider parameter consistency with ORGANIZATION_EVENTS_CONNECTION.
The existing
ORGANIZATION_EVENTS_CONNECTIONquery includes adescription_containsparameter that's missing in this new query. If filtering by description isn't needed for volunteer-related queries, please document this design decision.Let's check if description filtering is used in the codebase:
Consider adding the parameter for consistency if it's used:
query UserEventsVolunteer( $organization_id: ID! $title_contains: String + $description_contains: String $location_contains: String $first: Int $skip: Int $upcomingOnly: Boolean ) { eventsByOrganizationConnection( where: { organization_id: $organization_id title_contains: $title_contains + description_contains: $description_contains location_contains: $location_contains }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if description filtering is used in components rg -l "description_contains.*ORGANIZATION_EVENTS_CONNECTION"Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check the ORGANIZATION_EVENTS_CONNECTION query definition rg -A 20 "ORGANIZATION_EVENTS_CONNECTION\s*=" # Also check for any usage of description_contains in GraphQL queries rg "description_contains.*where" # And check the schema definition for the events connection fd "schema.graphql" --exec cat {}Length of output: 32370
130-144: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the schema and codebase analysis, I can now provide a definitive response about the N+1 query concern:
The N+1 query concern is valid and should be addressed.
Looking at the GraphQL schema, we can see that:
- The Event type has nested fields for both
volunteerGroupsandvolunteers- There is no evidence of DataLoader implementation in the codebase
- The schema shows these are separate entity types that would require individual database queries
The nested structure in the query:
volunteerGroups { volunteers { _id } } volunteers { _id user { _id } }will likely result in:
- 1 query to fetch the event
- N queries to fetch volunteer groups
- N queries for each group's volunteers
- N queries for the event's direct volunteers
- N queries for volunteer users
Recommendations:
- Implement DataLoader pattern to batch and cache the volunteer and user lookups
- Consider denormalizing frequently accessed volunteer counts
- Add field-level resolvers with proper batching
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider potential N+1 query performance impact.
The nested structure retrieving
volunteersfor both the event and eachvolunteerGroupcould lead to N+1 query performance issues if not properly optimized on the backend. Ensure that the GraphQL resolver implements proper batching or uses DataLoader pattern.Let's check the resolver implementation:
Let's search for the resolver implementation in the backend code to verify if there are any N+1 query concerns.
Let's try a different approach to find the backend code and GraphQL schema files:
Let's check the schema.graphql file to understand the resolver structure and any potential DataLoader implementations:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for the resolver implementation ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $_ { $$$ async volunteerGroups($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for resolver implementations and volunteer-related resolvers rg -l "class.*Resolver" --type ts # Then let's look for any resolver implementations related to volunteers or volunteer groups rg "volunteerGroups|volunteers" --type ts -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 142411
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for backend resolver files rg -l "resolver|Resolver" --type ts # Then look for any GraphQL type definitions or schemas related to volunteers rg "type.*Volunteer|input.*Volunteer" --type graphqlLength of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for GraphQL schema files with any extension fd -e gql -e graphql -e ts -e js . | grep -i "schema" # Search for volunteer-related resolvers and data loading patterns rg -i "dataloader|resolver.*volunteer|volunteer.*resolver" --type ts # Look for backend model/entity definitions related to volunteers rg "class.*Volunteer|interface.*Volunteer|type.*Volunteer" --type tsLength of output: 3973
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the GraphQL schema file cat schema.graphql # Also look for any DataLoader implementations in the codebase rg -A 5 "new DataLoader|createDataLoader" --type tsLength of output: 30995
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.mocks.ts (4)
28-30:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace hardcoded dates with dynamic date generation.
Using fixed future dates in test mocks can cause tests to fail when these dates are reached. Consider using relative dates based on the current date.
- assignmentDate: '2024-10-25', - dueDate: '2025-10-25', - completionDate: '2024-11-01', + assignmentDate: new Date(Date.now()).toISOString().split('T')[0], + dueDate: new Date(Date.now() + 30 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString().split('T')[0], + completionDate: new Date(Date.now() + 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString().split('T')[0],Also applies to: 64-66, 105-107
41-41:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent types for allotedHours across mocks.
The
allotedHoursfield is inconsistently typed:
- action1: number (8)
- action2: number (8)
- action3: null
This inconsistency might cause type-related issues in components consuming this data.
Consider standardizing the field:
- allotedHours: null, // in action3 + allotedHours: 8, // consistent with other mocksAlso applies to: 77-77, 118-118
121-230: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with additional query scenarios.
The current mocks cover basic sorting and filtering, but miss some important scenarios:
- Combined filters (both assigneeName and categoryName)
- Completed vs incomplete items filter
- Event-based filtering
- Date range filtering
Add these additional test scenarios:
{ request: { query: ACTION_ITEMS_BY_USER, variables: { userId: 'userId', orderBy: null, where: { orgId: 'orgId', assigneeName: 'Teresa', categoryName: 'Category 1', isCompleted: true, eventId: 'eventId1' }, }, }, result: { data: { actionItemsByUser: [action1], }, }, }
253-268: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error scenarios coverage.
The current error mock only covers a generic error case. Consider adding more specific error scenarios that the application might encounter:
- Network errors
- Authentication errors
- Permission errors
Add these additional error scenarios:
export const NETWORK_ERROR_MOCKS = [{ request: { query: ACTION_ITEMS_BY_USER, variables: { userId: 'userId', orderBy: null, where: { orgId: 'orgId' } } }, error: new Error('Network error: Unable to reach the server') }]; export const AUTH_ERROR_MOCKS = [{ request: { query: ACTION_ITEMS_BY_USER, variables: { userId: 'userId', orderBy: null, where: { orgId: 'orgId' } } }, error: new Error('Authentication required: Please log in again') }];src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.mocks.ts (3)
49-187: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios.
While the current test cases are good, consider adding these scenarios to improve coverage:
- Invalid/non-existent event title search
- Partial name matches (e.g., searching "Jo" should match "John")
- Case-insensitive search (e.g., "john" should match "John")
Add these test cases:
// Add to MOCKS array { request: { query: USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, variables: { where: { userId: 'userId', status: 'invited', filter: null, eventTitle: 'NonExistent', }, }, }, result: { data: { getVolunteerMembership: [], }, }, }, { request: { query: USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, variables: { where: { userId: 'userId', status: 'invited', filter: null, eventTitle: 'jo', // Partial match }, }, }, result: { data: { getVolunteerMembership: [membership1, membership2], }, }, },
235-263: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add more error scenarios for comprehensive testing.
Consider adding these error scenarios:
- Network timeout
- Server error (500)
- Invalid membership ID
// Add to UPDATE_ERROR_MOCKS array { request: { query: UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, variables: { id: 'invalidId', status: 'accepted', }, }, error: new Error('Membership not found: Invalid ID'), }, { request: { query: UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, variables: { id: 'membershipId1', status: 'accepted', }, }, error: new Error('Request timeout after 5000ms'), }
4-47:
⚠️ Potential issueFix invalid date and improve test coverage.
Several issues found in the mock data:
membership2.event.startDateuses an invalid date ('2044-11-31' - November has only 30 days)- Both memberships use the same
volunteerId, which might limit test coverage- The
startDateformat could be more consistent with ISO 8601Apply these changes:
const membership1 = { // ... event: { _id: 'eventId', title: 'Event 1', - startDate: '2044-10-31', + startDate: '2044-10-31T00:00:00.000Z', }, volunteer: { _id: 'volunteerId1', // ... }, }; const membership2 = { // ... event: { _id: 'eventId', title: 'Event 2', - startDate: '2044-11-31', + startDate: '2044-11-30T00:00:00.000Z', }, volunteer: { - _id: 'volunteerId1', + _id: 'volunteerId2', // ... }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const membership1 = { _id: 'membershipId1', status: 'invited', createdAt: '2024-10-29T10:18:05.851Z', event: { _id: 'eventId', title: 'Event 1', startDate: '2044-10-31T00:00:00.000Z', }, volunteer: { _id: 'volunteerId1', user: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe', image: 'img-url', }, }, group: null, }; const membership2 = { _id: 'membershipId2', status: 'invited', createdAt: '2024-10-30T10:18:05.851Z', event: { _id: 'eventId', title: 'Event 2', startDate: '2044-11-30T00:00:00.000Z', }, volunteer: { _id: 'volunteerId2', user: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe', image: null, }, }, group: { _id: 'groupId1', name: 'Group 1', }, };src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.mocks.ts (3)
113-208: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with pagination scenarios.
The mock data includes pagination parameters (
firstandskip) but they're always null. Consider adding test cases for:
- Paginated results
- Different page sizes
- Edge cases (empty pages, last page)
Also, ensure the
userIdin membership creation mocks matches the pattern used in event mocks.Add pagination test case:
{ request: { query: USER_EVENTS_VOLUNTEER, variables: { organization_id: 'orgId', title_contains: '', location_contains: '', upcomingOnly: true, first: 2, skip: 0, }, }, result: { data: { eventsByOrganizationConnection: [event1, event2], }, }, },
231-281: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error scenarios with specific error messages and additional cases.
The current error mocks use generic error messages and don't cover all potential failure modes. Consider:
- Using more specific error messages that match actual GraphQL error responses
- Adding error scenarios for:
- Network failures
- Validation errors
- Authorization errors
Example of improved error mock:
{ request: { query: CREATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, variables: { data: { event: 'eventId1', group: null, status: 'requested', userId: 'userId', }, }, }, error: new Error('Unauthorized: User does not have permission to create volunteer membership'), }
82-83:
⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent date range in event3.
The end date (2022-10-31) is earlier than the start date (2044-10-31), which could cause issues in tests.
startDate: '2044-10-31', - endDate: '2022-10-31', + endDate: '2044-10-31',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.startDate: '2044-10-31', endDate: '2044-10-31',src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/VolunteerManagement.tsx (5)
181-181: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add loading states for tab content.
The tab content components are rendered immediately without considering loading states, which might lead to a jarring user experience during component loading.
Consider adding loading states:
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); + +useEffect(() => { + setIsLoading(true); + // Reset loading state when content is ready + return () => setIsLoading(false); +}, [tab]); // In the render method: {isLoading ? ( <div className="text-center p-4"> <Spinner animation="border" variant="success" /> </div> ) : ( <TabContent[tab] /> )}Also applies to: 190-190, 196-196, 202-202
123-133:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove back button accessibility.
The back button lacks proper keyboard accessibility and ARIA attributes.
Apply this fix:
<Button size="sm" variant="light" className="d-flex text-secondary bg-white align-items-center px-3 shadow-sm rounded-3" + onClick={handleBack} + aria-label={t('backToOrganization')} > <FaChevronLeft cursor={'pointer'} data-testid="backBtn" - onClick={handleBack} /> </Button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<Button size="sm" variant="light" className="d-flex text-secondary bg-white align-items-center px-3 shadow-sm rounded-3" onClick={handleBack} aria-label={t('backToOrganization')} > <FaChevronLeft cursor={'pointer'} data-testid="backBtn" /> </Button>
64-69:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd proper validation for organization ID.
The current implementation only checks if
orgIdexists but doesn't validate its format or validity.Consider adding proper validation:
const { orgId } = useParams(); +const isValidOrgId = (id: string): boolean => { + // Add your organization ID validation logic here + return /^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$/.test(id); // Example for MongoDB ObjectId +}; + -if (!orgId) { +if (!orgId || !isValidOrgId(orgId)) { return <Navigate to={'/'} />; }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
173-206: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify tab content rendering logic.
The current IIFE pattern with switch statement could be simplified using an object map.
Consider this alternative approach:
-{(() => { - switch (tab) { - case 'upcomingEvents': - return ( - <div data-testid="upcomingEventsTab"> - <UpcomingEvents /> - </div> - ); - // ... other cases - } -})()} +const TabContent: Record<TabOptions, JSX.Element> = { + upcomingEvents: ( + <div data-testid="upcomingEventsTab"> + <UpcomingEvents /> + </div> + ), + invitations: ( + <div data-testid="invitationsTab"> + <Invitations /> + </div> + ), + actions: ( + <div data-testid="actionsTab"> + <Actions /> + </div> + ), + groups: ( + <div data-testid="groupsTab"> + <Groups /> + </div> + ), +}; + +{TabContent[tab]}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const TabContent: Record<TabOptions, JSX.Element> = { upcomingEvents: ( <div data-testid="upcomingEventsTab"> <UpcomingEvents /> </div> ), invitations: ( <div data-testid="invitationsTab"> <Invitations /> </div> ), actions: ( <div data-testid="actionsTab"> <Actions /> </div> ), groups: ( <div data-testid="groupsTab"> <Groups /> </div> ), }; {TabContent[tab]}
84-112: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider memoizing the renderButton function.
The
renderButtonfunction is recreated on every render but its logic depends only on thetabstate andtfunction.Consider using
useCallback:+const renderButton = useCallback( ({ value, icon, }: { value: TabOptions; icon: React.ReactNode; }): JSX.Element => { // ... existing implementation }, + [tab, t] +);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.mocks.ts (3)
104-130:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove duplicate test case.
There are two identical test cases for
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_LISTwithhasAccepted: false. The second case (lines 118-130) appears to be a duplicate of the first one (lines 104-116) and should be removed.
198-214:
⚠️ Potential issueRevise ADD_VOLUNTEER mock response.
The
createEventVolunteerresponse usesvolunteerId1which is already used by an existing volunteer mock. This could lead to confusion in tests. Consider using a new unique identifier (e.g.,volunteerId3).data: { createEventVolunteer: { - _id: 'volunteerId1', + _id: 'volunteerId3', }, },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.request: { query: ADD_VOLUNTEER, variables: { data: { eventId: 'eventId', userId: 'userId3', }, }, }, result: { data: { createEventVolunteer: { _id: 'volunteerId3', }, }, }, },
217-286:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error mocks and fix inconsistency.
Two suggestions for improvement:
- The error messages are generic. Consider using specific error messages that match real API error responses.
- The
MEMBERS_LISTmock (lines 238-273) returns successful data instead of an error, which seems inconsistent withMOCKS_ERRORarray's purpose.error: new Error('An error occurred'), + // Consider using specific error messages: + // error: new Error('Failed to fetch event volunteers: Invalid event ID'),{ request: { query: MEMBERS_LIST, variables: { id: 'orgId', }, }, - result: { - data: { - organizations: [...] - } - }, + error: new Error('Failed to fetch organization members'), },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerViewModal.tsx (1)
152-152:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd translation for "Volunteer Groups Joined".
The string "Volunteer Groups Joined" is hardcoded and should use the translation system.
-Volunteer Groups Joined +{t('volunteerGroupsJoined')}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventManagement/EventManagement.tsx (1)
230-248: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error boundaries for the new sections
The integration of
OrganizationActionItemsandVolunteerContainerlooks good. However, consider wrapping these components with error boundaries to gracefully handle potential rendering errors.Example implementation:
import { ErrorBoundary } from 'components/ErrorBoundary'; // In the render method: case 'volunteers': return ( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Error loading volunteer management</div>}> <div data-testid="eventVolunteersTab" className="mx-4 bg-white p-4 pt-2 rounded-4 shadow" > <VolunteerContainer /> </div> </ErrorBoundary> );src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.test.tsx (3)
132-142: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate search functionality tests.
The search tests are split into multiple test cases with similar setup. Consider consolidating them into a single describe block with different test scenarios.
describe('Search functionality', () => { it('should clear search on backspace', async () => { // Current implementation }); it('should search on ENTER key press', async () => { // Current implementation }); it('should handle empty search results', async () => { // Add new test case }); });Also applies to: 144-161
24-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify translation object creation.
The translation object creation can be simplified using object spread operator directly.
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, +};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, };
1-220: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add tests for concurrent operations and debounce search functionality
The codebase shows that concurrent operations are not adequately tested, and the search functionality lacks debouncing unlike other parts of the application (e.g., OrgPost component). This could lead to performance issues and race conditions.
Key points to address:
- Add debounce to search operations to prevent excessive API calls
- Add tests for concurrent operations:
// Example test structure it('should handle concurrent search and sort operations', async () => { renderGroups(link1); // Trigger search const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Group'); // Trigger sort before search completes const sortBtn = await screen.findByTestId('sort'); fireEvent.click(sortBtn); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByTestId('volunteers_DESC')); // Verify final state await waitFor(() => { const groups = screen.getAllByTestId('groupName'); expect(groups[0]).toHaveTextContent('Group 1'); }); });🔗 Analysis chain
Add tests for concurrent operations.
The test suite lacks coverage for concurrent operations that might occur in real usage scenarios.
Consider adding tests for scenarios like:
- Rapid sorting while search is in progress
- Multiple modal operations in quick succession
- Search operations while data is being refreshed
Example:
it('should handle rapid sorting while search is in progress', async () => { renderGroups(link1); // Start a search operation const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Group'); // Quickly trigger sorting before search completes const sortBtn = await screen.findByTestId('sort'); fireEvent.click(sortBtn); const sortOption = await screen.findByTestId('volunteers_DESC'); fireEvent.click(sortOption); // Verify the final state is consistent const groupNames = await screen.findAllByTestId('groupName'); expect(groupNames).toHaveLength(2); expect(groupNames[0]).toHaveTextContent('Group 1'); });
Let me analyze the test patterns and component implementation to better understand the concurrent operation handling before making a final recommendation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any concurrent operation tests in the codebase rg -l 'concurrent|race condition|simultaneous' --type tsLength of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any existing async test patterns in the Groups.test.tsx rg -A 5 "it\(.*async" "src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.test.tsx" # Check for any race condition handling in the actual component rg -A 5 "useEffect|useState|useMemo" "src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx" # Look for any debounce or throttle implementations that might handle concurrent operations rg "debounce|throttle" --type tsLength of output: 3848
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.test.tsx (3)
35-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using type-safe translation setup.
The current translation setup using JSON parsing could be made more type-safe and maintainable.
Consider using a typed translation helper:
type TranslationType = { eventVolunteers: Record<string, string>; common: Record<string, string>; errors: Record<string, string>; }; const getTranslations = (): TranslationType => ({ eventVolunteers: i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, common: i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}, errors: i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}, }); const t = getTranslations();
31-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider centralizing mock configurations.
The mock link setup could be more maintainable by moving the mock configurations to a separate file.
Consider creating a dedicated mocks configuration file:
// mocks/eventVolunteers.mocks.ts export const getMockLinks = () => ({ default: new StaticMockLink(MOCKS), error: new StaticMockLink(ERROR_MOCKS), empty: new StaticMockLink(EMPTY_MOCKS), updateError: new StaticMockLink(UPDATE_ERROR_MOCKS), });
68-77:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove test isolation and cleanup.
The current mock setup for
useParamscould affect other test files, and the cleanup could be more thorough.Consider these improvements:
describe('Testing Requests Screen', () => { const originalModule = jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'); beforeEach(() => { jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...originalModule, useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }), })); }); afterEach(() => { jest.resetModules(); jest.clearAllMocks(); }); });src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupViewModal.tsx (5)
54-66:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance accessibility attributes.
The modal and table components are missing important accessibility attributes.
Add necessary ARIA attributes:
<Modal className={styles.volunteerCreateModal} onHide={hide} show={isOpen} + aria-labelledby="volunteer-group-modal-title" > <Modal.Header> - <p className={styles.titlemodal}>{t('groupDetails')}</p> + <h2 id="volunteer-group-modal-title" className={styles.titlemodal}>{t('groupDetails')}</h2> <Button variant="danger" onClick={hide} className={styles.modalCloseBtn} data-testid="volunteerViewModalCloseBtn" + aria-label={t('close')} > // ... and for the table: - <Table aria-label="group table"> + <Table + aria-label={t('volunteerGroupTable')} + aria-describedby="volunteer-group-table-desc" + > + <caption id="volunteer-group-table-desc" className="visually-hidden"> + {t('volunteerGroupTableDescription')} + </caption>Also applies to: 199-204
121-139:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for image loading.
The image loading logic should handle load failures gracefully.
Add error handling for images:
{leader.image ? ( <img src={leader.image} alt="Volunteer" data-testid="leader_image" className={styles.TableImage} + onError={(e) => { + e.currentTarget.onerror = null; + setShowLeaderAvatar(true); + }} /> ) : ( // ... Avatar component )}Also, consider using a custom Image component that handles loading states and errors consistently across the application.
Would you like me to help create a reusable Image component with built-in error handling?
Also applies to: 156-174
207-224: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize volunteer list rendering.
The current implementation has potential performance and stability issues:
- Using array index as key in map function
- Missing memoization for large lists
- No virtual scrolling for handling large datasets
Consider these improvements:
- {volunteers.map((volunteer, index) => { + {volunteers.map((volunteer) => { const { firstName, lastName } = volunteer.user; return ( <TableRow - key={index + 1} + key={volunteer.user._id} sx={{ '&:last-child td, &:last-child th': { border: 0 }, }} >For large lists, consider implementing virtual scrolling using
react-windoworreact-virtualized.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
25-39:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate JSDoc documentation to match implementation.
The documentation mentions fields that don't match the actual implementation. The current docs mention "volunteer name, status, hours volunteered", but the component actually displays group details like name, description, volunteers required, leader, and creator.
Update the documentation to accurately reflect the implemented fields:
* The modal includes: * - A header with a title and a close button. - * - fields for volunteer name, status, hours volunteered, groups, and assignments. + * - Fields for group name, description, volunteers required + * - Leader and creator information with avatars + * - List of associated volunteers in a table format📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * A modal dialog for viewing volunteer group information for an event. * * @param isOpen - Indicates whether the modal is open. * @param hide - Function to close the modal. * @param group - The volunteer group to display in the modal. * * @returns The rendered modal component. * * The `VolunteerGroupViewModal` component displays all the fields of a volunteer group in a modal dialog. * * The modal includes: * - A header with a title and a close button. * - Fields for group name, description, volunteers required * - Leader and creator information with avatars * - List of associated volunteers in a table format */
191-192:
⚠️ Potential issueUse translation for "Volunteers" label.
The "Volunteers" label is hardcoded in English. Use the translation system for consistency with other labels.
- Volunteers + {t('volunteers')}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.test.tsx (2)
127-177: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve search tests with error cases and debounce handling.
The search tests should include:
- Error handling for invalid search terms
- Debounce verification for search input
- Case sensitivity tests
Consider adding these test cases:
it('should handle invalid search terms gracefully', async () => { renderVolunteerGroups(link1); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); userEvent.type(searchInput, '!@#$%^'); expect(await screen.findByText(t.noResults)).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('should debounce search input', async () => { jest.useFakeTimers(); renderVolunteerGroups(link1); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'test'); jest.advanceTimersByTime(200); // Less than debounce time expect(screen.queryByTestId('loading-indicator')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); jest.advanceTimersByTime(300); // Complete debounce time expect(screen.getByTestId('loading-indicator')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('should handle case-insensitive search', async () => { renderVolunteerGroups(link1); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'GROUP{enter}'); const groupNames = await screen.findAllByTestId('groupName'); expect(groupNames).toHaveLength(2); });
196-234: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add tests for concurrent modal operations and error states.
The modal tests should include:
- Error handling during modal operations
- Concurrent modal operations
- Form validation in create/edit modals
Consider adding these test cases:
it('should handle errors during group creation', async () => { const errorLink = new StaticMockLink([ { request: { query: CREATE_GROUP }, error: new Error('Network error') } ]); renderVolunteerGroups(errorLink); const createBtn = await screen.findByTestId('createGroupBtn'); userEvent.click(createBtn); const submitBtn = await screen.findByTestId('submitBtn'); userEvent.click(submitBtn); expect(await screen.findByText(/network error/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('should prevent opening multiple modals simultaneously', async () => { renderVolunteerGroups(link1); const createBtn = await screen.findByTestId('createGroupBtn'); const viewBtns = await screen.findAllByTestId('viewGroupBtn'); userEvent.click(createBtn); userEvent.click(viewBtns[0]); expect(screen.getAllByRole('dialog')).toHaveLength(1); }); it('should validate form fields in create modal', async () => { renderVolunteerGroups(link1); const createBtn = await screen.findByTestId('createGroupBtn'); userEvent.click(createBtn); const submitBtn = await screen.findByTestId('submitBtn'); userEvent.click(submitBtn); expect(await screen.findByText(t.nameRequired)).toBeInTheDocument(); });src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx (2)
97-124: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve avatar handling and null safety.
The current implementation has a few areas that could be improved:
- The complex condition for image presence could be simplified
- The name concatenation in the Avatar component could fail with undefined values
- {assignee?.user?.image || assigneeUser?.image ? ( + const assigneeImage = assignee?.user?.image || assigneeUser?.image; + const getAssigneeFullName = (user: any) => + user?.firstName && user?.lastName + ? `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}` + : ''; + + {assigneeImage ? ( <img - src={(assignee?.user?.image || assigneeUser?.image) as string} + src={assigneeImage} alt="Assignee" data-testid={`assignee_image`} className={styles.TableImage} /> ) : assignee || assigneeUser ? ( <Avatar key={assignee?._id || assigneeUser?._id} containerStyle={styles.imageContainer} avatarStyle={styles.TableImage} dataTestId={`assignee_avatar`} - name={`${assignee?.user.firstName || assigneeUser?.firstName} ${assignee?.user.lastName || assigneeUser?.lastName}`} + name={getAssigneeFullName(assignee?.user || assigneeUser)} alt={`assignee_avatar`} />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
85-92: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring the assignee name logic for better readability.
While the logic is correct, the nested ternary operator makes it harder to understand. Consider extracting this into a separate function.
+ const getAssigneeName = () => { + switch (assigneeType) { + case 'EventVolunteer': + return `${assignee?.user?.firstName} ${assignee?.user?.lastName}`; + case 'EventVolunteerGroup': + return assigneeGroup?.name; + default: + return `${assigneeUser?.firstName} ${assigneeUser?.lastName}`; + } + }; <TextField label={t('assignee')} variant="outlined" className={styles.noOutline} data-testid="assignee_input" - value={ - assigneeType === 'EventVolunteer' - ? `${assignee?.user?.firstName} ${assignee?.user?.lastName}` - : assigneeType === 'EventVolunteerGroup' - ? assigneeGroup?.name - : `${assigneeUser?.firstName} ${assigneeUser?.lastName}` - } + value={getAssigneeName()} disabled📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.data-testid="assignee_input" value={getAssigneeName()} ``` Note: The diff snippet also includes the implementation of the `getAssigneeName` function which should be placed in an appropriate location in the component, likely just before the return statement. The function implementation is: ```typescript const getAssigneeName = () => { switch (assigneeType) { case 'EventVolunteer': return `${assignee?.user?.firstName} ${assignee?.user?.lastName}`; case 'EventVolunteerGroup': return assigneeGroup?.name; default: return `${assigneeUser?.firstName} ${assigneeUser?.lastName}`; } };src/App.tsx (1)
201-204: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error boundary for the volunteer management route.
The volunteer management route is properly secured and well-placed within the user portal section. However, consider implementing a route-level error boundary to gracefully handle component failures.
Example implementation:
// Create ErrorBoundary component class VolunteerErrorBoundary extends React.Component { // ... error boundary implementation } // Wrap the route element <Route path="/user/volunteer/:orgId" element={ <VolunteerErrorBoundary> <VolunteerManagement /> </VolunteerErrorBoundary> } />src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.test.tsx (1)
77-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider organizing test data more effectively.
While the test data covers various scenarios, its organization could be improved for better maintainability.
Consider grouping the test cases by assignee type and extracting them into separate objects:
const TEST_CASES = { EVENT_VOLUNTEER: { withImage: { isOpen: true, hide: jest.fn(), item: { assignee: createAssignee(assigneeWithImage), assigneeType: 'EventVolunteer', // ... other properties } }, withoutImage: { // ... similar structure } }, USER: { // ... similar structure }, GROUP: { // ... similar structure } };This organization would:
- Make it easier to add new test cases
- Provide better visibility of test coverage
- Make it clearer which scenarios are being tested
Also applies to: 85-198
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.test.tsx (4)
21-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider safer translation setup approach.
The current translation setup uses multiple
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())operations which are both unsafe and inefficient.Consider refactoring to:
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}, +};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}, };
54-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve mock setup for better test isolation.
The current mock setup using
jest.mockinbeforeAllcould affect other test files. Additionally, the mock lacks type safety.Consider using a more isolated approach:
-beforeAll(() => { - jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ - ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }), - })); -}); +const mockUseParams = jest.spyOn(require('react-router-dom'), 'useParams'); + +beforeEach(() => { + mockUseParams.mockReturnValue({ + orgId: 'orgId', + eventId: 'eventId' + } as { orgId: string; eventId: string }); +}); + +afterEach(() => { + mockUseParams.mockClear(); +});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const mockUseParams = jest.spyOn(require('react-router-dom'), 'useParams'); beforeEach(() => { mockUseParams.mockReturnValue({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' } as { orgId: string; eventId: string }); }); afterEach(() => { mockUseParams.mockClear(); });
31-51: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing renderVolunteers utility function.
The utility function could be more flexible by accepting optional props for customization.
Consider adding options parameter:
-const renderVolunteers = (link: ApolloLink): RenderResult => { +interface RenderOptions { + link: ApolloLink; + initialRoute?: string; + store?: Store; +} + +const renderVolunteers = ({ + link, + initialRoute = '/event/orgId/eventId', + store: customStore = store +}: RenderOptions): RenderResult => { return render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> - <MemoryRouter initialEntries={['/event/orgId/eventId']}> - <Provider store={store}> + <MemoryRouter initialEntries={[initialRoute]}> + <Provider store={customStore}>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-261: 💡 Codebase verification
Test coverage needs improvement in accessibility and edge cases
The test suite has gaps that should be addressed:
- Missing accessibility testing for interactive elements, particularly the table with
aria-labelin VolunteerViewModal- Limited coverage of edge cases in modal components:
- No validation tests for the multi-select dropdown in VolunteerCreateModal
- Missing error state tests for form inputs
- No keyboard navigation tests for modal interactions
Consider adding:
- Tests for ARIA attributes and keyboard accessibility
- Input validation scenarios
- Edge cases for the multi-select dropdown
- Error state handling for form submissions
🔗 Analysis chain
Test suite looks good with room for enhancement.
The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of core functionalities. While there are opportunities for enhancement, the current implementation effectively validates the Volunteers component's behavior.
Let's verify the test coverage:
Let me gather more information about the test coverage of the modal components:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the Volunteers component and related files # Test: Look for any untested component files fd -e tsx -e ts --full-path "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers" --exec echo "Found component file: {}" # Test: Check for accessibility-related attributes in component rg -i 'aria-|role=' "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers"Length of output: 1062
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check test coverage of modal components # Look for test assertions in modal test files rg "it\(|test\(|describe\(" "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerCreateModal.test.tsx" "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerDeleteModal.test.tsx" "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerViewModal.test.tsx" # Check for untested accessibility attributes and interactive elements rg "button|input|select|tabIndex|onClick|onChange" "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerCreateModal.tsx" "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerDeleteModal.tsx" "src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerViewModal.tsx"Length of output: 3348
src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.test.tsx (5)
56-65:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove test hooks setup.
The current mock setup has a few potential issues:
- Mocking inside
beforeAllmight affect other test files.- The mock cleanup in
afterAllis incomplete.Move the mock setup before the describe block and ensure proper cleanup:
+jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), + useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), +})); + describe('Testing Leaderboard Screen', () => { - beforeAll(() => { - jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ - ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), - })); - }); - afterAll(() => { - jest.clearAllMocks(); + jest.restoreAllMocks(); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), })); describe('Testing Leaderboard Screen', () => { afterAll(() => { jest.restoreAllMocks(); });
21-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify translation setup using object spread.
The translation setup can be simplified to improve readability.
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.leaderboard ?? {}), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.leaderboard, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, +} ?? {};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.leaderboard, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, } ?? {};
128-208: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Group related timeframe filter tests.
The timeframe filter tests have redundant setup code and can be grouped together for better organization.
-it('Check Timeframe filter Functionality (All Time)', async () => { +describe('Timeframe filter functionality', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + renderLeaderboard(link1); + }); + + it('should filter by All Time', async () => { // ... existing test code - }); + }); - it('Check Timeframe filter Functionality (Weekly)', async () => { + it('should filter by Weekly', async () => { // ... existing test code - }); + }); - it('Check Timeframe filter Functionality (Monthly)', async () => { + it('should filter by Monthly', async () => { // ... existing test code - }); + }); - it('Check Timeframe filter Functionality (Yearly)', async () => { + it('should filter by Yearly', async () => { // ... existing test code + }); });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
279-285:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance error handling test coverage.
The error test case should verify the specific error message and ensure the UI handles the error gracefully.
it('Error while fetching volunteer data', async () => { renderLeaderboard(link2); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toHaveTextContent(t.errors.networkError); + // Verify that the loading state is handled + expect(screen.queryByTestId('loader')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); + // Verify that the main content is not displayed + expect(screen.queryByTestId('leaderboardGrid')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.it('Error while fetching volunteer data', async () => { renderLeaderboard(link2); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toHaveTextContent(t.errors.networkError); // Verify that the loading state is handled expect(screen.queryByTestId('loader')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); // Verify that the main content is not displayed expect(screen.queryByTestId('leaderboardGrid')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); });
210-254: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate search functionality tests.
The search-related tests have similar setup and can be consolidated using a describe block with shared setup.
+describe('Search functionality', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + renderLeaderboard(link1); + }); + - it('Search Volunteers and clear the input by backspace', async () => { + it('should clear the input by backspace', async () => { // ... existing test code }); - it('Search Volunteers on press of ENTER', async () => { + it('should search on ENTER key press', async () => { // ... existing test code }); - it('Search Volunteers on click of search button', async () => { + it('should search on button click', async () => { // ... existing test code }); +});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.mocks.ts (2)
163-366:
⚠️ Potential issueVerify sorting test data consistency.
In the volunteers_DESC sorting test (lines 196-200), the result shows [group1, group2], while in volunteers_ASC (lines 216-219), it shows [group2, group1]. However, looking at the mock data, all groups have exactly one volunteer. This makes the sorting test ineffective.
Consider modifying the mock data to have different volunteer counts:
const group1 = { // ... volunteers: [ { _id: 'volunteerId1', user: { /* ... */ }, }, + { + _id: 'volunteerId2', + user: { /* ... */ }, + }, ], };Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
368-405:
⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent parameter name in USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP query.
There's an inconsistency in the parameter name between successful and empty mocks:
- Successful mock uses
groupId(line 284)- Empty mock uses
group(line 394)This could cause tests to fail unexpectedly.
- group: 'groupId', + groupId: 'groupId',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const EMPTY_MOCKS = [ { request: { query: EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST, variables: { where: { userId: 'userId', orgId: 'orgId', leaderName: null, name_contains: '', }, orderBy: null, }, }, result: { data: { getEventVolunteerGroups: [], }, }, }, { request: { query: USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, variables: { where: { eventId: 'eventId', groupId: 'groupId', status: 'requested', }, }, }, result: { data: { getVolunteerMembership: [], }, }, }, ];src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.mocks.ts (4)
114-337: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding edge cases to improve test coverage.
While the current test cases cover basic CRUD operations and filtering/sorting scenarios, consider adding:
- Test cases for invalid inputs (e.g., negative volunteersRequired)
- Edge cases for the volunteersRequired field (e.g., max value, zero)
- Cases for invalid leader assignments
Add these test cases to the MOCKS array:
{ request: { query: CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP, variables: { data: { eventId: 'eventId', leaderId: 'userId', name: 'Invalid Group', description: 'desc', volunteerUserIds: ['userId'], volunteersRequired: -1, // Testing negative value }, }, }, error: new Error('volunteersRequired must be non-negative'), }, { request: { query: CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP, variables: { data: { eventId: 'eventId', leaderId: 'nonexistentId', // Testing invalid leader name: 'Invalid Leader Group', description: 'desc', volunteerUserIds: [], volunteersRequired: 0, // Testing zero value }, }, }, error: new Error('Invalid leader ID'), }
339-358: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance empty state testing coverage.
The current empty state testing only covers the EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST query. Consider adding empty state tests for:
- MEMBERS_LIST query with empty members array
- Empty volunteer arrays in groups
Add these cases to MOCKS_EMPTY:
{ request: { query: MEMBERS_LIST, variables: { id: 'orgId', }, }, result: { data: { organizations: [{ _id: 'orgId', members: [] }] } } }, { request: { query: EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST, variables: { where: { eventId: 'eventId', leaderName: null, name_contains: '', }, orderBy: null, }, }, result: { data: { getEventVolunteerGroups: [{ ...group1, volunteers: [] // Empty volunteers array }] } } }
360-452: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error messages and add specific error cases.
The current error messages are too generic ("An error occurred"). Consider:
- Using specific error messages that match backend validation errors
- Adding error cases for validation failures
Update error messages to be more specific:
export const MOCKS_ERROR = [ { request: { query: EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST, // ... }, - error: new Error('An error occurred'), + error: new Error('Failed to fetch volunteer groups: Invalid event ID'), }, { request: { query: DELETE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP, // ... }, - error: new Error('An error occurred'), + error: new Error('Cannot delete group: Active assignments exist'), }, // ... similar changes for other error cases ];Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
9-112:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance test coverage and data consistency.
Several improvements could make the mock data more robust:
- The
volunteersRequiredfield is null in all groups, limiting test coverage. Consider varying this value across groups.- The
createdAtdates are set in the future (October 2024), which could cause test failures.- Inconsistent image URL handling between groups (null vs 'img-url').
Consider applying these changes:
const group1 = { // ... - volunteersRequired: null, - createdAt: '2024-10-25T16:16:32.978Z', + volunteersRequired: 5, + createdAt: '2023-11-25T16:16:32.978Z', // ... leader: { // ... - image: 'img-url', + image: null, // ... }, }; const group2 = { // ... - volunteersRequired: null, - createdAt: '2024-10-27T15:25:13.044Z', + volunteersRequired: 10, + createdAt: '2023-11-27T15:25:13.044Z', // ... }; const group3 = { // ... - volunteersRequired: null, - createdAt: '2024-10-27T15:34:15.889Z', + volunteersRequired: 3, + createdAt: '2023-11-27T15:34:15.889Z', // ... };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const group1 = { _id: 'groupId1', name: 'Group 1', description: 'desc', volunteersRequired: 5, createdAt: '2023-11-25T16:16:32.978Z', creator: { _id: 'creatorId1', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', image: null, }, leader: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Teresa', lastName: 'Bradley', image: null, }, volunteers: [ { _id: 'volunteerId1', user: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Teresa', lastName: 'Bradley', image: null, }, }, ], assignments: [], event: { _id: 'eventId', }, }; const group2 = { _id: 'groupId2', name: 'Group 2', description: 'desc', volunteersRequired: 10, createdAt: '2023-11-27T15:25:13.044Z', creator: { _id: 'creatorId2', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', image: null, }, leader: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Teresa', lastName: 'Bradley', image: null, }, volunteers: [ { _id: 'volunteerId2', user: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Teresa', lastName: 'Bradley', image: null, }, }, ], assignments: [], event: { _id: 'eventId', }, }; const group3 = { _id: 'groupId3', name: 'Group 3', description: 'desc', volunteersRequired: 3, createdAt: '2023-11-27T15:34:15.889Z', creator: { _id: 'creatorId3', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', image: null, }, leader: { _id: 'userId1', firstName: 'Bruce', lastName: 'Garza', image: null, }, volunteers: [ { _id: 'volunteerId3', user: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Teresa', lastName: 'Bradley', image: null, }, }, ], assignments: [], event: { _id: 'eventId', }, };src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.test.tsx (2)
29-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify translation setup using a dedicated test helper.
The current translation setup is verbose and could be simplified for better maintainability.
Consider creating a test helper:
// utils/testHelpers.ts export const getTestTranslations = (namespace: string) => { return { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation[namespace], ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, }; };Then use it in the test:
const t = getTestTranslations('eventVolunteers');
112-129: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test rendering utility with error boundary and default props.
The rendering utility could be improved to handle errors during tests and reduce boilerplate.
Consider this enhancement:
import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary'; const defaultProps: InterfaceGroupModal = { isOpen: true, hide: jest.fn(), eventId: 'eventId', refetchGroups: jest.fn(), group: null, }; const renderGroupModal = ( link: ApolloLink, props: Partial<InterfaceGroupModal> = {}, ): RenderResult => { return render( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Something went wrong</div>}> <MockedProvider link={link} addTypename={false}> <Provider store={store}> <BrowserRouter> <LocalizationProvider dateAdapter={AdapterDayjs}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}> <GroupModal {...defaultProps} {...props} /> </I18nextProvider> </LocalizationProvider> </BrowserRouter> </Provider> </MockedProvider> </ErrorBoundary>, ); };src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.tsx (6)
55-57: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying search state management.
The component maintains two separate states for search:
searchTermandsearchValue. This could be simplified to use a single state variable with a debounced search effect.Consider using a debounced search approach:
const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState<string>(''); const debouncedSearch = useCallback( debounce((term: string) => { // This will trigger the query setSearchTerm(term); }, 300), [] );
64-84: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and error handling in updateMembershipStatus.
The function could benefit from stronger typing and more specific error handling.
Consider these improvements:
type MembershipStatus = 'accepted' | 'rejected'; const updateMembershipStatus = async ( id: string, status: MembershipStatus ): Promise<void> => { try { await updateMembership({ variables: { id, status, }, }); toast.success( t(status === 'accepted' ? 'invitationAccepted' : 'invitationRejected') ); await refetchInvitations(); } catch (error) { if (error instanceof ApolloError) { toast.error(error.message); console.error('GraphQL Error:', error.graphQLErrors); } else { toast.error(tErrors('unknownError')); console.error('Unknown Error:', error); } } };
86-108: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize query variables with useMemo.
The query variables object is recreated on every render. Consider memoizing it to prevent unnecessary query executions.
const queryVariables = useMemo( () => ({ where: { userId, status: 'invited', filter, eventTitle: searchTerm || undefined, }, orderBy: sortBy || undefined, }), [userId, filter, searchTerm, sortBy] ); const { data: invitationData, loading: invitationLoading, error: invitationError, refetch: refetchInvitations } = useQuery(USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP, { variables: queryVariables, });
116-131: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance loading and error state UX.
Consider providing more actionable error messages and a skeleton loader for better user experience.
if (invitationLoading) { return ( <div className={styles.container}> {/* Show skeleton loader instead of spinner */} <InvitationsSkeleton count={3} /> </div> ); } if (invitationError) { return ( <div className={`${styles.container} bg-white rounded-4 my-3`}> <div className={styles.message} data-testid="errorMsg"> <WarningAmberRounded className={styles.errorIcon} fontSize="large" /> <h6 className="fw-bold text-danger text-center"> {tErrors('errorLoading', { entity: 'Volunteership Invitations' })} <br /> {invitationError.message} </h6> <Button variant="primary" onClick={() => refetchInvitations()} className="mt-3" > {tCommon('retry')} </Button> </div> </div> ); }
234-238:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using array index as key prop.
Using array indices as keys can lead to rendering issues when items are added, removed, or reordered.
- key={index} + key={invite._id}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
241-246:
⚠️ Potential issueMove hardcoded strings to translation files.
The invitation subject texts should be moved to translation files for consistency and maintainability.
- <>Invitation to join volunteer group</> + <>{t('invitationToJoinGroup')}</> - <>Invitation to volunteer for event</> + <>{t('invitationToVolunteerEvent')}</>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{invite.group ? ( <>{t('invitationToJoinGroup')}</> ) : ( <>{t('invitationToVolunteerEvent')}</> )} </div>src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.test.tsx (5)
213-223: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate related search functionality tests.
The search functionality tests are spread across three separate test cases with similar setup. Consider consolidating them into a single describe block with more focused test cases.
-it('Search Invitations by event title and clear the input by backspace', async () => { - // ... test code -}); - -it('Search Invitations by event title on press of ENTER', async () => { - // ... test code -}); - -it('Search Invitations by event title on click of search button', async () => { - // ... test code -}); +describe('Search Functionality', () => { + beforeEach(async () => { + renderInvitations(link1); + await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); + }); + + it('should clear search input on backspace', async () => { + // ... test code + }); + + it('should filter results on ENTER key press', async () => { + // ... test code + }); + + it('should filter results on search button click', async () => { + // ... test code + }); +});Also applies to: 224-241, 242-259
278-292: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve invitation response test cases.
The accept and reject invitation tests could be more comprehensive and better organized.
+describe('Invitation Response', () => { + beforeEach(async () => { + renderInvitations(link1); + await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); + }); + - it('Accept Invite', async () => { + it('should show success message when accepting invitation', async () => { // ... existing test code }); - it('Reject Invite', async () => { + it('should show success message when rejecting invitation', async () => { // ... existing test code }); + + it('should update UI after accepting invitation', async () => { + const acceptBtn = await screen.findAllByTestId('acceptBtn'); + userEvent.click(acceptBtn[0]); + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(screen.queryByTestId('acceptBtn')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); + }); + }); +});Also applies to: 293-308
270-276: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error case testing.
The error handling test could be more comprehensive by verifying the exact error message and testing different error scenarios.
-it('Error while fetching invitations data', async () => { +it('should display appropriate error message when fetching invitations fails', async () => { renderInvitations(link2); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toHaveTextContent(t.fetchError); }); }); + +it('should handle network errors gracefully', async () => { + const networkErrorLink = new StaticMockLink([ + { + request: { + query: GET_INVITATIONS, + variables: { orgId: 'orgId' } + }, + error: new Error('Network error') + } + ]); + + renderInvitations(networkErrorLink); + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toHaveTextContent(t.networkError); + }); +});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
73-88: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test cleanup and type safety.
The test setup could be improved in two ways:
- Add more comprehensive cleanup in afterAll
- Add type safety for the mocked modules
+import type { Mock } from 'jest-mock'; + describe('Testing Invvitations Screen', () => { beforeAll(() => { - jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + jest.mock<typeof import('react-router-dom')>('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), })); }); beforeEach(() => { setItem('userId', 'userId'); }); afterAll(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); + jest.resetModules(); + localStorage.clear(); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import type { Mock } from 'jest-mock'; describe('Testing Invvitations Screen', () => { beforeAll(() => { jest.mock<typeof import('react-router-dom')>('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), })); }); beforeEach(() => { setItem('userId', 'userId'); }); afterAll(() => { jest.clearAllMocks(); jest.resetModules(); localStorage.clear(); });
38-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the translation setup.
The current translation setup involves multiple JSON parse operations which could be simplified. Consider creating a helper function to merge translation objects.
-const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.userVolunteer ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), -}; +const mergeTranslations = (keys: string[]) => + keys.reduce((acc, key) => ({ + ...acc, + ...(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.[key] ?? {}) + }), {}); + +const t = mergeTranslations(['translation.userVolunteer', 'common', 'errors']);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.test.tsx (1)
117-118: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting expected counts to constants.
The repeated use of hardcoded counts (2, 3, 2) across multiple tests could be made more maintainable by extracting them into named constants at the top of the test file. This would make it easier to update if the test data changes.
// Add at the top of the test file const EXPECTED_COUNTS = { JOHN_DOE: 2, JANE_DOE: 2, CATEGORY_1: 3, CATEGORY_2: 2, } as const; // Then use in tests expect(screen.getAllByText('John Doe')).toHaveLength(EXPECTED_COUNTS.JOHN_DOE);Also applies to: 174-175, 344-345
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupModal.test.tsx (5)
45-129: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting test data to a separate file.
The test data structure is quite large and could be moved to a separate file (e.g.,
__mocks__/volunteerGroupData.ts) to improve maintainability and reusability.
307-335: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using test.each for validation tests.
The volunteersRequired validation test could be more maintainable using test.each.
Consider refactoring to:
describe('volunteersRequired validation', () => { test.each([ { input: '-1', expected: '' }, { input: '0', expected: '' }, { input: '19', expected: '19' } ])('handles input $input correctly', async ({ input, expected }) => { renderGroupModal(link1, itemProps[2]); const vrInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.volunteersRequired); fireEvent.change(vrInput, { target: { value: input } }); await waitFor(() => { expect(vrInput).toHaveValue(expected); }); }); });
302-304:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance error assertion specificity in update test.
Similar to the create error test, the update error test should verify the specific error message.
Apply this fix:
await waitFor(() => { - expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Failed to update volunteer group')); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Failed to update volunteer group')); });
244-246:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance error assertion specificity.
The error test should verify the specific error message rather than just checking if toast.error was called.
Apply this fix:
- waitFor(() => { - expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalled(); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Failed to create volunteer group')); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Failed to create volunteer group')); });
194-198:
⚠️ Potential issueFix async assertion in create group test.
The waitFor callback is not being awaited, which could lead to flaky tests. The assertions might not be executed before the test completes.
Apply this fix:
- waitFor(() => { + await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.volunteerGroupCreated); expect(itemProps[0].refetchGroups).toHaveBeenCalled(); expect(itemProps[0].hide).toHaveBeenCalled(); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.volunteerGroupCreated); expect(itemProps[0].refetchGroups).toHaveBeenCalled(); expect(itemProps[0].hide).toHaveBeenCalled(); });src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboardMocks.ts (1)
450-451:
⚠️ Potential issueStandardize organization ID in VOLUNTEER_RANKING error mock.
The organization ID in VOLUNTEER_RANKING error mock uses '123' while other queries use 'orgId'.
Update the organization ID to maintain consistency:
- orgId: '123', + orgId: 'orgId',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.orgId: 'orgId', where: {src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1)
188-239: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the assignee rendering logic.
The implementation correctly handles both individual assignees and volunteer groups, but could benefit from some improvements:
- Add null checks in destructuring:
-const { _id, firstName, lastName, image } = - params.row.assigneeUser || params.row.assignee?.user || {}; +const { _id = '', firstName = '', lastName = '', image = '' } = + params.row.assigneeUser || params.row.assignee?.user || {};
- Use template literals for key prop:
-key={_id + '1'} +key={`${_id}_avatar`}
- Extract common avatar rendering logic:
const renderAvatar = (name: string, alt: string) => ( <div className={styles.avatarContainer}> <Avatar key={`${name}_avatar`} containerStyle={styles.imageContainer} avatarStyle={styles.TableImage} name={name} alt={alt} /> </div> );src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.test.tsx (5)
205-206:
⚠️ Potential issueUse
findByqueries for asynchronous elementsWhen expecting elements or functions to be called after asynchronous actions, consider using
findByqueries orwaitForto ensure that assertions are made after the DOM has been updated.Update your assertions as follows:
- await waitFor(() => { - expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.volunteerSuccess); - }); + expect(await toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.volunteerSuccess);Or use
findBy:- await waitFor(() => { - expect(screen.getByTestId('errorMsg')).toBeInTheDocument(); - }); + expect(await screen.findByTestId('errorMsg')).toBeInTheDocument();This approach provides clearer and more reliable asynchronous testing.
Also applies to: 221-222, 232-233
23-23:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the import statement for case sensitivity
The import path for
useLocalStoragemay have a case sensitivity issue. Ensure that the path matches the actual file name to prevent module resolution errors, especially on case-sensitive file systems.Apply this diff to fix the import statement:
- import useLocalStorage from 'utils/useLocalstorage'; + import useLocalStorage from 'utils/useLocalStorage';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import useLocalStorage from 'utils/useLocalStorage';
39-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the construction of the translation object
The
tobject is being constructed using multipleJSON.stringifyandJSON.parsecalls for deep cloning, which can be inefficient and unnecessary in this context.Consider simplifying the construction:
- const t = { - ...JSON.parse( - JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.userVolunteer ?? {}, - ), - ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), - }; + const t = { + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.userVolunteer ?? {}, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}, + };If deep cloning is necessary, consider using
lodash.cloneDeepor a similar utility for better readability and performance.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.userVolunteer ?? {}, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {}, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {}, };
75-80:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid calling
jest.mockinsidebeforeAllCalling
jest.mockinside abeforeAllblock may not behave as expected since module mocks are hoisted to the top of the file. Jest mocks should be declared at the top level of the file before imports.Move the
jest.mockcall to the top level of the file:+ jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), + useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), + })); + - beforeAll(() => { - jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ - ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), - })); - });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), }));
90-108: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce code duplication in rendering the component
The rendering logic in this test is duplicated instead of reusing the
renderUpcomingEventsfunction. This can lead to inconsistencies and harder maintenance.Modify the
renderUpcomingEventsfunction to accept additional parameters, such asinitialEntries, so it can be reused in this test case:...This reduces duplication and keeps your tests DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself).
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.test.tsx (3)
92-96:
⚠️ Potential issueImproper Use of
jest.mockInsidebeforeAllThe
jest.mockcall for mockingreact-router-domis placed inside thebeforeAllblock. Jest mocks should be declared at the top level of the test file to ensure they are applied correctly before any tests run.Apply this diff to move the mock to the top level:
+jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), + useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), +})); 90 describe('Testing Organization Dashboard Screen', () => { 91 beforeAll(() => { - jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ - ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), - })); 92 });This ensures that the mock is correctly applied throughout all tests.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), })); describe('Testing Organization Dashboard Screen', () => { beforeAll(() => { });
62-64:
⚠️ Potential issueDuplicate Route Definition for
/orgevents/:orgIdThe route for
/orgevents/:orgIdis defined twice in theMemoryRouter, which can lead to unexpected behavior or routing conflicts.Apply this diff to remove the duplicate route:
62- <Route 63- path="/orgevents/:orgId" 64- element={<div data-testid="orgevents"></div>}Ensure that each route is uniquely defined to prevent any navigation issues.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
29-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the Construction of the
tObjectThe
tobject is constructed by parsing and stringifying the translation data, which is unnecessary and can be simplified.Refactor the construction of
tas follows:29 const t = { 30- ...JSON.parse( 31- JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.dashboard ?? {}), 32- ), 33- ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), 34- ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.dashboard, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, + ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, 35 };This removes unnecessary serialization and improves code readability.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const t = { ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.dashboard, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common, ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors, };src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (4)
51-51:
⚠️ Potential issueRename component 'requests' to 'Requests' to follow React component naming conventions
In React, component names should start with a capital letter. This ensures that the component is correctly recognized as a React component.
Apply this diff to rename the component:
At line 51:
-function requests(): JSX.Element { +function Requests(): JSX.Element {At line 339:
-export default requests; +export default Requests;Also applies to: 339-339
318-318:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent use of
idand_idfor DataGrid rowsIn the DataGrid configuration, you are using
getRowId={(row) => row._id}, but in the row data, you are settingidtoindex + 1. This inconsistency can lead to unexpected behavior.To fix this, ensure that
getRowIdmatches theidfield in your row data, or adjust your row data to include the correct_id.At line 318, if you prefer to use
idas the row identifier:-getRowId={(row) => row._id} +getRowId={(row) => row.id}At lines 324-326, adjust the row data to use the
_idfield:-rows={requests.map((request, index) => ({ - id: index + 1, +rows={requests.map((request) => ({ + id: request._id,Also applies to: 324-326
90-92:
⚠️ Potential issueSafely handle unknown errors in catch block
When catching an error of type
unknown, directly casting it toErrormay not be safe if the error is not an instance ofError.Modify the catch block to safely handle the error:
catch (error: unknown) { - toast.error((error as Error).message); + if (error instanceof Error) { + toast.error(error.message); + } else { + toast.error(tErrors('unexpectedError')); + } }Ensure that
'unexpectedError'is a key in your error translation files.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
145-245: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use localization for DataGrid column headers
The
headerNameproperties in the DataGrid columns are hardcoded strings like'Sr. No.','Volunteer','Request Date', and'Options'. To support internationalization, these should be replaced with localized strings using thetfunction fromuseTranslation.Update the
headerNamefields to use localization:At line 147:
-headerName: 'Sr. No.', +headerName: t('srNo'),At line 160:
-headerName: 'Volunteer', +headerName: t('volunteer'),At line 199:
-headerName: 'Request Date', +headerName: t('requestDate'),At line 212:
-headerName: 'Options', +headerName: t('options'),Ensure that the corresponding translation keys (
'srNo','volunteer','requestDate','options') are defined in your translation files under the'eventVolunteers'namespace.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.tsx (4)
57-63:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate component documentation to reflect the Leaderboard functionality
The JSDoc comments describe the component as managing action items, which is inconsistent with the actual functionality of displaying the leaderboard. Please update the comments to accurately reflect the purpose of the
Leaderboardcomponent.
135-135: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Localize column headers in the DataGrid component
The
headerNameproperties for the columns'Rank','Volunteer','Email', and'Hours Volunteered'are hardcoded strings. To support internationalization, please replace them with localized strings using the translation functiont.Apply this diff to localize the column headers:
- headerName: 'Rank', + headerName: t('rank'), - headerName: 'Volunteer', + headerName: t('volunteer'), - headerName: 'Email', + headerName: t('email'), - headerName: 'Hours Volunteered', + headerName: t('hoursVolunteered'),Also applies to: 166-166, 212-212, 232-232
64-64:
⚠️ Potential issueCapitalize the component name for React convention compliance
React components should be named using PascalCase for consistency and to ensure they are recognized correctly. Please rename the
leaderboardfunction toLeaderboard.Apply this diff to update the component name:
-function leaderboard(): JSX.Element { +function Leaderboard(): JSX.Element { // component code } -export default leaderboard; +export default Leaderboard;Also applies to: 372-372
257-263: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using
onChangeinstead ofonKeyUpfor search input handlingUsing
onKeyUpto handle input changes may not capture all user interactions, such as pasting text with a mouse or using input methods other than the keyboard.onChangeis more reliable for detecting input field updates. Additionally, implementing debouncing can improve performance by reducing unnecessary queries.Here's a possible refactor:
<Form.Control type="name" placeholder={t('searchByVolunteer')} autoComplete="off" required className={styles.inputField} value={searchValue} - onChange={(e) => setSearchValue(e.target.value)} - onKeyUp={(e) => { - if (e.key === 'Enter') { - setSearchTerm(searchValue); - } else if (e.key === 'Backspace' && searchValue === '') { - setSearchTerm(''); - } - }} + onChange={(e) => { + setSearchValue(e.target.value); + setSearchTerm(e.target.value); + }} data-testid="searchBy" />Consider adding debouncing to optimize performance:
import { useEffect } from 'react'; // ... useEffect(() => { const handler = setTimeout(() => { setSearchTerm(searchValue); }, 300); // Adjust the debounce delay as needed return () => { clearTimeout(handler); }; }, [searchValue]);src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupModal.tsx (7)
86-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle loading and error states for mutations
It's good practice to manage loading indicators and error states when performing mutations to enhance user experience. This provides users with feedback while operations are in progress.
Utilize the
loadinganderrorstates returned byuseMutation:const [updateVolunteerGroup, { loading: updating, error: updateError }] = useMutation(UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP); const [createVolunteerGroup, { loading: creating, error: createError }] = useMutation(CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP);Then, you can display a loading indicator or disable the submit button while the mutation is in progress:
<Button type="submit" className={styles.greenregbtn} data-testid="submitBtn" + disabled={updating || creating} >Additionally, handle the
errorstates to inform the user if an error occurs outside the try-catch blocks.Also applies to: 131-136
198-201:
⚠️ Potential issueUse
onSubmitinstead ofonSubmitCapturefor form submissionThe form uses
onSubmitCapture, which is not the standard event handler for form submissions in React. UsingonSubmitensures that the form submission is handled during the bubbling phase, which is the conventional approach.Apply this diff to correct the event handler:
- <Form - onSubmitCapture={ + <Form + onSubmit={📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<Form onSubmit={ mode === 'edit' ? updateGroupHandler : createGroupHandler }
57-60:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the JSDoc comments to refer to 'Volunteer Group' instead of 'Pledge'
The JSDoc comments in lines 57-60 incorrectly refer to 'pledge' instead of 'volunteer group'. This appears to be a copy-paste error and could cause confusion.
Apply this diff to fix the terminology:
- * - Calls `updatePledge` mutation to update an existing pledge, or - * - Calls `createPledge` mutation to create a new pledge. + * - Calls `updateVolunteerGroup` mutation to update an existing volunteer group, or + * - Calls `createVolunteerGroup` mutation to create a new volunteer group.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.* - Calls `updateVolunteerGroup` mutation to update an existing volunteer group, or * - Calls `createVolunteerGroup` mutation to create a new volunteer group. * * Success or error messages are displayed using toast notifications based on the result of the mutation.
113-145: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider updating leader and volunteers during group edit
In the
updateGroupHandler, onlyname,description, andvolunteersRequiredare being updated. If it's acceptable to update the leader and volunteer users when editing a group, consider including these fields in the update.Modify
updateGroupHandlerto handle leader and volunteer users:try { await updateVolunteerGroup({ variables: { id: group?._id, data: { ...updatedFields, eventId, + leaderId: leader?._id, + volunteerUserIds: volunteerUsers.map((user) => user._id), }, }, });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
311-324:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance input validation for
volunteersRequiredfieldThe
onChangehandler for thevolunteersRequiredfield should include validation to handle non-numeric inputs and ensure the value is a positive integer. Currently, entering invalid inputs could lead to unintended behavior.Apply this diff to improve input validation:
onChange={(e) => { - if (parseInt(e.target.value) > 0) { + const value = parseInt(e.target.value, 10); + if (!isNaN(value) && value > 0) { setFormState({ ...formState, - volunteersRequired: parseInt(e.target.value), + volunteersRequired: value, }); } else if (e.target.value === '') { setFormState({ ...formState, volunteersRequired: null, }); + } else { + // Optionally, handle invalid input case + } }}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.onChange={(e) => { const value = parseInt(e.target.value, 10); if (!isNaN(value) && value > 0) { setFormState({ ...formState, volunteersRequired: value, }); } else if (e.target.value === '') { setFormState({ ...formState, volunteersRequired: null, }); } else { // Optionally, handle invalid input case } }} />
277-303:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure leader remains in volunteers list when editing volunteers
When modifying the
volunteerUsersselection, there's a risk that the leader might be removed from the volunteers list, causing inconsistency. Ensure that the leader is always included in thevolunteerUsersarray.Modify the
onChangehandler to ensure the leader is retained:(_, newUsers): void => { + const updatedUsers = leader + ? Array.from( + new Set([...newUsers, leader]), + ) + : newUsers; setFormState({ ...formState, - volunteerUsers: newUsers, + volunteerUsers: updatedUsers, }); }This ensures that the leader is always included in the volunteers list.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<Autocomplete multiple className={`${styles.noOutline} w-100`} limitTags={2} data-testid="volunteerSelect" options={members} value={volunteerUsers} isOptionEqualToValue={(option, value) => option._id === value._id} filterSelectedOptions={true} getOptionLabel={(member: InterfaceUserInfo): string => `${member.firstName} ${member.lastName}` } disabled={mode === 'edit'} onChange={ /*istanbul ignore next*/ (_, newUsers): void => { const updatedUsers = leader ? Array.from( new Set([...newUsers, leader]), ) : newUsers; setFormState({ ...formState, volunteerUsers: updatedUsers, }); } } renderInput={(params) => ( <TextField {...params} label="Invite Volunteers *" /> )} /> </Form.Group>
236-273:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent duplication of leader in volunteers list
When a leader is selected, they are added to the
volunteerUsersarray. There is a possibility of the leader being duplicated if they were already selected as a volunteer.Modify the
onChangehandler to prevent duplication:(_, newLeader): void => { if (newLeader) { setFormState({ ...formState, leader: newLeader, - volunteerUsers: [...volunteerUsers, newLeader], + volunteerUsers: Array.from( + new Set([...volunteerUsers, newLeader]), + ), }); } else { setFormState({ ...formState, leader: null, volunteerUsers: volunteerUsers.filter( (user) => user._id !== leader?._id, ), }); } }Alternatively, check if the leader is already present before adding:
if (newLeader) { - setFormState({ + const isAlreadyVolunteer = volunteerUsers.some( + (user) => user._id === newLeader._id, + ); + setFormState({ ...formState, leader: newLeader, - volunteerUsers: [...volunteerUsers, newLeader], + volunteerUsers: isAlreadyVolunteer + ? volunteerUsers + : [...volunteerUsers, newLeader], }); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<Form.Group className="d-flex mb-3 w-100"> <Autocomplete className={`${styles.noOutline} w-100`} limitTags={2} data-testid="leaderSelect" options={members} value={leader} disabled={mode === 'edit'} isOptionEqualToValue={(option, value) => option._id === value._id} filterSelectedOptions={true} getOptionLabel={(member: InterfaceUserInfo): string => `${member.firstName} ${member.lastName}` } onChange={ /*istanbul ignore next*/ (_, newLeader): void => { if (newLeader) { setFormState({ ...formState, leader: newLeader, volunteerUsers: Array.from( new Set([...volunteerUsers, newLeader]), ), }); } else { setFormState({ ...formState, leader: null, volunteerUsers: volunteerUsers.filter( (user) => user._id !== leader?._id, ), }); } } } renderInput={(params) => ( <TextField {...params} label="Leader *" /> )} /> </Form.Group> ``` Alternative 2 (Using conditional check): ```suggestion <Form.Group className="d-flex mb-3 w-100"> <Autocomplete className={`${styles.noOutline} w-100`} limitTags={2} data-testid="leaderSelect" options={members} value={leader} disabled={mode === 'edit'} isOptionEqualToValue={(option, value) => option._id === value._id} filterSelectedOptions={true} getOptionLabel={(member: InterfaceUserInfo): string => `${member.firstName} ${member.lastName}` } onChange={ /*istanbul ignore next*/ (_, newLeader): void => { if (newLeader) { const isAlreadyVolunteer = volunteerUsers.some( (user) => user._id === newLeader._id, ); setFormState({ ...formState, leader: newLeader, volunteerUsers: isAlreadyVolunteer ? volunteerUsers : [...volunteerUsers, newLeader], }); } else { setFormState({ ...formState, leader: null, volunteerUsers: volunteerUsers.filter( (user) => user._id !== leader?._id, ), }); } } } renderInput={(params) => ( <TextField {...params} label="Leader *" /> )} /> </Form.Group>src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx (5)
56-56:
⚠️ Potential issueComponent name should be capitalized.
In React, component names should start with an uppercase letter to be recognized as valid components.
Apply this diff to fix the component name:
-function groups(): JSX.Element { +function Groups(): JSX.Element {And update the export statement accordingly:
-export default groups; +export default Groups;Also applies to: 417-417
377-377:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent row IDs in
DataGridmay cause issues.The
getRowIdfunction usesrow._id, but theidin the rows is set toindex + 1. This inconsistency can lead to incorrect behavior in theDataGrid. It's important to use a consistent and unique identifier.Apply this diff to set the
idtogroup._id:rows={groups.map((group, index) => ({ - id: index + 1, + id: group._id, ...group, }))}Also applies to: 389-392
105-105:
⚠️ Potential issueUndefined
eventIdin query variables.The
eventIdis set toundefinedin the GraphQL query variables, which may lead to unintended behavior or errors. Ensure thateventIdis correctly obtained and passed to the query.If the
eventIdshould be retrieved from the URL parameters, update the code as follows:-const { orgId } = useParams(); +const { orgId, eventId } = useParams();And modify the
variablesobject:variables: { where: { - eventId: undefined, + eventId, userId, orgId, leaderName: searchBy === 'leader' ? searchTerm : null, name_contains: searchBy === 'group' ? searchTerm : null, }, orderBy: sortBy, },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
143-145:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid displaying raw error messages to users.
Displaying the raw
groupsError.messagecan expose sensitive information. Consider showing a generic error message and logging the detailed error for debugging purposes.Apply this diff to modify the displayed error message:
<h6 className="fw-bold text-danger text-center"> {tErrors('errorLoading', { entity: 'Volunteer Groups' })} <br /> - {`${groupsError.message}`} + {tErrors('pleaseTryAgainLater')} </h6>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
183-206:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate image URLs to prevent potential XSS vulnerabilities.
Using
imagedirectly in thesrcattribute without validation can lead to security risks if the URL is malicious. Ensure that theimageURL is from a trusted source or sanitize it before use.Consider adding validation for the
imageURL or implementing a default placeholder image when the URL is not valid:{image && isValidUrl(image) ? ( <img src={image} alt="Leader" data-testid={`image${_id + 1}`} className={styles.TableImage} /> ) : ( // Existing Avatar component )}Ensure
isValidUrlis a function that validates the URL format.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx (5)
57-57:
⚠️ Potential issueRename the component function to follow PascalCase naming convention.
The function
volunteerGroupsshould be renamed toVolunteerGroupsto adhere to React and JavaScript conventions, ensuring component names start with an uppercase letter. This improves readability and avoids potential issues with component recognition in JSX.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-function volunteerGroups(): JSX.Element { +function VolunteerGroups(): JSX.Element { ... } ... -export default volunteerGroups; +export default VolunteerGroups;Also applies to: 446-446
396-396:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent row IDs in DataGrid by using a unique identifier.
Currently,
getRowIdusesrow._id, but the rows are assigned anidofindex + 1. This inconsistency can lead to issues in row identification. It's recommended to assignidasgroup._idto matchgetRowIdand ensure consistent row keys.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
- rows={groups.map((group, index) => ({ - id: index + 1, + rows={groups.map((group) => ({ + id: group._id, ...group, }))}Also applies to: 408-411
394-394:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the DataGrid prop 'columnBufferPx' to 'columnBuffer'.
The prop
columnBufferPxdoes not exist on theDataGridcomponent. The correct prop iscolumnBuffer, which specifies the number of columns to render outside the viewport.Apply this diff to fix the prop name:
- columnBufferPx={7} + columnBuffer={7}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.columnBuffer={7}
52-56:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate the component documentation to accurately reflect its functionality.
The JSDoc comment mentions "creating and editing action items," which seems unrelated to this component. Since this component manages volunteer groups, the documentation should be updated to reflect its actual purpose.
Apply this diff to correct the documentation:
/** * Component for managing volunteer groups for an event. - * This component allows users to view, filter, sort, and create action items. It also provides a modal for creating and editing action items. + * This component allows users to view, filter, sort, and manage volunteer groups. It also provides modals for creating, viewing, and deleting volunteer groups. * @returns The rendered component. */📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Component for managing volunteer groups for an event. * This component allows users to view, filter, sort, and manage volunteer groups. It also provides modals for creating, viewing, and deleting volunteer groups. * @returns The rendered component. */
182-210:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks for 'leader' property in renderCell to prevent runtime errors.
In the 'Leader' column's
renderCell, it assumes thatparams.row.leaderand its properties (_id,firstName,lastName,image) are always defined. Ifleadercan be null or undefined, this could cause runtime errors. It's advisable to add null checks to handle such cases.Consider updating the code as follows:
+ if (!params.row.leader) { + return <div data-testid="noLeader">{t('noLeaderAssigned')}</div>; + } const { _id, firstName, lastName, image } = params.row.leader;And ensure
t('noLeaderAssigned')is properly defined in your translation files.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx (6)
219-221:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent Potential Runtime Error with Null Checks
When accessing
volunteer.user._id, there's a potential for a runtime error ifvolunteer.useris undefined. Consider adding a null check to ensure robustness.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const isVolunteered = volunteers.some( - (volunteer) => volunteer.user._id === userId, + (volunteer) => volunteer.user && volunteer.user._id === userId, );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const isVolunteered = volunteers.some( (volunteer) => volunteer.user && volunteer.user._id === userId, );
321-323:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent Potential Runtime Error with Null Checks
When accessing
volunteer._id, there's a potential for a runtime error ifvolunteeris undefined. Consider adding a null check to ensure robustness.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const hasJoined = volunteers.some( - (volunteer) => volunteer._id === userId, + (volunteer) => volunteer && volunteer._id === userId, );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.(volunteer) => volunteer && volunteer._id === userId, ); return (
245-248:
⚠️ Potential issueLocalize Hardcoded Text for Internationalization
The label 'location' is hardcoded and should be localized to support internationalization. Use the translation function to ensure consistency across different languages.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
<span> <IoLocationOutline className="me-1 mb-1" /> - location: {location} + {tCommon('location')}: {location} </span>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
100-108:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Proper Use of Pagination Variables in GraphQL Query
Passing
first: nullandskip: nullin the GraphQL query variables may lead to unintended behavior if the GraphQL server does not handlenullvalues appropriately. If pagination is not needed, consider omitting these variables or setting them to valid numbers.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
variables: { organization_id: orgId, title_contains: searchBy === 'title' ? searchTerm : '', location_contains: searchBy === 'location' ? searchTerm : '', upcomingOnly: true, - first: null, - skip: null, },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} = useQuery(USER_EVENTS_VOLUNTEER, { variables: { organization_id: orgId, title_contains: searchBy === 'title' ? searchTerm : '', location_contains: searchBy === 'location' ? searchTerm : '', upcomingOnly: true, },
249-251: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use Date Formatting for User-Friendly Display
Casting
startDateandendDateasunknown as stringmay not display dates in a user-friendly format. Consider using a date formatting library likedate-fnsormomentto format the dates appropriately for users.Apply this diff to improve date formatting:
+ import { format } from 'date-fns'; ... <div className={`d-flex gap-4 ${styles.subContainer}`}> <span> <IoLocationOutline className="me-1 mb-1" /> {tCommon('location')}: {location} </span> - <span>Start Date: {startDate as unknown as string}</span> - <span>End Date: {endDate as unknown as string}</span> + <span>{t('startDate')}: {format(new Date(startDate), 'PPP')}</span> + <span>{t('endDate')}: {format(new Date(endDate), 'PPP')}</span> </div>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
143-161: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve Search Input Handling with Debounce
Using the
onKeyUpevent to handle search can cause unnecessary queries and may not provide the best user experience. Consider implementing a debounce on theonChangeevent to optimize performance and improve responsiveness.Apply this diff to improve search handling:
+ import { useMemo } from 'react'; + import { debounce } from 'lodash'; ... const [searchValue, setSearchValue] = useState<string>(''); const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState<string>(''); ... + const debouncedSearch = useMemo( + () => debounce((value: string) => setSearchTerm(value), 300), + [] + ); ... <Form.Control type="name" placeholder={tCommon('searchBy', { item: searchBy.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + searchBy.slice(1), })} autoComplete="off" required className={styles.inputField} value={searchValue} - onChange={(e) => setSearchValue(e.target.value)} - onKeyUp={(e) => { - if (e.key === 'Enter') { - setSearchTerm(searchValue); - } else if (e.key === 'Backspace' && searchValue === '') { - setSearchTerm(''); - } - }} + onChange={(e) => { + setSearchValue(e.target.value); + debouncedSearch(e.target.value); + }} data-testid="searchBy" />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx (7)
70-70:
⚠️ Potential issueComponent Name Should Start with an Uppercase Letter
In React, component names should be capitalized to ensure they are recognized as React components. Please rename the
volunteersfunction toVolunteers.Apply this diff to fix the component name:
-function volunteers(): JSX.Element { +function Volunteers(): JSX.Element {And update the export statement accordingly:
-export default volunteers; +export default Volunteers;Also applies to: 462-462
415-415: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent Row Identification in DataGrid
You are assigning a custom
idto each row usingid: index + 1, but thegetRowIdfunction usesrow._id. This may lead to inconsistencies in row identification and selection. It's advisable to use a consistent and unique identifier for each row.Option 1: Remove the custom
idassignment and rely on the_idfrom your data:-rows={volunteers.map((volunteer, index) => ({ - id: index + 1, +rows={volunteers.map((volunteer) => ({ ...volunteer, }))}Option 2: If you prefer using the custom
id, update thegetRowIdfunction:-getRowId={(row) => row._id} +getRowId={(row) => row.id}Also applies to: 427-430
333-334: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid Inline Styles for Maintainability
Inline styles like
style={{ marginBottom: '10px' }}andstyle={{ marginTop: '11px' }}make the code less maintainable and harder to override. Consider moving these styles to your CSS module and applying them via class names.Example:
In your CSS module (
EventVolunteers.module.css):.searchButton { margin-bottom: 10px; } .addVolunteerButton { margin-top: 11px; }Then update your component:
- style={{ marginBottom: '10px' }} + className={styles.searchButton} - style={{ marginTop: '11px' }} + className={styles.addVolunteerButton}Also applies to: 400-400
42-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Centralize Styling for DataGrid
The custom styles for the
DataGridcomponent are defined within the component file. For better scalability and maintainability, consider moving these styles into your CSS module or a separate theme file.Create styles in
EventVolunteers.module.css:.dataGridRoot { /* Your styles here */ }Then apply them using the
classesprop or styled components.
263-263:
⚠️ Potential issueSafeguard Against Undefined
assignmentsAccessing
params.row.assignments.lengthwithout ensuring thatassignmentsis defined may cause runtime errors ifassignmentsisundefinedornull. It's important to add a null check or a default value.Apply this diff to prevent potential errors:
-{params.row.assignments.length} +{params.row.assignments?.length ?? 0}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{params.row.assignments?.length ?? 0}
179-179:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
userObject Exists Before DestructuringDestructuring
params.row.userwithout checking ifuserexists can lead to errors ifuserisundefinedornull. It's prudent to verify thatuseris defined before accessing its properties.Modify the code to include a null check:
-const { _id, firstName, lastName, image } = params.row.user; +const user = params.row.user; +if (!user) { + return null; // or handle the undefined user appropriately +} +const { _id, firstName, lastName, image } = user;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
320-326: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider Debouncing Search Input
Triggering a search on every key press can lead to unnecessary re-renders and performance issues. Implementing a debounce can improve performance by reducing the number of state updates and re-renders.
You can use the
useEffecthook with a timeout to debounce the search term:+import { useEffect } from 'react'; ... + useEffect(() => { + const handler = setTimeout(() => { + setSearchTerm(searchValue); + }, 300); // Adjust the delay as needed + return () => { + clearTimeout(handler); + }; + }, [searchValue]);Remove the
onKeyUphandler and update theonChangehandler accordingly.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.tsx (9)
2-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid mixing UI libraries to ensure consistent styling
The code imports and uses components from both
react-bootstrapand@mui/material, which can lead to inconsistent UI styles and increased bundle size. Consider standardizing on a single UI component library for consistency and maintainability.Also applies to: 14-24
29-30:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure correct and consistent icon imports and usage
There are inconsistencies in icon imports and usage:
FaXmarkis imported from'react-icons/fa6', which may not exist or might not includeFaXmark.- An
<i>tag with classfa fa-timesis used instead of an icon component.Consider standardizing icon usage by importing icons from the correct packages and using them consistently throughout the code.
Apply this diff to correct the icon imports and usage:
- import { PiUserListBold } from 'react-icons/pi'; - import { FaXmark } from 'react-icons/fa6'; + import { PiUserListBold } from 'react-icons/pi'; + import { FaTimes, FaUserCircle } from 'react-icons/fa'; ... - <i className="fa fa-times"></i> + <FaTimes /> ... - <PiUserListBold className="me-2" size={21} /> + <FaUserCircle className="me-2" size={21} /> ... - <FaXmark size={18} fontWeight={900} /> + <FaTimes size={18} />Also applies to: 33-33, 200-200
248-278: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize form components to a single library
The form uses
Form.Groupfromreact-bootstrapandFormControlandTextFieldfrom@mui/material. Mixing components from different UI libraries can cause inconsistent styling. Consider using form components from a single library.
353-353:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid concatenating numbers with string IDs
Adding numbers to
_id, which is likely a string, can result in unexpected strings. Use template literals or separate variables to ensure IDs remain unique and meaningful.Apply this diff:
- data-testid={`image${_id + 1}`} + data-testid={`image-${_id}`} ... - key={_id + '1'} + key={`${_id}-1`}Also applies to: 359-359
184-184:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle exceptions safely in error handling
Casting
errortoErrormay not always be accurate, and accessingmessagedirectly might cause issues iferroris not an instance ofError. Consider checking the error type before accessing its properties.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- toast.error((error as Error).message); + if (error instanceof Error) { + toast.error(error.message); + } else { + toast.error('An unexpected error occurred'); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (error instanceof Error) { toast.error(error.message); } else { toast.error('An unexpected error occurred'); }
155-188:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure all dependencies are included in
useCallbackThe
updateGroupHandlerfunction usesformState,group,updateVolunteerGroup,t,refetchGroups, andhide. Make sure all these dependencies are included in the dependency array to prevent unexpected behavior.Update the dependency array:
- [formState, group], + [formState, group, updateVolunteerGroup, t, refetchGroups, hide],Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
398-398:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unsupported
fontWeightprop from icon componentThe
fontWeightprop is not supported by theFaXmarkicon component. To style the icon's weight, apply CSS styles or use a different icon variant if needed.Apply this diff:
- <FaTimes size={18} fontWeight={900} /> + <FaTimes size={18} style={{ fontWeight: 900 }} />Or simply remove the
fontWeightif it has no effect:- <FaTimes size={18} style={{ fontWeight: 900 }} /> + <FaTimes size={18} />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
287-299:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove input validation for
volunteersRequiredfieldCurrently, the input handling does not account for non-numeric or invalid inputs, which could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider adding input type validation and user feedback for invalid entries.
Apply this diff to set the input type and handle invalid inputs:
<TextField + type="number" label={t('volunteersRequired')} variant="outlined" className={styles.noOutline} value={volunteersRequired ?? ''} onChange={(e) => { + const value = e.target.value; + const parsedValue = parseInt(value, 10); + if (!isNaN(parsedValue) && parsedValue > 0) { setFormState({ ...formState, - volunteersRequired: parseInt(e.target.value, 10), + volunteersRequired: parsedValue, }); } else if (value === '') { setFormState({ ...formState, volunteersRequired: null, }); + } else { + toast.error('Please enter a valid positive number'); } }} />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
43-70:
⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistencies in component name and parameters in comments
The JSDoc comments refer to
VolunteerGroupModaland include a parameterorgId, which is not present in the component's props. Update the comments to reflect the correct component nameGroupModaland remove or correct theorgIdparameter description.Apply this diff to correct the comments:
/** * A modal dialog for creating or editing a volunteer group. * * @param isOpen - Indicates whether the modal is open. * @param hide - Function to close the modal. * @param eventId - The ID of the event associated with volunteer group. - * @param orgId - The ID of the organization associated with volunteer group. * @param group - The volunteer group object to be edited. * @param refetchGroups - Function to refetch the volunteer groups after creation or update. * @returns The rendered modal component. * - * The `VolunteerGroupModal` component displays a form within a modal dialog for creating or editing a Volunteer Group. + * The `GroupModal` component displays a form within a modal dialog for creating or editing a volunteer group. * It includes fields for entering the group name, description, volunteersRequired, and selecting volunteers/leaders. * * The modal includes: * - A header with a title indicating the current mode (create or edit) and a close button. * - A form with: * - An input field for entering the group name. * - A textarea for entering the group description. * - An input field for entering the number of volunteers required. * - A submit button to create or update the pledge. * * On form submission, the component either: * - Calls `updateVolunteerGroup` mutation to update an existing group, or * * Success or error messages are displayed using toast notifications based on the result of the mutation. */📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * A modal dialog for creating or editing a volunteer group. * * @param isOpen - Indicates whether the modal is open. * @param hide - Function to close the modal. * @param eventId - The ID of the event associated with volunteer group. * @param group - The volunteer group object to be edited. * @param refetchGroups - Function to refetch the volunteer groups after creation or update. * @returns The rendered modal component. * * The `GroupModal` component displays a form within a modal dialog for creating or editing a volunteer group. * It includes fields for entering the group name, description, volunteersRequired, and selecting volunteers/leaders. * * The modal includes: * - A header with a title indicating the current mode (create or edit) and a close button. * - A form with: * - An input field for entering the group name. * - A textarea for entering the group description. * - An input field for entering the number of volunteers required. * - A submit button to create or update the pledge. * * On form submission, the component either: * - Calls `updateVolunteerGroup` mutation to update an existing group, or * * Success or error messages are displayed using toast notifications based on the result of the mutation. */src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx (4)
59-59:
⚠️ Potential issueComponent name and export should be in PascalCase
React components should be named in PascalCase to follow convention. Please rename the component function and the export accordingly.
Apply this diff to fix the naming:
-function actions(): JSX.Element { +function Actions(): JSX.Element {-export default actions; +export default Actions;Also applies to: 476-476
208-210:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential undefined values without type assertions
Avoid using type assertions like
as stringon potentially undefined properties. Provide default values to handle undefined cases safely.Apply this diff:
-name={params.row.assigneeGroup?.name as string} +name={params.row.assigneeGroup?.name || t('unnamedGroup')}-alt={params.row.assigneeGroup?.name as string} +alt={params.row.assigneeGroup?.name || t('unnamedGroup')}At line 212:
-{params.row.assigneeGroup?.name as string} +{params.row.assigneeGroup?.name || t('unnamedGroup')}Also applies to: 212-212
97-103: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reassess the use of
useCallbackforhandleModalClickUsing
useCallbackhere may be unnecessary unless you're passinghandleModalClickto child components that depend on memoization for performance optimization.Consider removing
useCallback:-const handleModalClick = useCallback( - (actionItem: InterfaceActionItemInfo | null, modal: ModalState): void => { - setActionItem(actionItem); - openModal(modal); - }, - [openModal], -); +const handleModalClick = ( + actionItem: InterfaceActionItemInfo | null, + modal: ModalState, +): void => { + setActionItem(actionItem); + openModal(modal); +};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const handleModalClick = ( actionItem: InterfaceActionItemInfo | null, modal: ModalState, ): void => { setActionItem(actionItem); openModal(modal); };
262-262:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the spelling of 'Alloted' to 'Allotted'
There's a spelling mistake in the header name. Please correct 'Alloted Hours' to 'Allotted Hours'.
Apply this diff:
-headerName: t('allottedHours'), +headerName: t('allottedHours'), // Ensure the translation key reflects the correct spellingCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.tsx (3)
451-464: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify conditional rendering for ranks
The nested ternary operator used for determining the medal image can be simplified for better readability.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
src={ - rank === 1 - ? gold - : rank === 2 - ? silver - : bronze + [gold, silver, bronze][rank - 1] }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<img src={ [gold, silver, bronze][rank - 1] } alt="gold" className={styles.rankings} /> ) : ( rank )}
166-170:
⚠️ Potential issueInclude
navigateandtErrorsin the dependency arrayThe
navigatefunction andtErrorsare used inside theuseEffecthook but are not included in the dependency array. This might lead to inconsistent behavior.Apply this diff to include them:
}, [errorOrg, errorPost, errorEvent, errorRankings]); + }, [errorOrg, errorPost, errorEvent, errorRankings, navigate, tErrors]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
453-460:
⚠️ Potential issueDynamic
altattribute for medal imagesThe
altattribute for the medal images is always set to "gold", regardless of the actual rank. This can be confusing for users relying on screen readers.Apply this diff to set the correct
alttext:<img src={ rank === 1 ? gold : rank === 2 ? silver : bronze } - alt="gold" + alt={ + rank === 1 + ? 'gold medal' + : rank === 2 + ? 'silver medal' + : 'bronze medal' + } className={styles.rankings} />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.rank === 1 ? gold : rank === 2 ? silver : bronze } alt={ rank === 1 ? 'gold medal' : rank === 2 ? 'silver medal' : 'bronze medal' } className={styles.rankings}src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItem.mocks.ts (4)
715-716:
⚠️ Potential issueTypo in variable name
dDateIn the
CREATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATIONvariables, the field namedDateseems to be a typo. The correct field should likely bedueDateto match the expected input of the mutation.Apply the following diff to correct the variable name:
- dDate: '2044-01-02', + dueDate: '2044-01-02',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.dueDate: '2044-01-02', },
44-68:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent
imagefield values in user dataIn
itemWithVolunteer, theimagefield for the user is set tonull, while in other mocks it varies between'user-image',null, andundefined. Inconsistent handling of theimagefield can lead to unpredictable behavior during testing. To ensure consistency, standardize theimagefield across all user mocks.Apply the following diff to set a consistent value for the
imagefield:# For 'itemWithVolunteer' assignee user image - image: null, + image: 'user-image', # Decide on a standard value (e.g., always use `'user-image'` or `null`) and apply it uniformly across all mock items.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
363-364:
⚠️ Potential issueUndefined
eventIdin query variablesIn the
groupListQuery, the variables include{ eventId: undefined }. Passingundefinedmay lead to unexpected behavior in the query execution. If the intention is to fetch all groups regardless ofeventId, consider omitting theeventIdparameter or setting it tonull.Apply the following diff to correct the query variables:
- variables: { where: { eventId: undefined } }, + variables: { where: {} }, # Alternatively, if the API expects `eventId` to be `null` for all events: + variables: { where: { eventId: null } },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
150-187:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential undefined
imagefields in group dataIn
itemWithGroup, theimagefields forcreatorandleaderare set toundefined. Usingundefinedmay cause issues in components expecting a string ornull. It's advisable to usenullor a placeholder string to represent the absence of an image.Apply the following diff to assign
nullto theimagefields:- image: undefined, + image: null,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const itemWithGroup: InterfaceActionItemInfo = { _id: 'actionItemId3', assigneeType: 'EventVolunteerGroup', assigneeUser: null, assignee: null, assigneeGroup: { _id: 'volunteerGroupId1', name: 'Group 1', description: 'Group 1 Description', volunteersRequired: 10, event: { _id: 'eventId1', }, assignments: [], volunteers: [], createdAt: '2024-08-27', creator: { _id: 'userId1', firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe', image: null, }, leader: { _id: 'userId1', firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe', image: null, }, }, preCompletionNotes: 'Notes 1', postCompletionNotes: 'Cmp Notes 1', assignmentDate: new Date('2024-08-27'), dueDate: new Date('2044-08-30'), completionDate: new Date('2044-09-03'), isCompleted: true, event: null, allotedHours: 24, actionItemCategory: actionItemCategory1,src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (5)
74-79:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent
assigneeIdinitializationIn the
initializeFormStatefunction, you're assigningassigneeIdfrom multiple possible sources (assignee,assigneeGroup,assigneeUser). Ensure that only one of these is set at a time to maintain data consistency and prevent conflicts when the form state is initialized.
243-252:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate required fields before creating an action item
In the
createActionItemHandler, ensure that all required fields, such asactionItemCategoryIdandassigneeId, are not null or empty before submitting the mutation. This prevents backend errors due to missing data.Consider adding validation logic before the mutation call:
try { + if (!actionItemCategoryId || !assigneeId) { + toast.error('Please fill in all required fields.'); + return; + } const dDate = dayjs(dueDate).format('YYYY-MM-DD'); await createActionItem({Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
459-481:
⚠️ Potential issueReset assignee selections when
assigneeTypechangesWhen the
assigneeTypechanges via the radio buttons, the previous assignee selection may no longer be valid. Resetting the relevant assignee state prevents unintended assignments.Update the
onChangehandlers:onChange={() => { handleFormChange('assigneeType', 'EventVolunteer'); + setAssignee(null); + handleFormChange('assigneeId', ''); + setAssigneeGroup(null); + setAssigneeUser(null); }}Repeat similar logic for the other
assigneeTypeoptions.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
107-115: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify assignee state management
You have separate state variables for
assignee,assigneeGroup, andassigneeUser. Consider consolidating these into a single state object that dynamically adjusts based onassigneeType. This can simplify state management and reduce the potential for bugs.Here's how you might refactor:
- const [assignee, setAssignee] = useState<InterfaceEventVolunteerInfo | null>(null); - const [assigneeGroup, setAssigneeGroup] = useState<InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo | null>(null); - const [assigneeUser, setAssigneeUser] = useState<InterfaceMemberInfo | null>(null); + const [assignee, setAssignee] = useState<InterfaceEventVolunteerInfo | InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo | InterfaceMemberInfo | null>(null);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
288-310: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repetitive
assigneeIdupdate logicThe checks for updating
assigneeIdbased onassigneeTypeare repetitive. Streamline this logic to improve maintainability.Here's a possible refactor:
- if ( - assigneeId !== actionItem?.assignee?._id && - assigneeType === 'EventVolunteer' - ) { - updatedFields.assigneeId = assigneeId; - } - if ( - assigneeId !== actionItem?.assigneeGroup?._id && - assigneeType === 'EventVolunteerGroup' - ) { - updatedFields.assigneeId = assigneeId; - } - if ( - assigneeId !== actionItem?.assigneeUser?._id && - assigneeType === 'User' - ) { - updatedFields.assigneeId = assigneeId; - } + const currentAssigneeId = + assigneeType === 'EventVolunteer' ? actionItem?.assignee?._id : + assigneeType === 'EventVolunteerGroup' ? actionItem?.assigneeGroup?._id : + actionItem?.assigneeUser?._id; + if (assigneeId !== currentAssigneeId) { + updatedFields.assigneeId = assigneeId; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const currentAssigneeId = assigneeType === 'EventVolunteer' ? actionItem?.assignee?._id : assigneeType === 'EventVolunteerGroup' ? actionItem?.assigneeGroup?._id : actionItem?.assigneeUser?._id; if (assigneeId !== currentAssigneeId) { updatedFields.assigneeId = assigneeId; } if (assigneeType !== actionItem?.assigneeType) { updatedFields.assigneeType = assigneeType; }src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.test.tsx (4)
150-276: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repetitive mock data for maintainability
The
itemPropsarray contains deeply nested mock data with similar structures. Consider extracting common mock data into separate helper functions or fixtures to improve readability and reduce duplication.
354-476: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce duplication in similar test cases
The test cases for "Create Action Item (for Volunteer)" and "Create Action Item (for Group)" share significant code. Refactor these tests to use parameterized inputs or test utilities to streamline the code and make it easier to maintain.
512-515:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd assertions to verify updated fields
After updating the action item, consider adding assertions to verify that the fields like
postCompletionNoteshave been updated correctly in the component or in the mocked data.Example assertion to add:
expect(screen.getByLabelText(t.postCompletionNotes)).toHaveValue('Cmp Notes 2');
98-98:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential
undefinedimage propertyThe
assignerobject has animageproperty set toundefined. Consider defaulting this to an empty string or handlingundefinedvalues within the component to prevent potential issues during rendering.Apply this diff to provide a default value:
assigner: { _id: 'userId2', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', - image: undefined, + image: '', },Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2397 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.08% 98.29% +0.20%
===========================================
Files 255 283 +28
Lines 7223 8207 +984
Branches 2090 2378 +288
===========================================
+ Hits 7085 8067 +982
- Misses 129 131 +2
Partials 9 9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts (2)
21-35: Consider simplifying thebaseActionItemmock object.The
baseActionItemcontains duplicate user information in bothassignerandcreatorproperties. Consider extracting the common user data into a separate constant to improve maintainability.+const baseUser = { + _id: 'userId', + firstName: 'Wilt', + lastName: 'Shepherd', + image: null, +}; export const baseActionItem = { - assigner: { - _id: 'userId', - firstName: 'Wilt', - lastName: 'Shepherd', - image: null, - }, + assigner: { ...baseUser }, creator: { - _id: 'userId', - firstName: 'Wilt', - lastName: 'Shepherd', - image: null, + ...baseUser, __typename: 'User', }, };
1-402: Consider adding more edge cases to the mock data.While the mock data covers the basic scenarios, consider adding these additional test cases to improve coverage:
- Volunteers with pending group invitations
- Action items with invalid/expired dates
- Edge cases for
volunteersRequired(e.g., 0 or negative values)- Cases with missing optional fields
Would you like assistance in generating these additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItem.mocks.ts(18 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts(1 hunks)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
src/GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries.ts (2)
3-11: Enhance query documentation for better maintainability.While the first query has documentation, it could be more detailed. Additionally, other queries lack documentation entirely.
Consider adding comprehensive JSDoc documentation for all queries, including:
- Detailed description of the query's purpose
- Complete parameter descriptions
- Return type structure explanation
- Example usage
/** * GraphQL query to retrieve event volunteers. * + * This query fetches a list of event volunteers with their user details, + * assignments, and group memberships. * * @param where - The filter to apply to the query. + * Example: { eventId: "123", status: "ACTIVE" } * @param orderBy - The order in which to return the results. + * Example: { createdAt: "DESC" } * @returns The list of event volunteers. + * @returns {Object[]} volunteers - Array of volunteer objects + * @returns {string} volunteers._id - Volunteer ID + * @returns {boolean} volunteers.hasAccepted - Acceptance status + * @returns {number} volunteers.hoursVolunteered - Hours contributed + * @returns {Object} volunteers.user - User details * **/
12-39: Consider adding pagination and additional fields for scalability.The query structure is good, but there are two potential improvements:
- Add pagination parameters to handle large datasets efficiently:
query GetEventVolunteers( $where: EventVolunteerWhereInput! $orderBy: EventVolunteersOrderByInput + $first: Int + $skip: Int ) { - getEventVolunteers(where: $where, orderBy: $orderBy) { + getEventVolunteers( + where: $where + orderBy: $orderBy + first: $first + skip: $skip + ) {
- Consider adding fields that might be useful for volunteer management:
user { _id firstName lastName image + email + phone } assignments { _id + status + dueDate + description }src/GraphQl/Queries/ActionItemQueries.ts (1)
83-97: Well-structured polymorphic query implementation.The use of inline fragments with
EventVolunteerandEventVolunteerGroupalong with__typenamefollows GraphQL best practices for polymorphic queries. This structure will enable proper type discrimination on the client side.Consider implementing a fragment for common fields shared between
EventVolunteerandEventVolunteerGroupto reduce duplication and make the schema more maintainable.src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.mocks.ts (3)
121-230: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios.The mock data covers basic sorting and filtering, but consider adding these important test cases:
- Filtering by completion status
- Filtering by date ranges
- Combined filters (e.g., category + completion status)
- Edge cases for sorting (e.g., null dates)
Consider organizing the test cases into logical groups using constants:
const SORT_MOCKS = [/* sorting test cases */]; const FILTER_MOCKS = [/* filtering test cases */]; const COMBINED_MOCKS = [/* combined filter test cases */]; export const MOCKS = [...SORT_MOCKS, ...FILTER_MOCKS, ...COMBINED_MOCKS];
232-251: Consider additional empty result scenarios.While the basic empty result case is covered, consider adding empty result scenarios for different filter combinations to ensure proper handling of "no results" states across all use cases.
Example scenarios to add:
- Empty results with category filter
- Empty results with date range filter
- Empty results with completion status filter
253-268: Expand error scenarios for better error handling coverage.The current error mock only tests a generic error. Consider adding specific error scenarios that your application needs to handle:
export const ERROR_MOCKS = [ // Current generic error { request: {/*...*/}, error: new Error('Mock Graphql ACTION_ITEMS_BY_USER Error'), }, // Network error { request: {/*...*/}, error: new Error('Network error'), }, // Validation error { request: {/*...*/}, result: { errors: [{ message: 'Invalid input', extensions: { code: 'BAD_USER_INPUT' } }] }, } ];src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.test.tsx (3)
82-122: Consider extracting shared test dataThe test data is well-structured and comprehensive. However, consider extracting common user objects (like creator and leader) into shared constants to improve maintainability.
Example refactor:
const MOCK_USER = { _id: 'userId2', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', image: undefined, };
Line range hint
249-257: Enhance error case test coverageWhile the test verifies the error toast, consider adding assertions to verify:
- Modal remains open after error
- Form state remains unchanged
- Error state is properly reflected in UI
Example additions:
await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Mock Graphql Error'); expect(screen.getByText(t.actionItemStatus)).toBeInTheDocument(); // Modal still visible expect(itemProps[2].hide).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); // Modal not closed });
Line range hint
1-257: Consider reorganizing tests for better maintainabilityThe test file effectively covers different assignee types (User, EventVolunteerGroup, EventVolunteer). Consider organizing tests into describe blocks for each assignee type to improve readability and maintenance:
describe('Testing ItemUpdateStatusModal', () => { describe('User Assignee', () => { // User-related tests }); describe('EventVolunteerGroup Assignee', () => { // Group-related tests }); describe('EventVolunteer Assignee', () => { // Volunteer-related tests }); });src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts (1)
21-35: Consider adding__typenameto assigner object.The
creatorobject includes__typenamebutassignerdoesn't. This inconsistency might cause issues with GraphQL type resolution if the schema expects type information for both fields.export const baseActionItem = { assigner: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', image: null, + __typename: 'User', }, creator: { _id: 'userId', firstName: 'Wilt', lastName: 'Shepherd', image: null, __typename: 'User', }, };src/utils/interfaces.ts (1)
Line range hint
31-51: Consider using discriminated unions for better type safetyThe current structure allows multiple assignee properties to be non-null simultaneously, which could lead to ambiguous states. Consider using a discriminated union pattern for better type safety.
- assigneeType: 'EventVolunteer' | 'EventVolunteerGroup' | 'User'; - assignee: InterfaceEventVolunteerInfo | null; - assigneeGroup: InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo | null; - assigneeUser: InterfaceUserInfo | null; + assignee: { + type: 'EventVolunteer'; + value: InterfaceEventVolunteerInfo; + } | { + type: 'EventVolunteerGroup'; + value: InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo; + } | { + type: 'User'; + value: InterfaceUserInfo; + };src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx (2)
141-152: Enhance error message displayThe current error message directly displays the technical error message to the user. Consider providing a more user-friendly error message while logging the technical details.
- {`${actionItemsError.message}`} + {tErrors('genericError')} + {process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' && ( + <small className="d-block mt-2 text-muted"> + {actionItemsError.message} + </small> + )}
379-387: Add aria-label to dropdown togglesThe dropdown toggles lack proper accessibility labels. Add aria-labels for screen readers.
<Dropdown.Toggle variant="success" id="dropdown-basic" className={styles.dropdown} data-testid="searchByToggle" + aria-label={tCommon('searchBy', { item: '' })} >src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
592-599: Add input validation for allottedHours.The current implementation allows any positive integer, but there should be a reasonable upper limit.
Add maximum value validation:
value={allottedHours ?? ''} onChange={(e) => handleFormChange( 'allottedHours', - e.target.value === '' || parseInt(e.target.value) < 0 + e.target.value === '' || + parseInt(e.target.value) < 0 || + parseInt(e.target.value) > 24 ? null : parseInt(e.target.value), ) } +inputProps={{ max: 24 }} +helperText={t('maxHoursPerDay')}src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.test.tsx (1)
329-334: Consider strengthening allotted hours validation tests.While the current tests check for empty, negative, and positive values, consider adding edge cases:
- Maximum allowed value
- Decimal numbers
- Non-numeric characters
const allottedHoursOptions = ['', '-1', '9']; +const allottedHoursOptions = ['', '-1', '9', '999999', '10.5', 'abc'];Also applies to: 391-397, 453-459, 549-556, 601-608
public/locales/zh/translation.json (1)
443-491: Consider refining action item terminology for better clarity.While most translations are accurate, consider these improvements for consistency:
- "受托人" (assignee) could be changed to "被指派人" to better match the context of task assignment
- Consider using "志愿者" consistently instead of mixing with "个人" for individual volunteers
public/locales/en/translation.json (1)
1409-1436: Consider renaming "Volunteership" to "Volunteering".While the user volunteer section is comprehensive and well-structured, consider changing "Volunteership" to "Volunteering" as it's more commonly used and aligns better with standard English terminology.
Apply this change:
- "title": "Volunteership", + "title": "Volunteering",public/locales/hi/translation.json (1)
443-491: Consider improving clarity of some technical terms.While the translations are functionally correct, consider the following improvements for better clarity:
- "क्रिया वस्तु" (action item) could be "कार्य सूची" which is more commonly used
- "प्राप्तकर्ता" (assignee) could be "कार्य निर्धारित व्यक्ति" which is more descriptive
public/locales/fr/translation.json (2)
443-491: Standardize capitalization in action items section.There are inconsistencies in the capitalization of words. Some translations start with capital letters while others don't within the same context.
Apply these changes for consistency:
- "actionItemCategory": "Catégorie de l'Action", - "actionItemDetails": "Détails de l'Action", - "actionItemCompleted": "Action Terminée", + "actionItemCategory": "Catégorie de l'action", + "actionItemDetails": "Détails de l'action", + "actionItemCompleted": "Action terminée",
1366-1408: Improve clarity in volunteer group translations.Some translations could be more natural in French. Consider these improvements for better clarity:
Apply these changes:
- "volunteerGroupCreated": "Groupe de bénévoles créé avec succès", - "volunteerGroupUpdated": "Groupe de bénévoles mis à jour avec succès", - "volunteerGroupDeleted": "Groupe de bénévoles supprimé avec succès", + "volunteerGroupCreated": "Le groupe de bénévoles a été créé avec succès", + "volunteerGroupUpdated": "Le groupe de bénévoles a été mis à jour avec succès", + "volunteerGroupDeleted": "Le groupe de bénévoles a été supprimé avec succès",public/locales/sp/translation.json (2)
755-759: Consider standardizing menu item capitalizationWhile the translations are correct, there's inconsistency in the capitalization of menu items. Some items start with uppercase (e.g., "Acciones", "Agendas") while others are lowercase (e.g., "volunteers").
- "actions": "Acciones", - "agendas": "Agendas", - "statistics": "Estadísticas", - "to": "A", - "volunteers": "Voluntarios" + "actions": "acciones", + "agendas": "agendas", + "statistics": "estadísticas", + "to": "a", + "volunteers": "voluntarios"
1367-1409: Consider improving translation for "Most/Least Volunteers"The translations are generally good, but "La mayoría de voluntarios" and "Menos voluntarios" could be more consistent with the pattern used in other similar phrases.
- "mostVolunteers": "La mayoría de voluntarios", - "leastVolunteers": "Menos voluntarios" + "mostVolunteers": "Mayor número de voluntarios", + "leastVolunteers": "Menor número de voluntarios"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
public/locales/en/translation.json(6 hunks)public/locales/fr/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/hi/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/sp/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/zh/translation.json(5 hunks)src/GraphQl/Mutations/ActionItemMutations.ts(2 hunks)src/GraphQl/Queries/ActionItemQueries.ts(4 hunks)src/GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries.ts(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.test.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.test.tsx(14 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(16 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.test.tsx(5 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.test.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx(5 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItem.mocks.ts(18 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.mocks.ts(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx(1 hunks)src/utils/interfaces.ts(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- src/GraphQl/Mutations/ActionItemMutations.ts
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.test.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.test.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItem.mocks.ts
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.test.tsx (2)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T07:40:16.065Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.test.tsx (2)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T07:40:16.065Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2397
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts:184-402
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T12:54:20.857Z
Learning: In `src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts`, test failures are not dependent on the `createdAt` fields; hardcoded dates in `createdAt` fields do not cause test failures in this file.
🔇 Additional comments (41)
src/GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries.ts (1)
41-87: Review data exposure and add pagination for nested lists.
The query structure is comprehensive but has potential security and performance concerns:
-
Verify if all user details should be exposed for all group members:
-
Add pagination for nested lists to prevent performance issues:
volunteers(
+ first: $volunteersFirst
+ skip: $volunteersSkip
+ orderBy: $volunteersOrderBy
) {
_id
user {
_id
firstName
lastName
- image
+ image @include(if: $includeImages)
}
}
assignments(
+ first: $assignmentsFirst
+ skip: $assignmentsSkip
+ orderBy: $assignmentsOrderBy
) {src/GraphQl/Queries/ActionItemQueries.ts (2)
29-47: LGTM! Query structure properly supports volunteer management.
The enhanced query structure now correctly handles both individual volunteers and volunteer groups, with proper user details and assignment types. The spelling correction for allottedHours is also appropriate.
Let's verify the consistency of the assigneeType field usage:
Also applies to: 73-73
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to:
- Find relevant type definitions and schema files
- Look for any assignee-related fields to understand the data structure
This will help us verify if the query structure aligns with the defined types and schema.
The previous search identified relevant files but had issues with file type recognition. Let's examine the actual content of these files to verify the type definitions and assignee field usage.
The assigneeType field usage is properly defined and consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- The
assigneeTypefield is properly defined in the interfaces (src/utils/interfaces.ts) with the correct types: 'EventVolunteer' | 'EventVolunteerGroup' | 'User' - The field is consistently used in GraphQL queries (
ActionItemQueries.ts) and mutations (ActionItemMutations.ts) - The UI components properly handle all three assignee types with appropriate rendering logic
- The field is properly tested across multiple test files with comprehensive test cases
The enhanced query structure correctly supports the volunteer management functionality with proper type safety and consistent implementation across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the assigneeType field usage across the codebase
# Expected: Should find corresponding type definitions and handling code
# Search for assigneeType in type definitions and schema
rg -t typescript -t graphql "assigneeType"
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for type definitions and schema files
fd "\.(graphql|ts)$" | xargs rg -l "type.*ActionItem|interface.*ActionItem"
# Also search for any mentions of assignee-related fields
rg -t typescript -t graphql "assignee(Type|User|Group)" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the schema and interface files we found
cat schema.graphql
cat src/utils/interfaces.ts
# Also try a simpler search for assignee fields without file type restrictions
rg "assignee(Type|User|Group)"
Length of output: 58878
Line range hint 126-173: LGTM! New query properly supports the volunteer dashboard requirement.
The query structure provides all necessary fields for displaying user-specific action items with proper filtering and ordering capabilities.
Let's verify the corresponding mutation support:
✅ Verification successful
Mutation support for action items is properly implemented
The codebase has complete mutation support for action items with:
- CREATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION with volunteer assignment capabilities (assigneeId, assigneeType)
- UPDATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION with full volunteer management features
- DELETE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION for cleanup
All mutations align well with the ACTION_ITEMS_BY_USER query structure and support the volunteer dashboard requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of corresponding mutations for action items
# Expected: Should find mutations for creating/updating action items with volunteer assignments
# Search for related mutations
ast-grep --pattern 'mutation $$$ActionItem$$$'
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for GraphQL mutations related to action items
# Search for mutation definitions in GraphQL files
rg -t ts "mutation.*ActionItem" --context 2
# Also search for any ActionItem mutation types
rg -t ts "type.*Mutation.*ActionItem" --context 2
# And search for specific mutation fields
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = gql`
mutation $$$ActionItem$$$
`'
Length of output: 2070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the complete mutation definitions to verify they support volunteer assignments
# Check CREATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION
rg -A 20 "CREATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION = gql`" src/GraphQl/Mutations/ActionItemMutations.ts
# Check UPDATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION
rg -A 20 "UPDATE_ACTION_ITEM_MUTATION = gql`" src/GraphQl/Mutations/ActionItemMutations.ts
Length of output: 977
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to view the mutation files
# View the complete ActionItemMutations.ts file
cat src/GraphQl/Mutations/ActionItemMutations.ts
Length of output: 2504
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.test.tsx (2)
42-49: LGTM: Well-structured test data for User-type action item
The changes properly implement the new assignee model with clear separation between user and group assignments.
149-187: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage for EventVolunteer type
The test data properly covers the EventVolunteer scenario with all necessary fields including volunteer-specific attributes.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx (5)
41-43: LGTM: Interface changes align with volunteer management requirements.
The addition of assigneeGroup, assigneeUser, and assigneeType properties properly supports the new volunteer management features.
50-50: LGTM: Fixed spelling of 'allottedHours'.
Corrected the spelling from 'allotedHours' to 'allottedHours'.
Line range hint 144-156: LGTM: Consistent updates to assigner display attributes.
The updates to data-testid and alt attributes maintain consistency throughout the component.
195-199: LGTM: Proper handling of allotted hours display.
The field correctly uses translations and handles null values with an appropriate default.
Line range hint 1-256: Verify consistent usage of action item types across the codebase.
Let's ensure that the assignee types are used consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
The assignee type handling is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows:
- The
assigneeTypevalues ('EventVolunteer', 'EventVolunteerGroup', 'User') are consistently defined ininterfaces.tsand used correctly across components - The interface
InterfaceActionItemInfoproperly defines all required fields with correct types - The component's conditional rendering based on
assigneeTypematches the interface contract - Mock objects demonstrate proper null handling for unused assignee fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of assignee types and related fields
# Test 1: Check for all occurrences of assigneeType to ensure consistent values
echo "Checking assigneeType usage:"
rg "assigneeType.*['\"]Event(Volunteer|VolunteerGroup)['\"]" -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
# Test 2: Check for consistent interface usage
echo -e "\nChecking InterfaceActionItemInfo usage:"
rg "InterfaceActionItemInfo.*\{" -A 10 -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
# Test 3: Check for potential missing null checks
echo -e "\nChecking for potential missing null checks:"
rg "assignee\.(user|group)\." -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 11108
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts (2)
1-10: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports are logically grouped and all are being used in the file.
11-19: LGTM! Action item categories are well-defined.
The categories are simple and reusable mock objects that are used consistently throughout the test data.
src/utils/interfaces.ts (4)
10-15: LGTM: Well-structured user info interface
The new InterfaceUserInfo interface provides a clean, reusable structure for user data that helps reduce duplication across the codebase.
356-356: LGTM: Consistent use of InterfaceUserInfo
The pledge interfaces have been properly updated to use the new InterfaceUserInfo type, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
Also applies to: 496-496
578-619: LGTM: Well-structured volunteer management interfaces
The InterfaceEventVolunteerInfo and InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo interfaces provide comprehensive structures for managing volunteers and groups, including:
- Volunteer acceptance tracking
- Hours management
- Group assignments
- Hierarchical organization with leaders and members
674-684: LGTM: Properly structured volunteer ranking interface
The InterfaceVolunteerRank interface correctly captures the requirements for the volunteer rankings leaderboard feature mentioned in the PR objectives.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (3)
39-45: LGTM: Well-structured form state interface.
The InterfaceFormStateType interface is well-defined with clear types for each field. The optional fields are properly marked with ? and nullable fields with | null.
446-491: LGTM: Well-implemented assignee type selection.
The radio button group for selecting assignee types is well-implemented with clear icons and labels. The conditional rendering based on eventId is appropriate.
243-252: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in createActionItemHandler.
The error handling could be more specific to help users understand and resolve issues.
Consider enhancing the error handling:
} catch (error: unknown) {
- toast.error((error as Error).message);
+ if (error instanceof Error) {
+ // Handle specific error types
+ if (error.message.includes('validation')) {
+ toast.error(t('validationError'));
+ } else if (error.message.includes('permission')) {
+ toast.error(t('permissionError'));
+ } else {
+ toast.error(t('generalError'));
+ }
+ } else {
+ toast.error(t('unexpectedError'));
+ }
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.test.tsx (5)
50-50: LGTM: Test data setup includes new volunteer-related fields.
The test data setup correctly includes the new eventId field and maintains proper structure for both event and non-event related action items.
Also applies to: 59-63
73-76: Comprehensive test data for different assignee types.
The test data properly covers all assignee types (User, EventVolunteer, EventVolunteerGroup) with their respective data structures, ensuring thorough testing of the component's handling of different assignment scenarios.
Also applies to: 159-174
354-414: Well-structured test cases for volunteer assignments.
The test cases thoroughly cover:
- Individual volunteer assignment
- Volunteer group assignment
- Radio button interactions
- Form submissions
Also applies to: 416-476
518-620: Comprehensive coverage of volunteer assignment updates.
The test cases effectively cover:
- Updating volunteer assignments
- Switching between volunteer types
- Transitioning from volunteer to group assignments
Also applies to: 622-671
Line range hint 756-795: LGTM: Proper error handling test coverage.
The test cases properly cover:
- Creation failures
- Update failures
- No-changes-made scenario
public/locales/zh/translation.json (2)
2-13: LGTM! Leaderboard translations are accurate and complete.
The Chinese translations for the leaderboard section accurately convey the intended meaning while maintaining natural language flow.
1366-1408: LGTM! Event volunteer management translations are well implemented.
The translations effectively cover all volunteer management features while maintaining natural Chinese language conventions.
public/locales/en/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are complete and consistent.
The leaderboard section includes all necessary translations for volunteer rankings functionality, with proper time frame options and consistent terminology.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard translations align with leaderboard functionality.
The added translations properly integrate volunteer rankings into the dashboard view.
754-758: LGTM: Event management translations support volunteer integration.
The additions properly integrate volunteer management into the event management section.
1366-1407: LGTM: Event volunteers section is comprehensive and well-structured.
The section includes all necessary translations for managing volunteers and volunteer groups, with proper status messages and confirmations.
public/locales/hi/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are complete and accurate.
The Hindi translations for the leaderboard section are properly implemented with appropriate translations for all UI elements including time frames, search functionality, and volunteer rankings.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard volunteer translations are properly implemented.
The Hindi translations for volunteer rankings in the dashboard section are accurate and align with the PR objectives for volunteer management features.
1366-1408: LGTM: Event volunteer translations are comprehensive.
The Hindi translations for the event volunteer section are well-implemented, covering all aspects of volunteer management including:
- Individual and group volunteer management
- Volunteer metrics and status updates
- Group creation and management
1409-1436: LGTM: User volunteer translations are well implemented.
The Hindi translations for the user volunteer section accurately cover all user-facing volunteer features including:
- Upcoming volunteer events
- Volunteer requests and invitations
- Group membership management
public/locales/fr/translation.json (3)
2-13: LGTM! Well-structured leaderboard translations.
The leaderboard section translations are accurate, follow French language conventions, and maintain consistency with the application's terminology.
281-283: LGTM! Dashboard translations are consistent.
The volunteer rankings translations in the dashboard section are accurate and maintain consistency with the existing dashboard translations.
1409-1436: LGTM! User volunteer section is well translated.
The user volunteer dashboard translations are accurate, natural, and maintain consistency with French language conventions.
public/locales/sp/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are well-structured and accurate
The Spanish translations for the leaderboard section are grammatically correct and maintain consistency with the application's terminology. The accents are properly used (e.g., "Clasificación", "Período").
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard volunteer rankings translations are accurate
The translations for volunteer rankings in the dashboard section are consistent with the leaderboard terminology and maintain proper Spanish grammar.
443-491: LGTM: Action items section is well translated
The translations for action items maintain consistency with the application's terminology and proper Spanish grammar. The section includes all necessary keys for managing action items, volunteers, and volunteer groups.
1410-1437: LGTM: User volunteer section translations are accurate and consistent
The translations for the user volunteer section are well-structured and maintain consistency with the volunteer-related terminology used throughout the file. The Spanish grammar and accents are correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 26
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.test.tsx (3)
115-142: Consider expanding sort functionality tests.While the current tests cover basic sorting scenarios, consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases (empty dates, null values)
- All available sorting options
- Persistence of sort order across searches
144-183: Enhance search functionality test coverage.Consider adding tests for:
- Empty search results
- Special characters in search
- Maximum length inputs
- Search with leading/trailing spaces
202-220: Add tests for modal interaction edge cases.Consider adding tests for:
- Attempting to open multiple modals simultaneously
- Modal keyboard navigation (Escape key)
- Modal form validation if applicable
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.test.tsx (1)
50-56: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The debounceWait utility function is well-implemented with proper React testing practices. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain its purpose and usage.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Utility function to wait for debounced operations in tests + * @param ms - The number of milliseconds to wait (defaults to 350ms) + * @returns Promise that resolves after the specified delay + */ const debounceWait = async (ms = 350): Promise<void> => {src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.tsx (1)
249-369: Consider additional features to enhance user experience.To better serve the admin portal requirements, consider adding:
- Export functionality to download the leaderboard data
- Persistence of user preferences for sorting and time frame filters
These enhancements would provide more value to administrators managing volunteer rankings. I can help implement these features if needed.
src/utils/interfaces.ts (2)
10-15: Consider aligning InterfaceUserInfo with InterfaceUserTypeThe new
InterfaceUserInfocould be more consistent with the existingInterfaceUserType. Consider adding theexport interface InterfaceUserInfo { _id: string; firstName: string; lastName: string; image?: string | null; + email: string; }
583-679: Consider implementing caching for volunteer rankingsThe volunteer-related interfaces are well-structured and support all the required functionalities. However, given that the rankings will be frequently accessed but infrequently updated, consider implementing caching at the application level.
Key considerations:
- Cache the volunteer rankings with a reasonable TTL
- Implement cache invalidation when volunteer hours are updated
- Consider using Redis or a similar caching solution for the leaderboard
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx (2)
288-294: Move inline styles to CSS module.Inline styles should be moved to the CSS module for better maintainability and consistency.
+ // In VolunteerManagement.module.css + .groupLabel { + font-size: 1rem; + color: grey; + } <Form.Label className="fw-lighter ms-2 mb-2 " - style={{ - fontSize: '1rem', - color: 'grey', - }} + className={styles.groupLabel} >
41-377: Consider splitting the component for better maintainability.The component currently handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused components:
EventSearch- Handle search and filter functionalityEventList- Display events and handle event-level volunteeringVolunteerGroups- Manage volunteer groups within an eventThis would improve maintainability, reusability, and testing.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx (1)
124-124: Improve type safety for refetch functionThe refetch function type should include the proper return type for better type safety.
- refetch: () => void; + refetch: () => Promise<{ data: { actionItemsByUser: InterfaceActionItemInfo[] } }>;src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (1)
24-43: Consider moving styles to a separate file.To improve code organization and separation of concerns, consider moving the
dataGridStyleobject to a separate CSS or styled-components file. This will make the component code more focused on the logic and structure.src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx (1)
25-29: Consider using a string enum for better type safety and readability.Instead of using a numeric enum, consider using a string enum for the
ModalState. This provides better type safety and readability.-enum ModalState { - SAME = 'same', - DELETE = 'delete', - VIEW = 'view', -} +enum ModalState { + SAME = 'SAME', + DELETE = 'DELETE', + VIEW = 'VIEW', +}src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx (1)
42-61: Consider moving styles to a separate file.While the styles are correctly applied to the
DataGridcomponent, it's generally recommended to keep the component logic separate from the styles for better maintainability and readability.Consider moving the
dataGridStyleobject to a separate CSS or styled-components file and importing it into the component.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.test.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx(7 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx(1 hunks)src/utils/interfaces.ts(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.test.tsx
- src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.test.tsx
- src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.test.tsx
- src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.test.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/testObject.mocks.ts
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.test.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.test.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (67)
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.test.tsx (3)
1-33: LGTM! Well-organized test setup with comprehensive imports.
The import statements and initial setup are properly structured, including all necessary testing utilities and proper initialization of i18n translations.
81-104: LGTM! Good error handling test for undefined URL parameters.
The test properly verifies the redirection behavior when URL parameters are missing.
1-221: Overall excellent test implementation with comprehensive coverage.
The test suite is well-structured and covers all major functionality of the Actions component. While there are some suggestions for additional test cases, the current implementation provides a solid foundation for ensuring the reliability of the volunteer actions feature.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.tsx (2)
1-29: LGTM! Well-organized imports and type definitions.
The imports are properly structured and the ItemFilter enum is well-defined.
1-301: Overall implementation looks good with room for improvements.
The component successfully implements the volunteer invitation management functionality as per the PR objectives. While the code is generally well-structured, consider implementing the suggested improvements for better reusability, performance, and maintainability.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.test.tsx (2)
125-126: LGTM! Improved test specificity.
The updated assertions now properly verify the exact count of name occurrences, making the test more robust and specific.
182-183: LGTM! Enhanced filtering test precision.
The assertions now verify exact category counts after filtering, providing better test coverage of the filtering functionality.
src/utils/interfaces.ts (4)
583-598: LGTM! Comprehensive volunteer tracking
The InterfaceEventVolunteerInfo properly tracks volunteer status, hours, assignments, and group memberships, aligning well with the PR objectives.
669-679: LGTM! Well-structured ranking interface
The InterfaceVolunteerRank properly supports the volunteer rankings leaderboard requirement with all necessary fields.
634-648: Verify event-volunteer relationship completeness
The InterfaceUserEvents extends InterfaceBaseEvent appropriately. However, let's verify that it captures all necessary volunteer-related information for the User portal requirements.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any additional volunteer-related fields in event queries
rg -A 5 "query.*Event.*\{" | rg "volunteer"
# Search for volunteer-related GraphQL fragments
rg "fragment.*on.*Event" | rg -A 10 "volunteer"45-49: Verify assignee type handling in the codebase
The introduction of assigneeType with corresponding nullable fields is a good pattern for type discrimination. However, we should verify that all code paths properly handle these types.
✅ Verification successful
Assignee type handling is properly implemented across the codebase
The verification shows comprehensive and consistent handling of the assignee types:
- Type discrimination is properly implemented using
assigneeTypechecks in multiple components:ItemViewModal.tsxuses type guards for rendering appropriate assignee informationItemModal.tsximplements proper form handling with radio buttons for assignee type selectionActions.tsxandOrganizationActionItems.tsxcorrectly handle conditional rendering based on assignee types
- Null checks are consistently used when accessing assignee properties (e.g.,
assignee?.user,assigneeGroup?.name) - The pattern is used consistently across test files, showing proper test coverage for different assignee types
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of assigneeType to ensure proper handling
rg -A 5 "assigneeType.*['\"](?:EventVolunteer|EventVolunteerGroup|User)['\"]"
# Search for potential null checks on assignee fields
rg "(?:assignee|assigneeGroup|assigneeUser)\s*\?\."
Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of assigneeType with proper escaping
rg "assigneeType.*['\"](?:EventVolunteer|EventVolunteerGroup|User)['\"]"
# Search for assignee-related fields access patterns
rg "assignee(Group|User)?\??\.|\bassignee\s*=|\bassignee\??\s*:"
# Look for type guards or conditional checks
rg "if.*assigneeType.*===.*['\"]|assigneeType\s+===\s+['\"]"
# Search for assignee-related interfaces and their usage
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Info {
$$$
assignee$_: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 11978
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx (1)
26-29: LGTM! Clean modal state management
The enum-based modal state management with TypeScript is well-implemented and type-safe.
Also applies to: 84-89
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (11)
1-22: LGTM!
The imports are well-organized and follow a logical order. The component imports the necessary dependencies, including React hooks, UI components, GraphQL queries and mutations, and utility functions.
45-51: Excellent documentation!
The component is well-documented with a clear description of its purpose and functionality. The JSDoc comment provides a concise overview of what the component does and what it returns.
52-64: LGTM!
The component properly handles the case when orgId or eventId is missing from the URL parameters by redirecting to the home page. This prevents the component from rendering with invalid data.
66-75: LGTM!
The component initializes the necessary state variables for search and sorting functionality. The useMemo hook is used to memoize the debounced search function, which optimizes performance by avoiding unnecessary re-creation of the function on each render.
77-99: LGTM!
The updateMembershipStatus function is implemented correctly. It uses the UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP mutation to update the membership status and handles the success and error cases appropriately. The function also triggers a refetch of the requests data after a successful update.
101-125: LGTM!
The component uses the useQuery hook from Apollo Client to fetch volunteer membership requests. The query variables are properly set based on the current search term and sorting preference. The refetch function is also destructured from the query result for later use.
127-130: LGTM!
The useMemo hook is used to memoize the requests data based on the requestsData. This optimization ensures that the requests array is only recomputed when the requestsData changes, preventing unnecessary re-renders.
132-148: LGTM!
The component handles the loading and error states of the requests query appropriately. It displays a loader while the data is being fetched and renders an error message if there is an issue loading the requests. The error message includes the specific error details for better debugging.
150-251: LGTM!
The columns array is well-structured and defines the columns for the data grid. Each column has appropriate properties such as field, headerName, flex, align, and headerAlign. The renderCell property is used to customize the rendering of cell contents for specific columns like "Volunteer" and "Options".
253-338: LGTM!
The component's return statement is well-organized and properly renders the UI elements. It includes a search input, sorting dropdown, and the data grid component. The data grid is conditionally rendered based on the presence of requests data, and a "No Requests" message is displayed if there are no requests available.
340-340: LGTM!
The component is correctly exported as the default export, making it accessible for importing in other files.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx (12)
1-4: LGTM!
The imports are well-organized and follow a logical order. The necessary dependencies for the component, such as React hooks, UI components, and routing utilities, are properly imported.
Also applies to: 6-8, 10-17, 22-22
25-28: LGTM!
The ModalState enum and dataGridStyle object are properly defined and follow the TypeScript syntax. The enum provides a clear way to manage the modal states, and the dataGridStyle object encapsulates the custom styles for the data grid component.
Also applies to: 30-49
51-55: LGTM!
The component's JSDoc comment provides a clear description of its purpose and functionality. The necessary translations and local storage utilities are properly set up using the useTranslation and useLocalStorage hooks. The component's state is managed using the useState hook, covering the selected group, search value, search term, sorting preferences, and modal visibility.
Also applies to: 56-62, 73-85, 87-90
92-118: LGTM!
The EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST query is properly executed using the useQuery hook from Apollo Client. The necessary variables, such as userId, orgId, search criteria, and sorting preferences, are passed to the query. The loading state, error handling, and data destructuring are correctly managed.
120-132: LGTM!
The openModal, closeModal, and handleModalClick functions are properly defined to manage the modal visibility and the selected group. The useCallback hook is correctly used to memoize the handleModalClick function and its dependencies.
134-137: LGTM!
The groups variable is memoized using the useMemo hook, ensuring that it only re-computes when the groupsData changes. This optimization helps prevent unnecessary re-renders of the component.
139-154: LGTM!
The component properly handles the loading state and error scenarios. When the groupsLoading is true, a Loader component is rendered to indicate the loading progress. If there is an error (groupsError), an error message is displayed with the appropriate styling and icon.
156-285: LGTM!
The columns array is well-structured and defines the columns for the data grid component. Each column object specifies the necessary properties, such as field name, header text, alignment, sorting, and custom cell rendering. The renderCell property is effectively used to render custom components for each cell, such as group name, leader details, action counts, and options.
287-415: LGTM!
The component's return statement is properly structured and includes the necessary elements:
- The header section with search input, search by dropdown, and sort dropdown is correctly implemented. The search input is debounced to optimize performance, and the selected search by and sort options are stored in the component's state.
- The
DataGridcomponent is properly configured with the necessary props, such asdisableColumnMenu,hideFooter,getRowId,slotsfor custom overlays, styling, row height, and column definitions. Thegroupsdata is correctly mapped to therowsprop. - The
GroupModalandVolunteerGroupViewModalcomponents are conditionally rendered based on the selected group and modal visibility state. The necessary props, such asisOpen,hide,refetchGroups,group, andeventId, are passed to the modals.
417-417: LGTM!
The component is correctly exported as the default export, making it accessible for importing in other files.
63-64: Verify the existence and validity of the userId and orgId.
Ensure that the userId and orgId are properly retrieved from the local storage and URL parameters, respectively. Validate that they are not null or undefined before using them in the query.
Run the following script to verify the existence and validity of userId and orgId:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and validity of `userId` and `orgId`.
# Test: Check if the `userId` exists in the local storage. Expect: `userId` should exist and not be null or undefined.
if [ -n "$(jq -r '.userId' localStorage.json)" ]; then
echo "userId exists in the local storage."
else
echo "userId is missing or invalid in the local storage."
fi
# Test: Check if the `orgId` exists in the URL parameters. Expect: `orgId` should exist and not be null or undefined.
if [ -n "$(echo "$QUERY_PARAMS" | sed -n 's/.*orgId=\([^&]*\).*/\1/p')" ]; then
echo "orgId exists in the URL parameters."
else
echo "orgId is missing or invalid in the URL parameters."
fiAlso applies to: 66-71
20-20: Verify the import paths for consistency.
Double-check that the import paths for EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST and GroupModal are correct and consistent with the project's file structure.
Run the following script to verify the import paths:
Also applies to: 23-23
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the import paths using a different approach.
Import paths are correctly configured
The verification confirms that:
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LISTis exported fromsrc/GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries.tsGroupModal.tsxexists atsrc/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.tsx
Both import paths in the code match the actual file locations in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the import paths for `EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST` and `GroupModal`.
# Test: Check if the files exist at the specified paths. Expect: Both files should exist.
if [ -f "src/GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries.ts" ] && [ -f "src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/GroupModal.tsx" ]; then
echo "Import paths are correct."
else
echo "Import paths are incorrect. Please verify the file locations."
fi
Length of output: 414
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the GraphQL queries file
echo "Searching for EventVolunteerQueries file:"
fd -e ts -e tsx EventVolunteerQueries
echo -e "\nSearching for GroupModal file:"
fd GroupModal.tsx
echo -e "\nVerifying the EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST export:"
rg "export.*EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
Length of output: 665
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx (14)
1-4: LGTM!
The imports are correctly organized and follow the project's conventions.
10-23: LGTM!
The imports are correctly organized and follow the project's conventions. The component imports the necessary types, components, styles, queries, and sub-components.
31-50: LGTM!
The dataGridStyle object is correctly defined using the Material-UI styling syntax. It applies the necessary styles to the DataGrid component.
52-56: LGTM!
The component documentation is clear and concise, providing an overview of the component's purpose and functionality.
57-69: LGTM!
The component correctly retrieves the necessary translations and URL parameters. It also handles the case when the required parameters are missing by navigating to the root route.
71-85: LGTM!
The component correctly initializes the necessary state variables using the useState hook. The state variables are typed correctly and have appropriate initial values.
87-111: LGTM!
The component correctly uses the useQuery hook from Apollo Client to fetch the list of volunteer groups for the event. It passes the necessary variables and options to the query.
113-128: LGTM!
The component defines the openModal and closeModal functions to handle the visibility of different modals based on the ModalState. It also defines the handleModalClick function to set the selected group and open the appropriate modal.
130-133: LGTM!
The component uses the useMemo hook to memoize the debounced search function, which is triggered when the search value changes. This optimization prevents unnecessary re-renders.
135-138: LGTM!
The component uses the useMemo hook to memoize the groups variable, which is derived from the groupsData query result. This optimization prevents unnecessary re-renders.
140-155: LGTM!
The component correctly handles the loading and error states of the groupsData query. It displays a loader while the data is being fetched and an error message if the query fails.
157-293: LGTM!
The component defines the columns array for the DataGrid component. Each column is configured with the necessary properties such as field, header name, alignment, sorting, and custom cell rendering. The custom cell rendering is implemented correctly for each column.
295-443: LGTM!
The component's return statement is well-structured and includes the necessary elements:
- Header with search, filter, and create button
- DataGrid component with the defined columns and rows
- VolunteerGroupModal component for creating and editing groups
- VolunteerGroupViewModal component for viewing group details
- VolunteerGroupDeleteModal component for deleting groups
The component correctly passes the necessary props and handlers to each sub-component.
446-446: LGTM!
The component is correctly exported as the default export of the module.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx (18)
1-4: LGTM!
The imports are relevant and necessary for the component's functionality.
6-12: LGTM!
The imports from @mui/icons-material are used appropriately within the component for rendering icons.
14-28: LGTM!
The imports are relevant and necessary for the component's functionality, including:
- Apollo Client for data fetching
- UI components like
Loader,DataGrid,Avatar - GraphQL queries
- Type definitions
- Child components for modals
30-34: LGTM!
The VolunteerStatus enum is used effectively for filtering the volunteer list based on their acceptance status.
36-40: LGTM!
The ModalState enum is used appropriately to manage the state of different modal dialogs within the component.
63-69: LGTM!
The component documentation provides a clear overview of the component's purpose and functionality.
70-82: LGTM!
- The
useTranslationhook is used correctly to access localized strings. - The
orgIdandeventIdare retrieved from the URL parameters using theuseParamshook. - The component correctly handles the case when
orgIdoreventIdis missing by redirecting to the home page.
84-98: LGTM!
The component maintains the necessary state variables using the useState hook, including:
volunteerfor the selected volunteersearchValueandsearchTermfor searching volunteerssortByfor sorting volunteersstatusfor filtering volunteers by acceptance statusmodalStatefor managing the visibility of different modal dialogs
100-117: LGTM!
The openModal, closeModal, and handleOpenModal functions are implemented correctly to manage the state of modal dialogs and the selected volunteer.
119-146: LGTM!
- The
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_LISTquery is used appropriately to fetch the list of event volunteers. - The
useQueryhook is utilized correctly to execute the query and handle loading state, errors, and refetching. - The query variables are dynamically set based on the component's state (
status,searchTerm,sortBy).
148-151: LGTM!
The useMemo hook is used effectively with debounce to optimize the search functionality and avoid unnecessary API calls.
153-156: LGTM!
The useMemo hook is used appropriately to memoize the volunteers data and avoid unnecessary re-renders.
158-171: LGTM!
The component correctly handles the loading state and errors:
- It renders a
Loadercomponent when the data is being fetched. - It displays an error message with an appropriate icon when there's an error fetching the data.
173-308: LGTM!
The columns array is defined correctly for the DataGrid component, including:
- Appropriate column definitions for volunteer name, status, hours volunteered, actions completed, and options.
- Custom rendering of cells using the
renderCellproperty. - Proper usage of styles and CSS modules.
- Correct handling of user interactions (e.g., opening modal dialogs).
310-433: LGTM!
The component's rendering logic is implemented correctly:
- The header section includes search functionality, sorting and filtering dropdowns, and an "Add Volunteer" button.
- The
DataGridcomponent is used to display the list of volunteers with the defined columns and styles. - The
slotsproperty is used to render a custom overlay when there are no volunteers. - The
rowsproperty is populated with thevolunteersdata, including anidfield.
435-441: LGTM!
The VolunteerCreateModal component is used correctly, passing the necessary props:
isOpenprop to control the visibility of the modalhideprop to close the modaleventIdandorgIdprops for creating a new volunteerrefetchVolunteersprop to refetch the list of volunteers after creating a new one
443-457: LGTM!
The VolunteerViewModal and VolunteerDeleteModal components are conditionally rendered based on the selected volunteer and the modalState.
- The
isOpenprop controls the visibility of the modals. - The
hideprop is used to close the modals. - The
volunteerprop passes the selected volunteer to the modals. - The
refetchVolunteersprop is passed to theVolunteerDeleteModalto refetch the list of volunteers after deleting one.
462-462: LGTM!
The component is exported correctly as a default export.
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
|
Please make the changes to make CodeRabbit approve the PR |
|
Please also fix the conflicting file |
|
Taking a look |
|
@GlenDsza please rebase the branch. |
|
Please don't merge this PR, I am yet to take synopsis of this PR from Glen. Will take it today and get this one closed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 26
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.test.tsx (5)
24-29: Consider using a type-safe mock for toast notifications.While the current mock implementation works, it could benefit from being more type-safe by explicitly defining the mock types.
-jest.mock('react-toastify', () => ({ +import type { Toast } from 'react-toastify'; + +jest.mock('react-toastify', (): { toast: Partial<typeof Toast> } => ({ toast: { success: jest.fn(), error: jest.fn(), }, }));
43-51: Consider making the translation setup more robust.The current implementation uses optional chaining which could potentially return undefined. Consider adding fallback values or type assertions to ensure type safety.
const t = { ...JSON.parse( JSON.stringify( - i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers ?? {}, + i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.eventVolunteers || {}, ), ), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})), - ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})), + ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common || {})), + ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors || {})), };
31-37: Consider adding type safety to the debounce utility.The debounce utility function could benefit from explicit return type annotation and error handling.
-const debounceWait = async (ms = 300): Promise<void> => { +const debounceWait = async (ms = 300): Promise<true> => { await act(() => { - return new Promise((resolve) => { + return new Promise<true>((resolve) => { setTimeout(resolve, ms); }); }); + return true; };
118-147: Enhance sorting test coverage.The sorting test could be more comprehensive by:
- Testing the initial sort state
- Verifying the sort icon state
- Testing the complete sorted list, not just the first item
it('Check Sorting Functionality', async () => { renderRequests(link1); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('searchBy')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); + // Verify initial sort state + let volunteerName = await screen.findAllByTestId('volunteerName'); + const initialNames = volunteerName.map(el => el.textContent); + let sortBtn = await screen.findByTestId('sort'); expect(sortBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); // Sort by createdAt_DESC fireEvent.click(sortBtn); const createdAtDESC = await screen.findByTestId('createdAt_DESC'); expect(createdAtDESC).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.click(createdAtDESC); - let volunteerName = await screen.findAllByTestId('volunteerName'); - expect(volunteerName[0]).toHaveTextContent('Teresa Bradley'); + volunteerName = await screen.findAllByTestId('volunteerName'); + const descNames = volunteerName.map(el => el.textContent); + expect(descNames).not.toEqual(initialNames); + expect(descNames).toEqual(['Teresa Bradley', 'John Doe']); // Sort by createdAt_ASC sortBtn = await screen.findByTestId('sort'); expect(sortBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.click(sortBtn); const createdAtASC = await screen.findByTestId('createdAt_ASC'); expect(createdAtASC).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.click(createdAtASC); volunteerName = await screen.findAllByTestId('volunteerName'); - expect(volunteerName[0]).toHaveTextContent('John Doe'); + const ascNames = volunteerName.map(el => el.textContent); + expect(ascNames).not.toEqual(descNames); + expect(ascNames).toEqual(['John Doe', 'Teresa Bradley']); });
149-163: Enhance search test coverage.The search test could be more robust by:
- Testing empty search results
- Testing case sensitivity
- Testing search by partial name
it('Search Requests by volunteer name', async () => { renderRequests(link1); const searchInput = await screen.findByTestId('searchBy'); expect(searchInput).toBeInTheDocument(); - // Search by name on press of ENTER + // Test exact match userEvent.type(searchInput, 'T'); await debounceWait(); await waitFor(() => { const volunteerName = screen.getAllByTestId('volunteerName'); expect(volunteerName[0]).toHaveTextContent('Teresa Bradley'); }); + + // Test case sensitivity + userEvent.clear(searchInput); + userEvent.type(searchInput, 't'); + await debounceWait(); + + await waitFor(() => { + const volunteerName = screen.getAllByTestId('volunteerName'); + expect(volunteerName[0]).toHaveTextContent('Teresa Bradley'); + }); + + // Test no results + userEvent.clear(searchInput); + userEvent.type(searchInput, 'xyz'); + await debounceWait(); + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(screen.getByText(t.noRequests)).toBeInTheDocument(); + }); });src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx (1)
191-198: Consider adding loading state for images.Add loading and error handling states for the image to improve user experience.
- <img - src={image} - alt="Assignee" - data-testid={`image${_id + 1}`} - className={styles.TableImage} - /> + <img + src={image} + alt="Assignee" + data-testid={`image${_id + 1}`} + className={styles.TableImage} + loading="lazy" + onError={(e) => { + e.currentTarget.onerror = null; + e.currentTarget.style.display = 'none'; + }} + />src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx (2)
1-24: Consider organizing imports by category.While the imports are functional, they could be better organized. Consider grouping them into these categories with a blank line between each:
- React and routing
- Third-party UI libraries
- GraphQL/Apollo
- Local components and utilities
import React, { useCallback, useMemo, useState } from 'react'; import { useTranslation } from 'react-i18next'; -import { Button, Dropdown, Form } from 'react-bootstrap'; import { Navigate, useParams } from 'react-router-dom'; + +import { Button, Dropdown, Form } from 'react-bootstrap'; +import { Search, Sort, WarningAmberRounded } from '@mui/icons-material'; +import { DataGrid, type GridCellParams, type GridColDef } from '@mui/x-data-grid'; +import { debounce, Stack } from '@mui/material'; -import { Search, Sort, WarningAmberRounded } from '@mui/icons-material'; - import { useQuery } from '@apollo/client'; -import type { InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo } from 'utils/interfaces'; +import type { InterfaceVolunteerGroupInfo } from 'utils/interfaces'; import Loader from 'components/Loader/Loader'; -import { - DataGrid, - type GridCellParams, - type GridColDef, -} from '@mui/x-data-grid'; -import { debounce, Stack } from '@mui/material'; import Avatar from 'components/Avatar/Avatar'; import styles from '../EventVolunteers.module.css'; import { EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LIST } from 'GraphQl/Queries/EventVolunteerQueries';
296-387: Move inline styles to CSS module.Several elements contain inline styles that should be moved to the CSS module for better maintainability:
// In EventVolunteers.module.css +.searchButton { + margin-bottom: 10px; +} + +.createButton { + margin-top: 11px; +} // In component -<Button - style={{ marginBottom: '10px' }} - // ... -> +<Button + className={styles.searchButton} + // ... > -<Button - style={{ marginTop: '11px' }} - // ... -> +<Button + className={styles.createButton} + // ... >src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx (2)
55-58: Enhance error handling for missing parameters.Consider showing a user-friendly error message before redirecting when
orgIdoruserIdis missing.if (!orgId || !userId) { + toast.error(tErrors('missingParameters')); return <Navigate to={'/'} replace />; }
286-292: Move inline styles to CSS module.Inline styles should be moved to the CSS module for better maintainability and consistency.
-<Form.Label - className="fw-lighter ms-2 mb-2" - style={{ - fontSize: '1rem', - color: 'grey', - }} -> +<Form.Label className={`${styles.formLabel} fw-lighter ms-2 mb-2`}>Add to CSS module:
.formLabel { font-size: 1rem; color: grey; }public/locales/en/translation.json (3)
2-13: Consider consolidating duplicate "no volunteers" messages.The "noVolunteers" message appears in both the leaderboard and dashboard sections with slightly different text:
leaderboard.noVolunteers: "No Volunteers Found!"dashboard.noVolunteers: "No Volunteers Found!"Consider consolidating these into a single reusable message to maintain consistency and ease maintenance.
Also applies to: 282-283
1366-1408: Consider adding specific error handling messages.While the success messages are well-defined, consider adding corresponding error messages for failed operations:
- Volunteer addition failure
- Volunteer removal failure
- Group creation/update/deletion failures
- Request acceptance/rejection failures
This would help provide better user feedback when operations fail.
1409-1440: Consider enhancing message clarity for better user experience.Some messages could be more descriptive:
- "Volunteered" could be "Successfully volunteered for event"
- "Joined" could be "Successfully joined volunteer group"
- Consider adding tooltips for action buttons ("join", "accept", "reject")
This would help users better understand the results of their actions.
public/locales/hi/translation.json (1)
1366-1408: Consider improving the translation for "Volunteer Groups".While most translations in the event volunteers section are accurate, consider revising the translation for "Volunteer Groups":
- "volunteerGroups": "स्वयंसेवक समूह", + "volunteerGroups": "स्वयंसेवक दल"The term "दल" might be more appropriate in this context as it better conveys the concept of an organized group working together, which is more aligned with the volunteer management feature's purpose.
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)
443-491: Consider standardizing capitalization in action items section.While the translations are accurate, there's inconsistent capitalization in the French text. Some terms start with capital letters while similar terms don't.
Consider standardizing the capitalization. In French, unlike English, it's conventional to only capitalize the first word of a title/heading. Apply this diff:
- "actionItemCategory": "Catégorie de l'Action", - "actionItemDetails": "Détails de l'Action", + "actionItemCategory": "Catégorie de l'action", + "actionItemDetails": "Détails de l'action"public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)
443-491: Consider revising the translation for action item states.While most translations are accurate, consider using more natural Spanish expressions for action item states:
- "actionItemActive": "Acción Activa", + "actionItemActive": "Acción en Curso", - "actionItemStatus": "Estado de la Acción", + "actionItemStatus": "Estado de la Tarea",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)public/locales/en/translation.json(6 hunks)public/locales/fr/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/hi/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/sp/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/zh/translation.json(5 hunks)src/App.tsx(5 hunks)src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.test.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx(7 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- .github/workflows/pull-request.yml
- src/App.tsx
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts
- src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.test.tsx
- src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.test.tsx
- src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.test.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.test.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.test.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.test.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Invitations/Invitations.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2397
File: src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx:367-374
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T16:18:01.545Z
Learning: In the `src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx` file, the search button intentionally includes `tabIndex={-1}`. This is acceptable for our application, and future reviews should not flag this as an accessibility concern.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2397
File: src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx:94-115
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T16:20:31.294Z
Learning: In the TypeScript files of this project, avoid suggesting explicit response types for `useQuery` calls unless necessary, as the team prefers to rely on TypeScript's type inference.
🔇 Additional comments (42)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.test.tsx (1)
1-232: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage with room for minor improvements.
The test file provides thorough coverage of the Requests component functionality, including:
- URL parameter handling
- Sorting and searching
- Request acceptance/rejection
- Error scenarios
- Empty state handling
The suggested improvements above would make the tests even more robust, but the current implementation is already solid.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.test.tsx (4)
50-56: LGTM! Well-implemented debounce utility.
The debounceWait utility function correctly uses act() to handle React state updates during the timeout, and the 300ms default timeout aligns with the component's implementation.
125-126: LGTM! More precise assertions.
The updated assertions using getAllByText().toHaveLength(2) provide better test coverage by verifying the exact number of occurrences for each name, rather than just checking for existence.
182-183: LGTM! Enhanced category count verification.
The assertions now properly verify the exact number of category occurrences (3 for "Category 1" and 2 for "Category 2"), providing more thorough test coverage.
312-313: Skip comment - previously addressed.
The debounce wait calls were already reviewed and approved in past comments, confirming the alignment with the component's 300ms debounce timing.
Also applies to: 337-337
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (2)
1-23: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are logically grouped and all are being utilized in the component.
104-125: Verify GraphQL query parameters.
The component's integration with the backend looks correct, but let's verify the GraphQL query parameters match the API schema.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL query parameters match the schema
The query parameters in the component match the GraphQL schema:
- The query accepts
where: VolunteerMembershipWhereInputandorderBy: VolunteerMembershipOrderByInputparameters - The component correctly passes these parameters with:
where: { eventId, status: 'requested', userName: searchTerm }orderBy: sortBy
- The returned fields (
_id,status,createdAt,event) are part of the query definition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GraphQL schema definitions for volunteer membership
ast-grep --pattern 'type VolunteerMembership {
$$$
}'
# Search for the query definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type Query {
$$$
getVolunteerMembership($$$): $$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for the GraphQL query file and schema definitions
fd -e graphql -e gql . --exec cat {}
# Also search for the query constant definition in TypeScript files
rg "USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP\s*=\s*gql|USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP.*=.*`" -A 5
Length of output: 28844
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the query definition in TypeScript files
rg "const USER_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP\s*=\s*gql" -A 10
# Also search for any GraphQL type definitions related to volunteer membership
rg "type\s+(Volunteer|VolunteerMembership)\s*\{" -A 10
Length of output: 907
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Groups/Groups.tsx (3)
1-24: LGTM! Well-organized imports and type definitions.
The imports are logically grouped and all dependencies are properly utilized in the component.
395-410: LGTM! Clean modal implementation.
The modal handling is well-structured with proper state management and conditional rendering.
95-118: Verify the undefined eventId in GraphQL query.
The eventId is set to undefined in the query variables. This might cause unexpected behavior if the backend expects a valid event ID.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx (3)
71-111: LGTM! Well-implemented state management and GraphQL integration.
The implementation shows good practices:
- Proper separation of immediate and debounced search state
- Well-structured GraphQL query with typed variables
- Comprehensive error handling
414-439: LGTM! Clean modal integration.
The modal implementation demonstrates good practices:
- Clear separation of concerns with different modal components
- Efficient conditional rendering
- Proper prop passing for state management
1-444: Verify component alignment with PR objectives.
The implementation successfully addresses the PR objectives for volunteer group management:
- ✅ CRUD operations for volunteer groups
- ✅ Search and filter functionality
- ✅ Group member management
- ✅ Comprehensive test coverage (data-testid attributes present)
However, let's verify the integration with the backend API endpoints.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the GraphQL mutations for CRUD operations.
Let me check how these mutations are used in the modal components.
Let me check the content of the VolunteerGroupModal component to verify the create/update mutation usage.
Let me check the actual mutation definitions to verify the naming consistency.
All GraphQL operations for volunteer group management are properly integrated
The implementation successfully integrates all necessary GraphQL operations:
- ✅ Query:
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_LISTfor fetching groups - ✅ Mutations:
CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUPfor creating groupsUPDATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUPfor editing groupsDELETE_VOLUNTEER_GROUPfor removing groups
- ✅ Proper error handling and success notifications
- ✅ Consistent refetching after mutations
The component's implementation aligns perfectly with the PR objectives and maintains proper integration with the backend API endpoints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify GraphQL query/mutation usage consistency
echo "Checking GraphQL operation usage..."
rg -A 2 "EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP" --type ts
Length of output: 8145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for GraphQL mutations in VolunteerGroup related files
echo "Checking GraphQL mutations..."
rg -A 2 "mutation.*VolunteerGroup" --type ts
# Check modal components for mutation usage
echo -e "\nChecking modal components..."
rg -A 5 "useMutation.*VolunteerGroup" --type ts
Length of output: 998
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check VolunteerGroupModal and VolunteerGroupDeleteModal for mutation usage
echo "Checking mutation usage in modal components..."
rg -A 10 "CREATE_EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP|UPDATE_EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP|REMOVE_EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP" --type ts
# Also check for any imports of these mutations
echo -e "\nChecking mutation imports..."
rg "import.*EventVolunteerMutation" --type ts
Length of output: 1668
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check VolunteerGroupModal implementation
echo "Checking VolunteerGroupModal implementation..."
cat src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupModal.tsx
# Also check for any renamed mutation imports
echo -e "\nChecking for renamed mutation imports..."
rg "CREATE_EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP as|UPDATE_EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP as" --type ts
Length of output: 11769
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the mutation definitions in EventVolunteerMutation.ts
echo "Checking mutation definitions..."
cat src/GraphQl/Mutations/EventVolunteerMutation.ts
# Also check if there are any other files importing these mutations
echo -e "\nChecking all mutation imports in VolunteerGroups directory..."
rg "CREATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP|UPDATE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP|DELETE_VOLUNTEER_GROUP" src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/
Length of output: 4950
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.tsx (2)
70-91:
Improve error handling in volunteer membership creation.
The current implementation exposes raw error messages to users. Consider using translated, user-friendly error messages.
} catch (error) {
- toast.error((error as Error).message);
+ console.error('Volunteer membership creation failed:', error);
+ toast.error(t('volunteerError'));
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
59-62: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a single search state object.
The component maintains separate states for search functionality. Consider combining related states into a single object for better maintainability.
-const [searchValue, setSearchValue] = useState<string>('');
-const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState<string>('');
-const [searchBy, setSearchBy] = useState<'title' | 'location'>('title');
+const [searchState, setSearchState] = useState({
+ value: '',
+ term: '',
+ by: 'title' as 'title' | 'location'
+});Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx (4)
59-59: Component name should follow React naming convention
The component name should be in PascalCase as per React naming conventions.
Also applies to: 471-471
75-89: Consider consolidating related state variables
The component uses multiple separate state variables for related functionality (search, filter, modal). Consider using a reducer or combining related state into objects for better maintainability.
91-94: Consider using a dedicated debouncing utility
The current implementation uses MUI's internal debounce utility. For better reliability and maintainability, consider using a dedicated utility like lodash/debounce.
451-466: LGTM! Clean modal implementation
The modal implementation is well-structured with:
- Proper conditional rendering
- Clean separation of concerns
- Type-safe state management
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (4)
160-163: LGTM: Well-implemented debounced search!
The implementation correctly separates the input value from the debounced search term, providing immediate visual feedback while optimizing backend queries.
Also applies to: 400-402
287-298: LGTM: Correct spelling and proper null handling
The column implementation properly handles null/undefined values and uses the correct spelling for "allotted".
551-571: Verify null handling for different modal types
While conditionally rendering modals is good for performance, verify that all modal types handle a null actionItem appropriately. The view modal might have different requirements than delete/status modals.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if modal components have proper null checks for actionItem prop
# Search for prop type definitions and null checks in modal components
echo "Checking ItemViewModal prop types and null handling:"
rg -A 5 "interface.*Props|type.*Props" --glob "src/screens/**/Item*Modal.{ts,tsx}"
echo "\nChecking null checks in modal components:"
rg "(\?|null|undefined).*actionItem|actionItem.*(\?|null|undefined)" --glob "src/screens/**/Item*Modal.{ts,tsx}"543-543: Verify eventId prop handling in ItemModal
The addition of eventId prop aligns with the PR objectives, but we should verify its implementation in the ItemModal component.
✅ Verification successful
eventId prop is properly implemented in ItemModal
The verification shows that the eventId prop is:
- Correctly typed as optional in the
ItemModalPropsinterface:eventId?: string - Properly passed through the component parameters
- Used appropriately in:
- GraphQL queries for volunteer and group lists with proper variables
- Conditionally included in mutation variables:
...(eventId && { eventId }) - UI rendering logic:
{eventId && ( ... )}for assignee selection
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper typing and usage of eventId prop in ItemModal
# Check prop types definition
echo "Checking ItemModal prop types:"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ItemModalProps {
$$$
eventId$_
$$$
}'
# Check eventId usage in mutations/queries
echo "\nChecking eventId usage in GraphQL operations:"
rg "eventId.*\(" --glob "src/screens/**/ItemModal.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 619
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive verification approach
# Check ItemModal component implementation
echo "Checking ItemModal implementation:"
rg -A 10 "interface ItemModalProps" --glob "src/screens/**/ItemModal.{ts,tsx}"
# Check how eventId is used in the component
echo "\nChecking eventId usage in ItemModal:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "eventId" --glob "src/screens/**/ItemModal.{ts,tsx}"
# Check for any GraphQL operations using eventId
echo "\nChecking GraphQL operations with eventId:"
rg "useQuery|useMutation.*eventId" --glob "src/screens/**/ItemModal.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 3556
public/locales/zh/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM! Leaderboard translations are accurate and well-structured.
The Chinese translations for the leaderboard section appropriately convey the intended meaning and maintain consistency in terminology.
281-283: LGTM! Dashboard translations maintain consistency.
The translations for volunteer-related items in the dashboard section maintain consistency with other sections.
1366-1408: LGTM! Event volunteers section is well translated.
The translations for volunteer management features are accurate and maintain consistency in terminology throughout the section.
Line range hint 1-1439: Overall translation quality is good with consistent terminology.
The Chinese translations effectively convey the intended meaning while maintaining consistency in terminology for volunteer-related features. The only minor improvement needed is standardizing date-related terms.
public/locales/en/translation.json (2)
754-758: LGTM!
The event management section updates appropriately integrate volunteer-related functionality while maintaining consistent naming conventions.
Line range hint 2-1440: Overall implementation looks good!
The translation additions:
- Follow consistent naming conventions
- Provide comprehensive coverage for volunteer features
- Align well with the PR objectives
- Maintain good organization and structure
The changes effectively support the new volunteer management functionality in both Admin and User portals.
public/locales/hi/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are accurate and consistent.
The Hindi translations for the leaderboard section are linguistically accurate and maintain consistency with the application's terminology. The translations properly convey the intended meaning while being natural in Hindi.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard volunteer-related translations are accurate.
The translations for volunteer-related entries in the dashboard section are correct and maintain consistency with the terminology used in other sections.
443-491: LGTM: Action items translations are well-structured and accurate.
The translations for action items maintain proper Hindi grammar and are consistent with the application's terminology. The translations effectively convey the technical concepts while being natural in Hindi.
1409-1439: LGTM: User volunteer section translations are complete and accurate.
The translations in the user volunteer section are linguistically accurate and maintain consistency with the application's terminology. The translations effectively convey the volunteer management concepts while being natural in Hindi.
public/locales/fr/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM! Leaderboard translations are well-structured and accurate.
The French translations for the leaderboard section are linguistically accurate and maintain consistency with the application's terminology.
281-283: LGTM! Dashboard translations maintain consistency.
The volunteer rankings translations in the dashboard section align well with the leaderboard terminology.
1366-1408: LGTM! Event volunteers translations are comprehensive.
The translations for the event volunteers section are complete and accurately convey the volunteer management functionality. The terminology is consistent with other sections.
1409-1439: Consider adding missing translations for volunteer dashboard elements.
The translations for the user volunteer section are good, but there might be missing translations for some dashboard elements mentioned in the PR objectives.
Let's verify if all required translations are present:
Consider adding translations for any dashboard-specific elements found in the English file.
public/locales/sp/translation.json (5)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are semantically accurate and consistent.
The Spanish translations for the leaderboard section maintain semantic accuracy while using natural Spanish expressions. For example, "Tabla de Clasificación" is an appropriate translation for "leaderboard" in this context.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard translations maintain consistency with existing terminology.
The translations for the new dashboard keys follow the established patterns and maintain consistency with existing translations in the dashboard section.
755-759: LGTM: Event management translations are concise and clear.
The translations for event management maintain brevity while clearly conveying the meaning. The translation "Voluntarios" for "Volunteers" is consistent with its usage throughout the file.
1367-1409: LGTM: Event volunteers section translations are comprehensive and accurate.
The translations for the event volunteers section are well-structured and maintain consistency with the volunteer-related terminology used throughout the application. The translations appropriately convey the hierarchical relationship between volunteers and volunteer groups.
1410-1440: LGTM: User volunteer section translations maintain semantic accuracy.
The translations for the user volunteer section accurately convey the meaning while using natural Spanish expressions. The invitation-related messages are particularly well-translated, maintaining formality and clarity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
public/locales/zh/translation.json (1)
1439-1440: Enhance invitation message translations.The invitation subject lines could be more descriptive in Chinese to better convey their purpose.
Consider this enhancement:
- "groupInvitationSubject": "邀请加入志愿者小组", - "eventInvitationSubject": "邀请参加活动志愿服务" + "groupInvitationSubject": "志愿者小组邀请函", + "eventInvitationSubject": "活动志愿服务邀请函"public/locales/en/translation.json (2)
1367-1409: Maintain consistent message formatting.While the translations are comprehensive, there are some inconsistencies in message formatting:
- Some success messages end with "successfully" while others don't
- Some confirmation messages have question marks while others don't
Consider standardizing the message format:
- "volunteerAdded": "Volunteer added successfully", - "volunteerRemoved": "Volunteer removed successfully", - "volunteerGroupCreated": "Volunteer group created successfully", - "removeVolunteerMsg": "Are you sure you want to remove this Volunteer?", - "deleteVolunteerGroupMsg": "Are you sure you want to delete this Volunteer Group?", + "volunteerAdded": "Volunteer added successfully.", + "volunteerRemoved": "Volunteer removed successfully.", + "volunteerGroupCreated": "Volunteer group created successfully.", + "removeVolunteerMsg": "Are you sure you want to remove this Volunteer?", + "deleteVolunteerGroupMsg": "Are you sure you want to delete this Volunteer Group?"
1410-1440: Standardize invitation subjects and success messages.The translations need consistent formatting for invitation subjects and success messages:
Consider these improvements:
- "invitationAccepted": "Invitation accepted successfully", - "invitationRejected": "Invitation rejected successfully", - "volunteerSuccess": "Requested to volunteer successfully", - "groupInvitationSubject": "Invitation to join volunteer group", - "eventInvitationSubject": "Invitation to volunteer for event" + "invitationAccepted": "Invitation accepted successfully.", + "invitationRejected": "Invitation rejected successfully.", + "volunteerSuccess": "Requested to volunteer successfully.", + "groupInvitationSubject": "Invitation to Join Volunteer Group", + "eventInvitationSubject": "Invitation to Volunteer for Event"public/locales/hi/translation.json (1)
444-492: Consider refining terminology for better clarity.While the translations are functionally correct, consider these improvements for better user understanding:
- "प्राप्तकर्ता" (assignee) could be changed to "कार्य प्राप्तकर्ता" to be more specific about the role
- "स्वयंसेवक समूह" (volunteer groups) could include "दल" as it's more commonly used in organizational contexts
These changes would make the terms more intuitive for Hindi-speaking users while maintaining consistency with common organizational terminology.
public/locales/fr/translation.json (2)
444-492: Consider standardizing capitalization in action items section.While the translations are accurate, there's inconsistent capitalization in the French translations. Some terms start with capital letters while similar terms don't.
Consider standardizing the capitalization. In French, only the first word of a title/label typically starts with a capital letter. Apply this diff:
- "actionItemCategory": "Catégorie de l'Action", - "actionItemDetails": "Détails de l'Action", - "actionItemCompleted": "Action Terminée", + "actionItemCategory": "Catégorie de l'action", + "actionItemDetails": "Détails de l'action", + "actionItemCompleted": "Action terminée",
1410-1440: Consider improving translation consistency in volunteer dashboard.While most translations are accurate, there are some inconsistencies in how similar terms are translated:
- "Latest" is translated as both "Le Plus Récent" and "Reçu le Plus Récemment"
- Inconsistent capitalization of "Plus" and "Premier"
Consider standardizing these translations for better consistency:
- "receivedLatest": "Reçu le Plus Récemment", - "receivedEarliest": "Reçu en Premier", + "receivedLatest": "Reçu le plus récemment", + "receivedEarliest": "Reçu le plus tôt",public/locales/sp/translation.json (3)
444-492: Consider improving action item translations for clarity.While the translations are functionally correct, consider these improvements for better clarity and consistency:
- Line 466: "Acción Activa" could be "Elemento de Acción Activo" for consistency with other translations
- Line 491-492: Consider adding "de" in "Grupos de Voluntarios" for better Spanish grammar
1368-1410: Enhance naturalness of volunteer-related translations.Consider these improvements for more natural Spanish translations:
- Line 1375: "No Hay Voluntarios" should be lowercase "hay" as it's mid-sentence
- Line 1408: "La mayoría de voluntarios" should be "La Mayoría de los Voluntarios" for better grammar
- Line 1409: "Menos voluntarios" should be "Menos Voluntarios" for consistency
1411-1441: Maintain consistent capitalization in volunteer section titles.While the translations are accurate, there are some inconsistencies in capitalization:
- Line 1415-1417: "Solicitudes", "Invitaciones", "Grupos de Voluntarios" - consider consistent capitalization for all section titles
- Line 1430-1431: "Invitación Individual", "No Hay Invitaciones" - maintain consistent capitalization rules
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)public/locales/en/translation.json(6 hunks)public/locales/fr/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/hi/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/sp/translation.json(5 hunks)public/locales/zh/translation.json(5 hunks)src/utils/interfaces.ts(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pull-request.yml
🔇 Additional comments (17)
src/utils/interfaces.ts (1)
Line range hint 44-65: LGTM! Well-structured discriminated union pattern
The changes to InterfaceActionItemInfo effectively implement a type-safe approach for handling different assignee types using a discriminated union pattern. The nullable completionDate is also appropriate for tracking incomplete items.
public/locales/zh/translation.json (3)
2-13: LGTM! Leaderboard translations are accurate and consistent.
The translations in the leaderboard section use appropriate Chinese terminology and maintain consistency with existing translations.
281-283: LGTM! Dashboard translations maintain consistency.
The volunteer-related translations in the dashboard section maintain consistency with the leaderboard section terminology.
1367-1409: LGTM with a note about date terminology.
The translations in the event volunteers section are accurate and comprehensive.
Note: The inconsistency in date-related terminology was previously flagged and the suggestion to standardize "最晚结束日期" to "最新结束日期" still applies.
public/locales/en/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are complete and consistent.
The leaderboard section includes all necessary translations for time frames, search functionality, and status messages. The terminology is clear and follows UI/UX best practices.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard translations for volunteer rankings are properly integrated.
The additions to the dashboard section maintain consistency with existing translations while adding necessary volunteer-related content.
755-759: LGTM: Event management translations properly include volunteer section.
The event management section appropriately integrates volunteer-related navigation items while maintaining consistency with existing translations.
Line range hint 1-1440: Verify translation coverage against PR objectives.
The translations comprehensively cover all volunteer management features mentioned in the PR objectives:
- ✓ Volunteer rankings and leaderboard
- ✓ Event volunteer management
- ✓ Volunteer group management
- ✓ Invitation and request handling
- ✓ Action items integration
Run this script to verify translation key usage:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see comprehensive usage of the translation keys across the codebase:
-
The translations are used in core volunteer management components:
- Leaderboard screen and tests
- Event volunteer management screens and tests
- User portal volunteer screens and tests
- Organization dashboard integration
-
The translations are properly included in all language files:
- en/translation.json
- fr/translation.json
- hi/translation.json
- sp/translation.json
- zh/translation.json
-
The keys are integrated into main app components:
- App.tsx
- OrganizationScreen.tsx
- UserScreen.tsx
Translation keys are properly integrated and used throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all new translation keys are used in the codebase
# Test: Search for the usage of new translation keys in components
rg -l "leaderboard|volunteerRankings|eventVolunteers|userVolunteer"
Length of output: 2473
public/locales/hi/translation.json (4)
2-13: LGTM! Leaderboard translations are complete and accurate.
The Hindi translations for the leaderboard section are well-structured and maintain consistency in terminology. The translations are natural and follow proper Hindi language conventions.
281-283: LGTM! Dashboard volunteer rankings translations are consistent.
The translations maintain consistency with the leaderboard section terminology and are properly integrated into the dashboard context.
1367-1409: LGTM! Event volunteers section is well translated.
The translations for event volunteer management are comprehensive and maintain consistency throughout the section. All necessary functionality is properly represented in Hindi.
1410-1440: LGTM! User volunteer section translations are complete.
The translations effectively cover all user volunteer functionality described in the PR objectives, maintaining consistency with other sections and providing clear Hindi equivalents for all features.
public/locales/fr/translation.json (2)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are accurate and well-structured.
The French translations for the leaderboard section are accurate and maintain proper French grammar and accents. The translations appropriately convey the intended meaning while following French language conventions.
1367-1409: LGTM: Event volunteers translations are accurate and complete.
The translations for the event volunteers section accurately capture the volunteer management functionality described in the PR objectives. The translations maintain proper French grammar and accents.
public/locales/sp/translation.json (3)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are well-structured and accurate.
The Spanish translations for the leaderboard section are semantically correct and maintain proper Spanish language conventions.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard volunteer translations are consistent.
The translations for volunteer rankings in the dashboard maintain consistency with the leaderboard section.
756-760: LGTM: Event management translations are clear and consistent.
The translations for event management menu items are concise and maintain proper Spanish language conventions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/GraphQl/Queries/ActionItemQueries.ts (2)
47-47: Document the possible values for assigneeType field.Please add a comment documenting the possible values for
assigneeTypeto help other developers understand the valid options.
78-83: Add JSDoc documentation for ACTION_ITEMS_BY_USER query.Please add JSDoc documentation similar to ACTION_ITEM_LIST to describe:
- The purpose of the query
- Parameters (userId, where, orderBy)
- Return value description
Example:
/** * GraphQL query to retrieve action items for a specific user. * * @param userId - The ID of the user for which action items are being retrieved * @param where - Filter conditions for action items * @param orderBy - Sort order for action items * @returns The list of action items assigned to the user */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
public/locales/zh/translation.json(5 hunks)src/GraphQl/Queries/ActionItemQueries.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/GraphQl/Queries/ActionItemQueries.ts (2)
Line range hint 84-125: LGTM! Well-structured query implementation.
The query implementation:
- Properly handles user-specific action item retrieval
- Includes comprehensive fields for volunteer dashboard
- Maintains consistency with existing query structure
29-41: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing redundant assigneeUser field.
There appears to be redundancy between assignee.user and assigneeUser fields. Both contain the same user information. Consider removing one to maintain a single source of truth.
Let's check if both fields are being used:
Also applies to: 41-46
public/locales/zh/translation.json (5)
2-13: LGTM: Leaderboard translations are accurate and consistent.
The Chinese translations for the leaderboard section accurately convey the intended meaning while maintaining consistency with the application's terminology.
281-283: LGTM: Dashboard volunteer translations are consistent.
The Chinese translations for volunteer rankings in the dashboard section maintain consistency with the volunteer-related terminology used in other sections.
444-492: LGTM: Action items terminology has been standardized.
The updates to the organization action items section have improved consistency in terminology:
- Standardized use of "行动项" for action items
- Consistent translation of roles (e.g., "受托人" for assignee)
1410-1440: LGTM: User volunteer translations are accurate and consistent.
The Chinese translations for the user volunteer section accurately convey the intended meaning while maintaining consistency with the application's volunteer-related terminology.
1367-1409:
Standardize date-related terminology.
The translations are generally good, but there's an inconsistency in the date-related terms:
- Line 1419: "最晚结束日期" vs "最新结束日期" used elsewhere
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
- "latestEndDate": "最晚结束日期",
+ "latestEndDate": "最新结束日期",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix, feature, refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2327
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
user.mp4
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
This PR is only supposed to be merged after API PR gets merged
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
Tests
ActionsandInvitationscomponents to cover various user interactions and error handling scenarios.