-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
i18next upgraded from version 21.10.0 to 23.11.5 #2197
i18next upgraded from version 21.10.0 to 23.11.5 #2197
Conversation
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
WalkthroughThis update focuses on upgrading the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (2)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/utils/errorHandler.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/utils/errorHandler.tsx (1)
10-13
: Type assertion adjustment fortErrors
.The change in type assertion for
tErrors
ensures compatibility with the upgraded i18next library. The use ofunknown
before asserting asTFunction<string>
is a common practice to ensure type safety when dealing with external library functions.package.json (1)
31-31
: i18next library upgraded to^23.11.5
.The upgrade to the i18next library ensures access to the latest features and improvements. Verify that this upgrade does not introduce compatibility issues with related dependencies, such as
react-i18next
and other i18next plugins.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR upgrades the i18next from version 21.10.0 to 23.11.5. Along with the upgrade, it addresses a type compatibility issue that arose in the src/utils/errorHandler.tsx file due to changes in i18next.
Issue Number:
Fixes #1941
Did you add tests for your changes?
No. Existing tests were reviewed and confirmed to be working as expected.
Snapshots/Videos:
Not applicable.
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No documentation updates were necessary for this change.
Summary
This PR primarily upgrades the i18next library to the latest version (23.11.5). The upgrade required a modification in the src/utils/errorHandler.tsx file to resolve a TypeScript type error. The issue was resolved by casting the result of i18n.getFixedT to unknown before asserting it as TFunction.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, this upgrade does not introduce any breaking changes.
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes