Upgrade Jest and @types/jest to Latest Versions

[akathedeveloper]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Dependency upgrade for jest and @types/jest

Issue Number:

Fixes #1942

Did you add tests for your changes?

No new tests added, existing tests were run to ensure the upgrade does not break functionality.

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A

Summary

This PR upgrades the following packages:

• jest from ^27.4.5 to ^29.7.0
• @types/jest from ^26.0.24 to ^29.5.13

The motivation behind this change is to ensure compatibility with newer features and optimizations in the latest versions of jest and its types, as well as to address potential security vulnerabilities in outdated packages.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR should not introduce any breaking changes. All tests passed after the upgrade.

Other information

N/A

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated dependency versions for @types/jest and jest to improve performance and incorporate recent enhancements.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the package.json file to upgrade the versions of the dependencies @types/jest and jest. The changes reflect a shift to more recent versions, which may include new features, improvements, or bug fixes.

Changes

File	Change Summary
package.json	Updated @types/jest from ^26.0.24 to ^29.5.13 and jest from ^27.4.5 to ^29.7.0.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Upgrade Dependencies (linked issue #1942)	✅
Syntax and Configuration Updates (linked issue #1942)	❓	It's unclear if all necessary code updates were made.
Maintain Existing Configurations (linked issue #1942)	✅
Preserve Functionality (linked issue #1942)	✅
Test Validity (linked issue #1942)	❌	No information on test validity provided.

Possibly related issues

• None identified.

Possibly related PRs

• eslint-plugin-jest upgraded #2261: This PR involves updates to eslint-plugin-jest, which is related to the Jest testing framework, similar to the updates made to jest in the main PR.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where jesters play,
We hop along, brightening the day.
With types upgraded, we cheer and sing,
New features and fixes, oh what joy they bring!
So let’s celebrate this leap we’ve made,
For every hop, a new path is laid! 🌼

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01ef5c6 and c1bd854.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

package.json (2)

113-113: LGTM!

The @types/jest dependency has been updated to the latest major version (29.x), which aligns with the PR objective. The caret semver range specifier ensures future minor and patch updates can be easily incorporated.

---

137-137: Verify Jest configuration and test suite compatibility.

The jest dependency has been updated to the latest major version (29.x), which aligns with the PR objective. The caret semver range specifier ensures future minor and patch updates can be easily incorporated.

As mentioned in the PR summary, existing tests were executed and passed successfully after the upgrade, indicating no functionality breakage. However, please double-check the following:

• Ensure the Jest configuration in jest.config.js or package.json is compatible with Jest 29.x and no deprecated options are used.
• Verify that the test suite remains valid and covers all critical functionality.
• Confirm that no Jest-related errors or warnings appear during test execution.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[akathedeveloper]

Working on the failed test cases

[github-actions]

This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work.

[palisadoes]

Closing. Inactivity