Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade package @mui/x-date-pickers #2326

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prasoon054
Copy link

@prasoon054 prasoon054 commented Oct 10, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Upgrades package @mui/x-date-pickers from 7.12.1 to 7.18.0

Issue Number:
issue #2295

Did you add tests for your changes?
N/A

Snapshots/Videos:
N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A

Summary
Upgrades @mui/x-date-pickers to newer version.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Other information
N/A

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new dependency, @mui/base, enhancing UI components.
  • Updates

    • Updated the version of @mui/x-date-pickers, improving date picker functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The package.json file of the talawa-admin project has been updated to include a new dependency, @mui/base, at version ^5.0.0-beta.58. Additionally, the existing dependency @mui/x-date-pickers has been upgraded from version ^7.11.1 to ^7.18.0. No changes were made to other sections of the file, maintaining the overall structure intact.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json - Added dependency: "@mui/base": "^5.0.0-beta.58"
- Updated dependency version: "@mui/x-date-pickers": "^7.11.1" to "@mui/x-date-pickers": "^7.18.0"

Possibly related issues

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
New dependencies sprout, as bright as can be!
With @mui/base joining the fun,
Upgrading date-pickers, our work is well done!
Hooray for the changes, let’s dance and play,
In the world of Talawa, we code all day! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

Line range hint 1-214: Summary of package.json changes

The changes in this file are minimal and focused:

  1. Addition of @mui/base dependency (requires clarification).
  2. Upgrade of @mui/x-date-pickers to version 7.18.0 (aligns with PR objectives).

These changes appear to be isolated and shouldn't affect other parts of the project configuration. However, please ensure that:

  1. The application has been thoroughly tested with these changes.
  2. The changelog for @mui/x-date-pickers has been reviewed for any breaking changes or new features that might affect the project.
  3. The addition of @mui/base is justified and necessary for the project.

Consider updating the project documentation to reflect these dependency changes, especially if @mui/base introduces new features or patterns to the project.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 887af3a and 90c6185.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)

15-15: Clarify the addition of "@mui/base" dependency.

A new dependency "@mui/base": "^5.0.0-beta.58" has been added. This addition was not mentioned in the PR objectives and requires explanation:

  1. Why was this dependency added?
  2. How does it relate to the PR's main objective of upgrading @mui/x-date-pickers?
  3. Are there any potential compatibility issues with other dependencies?
  4. Have you tested the application thoroughly with this new beta dependency?

Please provide more context on this addition and confirm that it has been properly tested.


22-22: Approved: Version upgrade of @mui/x-date-pickers

The upgrade of @mui/x-date-pickers to version ^7.18.0 aligns with the PR objectives. This minor version upgrade should maintain backwards compatibility.

However, there's a slight discrepancy in the reported initial version:

  • PR objectives mention upgrading from 7.12.1
  • AI summary mentions upgrading from 7.11.1
  • The actual upgrade is to 7.18.0

Could you please clarify the exact initial version of @mui/x-date-pickers before this upgrade? This will help in accurately documenting the change.

@palisadoes palisadoes changed the title Fixes issue #2295 Uppgrade package @mui/x-date-pickers Oct 12, 2024
@palisadoes palisadoes changed the title Uppgrade package @mui/x-date-pickers Upgrade package @mui/x-date-pickers Oct 12, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants